
US Treasuries face stablecoin-driven demand surge as supply looms
BOSTON (Reuters) -The potential for stablecoins to fuel demand for short-term U.S. Treasury securities was a hot topic at a money market fund conference in Boston this week, with investors expecting these digital tokens to absorb a huge supply of government debt later this year.
Stablecoins are pegged to highly liquid assets such as the U.S. dollar and the tokens can drive demand for U.S. Treasuries by requiring issuers to hold large, liquid, and safe reserves to support a 1:1 peg to the greenback.
"Stablecoins are drawing significant...demand for the Treasury market," said Yie-Hsin Hung, CEO of State Street Global Advisors, in keynote remarks at the Money Fund Symposium on Monday.
She said about 80% of the stablecoin market is invested in either Treasury bills, known as T-bills, or repos, which are repurchase agreements. That represents about $200 billion, roughly less than 2% of the overall Treasury market.
"But stablecoins are growing fast, and most likely, will outpace the growth of Treasury supply," Hung said.
As more financial institutions and corporations adopt stablecoin for payments, remittances, or decentralized finance applications, issuers need to hold more reserves to back the growing supply.
For instance, if the market capitalization of USDC, a stablecoin issued by Circle, increases by $10 billion, the issuer might purchase $10 billion in Treasuries to maintain the peg. Circle, a payments technology company, and Tether, a blockchain-enabled platform, are the two largest stablecoin issuers.
Given expectations of looming Treasury supply of as much as $1 trillion by the end of the year, the market is looking for an incremental buyer that would be a source of new demand for U.S. government debt. Stablecoin issuers fit the bill, market participants said.
"If they do indeed squeeze this supply balloon on Treasuries and rely on the front end of the curve for debt issuance, we think that one of the justifications...is that all this demand that's coming from stablecoins...gives (U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott) Bessent cover in order to make that shift to the shorter end," said Mark Cabana, head of U.S. rates strategy at BofA Securities, during one of sessions at the symposium.
Cabana noted that stablecoin issuers tend to buy T-bills and shorter-dated Treasury coupons.
Adam Ackermann, head of portfolio management at Paxos, a financial services and technology company, said he has had multiple conversations with the largest banks in the world wanting a stablecoin. "They're calling us and saying: I need a stablecoin in eight weeks. How can we get one?"
"What's somewhat concerning is we're just at this fever pitch right now," Ackermann said. "It's great for the industry, but we need to start to put some guardrails on things."
Stablecoins' popularity further ramped up after the U.S. Senate passed last week a landmark bill to create a regulatory framework for the token called the GENIUS Act.
The Republican-controlled House of Representatives still needs to pass its version of the bill before it heads to President Donald Trump's desk for approval, but the bill's passage bolstered hopes of wider adoption of a once-niche part of the crypto sector.
The stablecoin market is worth about $256 billion, according to crypto data provider CoinMarketCap, and is estimated by Standard Chartered to reach $2 trillion by 2028 if the legislation is signed by Trump.
"I expect that there will be a proliferation of stablecoins," Cabana said. "It will be an incremental demand source (for Treasuries), I would guess, over the next three to five, certainly 10 years."
(Reporting by Gertrude Chavez-Dreyfuss; Editing by Alden Bentley and Nia Williams)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
Stocks down with eyes on Middle East, dollar hit by Trump Fed comment
HONG KONG: Most stocks fell Thursday (June 26) and oil rose as traders kept a nervous eye on the Iran-Israel ceasefire, while the dollar dropped after Donald Trump said he had a handful of candidates to succeed Federal Reserve boss Jerome Powell, fuelling rate cut bets. Uncertainty over the US president's trade war was also keeping sentiment subdued, with most countries still not reaching deals with Washington to avert the reimposition of steep tariffs ahead of a July 9 deadline. With a shaky peace between Iran and Israel holding for now, Trump said he would hold nuclear talks with Teheran next week, even after insisting that US strikes had set its atomic programme back "decades". "We may sign an agreement. I don't know," he told reporters. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian had said Tuesday his country was willing to return to negotiations but that it would continue to "assert its legitimate rights" to the peaceful use of nuclear energy. Crude prices, which tanked Monday and Tuesday after the ceasefire was announced, edged up for a second day, though gains were capped by the possibility that Opec and other key producers will lift output. "While the Israel-Iran conflict is now de-escalating, we still believe that geopolitical risks remain where the ceasefire could easily fall apart," wrote Kai Wang, Asia equity market strategist at Morningstar. "While this possibility remains elevated, we do not believe that there would be a restriction on oil supply even under a re-escalating scenario. Given that oil has retreated to preconflict price levels, we believe that any future increase in oil price is likely to be short-lived." Equity markets were mostly down, with Hong Kong, Shanghai, Sydney, Singapore, Seoul, Jakarta and Wellington in the red but Tokyo and Taipei in positive territory. That came after a tepid lead from Wall Street, where the Nasdaq was the standout after chip titan Nvidia shot up more than four per cent to a record high, giving it a market valuation of around US$3.76 trillion. That makes it more valuable than Microsoft, Apple and other tech giants. The dollar held losses after Trump's latest salvo against Powell and suggestion that he was already lining up his replacement. Since returning to the White House the president has constantly hit out at the Fed boss for not cutting rates, questioning his intelligence and stoking worries about the bank's independence. "I know within three or four people who I'm going to pick," he told reporters after a Nato summit. "I mean he goes out pretty soon fortunately because I think he's terrible," Trump said of Powell, whose term ends in May next year. Trump added that Powell was "average mentally" and had "low IQ for what he does". The Wall Street Journal reported that the Republican was considering making an announcement in September or October, with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, economic adviser Kevin Hassett and former Fed governor Kevin Warsh among the contenders. Trump's remarks came days after Powell told lawmakers the bank needed to see the impact of the president's tariffs on the economy before making a move. "Trump's nomination will amp up the pressure, to the point where we could have a shadow Fed chair before Powell steps down in May next year," said National Australia Bank's Rodrigo Catril. "We think it's fair to suggest that the pressure on Powell to cut rates will increase, and that's adding to selling pressure on the dollar." - AFP


The Sun
3 hours ago
- The Sun
US Congress battle over state AI regulations heats up ahead of Senate vote
WASHINGTON: The fight over a proposed 10-year federal moratorium on state regulation of artificial intelligence heated up on Wednesday, with Republican and Democratic Senate leaders differing on whether such a measure would be tied to billions of dollars in funding to give rural communities access to broadband. The proposed moratorium, part of President Donald Trump's sweeping tax-cut and spending bill, faces mounting pressure from critics ahead of crucial votes by the U.S. Senate expected this week. A previous version would have blocked states that regulate AI from the $42 billion Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment program, known as BEAD. Republican Senator Ted Cruz released an updated version on Wednesday, which he said would only restrict states that tap a new $500 million fund to support AI infrastructure. Senator Maria Cantwell, senior Democrat on the Commerce committee, however, said the measure "continues to hold $42 billion in BEAD funding hostage, forcing states to choose between protecting consumers and expanding critical broadband infrastructure to rural communities." Proponents say the measure is necessary to lift the burden on companies of complying with laws that differ from state to state and boost U.S. dominance in AI. Critics say the measure erodes states' rights and would erase state protections for creative workers and children online. U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick voiced his support for the measure in a post on social media site X, saying it would end "the chaos of 50 different state laws and makes sure American companies can develop cutting-edge tech for our military, infrastructure, and critical industries--without interference from anti-innovation politicians." A Commerce Department spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Earlier on Wednesday, the president of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters had called the measure "a disaster for communities and working people." Teamsters President Sean O'Brien, who spoke at the Republican National Convention last year, said in a letter posted on social media site X that the measure "denies citizens the ability to make choices at the local or state level." "Pure and simple, it is a giveaway to Big Tech companies who reap economic value by continuing to operate in an unregulated void where their decisions and behavior are accountable to no one," he said. The letter from the head of the Teamsters, a union representing more than 1.3 million workers, many of them in blue-collar jobs such as trucking, was the latest instance of criticism. Unions, state lawmakers and attorneys general, faith leaders and the conservative Heritage Foundation have all opposed the measure, as have at least three Senate Republicans.


The Sun
3 hours ago
- The Sun
Senate split over AI regulation freeze tied to broadband
WASHINGTON: The fight over a proposed 10-year federal moratorium on state regulation of artificial intelligence heated up on Wednesday, with Republican and Democratic Senate leaders differing on whether such a measure would be tied to billions of dollars in funding to give rural communities access to broadband. The proposed moratorium, part of President Donald Trump's sweeping tax-cut and spending bill, faces mounting pressure from critics ahead of crucial votes by the U.S. Senate expected this week. A previous version would have blocked states that regulate AI from the $42 billion Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment program, known as BEAD. Republican Senator Ted Cruz released an updated version on Wednesday, which he said would only restrict states that tap a new $500 million fund to support AI infrastructure. Senator Maria Cantwell, senior Democrat on the Commerce committee, however, said the measure "continues to hold $42 billion in BEAD funding hostage, forcing states to choose between protecting consumers and expanding critical broadband infrastructure to rural communities." Proponents say the measure is necessary to lift the burden on companies of complying with laws that differ from state to state and boost U.S. dominance in AI. Critics say the measure erodes states' rights and would erase state protections for creative workers and children online. U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick voiced his support for the measure in a post on social media site X, saying it would end "the chaos of 50 different state laws and makes sure American companies can develop cutting-edge tech for our military, infrastructure, and critical industries--without interference from anti-innovation politicians." A Commerce Department spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Earlier on Wednesday, the president of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters had called the measure "a disaster for communities and working people." Teamsters President Sean O'Brien, who spoke at the Republican National Convention last year, said in a letter posted on social media site X that the measure "denies citizens the ability to make choices at the local or state level." "Pure and simple, it is a giveaway to Big Tech companies who reap economic value by continuing to operate in an unregulated void where their decisions and behavior are accountable to no one," he said. The letter from the head of the Teamsters, a union representing more than 1.3 million workers, many of them in blue-collar jobs such as trucking, was the latest instance of criticism. Unions, state lawmakers and attorneys general, faith leaders and the conservative Heritage Foundation have all opposed the measure, as have at least three Senate Republicans.