logo
The big questions the government needs to answer over Palestine Action

The big questions the government needs to answer over Palestine Action

Metroa day ago
On March 31 1990, Londoners gathered in Trafalgar Square to protest Margaret Thatcher's poll tax. Windows were smashed and premises were set alight. 339 people were arrested.
That is thought to be the record number arrested at a single protest in the UK – until last Saturday.
The demonstration at the weekend was a very different affair. While six people were arrested for allegedly assaulting police officers, the overwhelming majority – 522 – were arrested for holding up placards reading 'I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action'.
As of last month, Palestine Action (PA) is officially considered a terrorist group by the British government.
The direct action network, which targets businesses and factories in a bid to draw attention to Israel's actions in Palestine, was proscribed by Parliament on the same day as the Russian Imperial Movement and the Maniacs Murder Cult.
Speaking to the media today, a government spokesperson suggested some of those arrested on Saturday might not be aware of how the organisation they were supporting operates in real life.
Asked if Keir Starmer thinks the demonstrators – average age 54 – are terrorists or supporters of a terrorist group, the spokesperson said: 'We've said that many people may not yet know the reality of this organisation.'
He added that the assessments made by the Joint Terrorism Analysis Centre were 'very clear', and PA is a 'violent organisation' that has committed 'violent, significant injuries and extensive criminal damage'.
Hello, I'm Craig Munro and I'm Metro's man in Westminster.
Every Wednesday, I write our Alright, Gov? newsletter with insights from behind the scenes in the Houses of Parliament – and how the decisions made there will end up affecting you.
Last week we had a look inside Labour's split on trans women – and answered a question from a reader about if Sir Keir Starmer is likely to suspend more MPs in the future.
Click here to sign up
If the government believes people attended Saturday's protest without understanding who they were supporting, that means one of two things.
Either they don't realise the extent of the crimes committed by PA, or they know about the crimes but don't believe they should be considered terrorism.
If it's the first, ministers might need to work on publicising what exactly the group has done – and maybe even figure out a way to make public some of the details Home Office Minister Alex Davies-Jones said the government 'cannot disclose because of national security' in an LBC interview today.
If it's the second, ministers might need to clearly explain to the public why PA's acts have passed the legal threshold for terrorism.
Dr Jessie Blackbourn, an expert in counter-terrorism law at Durham University, said this appeared to be the first time a group has been proscribed largely based on criminal damage rather than 'serious violence against people' such as murder or torture.
One example of 'terrorism' defined under the Terrorism Act 2000 is 'serious damage to property' – a controversial clause in the legislation that has rarely been used until now.
Dr Blackbourn told Metro: 'Obviously, the Home Secretary is convinced that she's applied the definition of terrorism correctly in proscribing this organisation.
'But I think if you ask someone on the street what terrorism looks like, they would be more likely to think of it as being something like the IRA or al Qaeda or Islamic State than Palestine Action.'
When announcing the proscription, the Home Office pointed to three 'attacks' carried out by PA: one in 2022 at the Thales defence factory in Glasgow, and two last year at Instro Precision in Kent and Elbit Systems UK in Bristol.
The incident at Thales 'caused over £1 million worth of damage to parts essential for submarines', the department said, adding: 'Staff fled for safety as pyrotechnics and smoke bombs were thrown in evacuation areas.'
A few days before the announcement, two activists from the group also broke into RAF Brize Norton and damaged a pair of aircraft with red paint.
Outlining the reasons for proscription to the House of Commons the following day, Security Minister Dan Jarvis said: 'Palestine Action's attacks are not victimless crimes.
'Employees have experienced physical violence, intimidation and harassment, and they have been prevented from entering their place of work.
'We would not tolerate this activity from organisations motivated by Islamist or extreme right-wing ideology, and we cannot tolerate it from Palestine Action.'
Following Saturday's protest, Amnesty International UK chief executive Sacha Deshmukh said: 'We have long criticised UK terrorism law for being excessively broad and vaguely worded and a threat to freedom of expression. More Trending
'These arrests demonstrate that our concerns were justified.'
On July 30, the High Court ruled the proscription of Palestine Action could be reviewed after lawyers for the group's co-founder Huda Ammori argued the move gagged legitimate protest.
However, Judge Mr Justice Chamberlain also refused a request to pause the ban temporarily until the outcome of the challenge.
That raises the possibility of further demonstrations and even more arrests – unless the government is able to explain why the protesters shouldn't bother.
Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.
For more stories like this, check our news page.
MORE: Man 'throws water and grabs throat' of protester demanding release of Israeli hostages
MORE: Netanyahu says Israel has 'no choice but to finish the job' in Gaza
MORE: Netanyahu 'will have blood of hostages on his hands' if more are killed in Gaza takeover
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

JK Rowling mocks Sturgeon for saying public spaces need to be safer for women
JK Rowling mocks Sturgeon for saying public spaces need to be safer for women

Telegraph

timea few seconds ago

  • Telegraph

JK Rowling mocks Sturgeon for saying public spaces need to be safer for women

JK Rowling has mocked Nicola Sturgeon for using her memoir to warn about making public spaces safer for women. The Harry Potter author tweeted a picture of the relevant pages of the newly-released book, across which she had scrawled in capital letters: 'Are you f-----g kidding me?' In the highlighted section, Ms Sturgeon wrote about an unnamed male MSP she alleged had bullied her. She said he 'started calling me 'Gnasher', both to other people and occasionally to my face'. After finding out about the 'overtly sexual' rumour, she said she cried in the lavatories in the Scottish Parliament. Ms Sturgeon added: 'Today, a story of this type would stalk a woman round social media, day and night. We have such a long way to go to make the public sphere safe for women and girls. 'I just worry that by the time we get there, there will be too few women left in public life for it to matter.' She said she only realised it had been 'bullying of an overtly sexual nature' when she filled out a Holyrood survey in 2017, in the wake of the #MeToo scandal. Sharing her annotation of the page, Rowling said: 'Pages 108-9, in which our heroine opines on the need to make the 'public sphere' safe for women and girls.' Rowling has been one of the most outspoken critics of Ms Sturgeon's plan to allow biological males to self-identify as women and use female changing rooms and lavatories. The former SNP leader used her memoir to accuse Rowling of creating a toxic debate over trans rights and stoking 'vile' attacks which left her fearing for her physical safety. She referred to Rowling posting a selfie on X on Oct 6 2022 in a black T-shirt, whereby she was accused of being a 'destroyer of women's rights'. The former first minister claimed it was a turning point in which 'rational debate' on the trans issue became 'impossible' and 'any hope of finding common ground disappeared'. She also said that the abuse she received increased and 'made me feel less safe and more at risk of possible physical harm'. The row centres on Ms Sturgeon's controversial Gender Recognition Reform (GRR) Bill, which would have allowed Scots to change legal gender by simply signing a declaration. The legislation was passed at Holyrood but was vetoed by the UK Government over concerns it undermined women's safe spaces. However, it emerged that swathes of Scotland's public sector, including the prison estate, had adopted self-identification regardless. There was public uproar when trans rapist Isla Bryson was initially sent to a women's prison, in line with guidance at the time stating that criminals should be sent to the jail that matched their self-identified gender prior to conviction. Ms Sturgeon admitted this week that rapists should 'probably forfeit' the right to self-identify as women. However, she refused to apologise for the legislation. In a series of tweets on Tuesday, Rowling said she was reading the former first minister's memoirs with the intention of publishing a review of the book on her website. Rowling sarcastically referred to it as 'the memoir of Scotland's (checks notes) most persecuted, misunderstood, self-critical, open-to-debate, feminist-to-her-fingertips ex-First Minister'. She said she was annotating the book, which is titled Frankly, as she read it, adding that she may later auction 'my scribbled-on copy.' Annotating as I read to review. Might auction my scribbled-on copy, proceeds to go to @ForWomenScot. NB: nobody who's offended by swearing should bid. — J.K. Rowling (@jk_rowling) August 12, 2025 Rowling said the proceeds would be donated to For Women Scotland, the feminist group that won April's Supreme Court ruling that trans women are not legally women. However, she warned that 'nobody who's offended by swearing should bid'. Her intervention came after Ms Sturgeon said that she did not think Rowling would be willing to publicly debate her on the issue. 'I will debate with many people, but I don't think JK Rowling would be willing to do that. But who knows, maybe she would,' Ms Sturgeon said.

‘We don't want him': Cotswolds residents protest against JD Vance's UK visit
‘We don't want him': Cotswolds residents protest against JD Vance's UK visit

The Guardian

timea few seconds ago

  • The Guardian

‘We don't want him': Cotswolds residents protest against JD Vance's UK visit

There was cake and music. The weather was perfect. At first glance, it could have been a joyful community gathering in a sun-dappled Cotswolds village park, but the placards gave the game away. These pulled no punches as they criticised the policies and stances championed by the US vice-president, JD Vance, who is enjoying a country break down the road. About 100 people, the majority of them women, turned up for the 'not welcome' party organised by the Stop Trump Coalition on the park opposite the Co-op in Charlbury. 'He's simply not welcome here,' said therapist Sue Moon, from nearby Chipping Norton, who was carrying a placard reading: 'We don't want him. Cotswold childless cat ladies say go home', a reference to Vance's typically blunt put-down of Democrats. Moon, who has children and no cats, said the Cotswolds was earning a reputation as a bolt-hole for the rich and powerful – former prime minister David Cameron lives nearby. 'That's not what we're about. We don't want anything to do with people like him,' she said. Natasha Phillips, who had travelled 70 miles from Bath, bore a placard saying: 'JD Vance – the guy who bullied a war hero from the comfort of his couch.' 'The way he treated Volodymyr Zelenskyy was disgusting,' she said. 'The Ukrainian people are heroes. British people admire the way they are standing up to [Vladimir] Putin. I wanted to come here to show that.' Chris Tatton, a long-term resident of Charlbury and a former councillor, said one of the worst things he had seen in a lifetime of watching politics was Vance's ambush of the Ukrainian president. 'That was disgraceful,' he said. His friend, retired union organiser Steve Akers, said even worse for him was the sight of starving children in Gaza. 'That wouldn't happen without this US government.' One placard said: 'Make Charlbury great again – go home.' Another said: 'Not too push to protest.' A third: 'Rolling hills. Not rolling back climate change.' There were plenty of versions of the meme of Vance as a bloated baby. In June, a Norwegian man, Mads Mikkelsen, 21, accused American border officials of denying him entry into the US because he had the meme saved on his phone. More wholesomely, a boy with a skateboard wore a T-shirt with a cheerful Canadian motif. And the organisers had brought along a Colin the Caterpillar cake with an image of Vance's face attached to it. Rachel, a carer from Banbury, Oxfordshire, said: 'I'm most worried about his environmental policies. They risk eliminating the whole of humanity, all the creatures on the Earth.' Over the past few decades, this corner of Oxfordshire has been turned into a celeb-magnet – a place of designer delis, gastropubs, spas and private clubs. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion It is associated with rightwingers. Jeremy Clarkson's Diddly Squat farm shop and pub attracts fans of his TV shows and his conservative views (though Clarkson called Vance 'a bearded God-botherer' in a Times column earlier this year.) In the interest of political balance, Vance's predecessor as veep, Kamala Harris, was spotted in Charlbury's pub, the Bull, last month. House prices here have soared, making it hard for local young people to find a place to live. A modern three-bedroomed house in Charlbury will set you back the best part of £500,000. As in rural areas across England, services such as health and transport are stretched. Vance probably won't see the issues. He is believed to be staying in an 18th-century manor house, owned by the lightbulb millionaire Johnny Hornby and his wife, Pippa, a London art patron and collector, who are friends of Cameron. Jonathan Mazower, communications director for Survival International, a charity that works with Indigenous peoples, did not attend the 'party' but was angry that Vance had been invited. 'There's massive disruption – all roads and footpaths have been closed, all cars are searched, no visitors are allowed in. There are police and US Secret Service agents everywhere,' said Mazower, who lives near the sprawling digs where Vance is staying. 'But more important than the disruption is what he represents. On the whole people here are very much live and let live but this is something else entirely. Trump's No 2 coming here feels like an absolute outrage and imposition. 'The massive police and Secret Service presence makes any normal protest impossible, so we've had to resort to putting up placards around the village, some of which are being taken down.' Andy Graham, the leader of West Oxfordshire district council, compared the scenes to the Will Smith film Men in Black. 'Seeing someone dressed up with black suit, sunglasses, the whole lot, you kind of felt it was a bit over the top really,' he said. 'We understand that people do need security but I think they haven't been discreet about it.'

‘We don't want him': Dance Against Vance in Cotswolds in protest at vice-president's UK holiday
‘We don't want him': Dance Against Vance in Cotswolds in protest at vice-president's UK holiday

The Guardian

time3 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

‘We don't want him': Dance Against Vance in Cotswolds in protest at vice-president's UK holiday

There was cake and music. The weather was perfect. At first glance, it could have been a joyful community gathering in a sun-dappled Cotswolds village park, but the placards gave the game away. These pulled no punches, criticising the policies and stances championed by the US vice-president, JD Vance, who is enjoying a country break down the road. About 100 people, mostly women, turned up for the 'not welcome' party organised by the Stop Trump Coalition on the park opposite the Co-op in Charlbury. 'He's simply not welcome here,' said therapist Sue Moon, from nearby Chipping Norton, who was carrying a placard reading: 'We don't want him. Cotswold childless cat ladies say go home', a reference to Vance's typically blunt put-down of Democrats. Moon, who has children and no cats, said the Cotswolds was earning a reputation as a bolt-hole for the rich and powerful – former prime minister David Cameron lives nearby. 'That's not what we're about. We don't want anything to do with people like him,' she said. Natasha Phillips – who had travelled 70 miles from Bath to attend the event being billed as a 'Dance against Vance' – bore a placard saying: 'JD Vance – the guy who bullied a war hero from the comfort of his couch.' 'The way he treated Volodymyr Zelenskyy was disgusting,' she said. 'The Ukrainian people are heroes. British people admire the way they are standing up to [Vladimir] Putin. I wanted to come here to show that.' Chris Tatton, a long-term resident of Charlbury and a former councillor, said one of the worst things he had seen in a lifetime of watching politics was Vance's ambush of the Ukrainian president. 'That was disgraceful,' he said. His friend, retired union organiser Steve Akers, said even worse for him was the sight of starving children in Gaza. 'That wouldn't happen without this US government.' One placard said: 'Make Charlbury great again – go home.' Another said: 'Not too posh to protest.' A third: 'Rolling hills. Not rolling back climate change.' There were plenty of versions of the meme of Vance as a bloated baby. In June, a Norwegian man, Mads Mikkelsen, 21, accused American border officials of denying him entry into the US because he had the meme saved on his phone. More wholesomely, a boy with a skateboard wore a T-shirt with a cheerful Canadian motif. And the organisers had brought along a Colin the Caterpillar cake with an image of Vance's face attached to it. Rachel, a carer from Banbury, Oxfordshire, said: 'I'm most worried about his environmental policies. They risk eliminating the whole of humanity, all the creatures on the Earth.' Over the past few decades, this corner of Oxfordshire has been turned into a celeb-magnet – a place of designer delis, gastropubs, spas and private clubs. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion It is associated with rightwingers. Jeremy Clarkson's Diddly Squat farm shop and pub attracts fans of his TV shows and his conservative views (though Clarkson called Vance 'a bearded God-botherer' in a Times column earlier this year.) In the interest of political balance, Vance's predecessor as veep, Kamala Harris, was spotted in Charlbury's pub, the Bull, last month. House prices here have soared, making it hard for local young people to find a place to live. A modern three-bedroomed house in Charlbury will set you back the best part of £500,000. As in rural areas across England, services such as health and transport are stretched. Vance probably won't see the issues. He is believed to be staying in an 18th-century manor house, owned by the lightbulb millionaire Johnny Hornby and his wife, Pippa, a London art patron and collector, who are friends of Cameron. Jonathan Mazower, communications director for Survival International, a charity that works with Indigenous peoples, did not attend the 'party' but was angry that Vance had been invited. 'There's massive disruption – all roads and footpaths have been closed, all cars are searched, no visitors are allowed in. There are police and US Secret Service agents everywhere,' said Mazower, who lives near the sprawling digs where Vance is staying. 'But more important than the disruption is what he represents. On the whole people here are very much live and let live but this is something else entirely. Trump's No 2 coming here feels like an absolute outrage and imposition. 'The massive police and Secret Service presence makes any normal protest impossible, so we've had to resort to putting up placards around the village, some of which are being taken down.' Andy Graham, the leader of West Oxfordshire district council, compared the scenes to the Will Smith film Men in Black. 'Seeing someone dressed up with black suit, sunglasses, the whole lot, you kind of felt it was a bit over the top really,' he said. 'We understand that people do need security but I think they haven't been discreet about it.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store