Ghoulish Gamblers Are Already Betting on These Cardinals to be Next Pope
The election of a new pope is a complex process involving hundreds of cardinals that can stretch up to weeks on end. But the general public seems to have found its own way to show support for their pontiffs of choice.
As Pope Francis, 88, continues to battle health issues, people have flocked to online betting platforms like BetUS and Polymarket to place their wagers on his successor.
The pontiff has been out of the public eye for nearly two weeks after he was taken to a Rome hospital to receive treatment for double pneumonia. The Vatican said Thursday that the pope's condition continued to improve, though his prognosis remains guarded.
On BetUS and Polymarket—which was earlier slammed for taking bets on the California fires as people lost their homes and lives—the favorites were Pietro Parolin and Pierbattista Pizzaballa from Italy and Luis Antonio Tagle from the Philippines.
Pietro Parolin
Parolin, 70, was appointed Vatican Secretary of State by Pope Francis in 2013. Before he assumed the role as the Vatican's number two, he worked in the Holy See's diplomatic service for three decades, with terms in Nigeria, Mexico, and Venezuela. The Vatican describes Parolin as an expert in the Middle East and Asia. It credits him with strengthening relations between the Holy See and Vietnam as well as helping reopen dialogue between Israel and Palestine.
In 2020, the pope stripped Parolin's office of its power to independently manage money after Parolin figured in a financial scandal over a 350-million-euro investment in a London luxury building.
Pierbattista Pizzaballa
Pizzaballa, 59, was named Latin Patriarch of Jerusalem in 2020. He entered the Custody of the Holy Land in 1999, nine years after he moved to Jerusalem. Pizzaballa was appointed leader of the custody in 2004 and held the post for six years.
Luis Antonio Tagle
Tagle, 67, was appointed Prefect of the Congregation for the Evangelization of Peoples in 2019, putting him at the helm of global efforts to disseminate Catholicism. He became Bishop of Imus in 2001 and Archbishop of Manila in 2011. Tagle was also named president of Caritas Internationalis, the umbrella organization for Catholic charities worldwide, in 2015. In 2022, Pope Francis fired the top leadership of the organization over low staff morale.
Betting on the fate of popes and the outcome of papal conclaves goes back thousands of years.
The practice became so popular that Pope Gregory XIV in 1591 forbade all bets related to the election of a new pope, the duration of a pontificate, or the creation of new cardinals, with a penalty of excommunication.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
NJ nun tweeted at Trump every day in first term. Why she's changed her tune this time
Every day of Donald Trump's first term, Sister Susan Francois tweeted out a prayer addressed to the president, a ritual that earned the North Jersey nun scores of social media followers and national headlines. In almost 1,500 posts to @POTUS, the nun from the Sisters of St. Joseph of Peace in Englewood Cliffs prayed for him to "grow in humility" and "follow the light of compassion." As a registered Democrat involved with social justice activism, the Jersey City resident admits that praying publicly for this commander-in-chief was the "hardest spiritual practice" of her life. After all, she noted in a 2021 interview, "it's easy to pray for people you love." For others, it's a tad harder. But after Trump ended his first administration, she decided she was done. She managed to tweet out a few invocations for President Joe Biden, a fellow Catholic, but not as regularly. Neither leader responded to her electronic entreaties. Four years later, Trump is back in the Oval Office and as pugilistic and controversial as ever. Twitter is now X, owned by the president's political ally Elon Musk, and Sister Susan has mostly abandoned her one-way conversation. She's not tweeting prayers, or any other messages, at Trump, opting instead for what she hopes is more constructive online engagement. Does this mean there's no hope for spiritual redemption for the current occupant of the White House? "I never give up on the human person," Francois said in a recent interview. "Nobody is beyond repair." The 52-year-old has grown concerned over the "toxic nature of our public discourse," which has only intensified in her view. "That's something I don't want to contribute to," she said. "There's so much brokenness in the world now. We need positive messages." She will continue to pray for America's elected leaders offline. "It's in our Sunday liturgy," she noted. Francois, who previously worked as a city elections official in Portland, Oregon, said she was inspired to begin praying for the president after his January 2017 inauguration. Her motivation was largely to maintain her own sense of well-being, but the tweets were also a form of resistance during a politically chaotic period, she said. If Trump was aware of her prayers, he never responded. But that wasn't the point. Praying was helpful and transformative for her at a time of upheaval in America, she said. Francois was a lapsed Catholic who returned to religion in her 20s as she began to see a connection between the faith of her childhood and the social justice that became a major part of her life during college. She began attending Mass again in 1999 and joined the Congregation of the Sisters of St. Joseph of Peace in 2005. Its founding mission to promote peace through justice resonated with her, she said. Many of the sisters, like Francois, lobby for legislation and help marginalized communities. She recently posted a clip on TikTok about the importance of shareholder advocacy and "using investments in companies to ask them to do things for the common good." She also writes to legislators about policies that are meaningful to her and attends protests, such as a recent "Hands Off" rally against Trump's and Musk's second-term agenda. More: Bergen County rabbi will speak at Trump's inauguration. Who is Ari Berman? Though her prayers may not have sparked change in the White House, they affected her own spiritual life. Even the tone of her tweets has changed, sounding more tender. Initially, her messages were more policy-based and addressed Trump personally. "Dear @POTUS," she posted on Dec. 7, 2018. "664 days later still praying experience goodness and kindness in your own life and choose to do good and be kind in return. It can be habit forming." She often beseeched the 45th (and now 47th) president to find peace. Now she's less likely to confront the president directly over a disagreement and instead makes more general appeals for kindness and engagement. "May we be good to ourselves and one another on the long road ahead," she counseled in a Jan. 26 tweet, just days after Trump returned to office. Over the years, Francois said, she has been able to recognize the humanity behind the person issuing the edicts from the White House. She sees her prayerful activism as a lesson in how we should behave toward others, particularly those with whom we vehemently disagree. "Occasionally I get people who write a not-nice comment, but I try not to engage, because that's not helpful," she said. "Instead, I try to build up community and make people realize we have agency to do good." These days, she's not as active on X and is mostly on Bluesky, Facebook and TikTok. She frequently posts about the goodness of humankind and the need for everyone to love one another. "Those kinds of messages have an audience," she said in a recent interview with The Record and "That's what I feel called to do in the universe." "Every person is beloved by God, from the person trapped in a detention center to the person writing orders to hold the person there," Francois said. This article originally appeared on NJ nun tweeted prayers at Trump daily. Why she's changed tune
Hamilton Spectator
4 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Education minister vows to fire Brant Catholic trustee
A Brant Catholic trustee who disobeyed orders to repay Italy trip funds could lose his seat. In April, Education Minister Paul Calandra demanded four Brant Haldimand Norfolk Catholic District School Board trustees who took a now-infamous trip to Europe to buy art for schools (flying business class and eating at a Michelin star restaurant) repay the nearly $50,000 they expensed. Three trustees confirmed they repaid their shares of $12,666 ahead of the May 23 deadline. 'I, along with Rick Petrella and Dan Dignard, have repaid in full,' trustee Bill Chopp told The Spectator in an email last Thursday. On the same day, Petrella corroborated, telling The Spec 'I have, along with Dan Dignard, and Bill Chopp, fully repaid all amounts related to travel expenses to the board, in full compliance with the minister's directive.' On Thursday, Calandra told Newstalk 1010 host Deb Hutton he will 'fire' the fourth, who only paid '$2,000' of his share, CTV reported. Trustee Mark Watson owed $12,370. When asked last week, neither he nor the school board would confirm if he repaid the full amount. As it stands, Calandra can't remove a trustee — who is elected by the public — from their seat. However, he told Hutton he plans to bring forward legislation that would enable him to 'vacate that trustee's seat,' CTV reported. The Spectator was unable to reach Watson by phone on Thursday for comment. When asked, the school board said it doesn't have anything to share at this time. After news of the trip broke, Haldimand-Norfolk MPP Bobbi Ann Brady asked then-minister Jill Dunlop to call the four trustees and demand they resign. 'So, yes, I agree that this rogue trustee should be fired if he refuses to repay taxpayers the full amount of the Italian junket,' she told The Spectator Thursday. In a news conference earlier in the day, Calandra announced a Supporting Children and Students Act, which, if passed, would 'expand my authority as the minister of education for oversight and control of school board affairs,' he said. It would allow the ministry to intervene and put a school board under supervision without waiting for a recommendation from a third-party investigation, he said.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
The plight of Jimmy Lai shames us all
Dictatorships use solitary confinement as a form of torture, designed to break the prisoner's spirit. Under international law, 'prolonged solitary confinement' is defined as exceeding 15 days. British citizen and 77 year-old media entrepreneur Jimmy Lai, in jail in Hong Kong, has now exceeded 1,600 days in solitary confinement, yet has committed no crime. He has already served several prison sentences on multiple trumped-up charges, including 13 months for lighting a candle and saying a prayer at a vigil commemorating the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre. He is currently on trial under Hong Kong's draconian National Security Law, imposed by Beijing in 2020, and could face life imprisonment, simply for standing up for the human rights and democratic principles that China pledged to guarantee when it was handed control of Hong Kong from British rule. The authorities appear determined to drag his trial out for as long as possible. When it started at the end of 2023, it was due to last 30 days. Multiple adjournments have meant that closing submissions will not be heard until August this year and the verdict and sentencing may not come until the end of the year, making it a two-year trial process. This outrageous foot-dragging is designed to test the mental strength of Mr Lai, his family and his legal team. Despite widespread international condemnation, Mr Lai continues to be held in a tiny cell for more than 23 hours a day, deprived of natural light, and permitted less than an hour a day for physical exercise in a confined space. This is dehumanising and brutal treatment more often associated with 'maximum security prisons' for extremely violent offenders, while Mr Lai just lit a candle to commemorate a massacre that China has tried to erase from history, and exercised his freedom of expression by founding and publishing a successful newspaper. He is in jail for journalism, and for his opinions. Mr Lai, who is diabetic, has been denied access to independent medical care, and denied the right to his first choice of legal counsel, when British barrister Tim Owen KC was barred from representing him. His international legal team has received numerous outrageous threats. Even the right to receive Holy Communion has been restricted which, for Mr Lai as a devout Catholic, is a particularly poignant cruelty. Several governments around the world – including the United Kingdom, United States and Australia – have called for his release, as have the Canadian and European Parliaments. Five United Nations Special Rapporteurs – independent experts on freedom of expression, freedom of association, torture, the independence of judges and lawyers, and counter-terrorism and human rights – and the UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention have expressed concerns about the case. But the key question is what is the British government actually doing to free its citizen? It is not that no one seems to care – plenty of sympathy and support has been expressed for Mr Lai's plight. The fact that both the Prime Minister and the Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves have raised the case in their exchanges with China's leaders is welcome. A cross-departmental approach from the Government is the right strategy. But the important question is how was it raised? In passing, as a box-ticking exercise, or in a meaningful way? If Mr Lai dies in jail, what will be the consequences for China's relations with the United Kingdom, and have they been spelled out? It is time to turn sympathy into action, and words into meaningful measures. That is why an open letter to the prime minister last week by 22 former prisoners or relatives of former prisoners from around the world, asking him 'to do everything in your power to bring Jimmy Lai home', is so powerful and significant. Among the signatories are people whose own plight once looked dire. They include Russian opposition politician Vladimir Kara-Murza and his wife Evgenia, former Iranian prisoner Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe and her husband Richard, Chinese-Australian journalist Cheng Lei who was jailed in China, Paul Rusebagina who was imprisoned in Rwanda and the former Soviet dissident For these reasons, they urge the United Kingdom to take urgent steps to secure Mr Lai's release, 'before it is too late'. They call on the prime minister to meet Mr Lai's family as a matter of urgency, and to take 'robust, principled, strategic action'. President Donald Trump has said that Mr Lai's case will be on the table in any US-China trade talks. The United Kingdom must be equally strategic in identifying what leverage it can use to free Mr Lai. It must make it clear to Beijing that Mr Lai's continued imprisonment – and the risk that he might die in jail – is not in the interests of either China or Hong Kong. Not if it wishes to remain a significant business partner. Other countries have been able to secure the release of their citizens from China. Australia worked hard to free Cheng Lai, as did Canada in the case of its citizens Michael Spavor and Michael Kovrig, and Ireland with the detention of businessman Richard O'Halloran. The United States spares no effort in securing the release of its citizens unjustly imprisoned abroad. Sir Keir Starmer therefore must step up to free Mr Lai. Mr Lai's name must be on the lips of every world leader, every diplomat, every journalist and every Parliamentarian until he is freed. He should never have been arrested in the first place, but after four and a half years of his detention in solitary confinement it is time to say clearly to Beijing: enough is enough. Free Jimmy Lai now. Benedict Rogers is Senior Director of Fortify Rights and a co-founder and trustee of Hong Kong Watch Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
