
Researchers warn of 'quiet crisis' facing NHS Scotland
They cite a complex combination of factors, including a lack of ring-fenced funding to train and support clinical researchers, inequalities that lead to challenges for female and minority researchers, competitive disadvantages compared to English institutions, and extensive time commitments required to complete training and enter the profession.
Despite the challenges, the authors highlight the important contributions of Scotland's clinical researchers and what is potentially at risk of the trend of decline continues.
"In economic terms, investment in medical research pays dividends—every £1 spent returns around £1.25 annually to the wider economy.
"Scotland has long punched above its weight in this field. From pioneering bowel cancer screening programmes using the faecal immunochemical test (FIT), now central to early detection efforts worldwide, to the EAVE-II platform, which was instrumental in understanding vaccine effectiveness during COVID-19, our clinical academics have delivered innovations with national and global impact."
Prof Rory McCrimmon, one of the authors of the letter and Dean of the School of Medicine at the University of Dundee, explained how these types of contributions are at risk of becoming increasingly scarce.
He said that there are more academics over the age of 55 than under the age of 35. Clinical researchers now make up just 3% of the overall workforce, and only 0.6% of primary care workers are clinical researchers.
Prof Rory McCrimmon has argued that clinical researchers need more practical and financial support in order to continue performing their life-saving work. (Image: University of Dundee)
He added that the shrinking supply of clinical academics, combined with the baked-in challenges in the field, is adding immense stress on researchers.
"It is undoubtedly harder to do out-of-programme research at the PhD or MD level, because obtaining funding for that is challenging.
"Students leave university now with a larger amount of debt, and it takes a long time. It takes maybe ten to fifteen years to become a consultant. If you add a further three to five years of research on top of that, that's an incredibly long time to become a clinical academic.
"I think it is also perceived to be really, really hard, because you are moving into a very competitive world."
Read more:
Prof Lorna Marson, Dean of Clinical Medicine at Edinburgh and a contributor to the open letter, said that clinical researchers have a significant impact on their patients and communities, in addition to their broader contributions to the economy and the field.
"Research-active hospitals have better outcomes for their patients in terms of morbidity and mortality.
"Also, engaging in clinical trials gives patients the opportunity to get expensive drugs for no cost.
"There are many significant added values to being a patient in a research hospital, so we need to support that as much as we can."
Prof Lorna Marson has said that barriers to people looking to break into clinical research should not distract from the passion that these academics have for their profession. (Image: University of Edinburgh)
Prof Marson added that the decline in the number of clinical academics was not due to a lack of ambition in the profession and that better general support for researchers could make the career more feasible for many hopefuls.
'It's extraordinary that there are still a good number of people who want to do this. I think that demonstrates the huge commitment that people are bringing to this field, and therefore, we have to support them and help them if it's what they want to do.
'But it is exceptionally difficult for women who also want to have time out to have a family, or those who have caring responsibilities and wish to prolong their training.
'Using women as an example, we need to look for ways to support them not only to have time out to have families, but to undertake their research and continue in clinical academia. That is where we see the biggest drop-off, and it is not because they don't passionately want to stay.
'They just can't see a way through it.'
All of this is against a backdrop of extreme competition for funding. Prof Ian McInnes CBE, co-author of the letter and Vice Principal and Head of College, College of Medical, Veterinary & Life Sciences at the University of Glasgow, called it a 'sadness' that young researchers are facing barriers to the profession at a time when there are many new opportunities on the horizon.
'Increasingly, academicians of the future will be data scientists. They'll be computing scientists. They'll be business scientists with MBAs and organisational design specialists.
'One of the ambitions I have for Scotland is that we actually become a model for an incredibly diverse community of academic clinicians with expertise in so many different areas.'
Due to the interconnectedness of the UK higher education sector, Scottish researchers and institutions are in direct competition with their English counterparts.
But different structures and priorities mean they are not always on an even playing field, Prof McInnes explained.
In England, for example, the time of clinical academics is often divided evenly between clinical work and research. However, in Scotland, the divide is closer to 80% clinical and 20% research time.
'That 80% grows arms and legs, because clinical medicine is busier, clinical surgery is busier, clinical psychiatry is busier. So we're at a substantial disadvantage in Scotland compared to England.'
There are also significant financial awards available only in England, which can further limit opportunities for Scottish researchers.
Despite this, Prof McInnes was clear that the situation is not a case of finding fault. The different structures north and south of the border represent different strategies and priorities.
The Scottish Government is currently pursuing health innovation projects through its Accelerated National Innovation Adoption (ANIA) Pathway, which focuses on developing and implementing new health technologies across NHS Scotland. The programme recently committed £6 million to a project helping people with type 2 Diabetes, stroke patients and babies born with a rare genetic condition.
In the end, Prof McInnes said he and his colleagues are making a call to find collaborative solutions to a common problem and preserve what he called 'fabulous careers.'
'Clinical academics enrich and embellish the quality of clinical care, and they do that by being part of that community.
'There is very good evidence that just being in a clinical trial leads to better long-term outcomes for most chronic conditions. Even if you just get a placebo, you become a beneficiary of an ecosystem that seeks the best option, not the most convenient option.
'Being a clinical academic is an incredibly enriching profession, and part of our concern is that the focus on funding and crisis in the NHS obscures the fantastically brilliant career that is available.'
Health Secretary Neil Gray said clinical research is "vital" for both the NHS and the economy.
'The need and case for this plan and its actions is timely – in recent years, the sector has suffered from the impact of Brexit and from UK Government immigration policies which have stemmed the flow of international talent into research programmes.
'We continue to provide over £.1.1billion to universities each year, including over £368million for research and innovation. Our Chief Scientist Office also continues to provide various funding opportunities for clinical research, working closely with our academic community to deliver clinical trials, develop new research and fast-track new innovations and technologies which benefit Scottish patients.
'However, we recognise the challenges and opportunities highlighted in the recent MRC report and we will continue to collaborate closely with universities, the NHS and industry to maximise opportunities for clinical academics here in Scotland.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
Oasis comeback gig in Edinburgh expected to literally shake the earth
Oasis 's 2009 concert at Edinburgh 's Murrayfield Stadium has been identified as the most "ground-shaking" event at the venue in the past two decades. New seismic data analysis by the British Geological Survey (BGS) revealed the Gallagher brothers' last Scottish gig registered a peak power of 215.06Kw. This power output, more than double the next strongest event, is attributed to the movement of fans jumping and dancing in time to the music. The peak energy reading in 2009 coincided with Oasis taking the stage and performing "Rock 'N' Roll Star". With Oasis's highly anticipated comeback tour set for Murrayfield this weekend, experts suggest it could potentially top the previous seismic record.


STV News
4 hours ago
- STV News
More than half of Scots experience side-effects from medication, survey finds
Scotland's body for healthcare improvement has encouraged the public to take park in a scheme that tracks the side-effects of medications. Healthcare Improvement Scotland (HIS) made the plea after revealing that just 10% of Scots who experience adverse effects to prescribed medicines are reporting them to the Yellow Card scheme. The statistic was taken from a study which sampled 560 individuals across the country, asking them about medicine safety, long-term health problems, pre-conception health and care. The report recommended more awareness surrounding the Yellow Card scheme, which is run by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), to improve on underreporting of side-effects of various drugs. About 57% of sample members said they had experienced a side-effect or unintended effect from a medicine. Those who had experienced side-effects were asked if they had spoken to anyone about what they experienced. Of these, 84% had spoken to a doctor, nurse or pharmacist, 29% had spoken to family and friends and 10% had reported it through the Yellow Card scheme. Laura Fulton, chief pharmacist with HIS, said: 'The Yellow Card scheme collects and monitors information on suspected safety concerns involving healthcare products, of which medicines are a significant contributor. 'This is extremely important as it flags side-effects that previously have not been reported, for example. It is vital to improve our understanding of medicines and safeguard patients. 'I would encourage patients, members of the public and healthcare professionals to proactively utilise the Yellow Card scheme and report any concern as soon as they can. 'This will undoubtedly help others both now and in the future.' Professor Simon Maxwell, medical director of the Yellow Card Centre Scotland, said: 'I am pleased that HIS report recognised the important role that the Yellow Card scheme has played, and will continue to play, in safeguarding public health in Scotland. 'Since its inception in the 1960s in the wake of the thalidomide disaster, the scheme has been helping to shine a light on important but less common side-effects to medicines that have not been fully clarified at the time of regulatory approval. 'That was particularly evident following the rapid approval of the Covid-19 vaccines in 2021. 'Although the ability to report side-effects to the scheme was originally restricted to medical professionals, any member of the public can now report, and those reports are making a growing contribution to the scheme. 'I welcome the report's focus on increasing public awareness of the scheme as a mechanism whereby all citizens can all make a contribution to medicines safety.' Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country


The Herald Scotland
5 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
My nephew's life was put on hold by Long Covid
Long Covid cuts a swathe through the lives of children and adults alike, and the numbers affected are staggering. In Scotland alone, there are estimated to be over 185,000 people with this disease, living with debilitating symptoms like crushing fatigue, brain fog, digestive problems, breathing difficulties and muscle weakness. My lovely nephew is one of those people. He was an energetic student in his final year at Glasgow University when he caught Covid-19 aged 22 and has been laid low by Long Covid since. He was full of plans, to work and travel, but instead, had to give up his job and move back in with his parents. Read More: It's been like watching someone being drugged and restrained. His body cries out for sleep but rest doesn't refresh him. He could sleep for 10 hours and still wake up feeling shattered. Most days since being infected, he has had a painful upset stomach. Like other people with Long Covid, he has bad days and better days, but can never predict what's coming. Some days he can do things, others he can barely hold a conversation. All that is bad enough, but what compounds the distress is the lack of meaningful support. To say that NHS support services are inadequate to meet people's needs would be a laughable understatement. My nephew's experience of GPs he has seen is that he knows more about Long Covid than they do. In fact he puts it more bluntly than that: 'Most don't have a clue.' In spite of ministers' insistence that there are clear referral pathways for people with Long Covid in Scotland, reports by the ALLIANCE and Chest, Heart and Stroke Scotland show that the overwhelming majority of people struggle to get the support they need – a finding that is borne out by members of Long Covid Scotland. Again and again, people report having to research treatments themselves or turn to private GPs to get help that is not offered on the NHS – that's if they can afford it. As my nephew puts it, people feel 'abandoned' and have to figure out the way forward for themselves. The inadequacy of NHS support services has been the focus of campaigning by charities Long Covid Scotland and Long Covid Kids since they were set up, but they are at the end of their tether. This week, in protest at the Scottish Government's inaction, the two organisations formally resigned from the Scotland's Long Covid Strategic Network, which reports to the Scottish Government. They are exasperated and angry that after announcing a £4.5m one-year, non-recurring fund for people with Long Covid, ME, and chronic fatigue in December, ministers have yet to allocate a penny of it, and that this comes after years in which a previous £10m failed to deliver proper support for people with Long Covid. Trust has broken down. 'What was framed as a hopeful investment now stands as a symbol of inaction and broken promises,' says Jane Ormerod, the chair of Long Covid Scotland. The charities' verdict is withering. Instead of support being ramped up, they state that some services are being decommissioned, with still no provision at all for children and young people in most areas. They say that people with lived experience of Long Covid have consistently seen their input sidelined and that most health boards have disengaged from the network but the government hasn't intervened. They state: 'The Scottish Government remains functionally absent from the network: no oversight, no leadership, and no enforcement of its own Long Covid Service policy requirements. 'Faith has been lost. 'Too many times we have listened to assurances within the network followed by inaction.' Scots with Long Covid, they say, have been 'repeatedly let down'. That they've run out of patience is entirely understandable. A Holyrood Committee inquiry two years ago found that 'almost all individual respondents to the call for views spoke of a lack of awareness among medical professionals, GPs in particular, in terms of assessing patients, diagnosing long Covid and providing treatment options'. People told the Holyrood committee they had been 'gaslighted' and struggled to get their experience taken seriously. This just shouldn't happen, given the strong the international evidence that exists on Long Covid and how it presents. Research into Long Covid is ongoing, and no one expects a miracle cure, but the dim understanding of it among many medical professionals, the lack of clear treatment pathways for many sufferers and the history of broken promises, fall well short of what people have a right to expect. The effect of it all is that many people in the grip of a life-changing illness are being left without meaningful medical care. The Public Health Minister Jenni Minto says she regrets the charities' departure from the Long Covid network and that ministers are working with NHS Boards, preparing to set out how the £4.5m will be spent. But the charities have no faith in government promises. Perhaps the saddest aspect of all this is the experience of children and young people. Helen Goss, the Scottish lead for Long Covid Kids, says the system 'continues to fail the very people it was created to support'. The charities quote an 11-year-old with Long Covid in Edinburgh, who says: "I have nothing, no health, no fun, no life. No one seems to care.' Four years on from the height of the pandemic, the lack of meaningful support for children and adults with Long Covid is hard to excuse. The Scottish Government promises action – again – but for those living with this every day, it's way too late. Rebecca McQuillan is a journalist specialising in politics and Scottish affairs. She can be found on Bluesky at @ and on X at @BecMcQ