logo
Global retailers' tariff strategy risks spreading pain beyond U.S. consumer

Global retailers' tariff strategy risks spreading pain beyond U.S. consumer

Japan Times21-05-2025
Global retailers including sandal maker Birkenstock and jeweler Pandora are looking at spreading the cost of U.S. tariffs by raising prices across markets to avoid big hikes in the United States that could hurt sales.
A global presence gives large retailers an advantage to minimize higher tariff costs in the U.S. But it is putting central banks on watch as the strategy could fuel inflation in other markets such as the European Union and Britain, where consumer prices have finally started to stabilize.
Birkenstock's chief financial officer said last week that a "low-single-digit" price increase globally would be enough to offset the U.S. tariff impact.
Pandora CEO Alexander Lacik said the Danish company is debating whether to raise prices globally or more in the U.S., its biggest market.
"Companies are really thinking about distributing the tariff," said Markus Goller, a partner at consultancy Simon Kucher in Bonn, Germany. "A manufacturer from outside of the U.S. might say, OK, I cannot increase my prices to the U.S. market that much, so I will do a little increase in the U.S., and a little increase in Europe, and in other markets."
U.S. President Donald Trump has imposed a blanket tariff of 10% on all global imports and is threatening higher so-called "reciprocal" tariffs on its trading partners.
A Birkenstock shoe store in Oldenburg, Germany, on May 2. Birkenstock's chief financial officer said last week that a "low-single-digit" price increase globally would be enough to offset the U.S. tariff impact. |
Bloomberg
When U.S. behemoth Walmart said it would have to raise prices in response to tariffs, Trump ordered the world's biggest retailer via social media to "eat the tariffs."
Announcing price increases in non-U.S. markets could be a way for retailers to avoid a similar backlash from Trump.
"Obviously if your products coming into the U.S. are now subject to tariffs, then math says that you have to raise your prices in the U.S.," said Jean-Pierre Dube, professor of marketing at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business.
"But you don't want to be accused by the White House of raising prices purely because of U.S. tariffs, so if you can demonstrate that your prices are going up everywhere then ... it's kind of a shield."
Retailers could raise prices on certain products or in certain markets where consumers are less price-sensitive, and use that to subsidize other products or countries where price hikes would hurt sales more, said Jason Miller, a professor of supply chain management at Michigan State University.
"Maybe a U.S.-only firm has to raise (U.S.) prices by 12%. But you, as a global firm, raise prices by 8% because you can play with pricing in other markets," he said.
If many multinational retailers do spread the tariff pain, higher inflation could spread even to countries which, like Britain, have already struck trade agreements with the U.S. in a bid to minimize the economic fallout of tariffs.
Bank of England Governor Andrew Bailey earlier this month raised the issue of "global companies that don't make that distinction (on tariff rates) and just say, we're going to impose a pricing solution which goes right across the world irrespective of those differences."
"I think we do have to watch that carefully," he said.
Workers in a Pandora jewelry factory in Lamphun, Thailand, in 2019 |
Pandora / via The New York Times
In the eurozone, inflation was finally gliding toward the European Central Bank's (ECB) 2% target. European companies surveyed by the ECB in late March said price growth in the retail sector was subdued.
But that was before Trump unveiled his tariff policy on April 2, and later hiked tariffs on Chinese goods to 145%.
However, the U.S. tariffs on China — lowered last week to 30% — have allowed some European retailers to source goods more cheaply than before.
Martino Pessina, CEO of Takko Fashion, which sells clothes in 17 European countries, said suppliers in China had offered lower prices as U.S. retailers cancelled orders from factories there, and shipping costs also fell.
A Walmart store in Teterboro, New Jersey, on April 10. When Walmart said it would have to raise prices in response to tariffs, U.S. President Donald Trump ordered the retailer via social media to "eat the tariffs." |
Karsten Moran / The New York Times
"What we don't know is if there's going to be inflation in the U.S. and if that inflation comes to Europe or not," Pessina said.
Some big retailers have in any case ruled out raising prices outside the U.S.
"There is no reason to raise prices outside the U.S. because of the tariffs," Adidas CEO Bjorn Gulden told investors after reporting results late last month. "The discussion we're having on tariffs is only for the U.S."
ECB executive board member Isabel Schnabel has said the eurozone's inflation rate may initially dip below the central bank's 2% target, but that tariffs might prove inflationary further down the road.
"In order to compensate for the hit to input costs, firms also tend to raise the prices of goods not directly affected by tariffs," Schnabel said in a speech earlier this month.
While every company has its own pricing strategy, economists warn some could take advantage of tariffs to raise prices by more than rising costs, boosting their profits similarly to the inflation surge of 2021-22 during the pandemic.
"It will be very difficult for a firm's customers to know what portion of the product's total costs are subject to the tariff, or even the tariff rate that applies. This information asymmetry creates a ripe environment for exploitation. Just as it did during COVID," said Hal Singer, professor of economics at the University of Utah.
U.S. consumers' 12-month inflation expectations jumped in April to 6.7%, the highest reading since 1981. And in the eurozone, too, consumers are expecting inflation to rise.
"If people are expecting inflation, well then it gives firms a little bit more room to raise prices," said Miller.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Nvidia CEO says China's military unlikely to use U.S. AI chips
Nvidia CEO says China's military unlikely to use U.S. AI chips

Japan Times

time32 minutes ago

  • Japan Times

Nvidia CEO says China's military unlikely to use U.S. AI chips

Nvidia Chief Executive Officer Jensen Huang said the U.S. government doesn't need to be concerned that the Chinese military will use his company's products to improve their capabilities. Addressing the largest concern Washington has cited in placing increasing restrictions on U.S. technology exports to the Asian nation, Huang said the Chinese military will avoid using U.S. technology because of the risks associated with doing so. "We don't have to worry about it,' he said in an interview on CNN's "Fareed Zakaria GPS" broadcast Sunday.

Sri Lanka's Tariff Shock
Sri Lanka's Tariff Shock

The Diplomat

timean hour ago

  • The Diplomat

Sri Lanka's Tariff Shock

Last week, U.S. President Donald Trump wrote to his Sri Lankan counterpart, Anura Kumara Dissanayake, informing him that the United States will impose a 30 percent tariff on all Sri Lankan exports from August 1. While some argue that this rate is better than what some regional competitors like Laos and Cambodia face, it is clear that Sri Lanka's dependence on a handful of export markets and an even narrower band of products has left it vulnerable to sudden policy shifts by its main trade partners. It is also a warning of more pain ahead if the country doesn't fundamentally change course. Since 1977, Sri Lanka has followed the model prescribed by international lenders and consultants, i.e., open markets, free trade, and export-led growth. Sri Lanka has reduced tariffs, liberalized its economy, and chosen foreign direct investment, tourism, and the apparel sector as engines of its growth. This formula has delivered sporadic growth, but it has also created significantg vulnerabilities. According to Sri Lanka's Export Development Board, in 2024, Sri Lanka's total merchandise exports amounted to $12.7 billion. Almost 40 percent of the export income came from apparel, 11 percent from tea, and 7.3 percent from rubber-based products. In 2024, about 25 percent of all manufactured exports went to the U.S., with textiles and apparel accounting for about 40 percent of that total. The European Union (about 24 percent) is the other dominant customer, because of the preferential access under the GSP+ scheme. For many years, academics and researchers have warned that Sri Lanka's narrow base was its main vulnerability. Sri Lanka produces mostly low-value-added goods, apparel, tea, rubber, and seafood for Western buyers, who add value to these products under their own labels. Sri Lanka does not have internationally recognized brands (or even brands recognized in South Asia, perhaps with the exception of Dilmah tea), which prevents any brand loyalty or the ability to charge a premium. It has not invested in higher-value manufacturing, and productivity of most sectors is low. For example, Sri Lankan apparel, the country's main merchandise export, is not competitive without tariff exemptions from the U.S. and the EU. Thus, when the U.S. or EU makes a policy change, the impact is immediate, sweeping, and difficult to escape. The U.S. says it is imposing tariffs on other countries as a response to 'unsustainable trade deficit and a lack of reciprocity.' The apparel sector will bear the brunt of this decision. Industry bodies like the Free Trade Zone Manufacturers' Association warn that up to 50,000 jobs could be lost as the competitive gap with India or Vietnam, two of its fiercest regional rivals in apparel manufacturing, would widen due to the tariffs. This is not the first time that Sri Lanka's foreign trade vulnerability has been exposed. The EU's GSP+ has always come with strings attached, linking market access to a wide range of non-trade issues, from human rights to environmental standards. The EU revoked GSP+ concessions in 2010 over human rights concerns and only reinstated access in 2017. In the past few years, the EU has passed several resolutions condemning the 'deterioration' of Sri Lanka's human rights situation, and the country has to be on pins and needles each time the concession is under review. Unfortunately, successive Sri Lankan governments have done very little to find new markets or promote new products. Sri Lanka's exports to China, ASEAN, and Africa remain low. The National People's Power government has vowed to change these patterns. While the task is not easy, recent developments have shown it is urgent. Sri Lanka must break the cycle of dependency by investing in domestic brands, supporting value addition, and diversifying both its products and export destinations. This means moving up the value chain in manufacturing, supporting entrepreneurs, and protecting key sectors from the worst excesses of global competition while they scale and innovate. It also means developing a trade and industrial policy that serves Sri Lanka's long-term interests, rather than aping models from abroad. A stronger, more resilient economy will require difficult choices, from education and research investment, and a realistic assessment of the country's exposure to foreign shocks. Without a fundamental shift towards diversification, value addition, and strategic independence, the next blow, whether from Washington or Brussels, could be even harder to withstand.

Amid Air India probe, U.S. FAA and Boeing say fuel switch locks are safe
Amid Air India probe, U.S. FAA and Boeing say fuel switch locks are safe

Japan Times

timean hour ago

  • Japan Times

Amid Air India probe, U.S. FAA and Boeing say fuel switch locks are safe

The U.S. Federal Aviation Administration and Boeing have privately issued notifications that the fuel switch locks on Boeing planes are safe, a document seen by Reuters showed and four sources with knowledge of the matter said. The FAA's Continued Airworthiness Notification on July 11 came after a preliminary report into Air India's Boeing 787-8 crash, which killed 260 people last month, raised questions over engine fuel cutoff switches. The FAA's notification to Civil Aviation Authorities, seen by Reuters, said: "although the fuel control switch design, including the locking feature, is similar on various Boeing airplane models, the FAA does not consider this issue to be an unsafe condition that would warrant an Airworthiness Directive on any Boeing airplane models, including the Model 787." When asked for comment, the FAA said it did not have anything to add beyond the notification. Boeing also referred to the FAA notification in a Multi-Operator-Message sent to the airlines in the past few days, which said the planemaker is not recommending any action, two of the sources with direct knowledge said. When asked for comment, Boeing referred any questions to the FAA. The preliminary investigation report into the crash by India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB), referred to a 2018 FAA advisory that recommended but did not mandate operators of several Boeing models, including the 787, to inspect the locking feature of the fuel cutoff switches to ensure it could not be moved accidentally. The report said Air India had said it had not carried out the FAA's suggested inspections as the FAA 2018 advisory was not a mandate. But it also said maintenance records showed that the throttle control module, which includes the fuel switches, was replaced in 2019 and 2023 on the plane involved in the crash. The report noted "all applicable airworthiness directives and alert service bulletins were complied on the aircraft as well as engines." ALPA India, which represents Indian pilots at the Montreal-based International Federation of Air Line Pilots' Associations, in a statement on Saturday rejected the presumption of pilot error and called for a "fair, fact-based inquiry." "The pilots body must now be made part of the probe, at least as observers," ALPA India President Sam Thomas said on Sunday. ALPA India, in a letter posted on X, said the preliminary investigation report referred to the 2018 FAA advisory "concerning the fuel control switch gates, which indicates a potential equipment malfunction." In the flight's final moments, one pilot was heard on the cockpit voice recorder asking the other why he cut off the fuel. "The other pilot responded that he did not do so," the report said. It said fuel switches had almost simultaneously flipped from run to cutoff just after takeoff. The report did not say how the switches could have flipped during the flight. Two U.S. safety experts said on Saturday they backed ALPA India's request to be observers in the probe, but said the investigation report did not suggest a bias toward pilot error. John Cox, a pilot and former ALPA U.S. representative, said AAIB's report seemed objective and fair.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store