Gitxsan Hereditary Chiefs Advocate for Respect of Indigenous Laws to Safeguard Cultural Heritage
The Chiefs recognize that upholding ayoo k is crucial for preserving unique Gitxsan culture, traditions and sanctity of their laxyip. Their commitment to the Gitxsan Nation's long-term well-being and prosperity is rooted in millennia of traditional stewardship, which must continue to be respected today.
"For generations, our responsibility has been to ensure a thriving future for the huwilp (Gitxsan houses) and the Gitxsan people," says Simoogit Geel, Catherine Blackstock. "This means protecting our land, our culture, and our way of life while also building an economically strong nation. Today, we seek balance: development that strengthens our community so our children and grandchildren can continue to live and prosper on our ancestral lands, and respect for our environment and laws so we can lead our own way forward."
The Gitxsan Nation has presided over 35,000 square kilometres of Gitxsan Laxyip in Northwestern British Columbia since time immemorial. This campaign ensures Gitxsan Ayoo k is understood and respected, safeguarding the land and its resources for future generations.
"Our ayoo k are living systems governing our relationship with the land and with each other," explains Simoogit Gwiiyeehl, Brian Williams. "This campaign reflects our commitment to protect our laxyip for future generations. Respect for these laws is essential to true reconciliation and the survival of our way of life."
Delgamuukw, Geel, Gitluudaahlxw, Gwiiyeehl, Gyetm Galdoo, Kliiyeem Lax Ha, Luutkudziiwus, Mauus, Wii Eelast, Wii Mukwilixw, Wosimlaxha and Yagosip
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Edmonton Journal
4 hours ago
- Edmonton Journal
Conservatives aiming to amend Criminal Code so immigration status won't be a factor in sentencing
Article content The Crown sought a 90-day jail sentence. Ontario Court judge Paul O'Marra wrote that a criminal record would likely prevent the offender from sponsoring his wife to also become a permanent resident, as well as delay the offender's eligibility for Canadian citizenship and jeopardize his ability to become a licensed engineer. Article content O'Marra concluded that 'a custodial sentence would be unduly harsh' and instead handed down a conditional discharge with 12 months of probation, which included three months of house arrest. In establishing the basis for his reasoning, he wrote: 'The Pham decision stands for the principle that collateral consequences, while not determinative, can justify a lower sentence within the legal range to avoid disproportionate hardship,' Article content In an Alberta case cited by Rempel Garner, a man in Canada on a visitor's permit was accused of groping an 18-year-old woman in a nightclub twice. The judge ruled that 'in consideration of the devastating collateral immigration consequences to recording a conviction, I conclude that the appropriate sentence for Mr. Singh is a conditional discharge with a probation order of maximum duration, 3 years.' Article content Article content Rempel Garner insists that when 'it comes to sentencing non-citizens, Canada has essentially adopted a system of two-tier justice where judges can and have given lighter sentences to individuals who are non-citizens.' Article content The Conservatives are proposing a bill that would prohibit immigration discounts in sentencing. Great news! Courts have been more lenient on non-citizens since 2013, at times going light on sex offenders to help them remain in Canada. That can change if Parliament wills it. — Jamie Sarkonak (@sarkonakj) August 13, 2025 Article content Article content Rempel Garner said the Conservatives intend to introduce legislation to amend the Criminal Code. 'Our bill will add a section after Section 718.202 … which will expressly outline that any potential impact of a sentence on the immigration status of a convicted non-citizen offender, or … their family members, should not be taken into consideration by a judge when issuing a sentence.' Article content Acknowledging that the vast majority of immigrants and temporary residents in Canada abide by the law, she said 'removing non-citizens convicted of serious crimes is a no-brainer. Conservatives will always fight to protect Canadians, the value of our citizenship and the safety of every person who lives here. Becoming a Canadian is a privilege, not a right.'
Vancouver Sun
4 hours ago
- Vancouver Sun
Conservatives aiming to amend Criminal Code so immigration status won't be a factor in sentencing
When Parliament resumes this fall, a Conservative MP says her party will introduce legislation to end consideration of immigration status when a judge is sentencing a convicted criminal who is not a citizen. Michelle Rempel Garner, MP for Calgary Nose Hill and shadow minister for Immigration, said the practice has essentially resulted in a two-tier justice system that allows non-citizens to get lighter sentences than Canadians convicted of the same crime. 'This offends all principles of fairness that should be foundational to our justice system,' Rempel Garner said at a press conference in Ottawa on Wednesday. She pointed to a 2013 Supreme Court of Canada decision that she says has permitted judges to consider immigration status at the sentencing stage of a case. In that case, R. v. Pham , the accused was a non‑citizen, convicted of two drug‑related offences. The trial judge imposed a sentence of two years' imprisonment. However, the Supreme Court noted that under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, a non‑citizen sentenced to a term of imprisonment of at least two years loses the right to appeal a removal order against him or her. In reducing Pham's sentence, the Supreme Court ruled that 'collateral immigration consequences' are relevant factors that a sentencing judge may take into account in determining an appropriate sentence, but added that those consequences should not influence whether or not deportation occurs. Rempel Garner cited a few recent cases that relied on the Pham ruling in handing down a sentence. In the first example, a permanent resident was convicted of trying to buy sex from a police officer posing as a 15-year-old in an online sting operation. The Crown sought a 90-day jail sentence. Ontario Court judge Paul O'Marra wrote that a criminal record would likely prevent the offender from sponsoring his wife to also become a permanent resident, as well as delay the offender's eligibility for Canadian citizenship and jeopardize his ability to become a licensed engineer. O'Marra concluded that 'a custodial sentence would be unduly harsh' and instead handed down a conditional discharge with 12 months of probation, which included three months of house arrest. In establishing the basis for his reasoning, he wrote: 'The Pham decision stands for the principle that collateral consequences, while not determinative, can justify a lower sentence within the legal range to avoid disproportionate hardship,' In an Alberta case cited by Rempel Garner, a man in Canada on a visitor's permit was accused of groping an 18-year-old woman in a nightclub twice. The judge ruled that 'in consideration of the devastating collateral immigration consequences to recording a conviction, I conclude that the appropriate sentence for Mr. Singh is a conditional discharge with a probation order of maximum duration, 3 years.' Rempel Garner insists that when 'it comes to sentencing non-citizens, Canada has essentially adopted a system of two-tier justice where judges can and have given lighter sentences to individuals who are non-citizens.' The Conservatives are proposing a bill that would prohibit immigration discounts in sentencing. Great news! Courts have been more lenient on non-citizens since 2013, at times going light on sex offenders to help them remain in Canada. That can change if Parliament wills it. Rempel Garner said the Conservatives intend to introduce legislation to amend the Criminal Code. 'Our bill will add a section after Section 718.202 … which will expressly outline that any potential impact of a sentence on the immigration status of a convicted non-citizen offender, or … their family members, should not be taken into consideration by a judge when issuing a sentence.' Acknowledging that the vast majority of immigrants and temporary residents in Canada abide by the law, she said 'removing non-citizens convicted of serious crimes is a no-brainer. Conservatives will always fight to protect Canadians, the value of our citizenship and the safety of every person who lives here. Becoming a Canadian is a privilege, not a right.' Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here .
8 hours ago
Could federal legislation have eased a key sticking point in the Air Canada dispute?
Flight attendants poised to strike this week have previously asked the federal government to address one of their biggest grievances — unpaid work. The Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) gave Air Canada a 72-hour strike notice early Wednesday. In response, the carrier issued a lockout notice starting at 1:30 a.m. ET on Saturday and says it will begin cancelling flights on Thursday. CUPE represents more than 10,000 flight attendants who work for the major airline and its budget carrier Air Canada Rouge. The two sides have been negotiating a new collective agreement since March, and the union says the most contentious issues at the bargaining table are wages — which it says haven't kept up with inflation — and unpaid work. Flight attendants typically don't start getting paid until the plane is in motion and their compensation ends when the plane stops at the gate after landing — meaning they aren't paid for pre- and post-flight duties. Air Canada has proposed paying flight attendants 50 per cent of their hourly wage for work done on the ground, but the union is asking for 100 per cent. While it is a sticking point in the current labour dispute, flight attendants from a number of carriers have been calling on the federal government to make changes to the Canada Labour Code to address unpaid work. WATCH | Flight attendants rally at airports across Canada: It's not a huge ask, really. All people are asking for is to be paid for their time on the job, CUPE spokesperson Hugh Pouliot told CBC News. It's a very problematic situation, not just for Air Canada flight attendants, but flight attendants across the board. Pouliot said flight attendants reached a breaking point due to ground delays experienced as Canadians slowly began flying again following the height of the COVID-19 pandemic (new window) . Both the Conservatives and NDP introduced bills last parliamentary session that would have changed the Labour Code to ensure flight attendants are paid for pre- and post-flight duties. But both bills died when the House was prorogued earlier this year. Pouliot said it's encouraging to see opposition parties supporting the changes, but said it's tragic and confounding that the Liberals haven't backed the move. I think you would be looking at a fundamentally different situation at Air Canada right now if the Liberals — a year and a half ago — had decided to play ball with the other parties, he said. Wesley Lesosky, a flight attendant and president of CUPE's Air Canada component, told CBC News that he thinks the government ultimately needs to step in. We feel it should be addressed through the government and it shouldn't be used as bargaining capital at the table, Lesosky told host Sarah Galashan. When asked by CBC News, a spokesperson from Jobs Minister Patty Hajdu's office didn't comment on whether the Liberals would support changes to the Labour Code to address flight attendants' concerns. But they encouraged Air Canada and CUPE to reach an agreement. Enlarge image (new window) A spokesperson for Minister of Jobs and Families Patty Hajdu did not directly respond to a question of whether the government would back changes to the Canada Labour Code. Photo: La Presse canadienne / PATRICK DOYLE During the bargaining process, parties establish agreements on wages, working conditions and other employment terms. Mediators will remain available until a deal is reached. The minister is closely monitoring this situation and encouraged both parties to stay at the table until a deal is found, the spokesperson said in an email. Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre and Conservative labour critic Kyle Seeback wrote a letter to Hajdu last week calling for the Liberals to make the Labour Code changes. No other federally regulated worker would accept being on the job without being paid and neither should flight attendants. It's time to end this outdated and unfair practice, their letter reads. Speaking to reporters Wednesday, Conservative MP Michelle Rempel Garner reiterated her party's stance. As somebody who is a frequent flyer, I think they should be paid for [pre- and post-flight duties], Rempel Garner told reporters on Parliament Hill. I hope that the union and management can come to an agreement on this, but certainly the principles that were contained in that bill last year are things we stand behind as a party. The NDP announced Wednesday that it intends to reintroduce its own bill this fall. Every hour worked should be an hour paid, interim NDP Leader Don Davies said in a statement. The Liberals have done nothing to stop major airlines from exploiting their workers — most of whom are women. Instead, they handed those same airlines billions in taxpayer dollars. Workers deserve better. Delta Air Lines is one of the only major North American airlines that offers ground pay to its flight attendants, paying them at half their hourly rate for 40 to 50 minutes of boarding time depending on the destination and aircraft. Pouliot noted that Porter Airlines started paying flight attendants for some boarding duties this year while some smaller carriers — such as Pascan Aviation — pay full salary for ground duties. But he cautioned that the issue of unpaid work could spill over into future labour negotiations with other Canadian airlines. If the government is interested in labour peace in the airline sector, then this is absolutely a priority, Pouliot said. To whatever extent it's resolved with Air Canada, it is going to be an issue for WestJet. It will be an issue for Flare. It will be an issue for Air Transat. It will be an issue for all of the air carriers in the country, because at every single one of these airlines flight attendants are beyond exhausted with working so many hours for free. It's going to stop one way or another. Darren Major (new window) · CBC News · Senior writer Darren Major is a senior writer for CBC's parliamentary bureau in Ottawa. He previously worked as a digital reporter for CBC Ottawa and a producer for CBC's Power & Politics. He holds a master's degree in journalism and a bachelor's degree in public affairs and policy management, both from Carleton University. He also holds master's degree in arts from Queen's University. He can be reached at
