
Palestinian Journalist killed in Israeli airstrike in Gaza
Palestinian journalist Ibrahim Hajjaj was killed in an Israeli airstrike targeting eastern Gaza City on Wednesday, according to local media sources.
Hajjaj's death adds to the growing toll on media workers in the conflict. Since the beginning of Israel's military campaign in Gaza in October 2023, at least 230 journalists and media professionals have been killed, with 46 reportedly targeted in connection with their reporting, according to press watchdogs.
The Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ), a New York-based media freedom organization, and the Costs of War project at Brown University's Watson Institute have consistently ranked Gaza as one of the most dangerous environments for journalists worldwide.
Beyond fatalities, many journalists in Gaza have lost family members, homes, and access to necessities.
With Israel barring international reporters from entering the enclave, Palestinian journalists remain the only source of on-the-ground coverage from within the war zone.
Major international news organizations, including Agence France-Presse (AFP), the Associated Press, BBC News, and Reuters, issued a joint statement expressing grave concern for their Gaza-based colleagues. They warned that many are 'increasingly unable to feed themselves and their families' amid mounting food insecurity and infrastructure collapse.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Shafaq News
8 hours ago
- Shafaq News
Hamas ties talks to end Gaza famine
Shafaq News – Gaza On Thursday, Hamas expressed its 'immediate readiness' to resume ceasefire negotiations, on the condition that humanitarian aid reaches its intended recipients and the famine in Gaza is brought to an end. In a statement, the Palestinian group warned that continuing talks amid what it described as a starvation policy strips the negotiations of meaning. Hamas accused Israel of withdrawing from the talks without justification while 'continuing to deprive more than two million Palestinians of food,' resulting in what the group called an unprecedented humanitarian disaster. Hamas called on the international community and relevant stakeholders to take urgent action to stop the 'massacre committed by the Israeli military against Gaza's population.' It demanded the immediate, unconditional delivery of food aid with guarantees to protect it from obstruction or targeting. The group stressed that any future negotiations must be built on ending the current crisis and ensuring basic human rights.


Shafaq News
9 hours ago
- Shafaq News
Iraq's Speaker: Anfal massacre against Barzanis is unforgivable crime
Shafaq News – Baghdad Iraqi Parliament Speaker Mahmoud al-Mashhadani condemned the mass killing of Barzanis during the Anfal campaign, describing it as one of the most horrific atrocities in Iraq's modern history. In an official statement marking the anniversary of the campaign, al-Mashhadani extended condolences to the Barzani family, Kurdish leadership, and the broader Kurdish population, calling the massacre a 'moral outrage' and 'unforgivable crime.' 'We recall with deep sorrow and pain the unjust aggression committed against innocent Barzanis during the Anfal operations,' al-Mashhadani stated, emphasizing that the campaign—which involved mass killings, forced displacement, and attempts to erase the identity of the Kurdish Barzanis—occurred at a time when human conscience was absent or silenced. He reiterated that the Iraqi parliament stands firmly committed to justice and human rights and bears a continued responsibility to support all victims and prevent such tragedies from recurring. 'The blood of the innocent will not be in vain, and history will not forgive those who stood idle in the face of such crimes. Equating victim and executioner is a betrayal of human values.'


Shafaq News
9 hours ago
- Shafaq News
Public opinion is absent from the Anfal crimes anniversary
Shafaq News Although the memory of Iraqis is burdened with disasters and bloody tragedies, they rarely express them with collective awareness or in public. Bitter experiences have taught them that reviving such memories could be exploited politically by certain parties. Every year, the anniversary of the Anfal campaigns launched by Saddam Hussein's regime against the Kurds passes without genuine engagement from Iraqi public opinion. The reason lies not in a weak collective memory but in official policies that have deliberately employed these occasions while ignoring their national and humanitarian dimensions. Successive governments, along with their media apparatuses, have adopted a political discourse stripped of moral content, causing confusion and apathy among the people. This performance has weakened trust and deepened divisions to the point that mourning for an Anfal child has become rare, and some have even gone as far as justifying the crime or praising the perpetrator. Had media policies over the past two decades been more professional and just, Iraqis of all backgrounds would today be at the forefront of those crying out against the Anfal crimes and other massacres. But the selective narrative and political exploitation have obscured the story, disappointed the public, and embarrassed state institutions. More than four decades have passed since the massacres committed by the Ba'ath regime against Kurdish villages and towns under the banner of "Anfal." Yet official stances remain lackluster, and society lacks a true moral compass. Although the Supreme Criminal Court recognized the Anfal as a crime of genocide, that recognition failed to build a firm societal awareness or prevent similar future catastrophes. Even the global public only came to grasp the gravity of what occurred much later—because we failed to tell the truth in its proper time. Sociologists understand that neglecting such memories or approaching them coldly weakens the collective conscience and causes dangerous moral dysfunction in society. True commemoration of these events does not come through official statements but through reviving awareness and involving generations in understanding what happened and why it happened. What is lost today is not merely a historical event, but a precious moral and human capital. The moral exhaustion has reached a point where society can no longer bear to look at images of the victims or comprehend the horror of the crime. This poses a serious threat to the identity and social fabric of the country. Perhaps the deliberate neglect of the anniversary of the Barzani Anfal this year is a glaring example of this absence. There are no sufficient justifications for erasing this tragedy from public awareness, because the collective memory only thrives when citizens feel that it concerns them—that it lies at the heart of their cause. Commemorating this anniversary does not mean inflating the number of victims, but pausing to understand how the Kurds reached that moment in history, and what must change to ensure it does not happen again. The loss of social trust capital has worsened today, and officials must recognize the value of these occasions as gateways to restoring national unity. The Anfal is not merely a Kurdish tragedy—it is an Iraqi catastrophe par excellence. It deserves to be embraced by all components of the Iraqi people, not as a sad memory, but as a cry of conscience against tyranny, whose echo should be heard in Basra, Al-Anbar, Nineveh, and every corner of this land—a roadmap toward a future where justice is never forgotten.