New dispute breaks out between GIPE & parent body SIS over financial control
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
At a press conference on Thursday, GIPE's officiating deputy registrar Vishal Gaikwad, accused SIS of wrongdoing, including freezing its account. However, SIS president Damodar Sahoo, who later met reporters, countered the charges.
Gaikwad said, "We came to know 3-4 days ago that Sahoo wrote to the bank to freeze the account from which the staff salaries are disbursed. But we met the bank's officials and made it operational."
Sahoo, on the other hand, stated that it was a joint account with two signatories, SIS and GIPE. However, GIPE had removed SIS's signatory without any prior notification.
He said, "Hence, we wrote to the bank to freeze the account to know what happened as this has been a joint account since inception and there have always been two signatories and one cannot randomly delete one signatory."
In April, an FIR was lodged by GIPE against SIS's former secretary Milind Deshmukh, accusing him of misappropriating funds worth Rs 1.42 crore.
Gaikwad said that he wrote to the police asking them to add Sahoo's name to the FIR. Sahoo said he has no information about GIPE's letter, nor have the police contacted him.
In view of their allegations against SIS of misusing GIPE funds, Gaikwad said that the institute wrote to the charity commissioner requesting suspension of the SIS leadership and appointment of an administrator. Sahoo alleged that GIPE has no right to make such a demand since SIS is its parent body.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
A few months ago, SIS had accused interim VC Shankar Das of allegedly bypassing procedures in faculty and staff recruitment at GIPE which escalated to the SIS removing Sanjeev Sanyal as chancellor and appointing an interim chancellor.
Sanyal hit back, alleging lack of transparency in financial transactions of SIS. In a series of posts on X, Sanyal said that JNU vice-chancellor Santishree Pandit will inquire into the allegations against Das after which Sahoo called it all a misunderstanding and Sanyal was reinstated.
Pandit's committee, which comprised two more members from SPPU, conducted an inquiry and gave a clean chit to the recruitment process taken up by Das.
She said, "We had two online meetings and one in-person meeting at GIPE. We looked at all the documents and found that no rules of UGC or the state govt were flouted during the appointments made during Das's tenure. Sahoo withdrew his complaint against Das. A public notice was issued requesting submission of any evidence related to the complaint before the committee.
However, Sahoo did not present or submit any documents before the committee.
None of the allegations could stand scrutiny, and the process documents proved beyond doubt that all rules and regulations were followed."
Pandit added that there was another complaint from a faculty member at GIPE alleging irregularities in the appointments. "We admitted the complaint and went through its allegations. We also gave the professor a fair hearing.
However, since no rules were flouted, we gave a clean chit to Das and submitted the report to the chancellor a month and a half ago," she said.
Sahoo said that he had not withdrawn the complaint, and was not called to give evidence. "I have not even been given a copy of the report nor was my side heard," he added.
The SIS president said an advisory body was created to bridge the souring relationship between GIPE and SIS and keep communication channels open.
However, Gaikwad said there is no provision for such a committee in SIS's byelaws.
New VC Soon
Both Gaikwad and Sahoo confirmed that the selection process for a new vice-chancellor for Gokhale Institute of Politics and Economics has been completed and the institute will soon have a new head.
Sahoo said, "I am very hopeful that under able leadership and guidance, our new VC will shoulder the responsibility of GIPE and render his best services for all-round development of the institute and re-establish a cordial relationship between SIS and GIPE."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
3 minutes ago
- Hans India
'Limit to everything... ': Madras HC summons ED Joint Director in contempt case over TASMAC scam
Chennai: The Madras High Court on Wednesday directed the Joint Director of the Enforcement Directorate's (ED) Chennai Zone-I unit to appear before it in connection with a contempt petition filed by film producer Akash Bhaskaran. The petition was filed after the agency issued a summons to him despite an interim stay already granted by the court in the probe into the alleged Rs 1,000 crore TASMAC liquor scam. A division bench of Justices M.S. Ramesh and V. Lakshminarayanan expressed displeasure over the agency's conduct. "There is a limit to everything. The officer was present in the court when the stay order was passed. Despite that, he issued the summons," the judges observed. When the ED's counsel argued that the issuance of the summons was not intentional but an oversight, the bench curtly replied: "Let him appear so that he might not repeat this oversight again." It also highlighted the agency's repeated non-compliance. "We directed you to file a counter in the contempt petition. You failed to do so even after several adjournments. We imposed a cost of Rs 30,000. You refused to pay and instead said you would move an appeal against the order imposing cost," the bench remarked. Senior advocate Vijay Narayan, representing Bhaskaran, pointed out that the ED even filed a plea before the High Court seeking waiver of the cost. Earlier in the day, Additional Solicitor General S.V. Raju, appearing through video conferencing, sought time to file an appeal against the cost order. However, the bench insisted that the officer must appear in person. "Let the officer appear on September 17. You can file an appeal against this order also, if you want," the court said, while adjourning the matter to that date. The case relates to alleged large-scale corruption in TASMAC operations. The ED had earlier carried out searches at properties linked to Bhaskaran and businessman Vikram Ravindran, during which documents were seized. However, the High Court subsequently ruled that the ED had no power to lock and seal premises, directed the return of seized documents to Bhaskaran, and restrained the agency from using those materials for further action. Despite this explicit order, the ED went on to issue a summons to Bhaskaran, prompting the court on July 23 to censure the agency for violating its directions. The bench had also permitted Bhaskaran to initiate contempt proceedings if required. Acting on this liberty, Bhaskaran filed the present contempt plea, which has now resulted in the court summoning the ED officer to appear before it in September.
Deccan Herald
3 minutes ago
- Deccan Herald
BJP's R Ashoka says e-Khata could be Rs 10,000 crore scam, accuses Karnataka govt of 'not delivering development'
Ashoka launched a broadside against the Congress government, accusing it of not delivering development despite imposing levies worth Rs 56,422 crore on citizens.
Time of India
3 minutes ago
- Time of India
Gaming industry gears up to challenge Centre's gaming bill in court
As senior executives from the industry huddle together to chart their next move in a fight for survival, legal luminaries see the law being contested in court on standpoints ranging from constitutional protection to the right to trade, and more. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads In the aftermath of the Lok Sabha passing the Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Bill, 2025 , senior executives of companies in this space are huddling together and deciding on next steps, which will include approaching the courts against the proposed and lawyers told ET that the legal challenges will look to test the Supreme Court 's stance on skill-based gaming against the proposed per the bill, the definition of online real money gaming looks to lump together skill-based games and chance-based games under a single regulatory net, and this could endanger skill-based operators, which have so far survived legal scrutiny.'The Punjab and Haryana High Court was actually the first to say back in 2017 that fantasy sports should be treated as a game of skill. Since then, the Supreme Court has repeatedly turned down review petitions challenging that view. But the new law has changed the game completely…acting almost like a killswitch for the industry. Plans are being finalised to challenge the bill in court,' a senior executive proposed law, which also seeks to set up a regulator to decide which games can legally operate, risks stripping that protection from fantasy sports, rummy, e-poker, and other skill-led formats offered by companies such as Dream11, Gameskraft, Games 24x7, Pokerbaazi, Rupee, and Winzo Games, people said.'While typically any new statute passed by parliament gets tested on its own merits, in this case, given past protections, especially in the context of games of skill, there could be a degree of overlap that gets tested,' said Mihir Rale, partner, Cyril Amarchand whether real money gaming companies will have constitutional protection, Rale said, 'This appears to be virtually an existential question for the sector. That factor alone demands a degree of care and scrutiny to be applied to its passage and judicial oversight that will likely follow.''The key question is whether this is the only way that public interest can be served and no other measure that preserves businesses or jobs while effectively remedying public harm is possible,' he a letter to home minister Amit Shah on Tuesday, India's leading online gaming industry associations urged his intervention in the government's move to introduce legislation to ban real-money games, warning that it could cripple the sector, cost the exchequer nearly Rs 20,000 crore annually, and drive millions of users to unsafe offshore a joint letter to the home minister, the All India Gaming Federation (AIGF), E-Gaming Federation (EGF), and the Federation of Indian Fantasy Sports (FIFS) said the bill, which seeks to prohibit all online games with a monetary component, including those based on skill, would 'strike a death knell' for the industry.'While an Act of Parliament can override earlier Supreme Court rulings by changing the definition of gambling, such a law must still survive constitutional scrutiny, and a blanket prohibition is open to being struck down as disproportionate and arbitrary,' Nazneen Ichhaporia, partner, ANB Legal, online gaming industry employs more than 200,000 people, has attracted Rs 25,000 crore in foreign direct investment (FDI), and contributes over Rs 20,000 crore in annual tax revenues, they bill also seeks to curb online real money gaming by declaring any advertisement or promotion of such games as an offence, while also banning the facilitation of any transaction or authorisation of funds by banks or financial institutions for such a central legislation, the government has moved away from fragmented state regulations on gambling and betting – by looking to ban real money games in one fell swoop.'Gaming is a state subject under the Constitution, and there could be an argument that prohibiting an entire sector that has been in existence for years and contributes revenue is a violation of Article 19(1)(g) (which accords the right to trade). However, the Union government seems to have relied on…its power to regulate the internet and interstate commerce. We will certainly see this being debated in the courts on constitutional grounds,' said Aprajita Rana, partner at corporate law firm AZB & Partners.
