Defining ‘Antisemitism' Is the Subject of Bitter Debate
There's no consensus about what, precisely, constitutes antisemitism.
University administrators and federal officials alike have considered one contentious definition that has gained traction in recent years, put forward by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance.
The definition itself is not the source of controversy. It states that antisemitism is a 'certain perception of Jews that may be expressed as hatred' toward them. But the alliance also includes with the definition a series of examples that alarm many supporters of free expression.
They include holding Israel to a 'double standard' and claiming Israel's existence is a 'racist endeavor.' Supporters of the Palestinian cause say those examples conflate antisemitism with anti-Zionism and are intended to protect Israel from criticism.
Supporters of the alliance's definition say that it helps press colleges to stop tolerating behavior against Jews that would be unacceptable if it were directed at racial minority groups or L.G.B.T.Q. students.
Debates over how to define antisemitism have intensified on college campuses since the Hamas attack on Israel in 2023 and Israel's ensuing war in Gaza. The definition has been invoked in debates over whether to cancel controversial speakers, events and panels on the ground that they are antisemitic.
Donald Trump campaigned on punishing universities that did not do enough to curb antisemitism. His administration has threatened significant amounts of funding to institutions like Harvard, saying they did not do enough to keep Jewish students safe.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
a few seconds ago
- New York Times
Trump, Term-Limited, Amasses $200 Million War Chest for Political Ambitions
President Trump's super PAC is sitting on about $200 million that it can spend against his rivals, giving a term-limited president a never-before-seen amount of power in his party's finances and future. In the first half of 2025, Mr. Trump's group, MAGA Inc., collected about $177 million from the likes of Elon Musk, Mr. Trump's erstwhile ally, the TikTok investor Jeffrey Yass and the Silicon Valley executives Ben Horowitz and Marc Andreessen, according to a filing on Thursday with the Federal Election Commission. Mr. Trump has been able to capitalize on a thirst from corporate America to get into his good graces. He held a half-dozen fund-raisers for his super PAC this year with tickets costing seven figures a seat. At the dinners, often held at one of Mr. Trump's properties, executives and lobbyists had the chance to tell the president about their businesses. The super PAC's exact cash on hand is $196.1 million, according to the filing. There is no precedent for politicians so aggressively raising money for their own entities when they do not have a campaign to use it for. In the first half of 2013, a similar political group supporting a term-limited Barack Obama, Priorities USA, raised just $356,000. As of that June, it held $3.4 million, less than 2 percent of the cash on hand of Mr. Trump's super PAC. The money raised by MAGA Inc. during the first six months of the year is almost twice the amount collected by the Republican National Committee, which is subject to contribution limits. Mr. Yass donated $15 million to the super PAC and Mr. Horowitz and Mr. Andreessen combined to donate an additional $11 million. That Mr. Trump is raising so much money for his group has confounded some Republicans. Some of Mr. Trump's most loyal supporters have argued that he should try to run for a third term, despite it being unconstitutional. Mr. Trump's aides have argued that he would be foolish not to accept money that is essentially for the taking, and that the assets can be used to target Mr. Trump's rivals, beginning with Representative Thomas Massie, a Kentucky Republican whom MAGA Inc. is attacking. Mr. Massie broke with Mr. Trump on the president's decision to bomb Iran and on his domestic bill. With a $200 million war chest, MAGA Inc. figures to be a big part of Republican primaries, making Mr. Trump's endorsements in those races all the more important. The money is sure to be spent on advertising to back Mr. Trump's endorsed candidates. The sum raised by Mr. Trump's group has scrambled the Republican fund-raising landscape and worried some conservatives. Mr. Trump's group, not those of the Republican leadership in the House and Senate, will most likely be the biggest spender in the 2026 midterm elections, weakening the power of allies like Speaker Mike Johnson and Senator John Thune, the majority leader. Mr. Johnson's and Mr. Thune's groups, the Congressional and Senate Leadership Funds, reported holding just $32.7 million and $29.7 million as of June 30. Super PACs had to file reports with the F.E.C. by midnight Thursday, detailing fund-raising and spending activity from January to June. Perhaps the only group that could rival the influence of Mr. Trump's super PAC is Fairshake, a super PAC supported by the crypto industry that entered July with about $140 million on hand, filings show. MAGA Inc. also has an allied political nonprofit group that is not required to disclose its donors or total donations but can spend some of its money on political advocacy. The New York Times reported in May that MAGA Inc. and the nonprofit had raised about $400 million since the November election. Support from Mr. Musk was never guaranteed. He initially pledged to Mr. Trump that he would spend about $100 million on the president's political operation, but his eventual contributions were far smaller — just $5 million. Mr. Musk's relationship with Mr. Trump has recently blown up, and Mr. Musk now considers himself unaligned politically. The Tesla chief also made contributions to the Senate and Congressional Leadership Funds, the filings reveal. Mr. Musk donated $5 million to each group a few weeks after his public blowup with Mr. Trump, seemingly a signal that he planned to back Republicans in the midterms. But a few days later, after Mr. Trump's budget bill passed, he pledged to leave the Republican Party and start a rival entity. He has made little headway in that work. The filings also reveal that Mr. Musk spent about $45 million through his super PAC, America PAC, on a Wisconsin judicial race. Two-thirds of the money that Mr. Musk put into the super PAC in the first half of the year went to incentives for people who had signed or promoted a petition hawked by the super PAC, according to its filing. Mr. Musk's chosen candidate lost badly. Other significant donations in the first half of 2025 revealed this week included $10 million from Mr. Yass to a super PAC supporting Vivek Ramaswamy, who is running for governor of Ohio; $1 million from the Oracle co-founder Larry Ellison to support Senator Lindsey Graham, the South Carolina Republican and a longtime friend; and millions from Paul Singer, John Paulson and a group backed by Miriam Adelson to another anti-Massie group, donations that Mr. Musk deemed 'interesting.'
CNN
a few seconds ago
- CNN
Family of Epstein accuser Virginia Giuffre wants files released
CNN's Kaitlan Collins speaks with the family of Virginia Giuffre, one of Jeffrey Epstein's sex-trafficking accusers. The family wants all Epstein files to be released saying that Virginia Giuffre wanted the files to be released.
CBS News
a few seconds ago
- CBS News
Hurricane Plan for Florida's Alligator Alcatraz heavily redacted, raising concerns
Florida emergency officials have released a heavily redacted 33-page draft plan outlining evacuation procedures for the Alligator Alcatraz detention center in the event of a hurricane. The plan left lawmakers and advocates demanding more transparency. The draft, titled South Florida Detention Facility Continuity of Operations Plan, was issued by the Florida Division of Emergency Management. It outlines broad hurricane evacuation protocols, including transportation, staffing and relocation procedures for detainees. However, large portions of the document—sometimes entire pages—have been blacked out, including the list of five alternate facilities that could be used during an evacuation. On page 4, the plan reads: "The geography [of] this location, while ideal for integrated detention operations in support of the DHS–ICE initiatives, is vulnerable to tropical weather." It continues: "All vendors have developed individual continuity planning procedures to include the level of staffing necessary to support the STDF concurrently with evacuation and relocation of detainees to alternate facilities…" Who those vendors are and what the procedures entail remains unclear. Gov. Ron DeSantis and state officials addressed the facility's storm readiness at a press conference held at Alligator Alcatraz last week. Florida Division of Emergency Management Executive Director Kevin Guthrie stated that the facility could withstand winds up to a Category 2 hurricane. "I may have visited some facilities in the state of Florida. Why? Because this facility, as I've said before, can withstand category winds of up to category 2," Guthrie said. He added that for anything stronger, evacuation would be necessary. "When we have that situation, we will have to do an evacuation, and it's coming upon the Florida Division of Emergency Management to be able to take care of that." Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz, a vocal critic of the facility, toured Alligator Alcatraz on July 12 and later referred to it as an "internment camp." Reacting to the redacted plan, she told CBS News Miami, "We cannot go by just blacked-out information in a 30-page document and just trust the DeSantis administration." She emphasized the need for accountability and clarity: "This is what is unacceptable. We absolutely need to have a clear, written, confirmed plan in hand from the Division of Emergency Management and ICE, who are responsible for these detainees at the end of the day." CBS News Miami has reached out to the Florida Division of Emergency Management for more information. As of Thursday, the agency has not responded.
