Report calls for tougher policing to tackle London's soaring knife crime
Former detective chief inspector David Spencer said 'proactive policing' had collapsed, owing to a range of political decisions.
In 2024, London recorded nearly 17,000 knife crime offences − an 86.6 per cent increase since 2014/2015. In the same year there were over 35,000 robberies an increase in only three years of 18.2 per cent.
He called for a renewed use of the controversial stop and search method, and a bigger roll out of live facial recognition technology, in a report for the UK think tank Policy Exchange.
'London is in the grip of a knife crime, robbery and theft epidemic,' said Mr Spencer. 'A cosy consensus between police chiefs and political leaders has led to a collapse in proactive policing – in particular stop and search rates – allowing the streets to be surrendered to thugs, robbers and thieves.'
Political backlash against stop and search over the past 15 years, was partly to blame for the surge the report said.
Risks of getting caught and adequately punished are minimal
Policy Exchange
David Cameron's Conservative-led coalition government began to roll back on its use in 2010, and it was later criticised by former prime minister Theresa May and current Home Secretary Yvette Cooper.
Under the leadership of Mayor of London Sir Sadiq Khan the number of searches has fallen by 56.4% between 2021/22 and 2024/25 − from 311,352 searches to 135,739 searches annually.
Though London had the highest rates of knife crime in the UK, this was not spread evenly across the city, but rather concentrated in a few pockets. The West End, particularly the areas near Oxford Circus, Regent Street and Piccadilly, had the highest rates of reported knife crime.
Other parts of the UK such as Manchester and Yorkshire, had also seen high rates.
Robbery was the predominant reason for knife crime in the UK, accounting for almost two thirds (61.62 per cent), followed by assault which accounts for a third (28.19 per cent).
Yet police were increasingly unable to solve robberies and non-violent thefts. Only 5.1 per cent of robberies, or 1 in 20, and 0.6 per cent of thefts where no violence was used, or 1 in 170, were solved in 2024.
Even when caught, robbers and violent criminals were less likely to be sent to prison than they were 10 years ago, owing to a 'dangerously lax' sentencing, said the report.
In 2013, 66.1 per cent of robbers were sentenced to immediate imprisonment, falling to 55.4 per cent in 2024.
'The Metropolitan Police's apparent ability to solve street level crimes such as robbery and theft person has collapsed to almost negligent levels,' the report said.
Repeat offenders were increasingly walking free from courts. Less than half of the most prolific criminals (44.5 per cent), who have more than 45 previous convictions, were sent to prison after sentencing in 2024, allowing 4,555 of them to walk free.
This sent the message to criminals that the 'risks of getting caught and adequately punished are minimal.'
The report also blamed the diversion of police officers to departments that could be managed by civilians, such as human resources and diversity and inclusion. The report calls for some of these departments to be cut entirely, without naming them.
At least 850 police officers currently working desk jobs should be redeployed to tackle knife crime, robbery and theft in those areas, the report said.
It called for high visibility police patrolling in 'hotspot' areas for knife crime, such as London's West End, and for a 'renewal' of stop and search by the police.
Stop and search is widely viewed as unfairly targeting black people and creating distrust in the police among ethnic minorities.
But the report rejects the suggestion that stop and search is being deployed in a 'racist' way – and said it was necessarily to promote a 'zero tolerance' policy towards knife crime.
Shadow home secretary Chris Philp described the report as a 'call to action'.
'Implementation of a 'zero-tolerance' approach to crime requires a combination of clear policy, political will and savvy operational policing. It also requires policing and political leaders to put public safety ahead of ideological dogma on issues such as stop and search,' he said.
Labour MP and former Metropolitan Police inspector Jonathan Hinder said the criminal justice system was 'utterly broken'.
'We urgently need to properly resource our courts and prisons if we are to restore public faith that justice is being done,' he said.
'In the meantime, the law-abiding public want a strong police force to have the confidence to take on criminals, and it's time for politicians of all colours to give the police their full backing to do just that.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Middle East Eye
2 days ago
- Middle East Eye
Why Sudanese people are losing faith in the 'government of hope'
When former UN official Kamil Idris was sworn in as Sudan's new prime minister this spring, he became the first person to hold the position in a permanent capacity since Abdalla Hamdok resigned in January 2022 amid ongoing political turmoil. His appointment by Sudanese army chief Abdel Fattah al-Burhan elicited a polarised response. Proponents viewed it as a potential turning point in Sudan's democratic transition, citing Idris's political independence, technocratic expertise, and established ties with international organisations. They argued that his non-partisan background would help in navigating Sudan's complex transitional landscape. Sceptics, meanwhile, questioned the legitimacy of an unelected leader, arguing that his appointment - as opposed to a popular mandate - could constrain his autonomy. Critics have also pointed to the persistence of military influence, suggesting that Idris might function as a civilian proxy, with his authority circumscribed. This perspective underscores broader apprehensions about the deep involvement of the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) in politics - a role that contradicts the principle of a military remaining neutral in governance. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters While not all observers may recognise this dynamic, analysts, and those closely following Sudanese politics, note SAF's entrenched influence in political life. Furthermore, during the ongoing conflict in Sudan this politicisation of the army has led to suggestions about the close connections with the Islamist-led regime which had been overthrown by the revolution of 2018/2019. There is heightened skepticism about whether Sudan's current transition will produce a genuinely inclusive civilian government, or if military-backed structures will continue to shape power behind the scenes, and therefore the risks of a facade of civilian rule without substantive democratisation. Idris faces multiple challenges, chief among them the ongoing war between the Sudanese Armed Forces and the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which has raged since April 2023, severely destabilising Sudan's economy and social cohesion. Forming a new government was his first hurdle. Last month, Idris unveiled plans for a non-partisan, technocratic "government of hope" - a move that swiftly drew criticism from key political factions, who accused him of sidelining major civilian coalitions that had been instrumental in resisting military rule. Escalating tensions Although Idris has vowed to convene an inclusive dialogue with Sudan's political and social stakeholders, this initiative faces significant challenges, as some parties contest the legitimacy of his appointment and decry his government as unrepresentative of their interests. Notably, the Sudanese Congress Party, the Socialist Arab Ba'ath Party, and Somood, the Civil Democratic Alliance (CDA) led by the former Prime Minister Abdalla Hamdok. The latter was a product of the fragmentation of Taqadum, a civilian coalition formed in early 2024 of specific political actors from the Forces of Freedom and Change (FFC). Eventually, Tadadum split with two movements emerging; some FFC members joined Somood under Hamdok's leadership while others joined the Sudan Founding Alliance (Ta'sis), championed by RSF leader Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo (Hemeti). By forming an alliance with the latter, these civilian political actors rejected the authority of the Idris-led government. For its part, Somood has opted instead to engage directly with warring factions, circumventing the government based in Port Sudan. Tensions had been escalating since Idris dissolved the previous caretaker government in early June. Signatories of the Juba Peace Agreement protested the move, viewing it as an erosion of their negotiated gains. The dispute revolves around an article in the Juba agreement that had guaranteed signatories a 25-percent share of executive authority throughout the transitional period established by the Constitutional agreement of August 2019. Critics argue that the Juba deal has failed to address broader societal demands or to resolve persistent on-the-ground grievances, intensifying calls for its revision or scrapping. But ignoring its safeguards would erode trust in political settlements, destabilise the transition, and undermine national unity. Idris's technocratic experiment thus raises existential questions: is this a genuine democratic step, or another military facade? Mohamed Sid Ahmed al-Jakumi, head of the Northern Track, a signatory to the Juba deal, has demanded adherence to the 'quarter of power' principle, under threat of legal action. He has called for key ministries to be led by independent experts, rejecting the 'monopolisation' of power by any party. Amid this dispute, Idris advanced his cabinet formation late last month, issuing decisions to appoint Lieutenant General Hassan Daoud Kabron Kayan as defence minister and Lieutenant General Babiker Samra Mustafa Ali as interior minister. In early July, three technocratic appointments followed, with several Sudanese professors placed in charge of the agriculture, higher education and health ministries. Among the figures were Muiz Omer Bakhit, minister of health, Ismat Gurashi Abdullah Mohamed, minister of Agriculture and Irrigation, Ahmed Mudawi Musa Mohamed, minister of Higher Education and Scientific Research. These three ministries were said to be pro-revolution. Idris emphasised merit-based selection, but the nominations have ignited a backlash, with critics scrutinising the appointees' allegiances and warning of militarised governance. Significant setback Since then, Idris has appointed another 10 ministers to his 'government of hope', filling the rural development, justice, finance, trade, and religious affairs ministries on 7 July; and the fisheries, culture, minerals, social welfare, and transport portfolios a week later. Idris described the appointments as the result of a thorough review of national competencies and expertise. The remaining seven ministerial appointments remain pending. But already, the ministerial appointments represent a significant setback for the transitional process. Many of the appointees were involved in the previous government. For example, just to cite a few names, Mahassen Ali Yacoub who was the acting minister of trade and industry in the previous government that took over after the coup of 2021, is holding the same post in Idris-led government. Also, Abdall Mohamed Daraf, who is appointed as minister of Justice, is publicly known for his political support for the previous government, raising questions about the extent of his neutrality in this sensitive position. Sudan crisis: How a parallel RSF government could destroy the nation Read More » This could undermine trust in the state's commitment to meaningful reforms, while sending a deeply concerning signal to both the international community and the US-hosted process aimed at resolving the Sudanese crisis. Rather than advancing progress, these appointments reflect is only a repetition of past mistakes and failed modalities of governance despite different forms of organisation. Finally, Tasis finalised its charter and managed to establish a parallel 'peace and unity government' on 26 July with Hemeti as the leader of the presidential council. It has espoused a compromise pertaining to the commitment of its ally Al Hilu, the leader of one of the fragments of the Sudan People's Liberation Movement/Army (SPLM/A-North) and a stanuch advocate of a secular Sudanese state. Overall, Idris's efforts have unveiled deepening fractures between civilian and military actors, among Juba signatories, and within the realm of public opinion. Sudan's political landscape remains paralysed by entrenched polarisation, with the war economy and societal fragmentation aggravating divisions. This deadlock, compounded by grievances and institutional distrust, risks precipitating state fragmentation unless a consensus-driven dialogue emerges among military, political and civilian forces. The enduring contest for dominance has left Sudan trapped in a cycle of instability for nearly seven decades, as political and military elites have consistently failed to resolve their protracted power struggles. Idris's technocratic experiment thus raises existential questions: is this a genuine democratic step, or another military facade? As fragmentation looms, Sudanese people demand action, not just hope. The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.
The National
4 days ago
- The National
ISIS Swede convicted for role in 2015 killing of Jordanian pilot
A Swedish man was convicted and sentenced to life in prison on Thursday for his role in the 2015 killing of a Jordanian pilot by ISIS, Swedish media reported. The 26-year-old Jordanian, First Lt Muath Al Kasasbeh, was taken captive after his F-16 fighter jet crashed near the extremists' de facto capital of Raqqa in northern Syria. He was put in a cage that was then set on fire in early 2015. Swedish prosecutors said Osama Krayem, 32, travelled to Syria in September 2014 to fight for ISIS. Armed and masked, Krayem was among those who forced Lt Al Kasasbeh into the cage, the court heard. The pilot died when the cage was set ablaze. Krayem, who was born in Sweden to a Palestinian mother and a Syrian father, was sentenced to life in prison on Thursday, Swedish news agency TT reported. He was indicted by Swedish prosecutors in May on suspicion of committing serious war crimes and terrorist crimes in Syria. He was previously convicted in France and Brussels for deadly ISIS attacks in those countries. Prosecutors in Belgium had described him as unrepentant. The airman became the first known foreign military pilot to fall into the militants' hands after the US-led international coalition began its aerial campaign against ISIS in Syria and Iraq in 2014. Jordan, a close US ally, was a member of the coalition and the pilot's killing appeared aimed at pressuring the government of Jordan to leave the alliance. In a 20-minute video released in 2015, purportedly showing the killing of Lt Al Kasasbeh, he displayed signs of having been beaten. He was shown wearing an orange jumpsuit and standing in a cage outdoors as a masked militant ignites a line of fuel leading to it. The footage, widely released as part of the militant group's propaganda, sparked outrage and demonstrations in Jordan. In 2022, Krayem was among 20 men convicted by a special terrorism court in Paris for involvement in a wave of ISIS attacks in the French capital in 2015, targeting the Bataclan theatre, Paris cafes and the Stade de France. The assaults killed 130 people and injured hundreds. Krayem was sentenced to 30 years in prison, for charges including complicity to terrorist murder. French media reported that France agreed in March to turn Krayem over to Sweden for the investigation and trial. In 2023, a Belgian court sentenced Krayem, among others, to life in prison on charges of terrorist murder in connection with 2016 suicide bombings that killed 32 people and wounded hundreds at Brussels Airport and a busy subway station in the country's deadliest peacetime attack. Both the Paris and Brussels attacks were linked to the same ISIS network.
Middle East Eye
5 days ago
- Middle East Eye
Fifteen countries back French-led statement calling for recognition of Palestinian state
Fifteen countries have signed a joint French-led declaration, demanding an immediate ceasefire, unconditional release of all captives held by Hamas and calling for a two-state solution. We "have already recognised, have expressed or express the willingness or the positive consideration of our countries to recognise the State of Palestine, as an essential step towards the two-State solution," the statement said, inviting "all countries that have not done so to join this call." The statement also called for the unification of "the Gaza Strip with the West Bank under the Palestinian Authority" and expressed "grave concern over the high number of civilian casualties and humanitarian situation in Gaza and emphasised the essential role of the United Nations and its agencies in facilitating humanitarian assistance." The signatory countries include Andorra, Australia, Canada, Finland, France, Iceland, Ireland, Luxembourg, Malta, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, San Marino, Slovenia, and Spain.
