logo

The future of private broadcaster TVA Group is at stake - Company forced to cut more jobs in its television division Français

Cision Canada21-05-2025

MONTRÉAL, May 21, 2025 /CNW/ - Pierre Karl Péladeau, acting President and CEO of TVA Group, is sounding the alarm over the future of TVA and Québec's television industry. He issues the following statement:
''TVA Group, like other private broadcasters, is operating in a steadily deteriorating business environment and continues to absorb substantial financial losses while competing on an uneven playing field.
In this alarming situation, TVA Group is forced to cut some 30 jobs, mainly in its television division. These are teams that have already undergone major restructuring in recent years, including two overhauls since 2023 that resulted in the elimination of more than 650 jobs, half of TVA Group's workforce. The financial picture has also forced us to slash budgets for original Québec productions by independent producers belonging to the Association québécoise de la production médiatique (AQPM) and drop popular programs from our schedule.
Despite these rationalization efforts, the situation continues to worsen. TVA Group's financial results for the first quarter of 2025, released on May 5, 2025, confirmed the trend once again. TVA Group's total net loss over the past three years now stands at $76.1 million. The financial burden has been borne entirely by its shareholders, who have seen the value of their shares collapse.
This despite the fact that TVA Group's channels and programs consistently top the Québec ratings. How is it possible that a broadcaster that reached 80% of the population every week during the winter 2025 season is in financial peril? And yet, that is the reality. Although our market share is growing, advertising and subscription revenues continue to fall. Over the past three years, TVA Group's television advertising revenues have declined by $27.7 million. At the same time, its subscriber base and subscription revenues have dwindled as audiences and their subscription fees migrate to U.S. platforms and social networks, which are also capturing more advertising revenues than ever.
The challenges are great and they're not going away. They are undermining all our efforts to turn the situation around. Government authorities need to understand that the precarious state of the television industry will only worsen in the future, resulting in significantly lower tax contributions by industry players and job losses, whereas the economic footprint of the foreign players is minimal.
As we all know, television broadcasters have been contending with the rise of new players for years, namely U.S.-based video streaming services. For too long, the CRTC and public authorities have unthinkingly given them free rein, without acknowledging their real impact on our broadcasting system. Meanwhile, Canadian broadcasters must meet licencing requirements and unnecessarily restrictive regulatory burdens in order to operate. The situation is egregious. The unlicensed American online services have been causing the initially slow and now quickening downfall of Canadian broadcasting. Operating outside regulatory constraints, they are destabilising Canada's broadcasting ecosystem, accentuating changes in viewing habits and contributing to the erosion of viewing and advertising revenues on traditional platforms. How can TVA survive in such an unfavourable, over-regulated and over-taxed environment, when the Web giants can operate with virtually no restrictions?
The government must act to protect Canadian jobs and businesses.
At a time when television is struggling to survive but remains the public's leading source of news, it also defies comprehension that governments are still limiting the journalism labour tax credit to print media and refusing to extend it to television journalism. We have to ask the question: why are governments dividing journalists doing essentially the same work for our democracy into two classes? The artificial line between print and broadcast media drawn by this exclusion is destined to disappear with digitization. There is no reason not to act now.
In addition, the public broadcaster's over-the-top commercialism poses an additional challenge for private broadcasters such as TVA, which rely solely on advertising revenue. For too long, CBC / Radio-Canada has been in direct and unfair competition with private broadcasters, vying for advertising revenue, ratings and content acquisition. And even as the public broadcaster flouts its mandate and its social mission, it receives lavish, constantly increasing public funding—which does not seem to satisfy its management, which is asking for more while charging viewers fees for online services such as Tou.Tv Extra and unabashedly running commercials during mainstream programming. A strong, home-grown broadcasting system requires complementarity between the public and private sectors. It is imperative that the public broadcaster's mandate and business practices be refocused and all advertising removed from its platforms. As he begins his second term as Minister of Canadian Heritage, Steven Guilbeault should move swiftly to implement all the recommendations made by his predecessor in February 2025, which echo those of the 2020 Yale Report.
Bell is also persisting in its anti-competitive behaviour by refusing to pay the fair market price for TVA Group's specialty channels, particularly TVA Sports, as all other BDUs in Québec and Canada have been doing for years. The CRTC must intervene quickly to make Bell pay fair compensation for TVA Sports at last.
In addition to all these issues, the recent reduction in funding from the Canada Media Fund (CMF) has meant a net loss of $5 million for TVA alone for 2025-26, or almost a third of its funding.
For more than a decade, TVA Group and others have been making the case that these problems are crippling the industry, but no significant reforms have been implemented to enable our television industry to cope with the current upheavals. Effectively addressing these issues could be a game-changer for private broadcasters, which are essential to our cultural sovereignty and to maintaining a strong, home-grown broadcasting system.
Do we want a media landscape occupied solely by the public broadcaster and American platforms such as META, which are known to tolerate fake news?
TVA's fragility has implications beyond the company itself: its precarious condition endangers the entire chain of cultural creation, production and dissemination in Québec. It is crucial that government, regulatory authorities and all industry stakeholders understand the repercussions and finally adopt a long-term vision so that together we can find lasting solutions, before it is too late.
The last few years have been sorely trying for the cultural sector. Can we afford to lose thousands of jobs—including those of artists, control room technicians, camerapeople, lighting technicians, sound engineers, editors, writers, directors, musicians, presenters, journalists, set designers, stylists, make-up artists, hairdressers and so many other professionals who work on TVA productions?
Private broadcasters find themselves at a critical juncture. Throughout its 60-year history, TVA has always broadcast programs and experiences that bring Quebecers together. It is a powerful driver of our society's cultural vitality and democratic expression. If our television were to disappear, what would be left of our common culture, our shared stories and our identity? What would remain of the economic footprint of our businesses and their philanthropic contributions? We cannot afford to let this happen.''

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

HTX May Performance Report: Trading Volume Surges, Assets Grow Steadily, Rankings Rise Across 6 Major Data Platforms
HTX May Performance Report: Trading Volume Surges, Assets Grow Steadily, Rankings Rise Across 6 Major Data Platforms

Cision Canada

timean hour ago

  • Cision Canada

HTX May Performance Report: Trading Volume Surges, Assets Grow Steadily, Rankings Rise Across 6 Major Data Platforms

SINGAPORE, June 12, 2025 /CNW/ -- HTX, a leading global cryptocurrency exchange, has released its May Performance Report, highlighting its strategic growth and strengthened market presence amidst a volatile crypto market. Despite Bitcoin's price fluctuating around $107,000 and prevailing market caution, HTX significantly improved its standing, climbing two spots to rank 8th globally among 45 major exchanges in Kaiko's Q2 2025 Spot Exchange Ranking. This achievement designates HTX as the most improved exchange within the Top 10. HTX demonstrated substantial progress across multiple areas in May, including expanded trading activity, branding initiatives, new listings, product innovation, security enhancements, and user engagement. HTX Solidifies Position as a Top-Tier Exchange with Elevated Authority Rankings In Kaiko's exchange ranking, HTX scored the second-highest globally in "Business" and "Technology." Its "Security" performance also received high recognition, positioning HTX among the industry's top exchanges. This upward trend is mirrored across other authoritative crypto data platforms. HTX's CoinGecko ranking soared from 13th to 7th. Its jump from 15th to 9th on CoinMarketCap (CMC) solidifies its reputation as a top-tier exchange for global Web3 users. HTX also holds the 6th position on DefiLlama (North America-focused) and the 3rd on CryptoRank (popular in the CIS region). HTX's consistent ascent in global rankings underscores its steadfast dedication to user asset security, innovative product development, strategic global expansion, and robust service infrastructure. May also saw a notable increase in HTX's trading activity. Active traders grew by 11% MoM, trading volume surged by 33% MoM, and the platform's asset balance rose 11% MoM, marking four consecutive months of positive growth. This highlights growing user confidence in HTX's trading environment, resulting in more consistent capital inflows. HTX Sharpens Its Edge in New Asset Listings, Product Innovation, and Industry Research HTX listed 23 new assets in May, covering stablecoins, meme coins, RWA/DeFi, and InfoFi/AI sectors. USD1, issued by WLFI, made its global debut on HTX and quickly gained traction as one of May's most discussed projects on social media. Meanwhile, SYRUP (Maple Finance), a key RWA/DeFi player, witnessed an impressive 117.7% surge after its May 8 listing. B2, the first meme coin to use the USD1 pool, posted a 40% gain. Other projects, like SOON and NXPC, maintained high social media discussion during their listings by leveraging strong community engagement and platform traffic. HTX rolled out several key product enhancements in May to improve the user experience. These optimizations included launching SEO-optimized Token Detail pages, adding support for custodial sub-account functionality, and implementing multi-asset collateral for margin trading. In May, HTX Ventures, the global investment arm of HTX, released "Industry Insights: Crypto Challenges and Opportunities Amid Macro Noise". This insightful report offers a detailed analysis of key trends and opportunities shaping the current crypto market cycle. Concurrently, HTX Research, the research arm of HTX, published "The New Macroeconomic Landscape and Bitcoin Outlook: An Analysis of Liquidity, Risk Appetite, Policy Dynamics, and Investment Strategy". This comprehensive publication dissects the global macroeconomic environment's influence on the Bitcoin market, assisting global investors navigate the new market cycle's potential risks and opportunities. HTX Prioritizes Security and Transparency to Foster a Trusted Trading Environment Security remains a paramount focus for HTX, with increased measures implemented in May to protect user and platform assets. See details below: HTX remains committed to user asset safety and transparency, evidenced by 32 consecutive months of publicly disclosed asset reserve data. The latest Merkle Tree-based report for June confirms that the platform's overall reserve ratio remains above 100%, with USDT reserves recording positive growth for the third straight month. Throughout May, HTX's customer service team served 138,423 users, resolving 37,851 issues across key areas like P2P trading and on-chain deposits/withdrawals. The team maintained a user satisfaction rate above 83%. At the midpoint of 2025, HTX is accelerating its journey toward becoming a top-tier global crypto exchange, driven by clear strategy, steady progress, and a spirit of innovation. About HTX Founded in 2013, HTX has evolved from a virtual asset exchange into a comprehensive ecosystem of blockchain businesses that span digital asset trading, financial derivatives, research, investments, incubation, and other businesses. As a world-leading gateway to Web3, HTX harbors global capabilities that enable it to provide users with safe and reliable services. Adhering to the growth strategy of "Global Expansion, Thriving Ecosystem, Wealth Effect, Security & Compliance," HTX is dedicated to providing quality services and values to virtual asset enthusiasts worldwide.

Australia's defense minister downplays concerns over Pentagon review of multi-billion submarine deal
Australia's defense minister downplays concerns over Pentagon review of multi-billion submarine deal

Winnipeg Free Press

timean hour ago

  • Winnipeg Free Press

Australia's defense minister downplays concerns over Pentagon review of multi-billion submarine deal

BANGKOK (AP) — Australia's defense minister dismissed concerns Thursday that a deal between the U.S., Australia and Britain to provide his country with nuclear-powered submarines could be in jeopardy, following a report that the Pentagon had ordered a review. Australian Defense Minister Richard Marles told Sky News Australia that he had known about the review of the deal 'for some time,' saying that it was a 'very natural step for the incoming administration to take.' He noted that the UK's government also reviewed the deal, the centerpiece of a three-way alliance known as AUKUS after it was elected, and that his own government had looked at it as part of its own review of Australia's entire defense posture. 'I think an incoming government having a look at this is something that they have a perfect right to do and we welcome it and we'll work with it,' he said. The deal, worth more than $200 billion, was signed between the three countries in 2021 under then President Joe Biden, designed to provide Australia, one of Washington's staunchest allies in the region, with greater maritime capabilities to counter China's increasingly strong navy. The deal also involves the U.S. selling several of its Virginia-class submarines to Australia to bridge the gap as the new submarines are being jointly built. In January, Australia made the first of six $500 million payments to the U.S. under the AUKUS deal, meant to bolster American submarine manufacturing. Marles met with U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on the sidelines of a defense conference in Singapore less than two weeks ago, and told reporters afterward that he had come away with 'a sense of confidence about the way in which AUKUS is proceeding.' 'AUKUS is on track and we are meeting all the timelines that are associated with it,' he said. 'We are very optimistic.' Hegseth's address to the defense forum made multiple mentions of cooperation with Australia but no reference to AUKUS, however, though he did later mention the deal when he was taking questions. Hegseth did urge allies in the Indo-Pacific to increase their defense spending, and underscored the need for a 'strong, resolute and capable network of allies and partners' as the U.S. seeks to counter China.

Canada's Conservatives still aren't serious about housing
Canada's Conservatives still aren't serious about housing

National Observer

timean hour ago

  • National Observer

Canada's Conservatives still aren't serious about housing

He was so close to getting it. Jacob Mantle, the newly-elected thirty-something Conservative MP for York-Durham, rose in the House of Commons on Tuesday to make a point about housing costs. 'Oxford Economics reports that Toronto's housing market ranks among the worst in the world for affordability. At the same time, mortgage delinquency rates in Toronto are higher than at any time during the pandemic. The financial burden is suffocating the next generation of homebuyers.' But Mantle wasn't actually interested in proposing solutions to that problem. Instead, he wanted to whine about the fact that the Carney government isn't going to table a budget until the fall, which the government has defended on the basis that it will be better able to account for the fallout from Donald Trump's tariffs by then. And despite his supposed concern over housing, Mantle was dismissive of the government's plan to embrace and scale up modular housing in Canada. 'My generation refuses to live in a shipping container,' Mantle said. For what it's worth, I suspect many members of his generation (and mine) would be happy to live in the sort of modified shipping containers that are being designed and built right now, including the ones in his own city. But modular housing is so much more than just the use and conversion of shipping containers. It's an entirely new approach to homebuilding, one that uses factories and their inherent economies of scale to drive down costs. They can be one or two-storey, single or multi-family, and configured in any number of layouts and sizes. In an environment where driving down construction costs is a nearly existential issue for Mantle's generation, you'd think he would be more open to new ideas and economic innovation — especially when it promises to use more Canadian materials and labour. Then again, if you've been paying close attention to the Conservative Party of Canada's approach to this issue, his behaviour was entirely predictable. Under Pierre Poilievre's leadership, the party and its MPs have repeatedly highlighted the very real problem of rising housing costs in Canada and the disproportionate impacts they have on younger people. But when it comes to actual solutions to that problem — ones, at least, that don't involve cutting taxes or regulations and assuming the market will magically solve the problem it has helped create — those same Conservatives either disappear into the metaphorical bushes or come out on the other side of the issue. In Calgary, for example, opposition to a city-wide measure to increase affordability and density while reducing sprawl came mostly from Conservative-leaning councilors like Dan McLean, Peter Demong and Sean Chu, with some conspicuous cheerleading work coming from federal Conservative MP Greg McLean. In British Columbia, provincial Conservative party leader John Rustad decided to go to bat for the very 'gatekeepers' standing in the way of new housing that Poilievre had repeatedly promised he would eliminate. Even in Ontario, where Conservative politicians have been more visibly and vocally on-side with pro-supply measures, the results of the Ford government's efforts have been underwhelming, to say the least. We are not in a moment where we can afford to reflexively turn our noses up at potential solutions. And yet, Conservative politicians like Mantle seem determined to find fault in every proposed approach that doesn't flatter their own pre-existing ideological and political biases towards cutting taxes and reducing government involvement. Modular housing will not be, in and of itself, the solution to a problem that has been building for more than two decades. But that's only because nothing on its own will, or could, be the solution. The Carney government has embraced modular housing as a way to lower costs and improve affordability in Canada's housing market. Canada's Conservatives, on the other hand, seem determined to miss the mass timber for the trees. Instead, we need every possible lever being pulled right now, from regulatory reform and improved operating efficiencies to direct government involvement, procurement, and even development. Mantle is right that the status quo has failed his generation. But he's wrong to indignantly oppose a good-faith effort at challenging and changing it, and all the more so as he pretends to speak on behalf of an entire generation. We can only hope that his party and its online proxies don't decide to turn modular housing into this year's iteration of the 15-minute city and throw a self-evidently good and decent idea into the stew of online conspiracies it always seems to have at low boil. Yes, that might feed the eternally hungry appetites of their increasingly online political base. But it won't do anything to address the problem Conservatives like Mantle claim to care about. At some point, Canadians may conclude that they're not actually all that interested in solving it.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store