Telangana high court to take up bail plea of mining baron Gali Janardhan Reddy today
Hyderabad: The Telangana high court will on Tuesday decide the bail plea of mining baron and Karnataka MLA Gali Janardhan Reddy who was sentenced to seven years along with three others in the illegal Obulapuram mining case recently.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
On Monday, Justice K Lakshman heard arguments in the bail petitions of Gali, Obulapuram Mining Company (OMC) MD BV Srinivas Reddy and two others, and reserved his orders for Tuesday.
Senior counsel S Nagamuthu argued the case of Gali and urged the court to suspend the sentence and release him on bail. While Srinivas Reddy's counsel Pappu Nageswara Rao, citing judgments of the Supreme Court, said that convicts who have served half of their term could be released on bail.
In the current case, both Gali and Srinivas Reddy have served more than three and a half years of jail term as remand prisoners prior to their conviction.
The lawyers said the case entrusted to CBI was about alleged illegal mining beyond leasehold areas and transgression of state borders, which finds no mention in its charge sheet, while the case against them was about violation of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act – which was not dealt with by the probe agency. They also pointed out that when those named as principal offenders – former mines minister Sabita Indra Reddy and former industries secretary Kripanandam – were acquitted, how can those charged with conspiracy be convicted?
Opposing the bail pleas, CBI counsel Srinivas Kapatia said the convicts could not show any compelling circumstance that warrants interference by the court.
The judge said he would only look at the bail pleas for now and made it clear that their main appeals will be heard from Aug 11.
HC to take up Srilakshmi acquittal issue
The judge, during the hearing, directed the registry to list before him the case of former industries secretary Y Srilakshmi (who succeeded Kripanandam). The high court had earlier discharged her from the case, but CBI had appealed in SC which directed the HC to hear the CBI version also before arriving at a conclusion. CBI made out a case that the HC had not heard their version before allowing Srilakshmi's plea.
The judge said he would decide the issue before the expiry of a three-month deadline fixed by the apex court and directed the CBI to file its counter.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
38 minutes ago
- Time of India
HC to state: Justify SC/ST/OBC quotas in minority institutions
Mumbai: Bombay high court on Tuesday questioned state govt on what basis had it issued the govt resolution (GR) including SC, ST and OBC reservations for FYJC admission in minority institutions in the state. "Justify your stand," said Justices Makarand Karnik and Nitin Borkar and posted the hearing on Wednesday. They heard a petition by Solapur's APD Jain Pathashala, a trust that runs Walchand College of Arts and Science and Hirachand Nemchand College of Commerce, filed through advocate Sandeep Waghmare, challenging the May 6 GR issued by the school education and sports department applying constitutional/social reservations in minority education institutes. Even as HC began hearing this case, colleges such as St Xavier's, Jai Hind, HR, KC and Maharashtra College that filed a joint petition with the Maharashtra Association of Minority Educational Institution against the GR, sought a hearing too. All matters will be heard on Wednesday. Advocate S C Naidu, for the Solapur colleges, argued that Article 15 (5) of the Indian Constitution excludes minority educational institutions, aided or unaided, from applicability of reservations for socially and educationally backward classes. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Trade Bitcoin & Ethereum – No Wallet Needed! IC Markets Start Now Undo He said that under Article 30 (1) (Right of minorities to establish and administer educational institutions), the right of admission is exclusively with the management of the minority institution. Naidu also questioned the timing of implementation of the reservations. "This they do at the last minute," he said, adding that it disturbs the admission procedure. Naidu said an identical GR was issued on March 7, 2019, by state govt and was "simply" withdrawn after petitions were filed in HC. "They are playing not only with colleges, but also with students ...Students have to go through stress for studies, for exams and now this stress of uncertainty in admission," Naidu added. The judges then asked the state's advocate to take instruction and inform. Naidu said the finalisation of the merit list is scheduled for Wednesday. The judges then directed that it will be subject to the outcome of the petition. The petition, filed by Maharashtra Association of Minority Institutions and Mumbai colleges, through advocate Manorama Mohanty, said being minority educational institutions, they are governed by an indefeasible right guaranteed under Article 30 to establish, administer and manage educational institutions of their own choice. Further, this right has been acknowledged and reiterated in a series of judgments of Supreme Court as well as Bombay HC "which have consistently held that the minority educational institutions are not subject to any social reservations". The petitioners urged HC to quash and set aside the contentious portion of the May 6 GR and to stay it pending hearing. They also sought directions to state govt to update/rectify the in-house and management quotas and to follow the seat distribution matrix used in 2024-25 academic year. This year, the seat distribution matrix has reduced the management and in-house quota share to half. Mumbai: Bombay high court on Tuesday questioned state govt on what basis had it issued the govt resolution (GR) including SC, ST and OBC reservations for FYJC admission in minority institutions in the state. "Justify your stand," said Justices Makarand Karnik and Nitin Borkar and posted the hearing on Wednesday. They heard a petition by Solapur's APD Jain Pathashala, a trust that runs Walchand College of Arts and Science and Hirachand Nemchand College of Commerce, filed through advocate Sandeep Waghmare, challenging the May 6 GR issued by the school education and sports department applying constitutional/social reservations in minority education institutes. Even as HC began hearing this case, colleges such as St Xavier's, Jai Hind, HR, KC and Maharashtra College that filed a joint petition with the Maharashtra Association of Minority Educational Institution against the GR, sought a hearing too. All matters will be heard on Wednesday. Advocate S C Naidu, for the Solapur colleges, argued that Article 15 (5) of the Indian Constitution excludes minority educational institutions, aided or unaided, from applicability of reservations for socially and educationally backward classes. He said that under Article 30 (1) (Right of minorities to establish and administer educational institutions), the right of admission is exclusively with the management of the minority institution. Naidu also questioned the timing of implementation of the reservations. "This they do at the last minute," he said, adding that it disturbs the admission procedure. Naidu said an identical GR was issued on March 7, 2019, by state govt and was "simply" withdrawn after petitions were filed in HC. "They are playing not only with colleges, but also with students ...Students have to go through stress for studies, for exams and now this stress of uncertainty in admission," Naidu added. The judges then asked the state's advocate to take instruction and inform. Naidu said the finalisation of the merit list is scheduled for Wednesday. The judges then directed that it will be subject to the outcome of the petition. The petition, filed by Maharashtra Association of Minority Institutions and Mumbai colleges, through advocate Manorama Mohanty, said being minority educational institutions, they are governed by an indefeasible right guaranteed under Article 30 to establish, administer and manage educational institutions of their own choice. Further, this right has been acknowledged and reiterated in a series of judgments of Supreme Court as well as Bombay HC "which have consistently held that the minority educational institutions are not subject to any social reservations". The petitioners urged HC to quash and set aside the contentious portion of the May 6 GR and to stay it pending hearing. They also sought directions to state govt to update/rectify the in-house and management quotas and to follow the seat distribution matrix used in 2024-25 academic year. This year, the seat distribution matrix has reduced the management and in-house quota share to half.
Deccan Herald
2 hours ago
- Deccan Herald
Teeth to domestic violence law
The bench of Justices B V Nagarathna and Satish Chandra Sharma also directed the National Legal Services Authority to instruct the state legal services authorities to make women aware of their right to free legal aid and advice under the Act.
India Today
2 hours ago
- India Today
Will be met with big force: Trump warns protesters ahead of Army parade
President Donald Trump on Tuesday issued a stern warning to anyone planning to protest during the upcoming military parade on June 14, which marks the US Army's 250th anniversary in Washington. The large-scale event, scheduled to take place on the National Mall and through the streets of Washington, also coincides with Trump's 79th birthday. It will feature a military parade, an Army birthday festival, and a special enlistment and re-enlistment ceremony overseen by the president those people that want to protest, they're going to be met with very big force," Trump told reporters during unscheduled remarks in the Oval Office. The president emphasized that Saturday's parade is intended to be a patriotic celebration and suggested that dissenters would be treated as hostile IN: President Trump sends a STRONG message those planning to disrupt the Army Parade in DC this weekend'YOU WILL BE MET WITH VERY HEAVY FORCE!' Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) June 10, 2025Law enforcement officials are preparing for what could be a massive turnout. According to US Secret Service Special Agent in Charge Matt McCool, 'thousands of agents, officers and specialists' from federal, state, and local agencies will be deployed. McCool added that 'at least nine permits have been issued for protests' on that day, although the FBI and Metropolitan Police have found no credible threats so One group organizing nationwide protests is called No Kings, which has openly criticized the administration's policies. "They've defied our courts, deported Americans, disappeared people off the streets, attacked our civil rights and slashed our services," the group states on its website. "The corruption has gone too far. No thrones. No crowns. No kings."Trump, meanwhile, reiterated his support for a strong military presence in response to public unrest, including his controversial decision to send 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 Marines to Los Angeles. The deployment followed protests triggered by immigration raids targeting workplaces."We're going to celebrate big on Saturday," Trump declared, before doubling down on his warning to demonstrators. "If any protesters want to come out, they will be met with very big force.""This is people that hate our country," he continued. "They will be met with heavy force."TRUMP SAYS OPEN TO INVOKING INSURRECTION ACTDuring an Oval Office exchange with reporters, Trump signaled he may consider invoking the Insurrection Act: one of the most extreme emergency powers available to a president, in response to ongoing immigration protests in Los Angeles. The Act allows the deployment of military forces within the United States to suppress rebellion, domestic unrest, or enforce federal law in specific the scale of Saturday's planned celebration, Trump added, "It's going to be a parade, the likes of which I don't know if we've ever had a parade like that. It's going to be incredible." He also touted the spectacle of military equipment, old and new, on display: "We have many tanks. We have all sorts of new ones and very old ones old from World War I and World War II,' Trump was quoted as saying by ABC News."We have a lot of those army airplanes flying over the top, and we have tanks all over the place," the president said, suggesting the event would rival global military parades in grandeur and patriotic spirit.(With inputs from Reuters)Tune InMust Watch
