logo
Washington DC Sues Trump, Calling Police Takeover Illegal

Washington DC Sues Trump, Calling Police Takeover Illegal

Yahoo7 hours ago
(Bloomberg) -- Washington DC is asking a federal court to immediately block the Trump administration's effort to take over the city's police force, saying that the move is illegal and risks public safety.
The US-Canadian Road Safety Gap Is Getting Wider
Festivals and Parades Are Canceled Amid US Immigration Anxiety
To Head Off Severe Storm Surges, Nova Scotia Invests in 'Living Shorelines'
Five Years After Black Lives Matter, Brussels' Colonial Statues Remain
For Homeless Cyclists, Bikes Bring an Escape From the Streets
The lawsuit filed by Washington's Attorney General Brian Schwalb on Friday follows an escalation between city officials and the Justice Department over President Donald Trump's moves to take control of the Metropolitan Police Department and deploy hundreds of National Guard troops to the nation's capital.
The complaint, which was filed in Washington federal court, alleged that Trump exceeded the authority granted by Congress in taking those steps. City officials also asked a judge Friday to block the federal government from assuming control of the metropolitan police force or issuing any further orders.
'The administration's unlawful actions are an affront to the dignity and autonomy of the 700,000 Americans who call DC home,' said Schwalb in a statement issued by the Washington Attorney General's Office. 'We are fighting to stop it.'
The White House and the Justice Department didn't immediately respond to requests for comment.
Trump cited a 'crime emergency' in exercising rarely-used presidential powers to ramp up the federal presence in Washington's local affairs, even though recent data — including from the Justice Department — show sharply declining crime rates.
Tensions between city officials and Attorney General Pam Bondi flared Thursday when DC Mayor Muriel Bowser and Schwalb rejected an order from Bondi that would strip the Metropolitan Police Department's chief of her authority and place the agency under federal control.
Bondi's directive named the head of the Drug Enforcement Administration, Terrence Cole, as 'emergency police commissioner' giving him the full powers of the city's police chief. The missive orders Washington's police leaders to seek Cole's approval before issuing directives, rescinds several department orders and instructs officers to fully enforce laws against blocking streets and occupying public spaces.
In her order, Bondi criticized the city's sanctuary policies for shielding criminals who are in the US illegally 'from the consequences of federal law.' The DC attorney general's lawsuit warned that Bondi's order would upend the command structure of the local police and 'sow chaos among the more than 3,100 officers serving the District, endangering the safety of the public and law enforcement officers alike.'
Washington has a unique relationship with the federal government. Congress passed a law in 1973, known as the Home Rule Act, that empowers the city to elect its own leaders and run its own day-to-day affairs. But the district is still subject to congressional oversight, its local judges are nominated by the president and confirmed by the US Senate, and the US attorney's office handles a large proportion of local prosecutions.
The home rule law includes a section that allows the president to exercise control over the city's police force if 'special conditions of an emergency nature exist.' The takeover can last as many as 30 days, at which point it can only continue if Congress votes to approve the extension.
The president also controls the city's National Guard reserve force, another dynamic that sets it apart from states.
Washington's lawsuit alleged that Trump doesn't have the authority to 'seize command and control over the police force himself,' but can only require the mayor to offer assistance from the police in 'certain emergency circumstances.' The city also argued that Trump's use of rising crime as a reason to assert his authority was so sweeping that it 'would undermine Congress's decision to transfer control for day-to-day governance of the city to locally elected and accountable leaders.'
Bowser supports statehood for the district and has pushed back on Republican calls to repeal the home rule law and federalize the city. Still, she's sought to avoid an aggressively adversarial relationship with the White House during Trump's second term.
Bowser said her administration has complied with the DC Home Rule Act's requirement to provide police services for federal purposes during a declared emergency but added, 'there is no statute that conveys the District's personnel authority to a federal official.'
Schwalb has taken a confrontational approach, releasing a statement calling Trump's actions 'unprecedented, unnecessary, and unlawful.' He sent a letter to Washington Police Chief Pamela Smith dated Aug. 14 saying that in his opinion Bondi's order 'is unlawful, and that you are not legally obligated to follow it.'
--With assistance from Kate Sullivan.
(Updates with details from the complaint.)
Americans Are Getting Priced Out of Homeownership at Record Rates
What Declining Cardboard Box Sales Tell Us About the US Economy
Bessent on Tariffs, Deficits and Embracing Trump's Economic Plan
Dubai's Housing Boom Is Stoking Fears of Another Crash
Twitter's Ex-CEO Is Moving Past His Elon Musk Drama and Starting an AI Company
©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump Wants a Piece of Intel -- And Wall Street Is All Ears
Trump Wants a Piece of Intel -- And Wall Street Is All Ears

Yahoo

time24 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump Wants a Piece of Intel -- And Wall Street Is All Ears

The Trump administration could be gearing up for a bold move: a direct equity stake in Intel (NASDAQ:INTC). According to people familiar with the talks, the potential deal is aimed at reviving Intel's long-delayed factory project in Ohio, once promised to be the largest chipmaking hub in the world. Shares jumped 7.4% to $23.86 on the day of the news and gained as much as another 4% after hours, as the market reacted to the possibility of federal backing. The discussions come just days after President Donald Trump met with Intel's new CEO Lip-Bu Tan, whom he recently criticized for alleged ties to China. While the deal's details are still in fluxand could fall apartany move would signal Tan's job is likely safe for now. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 10 Warning Signs with INTC. This wouldn't be the first time the Trump administration takes a hands-on approach with corporate America. It recently took a 15% cut of certain semiconductor sales to China and secured a golden share in U.S. Steel to help clear a foreign acquisition. Even more surprising? The Pentagon just became the biggest shareholder in MP Materials (NYSE:MP) with a $400 million preferred equity deal. If Intel follows the same playbook, investors could see a blend of equity, guaranteed purchases, and government-led financingsomething the White House sees as a way to crowd in private capital while reassuring markets that the U.S. government has skin in the game. Intel's Ohio site was expected to benefit heavily from the 2022 CHIPS Act, but with funding momentum now uncertain, a direct government stake could change the equation. The factory buildout has already been pushed into the 2030s, and Tan has shifted focus toward stabilizing the company's finances. Earlier this year, one idea floated was to have TSMC (NYSE:TSM) operate Intel's factories under a joint venturebut that plan never advanced. What's unfolding now could become a new chapter in U.S. industrial policy: one where Washington doesn't just regulate or subsidizebut invests, owns, and influences. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Sign in to access your portfolio

Stop anti-Trump judges, it's still the economy, stupid and other commentary
Stop anti-Trump judges, it's still the economy, stupid and other commentary

New York Post

time25 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Stop anti-Trump judges, it's still the economy, stupid and other commentary

From the right: Stop Anti-Trump Judges 'The judiciary's credibility will continue to suffer until elected lawmakers set reliable restraints to thwart Judge [James] Boasberg's next intrigue,' fume The Washington Times' editors. The DC Circuit judge months back took issue with ICE deporting illegal migrants determined to be Tren de Aragua members, and even 'ordered the government to 'turn the planes around' while they were over international waters.' Then, after the Supreme Court in April 'concluded this inferior magistrate had no right to weigh in at all,' he nonetheless 'said he would levy criminal penalties on the administration lawyers who purportedly disobeyed' him. Last week, the DC Circuit Court of Appeals rebuked him, slamming that threat as an abuse of discretion. But 'the judiciary rarely punishes its own wayward members'; it's up to Congress to do something about these out-of-control judges. Liberal: It's Still the Economy, Stupid New data from The Economist/YouGov finds that 'Americans remain deeply pessimistic about the U.S. economy,' warns the Liberal Patriot's John Halpin. We have 'more than 70 percent of Democrats and half of independents' foreseeing 'higher inflation in the next six months,' while 40% of Republicans 'expect inflation to be lower.' Bottom line: 'Like President Biden before him, President Trump and his administration have not yet shown or convinced most Americans (even many of their own partisan voters) that they have a grip on the overall economy and rising costs.' And: 'Until the green shoots on jobs and prices turn into firm growth, expect Americans to remain dour on the economy and willing to punish those in power, of either party.' Harvard prof: Teachers Must Fight AI Overuse His students have 'told me that after relying on AI to draft their papers and emails, their ability to write, speak and conduct basic inquiry is slipping away,' Alex Green reports at The Wall Street Journal. Profs who don't resist 'the rampant overuse of AI' bear the blame. 'Students must gain the ability to synthesize information. They must be able to listen, read, speak and write — so they can express strategic and tactical thinking.' That's what they're losing. 'The human possession of these skills will never become irrelevant if we value life, society and governance. For students to grow into professionals who have those skills, they must first develop them.' But what it'll take for teachers 'to defend that right . . . I do not know.' Foreign desk: The End Is Near for Maduro 'Nicolás Maduro, the dictator of Venezuela, is on the ropes,' cheers Arturo McFields at The Hill. The feds set an unprecedented '$50 million reward' for his capture, and the Pentagon is preparing options for the 'use of military force against drug cartels' with the Maduro-linked Cartel de los Soles already 'designated as a foreign terrorist organization.' Secretary of State Marco Rubio says Venezuela's narco-terrorist state is 'no longer a law enforcement issue' but 'a national security issue.' Good: 'After nearly 25 years of the Chavista regime, the situation in Venezuela is worsening every day. International collaboration is needed to end a tragedy that represents a clear and present danger to Latin America and the U.S.' Libertarian: How to Save Social Security Most Americans 'don't understand how' Social Security works, but happily 'the public gets that there is a problem, and some are open to changes,' notes Reason's J.D. Tuccille. Sadly, some 55% 'think Social Security is supposed to 'largely replace seniors' income after they retire,' '; in fact, it's meant 'to make sure seniors don't fall into poverty.' Most people would be better off diverting 'the money they currently surrender as payroll taxes to retirement savings plans like the 401(k),' and 'younger Americans may be open to the idea,' as they are more likely than Boomers to support cutting benefits over raising taxes. A Social Security program 'that's rightly recognized as a safety net is on its way to replacement by private planning.' — Compiled by The Post Editorial Board

Bolton: No Ukraine, Russia peace deal ‘anywhere in the near future'
Bolton: No Ukraine, Russia peace deal ‘anywhere in the near future'

The Hill

time25 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Bolton: No Ukraine, Russia peace deal ‘anywhere in the near future'

John Bolton, President Trump's former national security advisor, doubled down on his view that the president's summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska will not result in a peace deal. 'I don't think there's a peace deal anywhere in the near future,' Bolton told CNN's Jake Tapper on Friday. 'As long as Putin is advancing on the battlefield, even if it's three yards in a cloud of dust, he's not going to give up anything if he can get away with it,' he added. 'And I think here, I think the White House has lowered expectations precisely for the reason that it's too complicated to handle here.' Trump is meeting with Putin after greeting him at the airport earlier on Friday, shaking hands with the Eastern European leader. Days before the meeting, the White House lowered expectations around the talks, calling the historic meeting a 'listening session' and 'feel-out meeting.' Trump this week also promised European leaders and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky that he would not negotiate giving up any Ukrainian territory with Vladimir Putin. 'They'll be discussed, but I've got to let Ukraine make that decision. And I think they'll make a proper decision. But I'm not here to negotiate for Ukraine. I'm here to get them at a table,' Trump said on Friday about Ukrainian territories. Bolton, in his Friday CNN interview, continued to criticize Trump strategy on the Russia-Ukraine war. 'And I think the real measure of what we do here is to consider the failures of the past three and a half years, to have a strategy on our side to do what was the stated position of every NATO member, the full restoration of Ukrainian sovereignty and territorial integrity,' he said. Bolton previously argued that the meeting is benefiting Russia. Putin's visit to Alaska is first time on U.S. soil since 2015. 'I think Putin has the initiative here, and I think his — what he's going to try to do is show to Trump that he has a peace plan and that it's sincere, even though I don't think it will be,' he said on Wednesday on CNN's 'AC360″ with Anderson Cooper.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store