AIMIM Leader Asaduddin Owaisi Responds To Pakistan's Water Threats With BrahMos Missile Reference
Speaking to a news agency, Owaisi directly addressed Sharif's aggressive statements by highlighting India's possession of the BrahMos missile system and advising the Pakistani leader to refrain from making provocative statements. The AIMIM chief emphasized that such intimidatory tactics would have no impact on India's resolve or policy decisions.
The exchange stems from Sharif's inflammatory remarks made during a ceremony in Islamabad on Tuesday, where he declared that Pakistan's adversaries would not be permitted to seize even a single drop of water belonging to his country. The Pakistani Prime Minister had issued what appeared to be a veiled threat, suggesting that any attempt to interfere with Pakistan's water supply would result in severe consequences for the perpetrator.
India's decision to suspend the Indus Waters Treaty on April 23 came as part of comprehensive punitive measures implemented following a devastating terrorist attack in Jammu and Kashmir's Pahalgam region. The assault, which occurred the previous day, resulted in 26 fatalities and prompted New Delhi to reconsider its water-sharing arrangements with Pakistan.
Sharif's address in Islamabad contained direct warnings to India, stating that any nation threatening to obstruct Pakistan's water flow should remember that they cannot deprive Pakistan of its rightful water resources. He went further to suggest that any such attempt would result in a harsh lesson that would leave the aggressor in a position of regret and submission.
Pakistan has consistently maintained that any effort to block water flow to the country would constitute an act of war, a position that has heightened tensions between the two nuclear-armed neighbors. The water dispute has become yet another flashpoint in the already complex relationship between India and Pakistan.
Owaisi's response represents part of a broader pattern of Indian political leaders responding forcefully to Pakistani provocations. The AIMIM leader has previously criticized Pakistani military leadership for making threatening statements against India, particularly condemning such rhetoric when delivered from foreign soil, which he characterized as particularly objectionable.
The Hyderabad MP had earlier expressed strong disapproval of Pakistani Army Chief Asim Munir's nuclear threats, describing the language used against India as completely unacceptable. He had called for a robust political response from the Indian government beyond standard diplomatic protests, urging authorities to formally lodge complaints and raise the issue with international partners.
This latest exchange follows similar strong reactions from other Indian political figures. BJP leader and actor Mithun Chakraborty had previously issued stern warnings in response to Pakistani Foreign Minister Bilawal Bhutto Zardari's comments about India's planned projects on the Indus river system. Chakraborty suggested that continued provocative statements could result in consecutive missile launches if India's patience was exhausted.
The water dispute centers around allegations that India's infrastructure projects on the Indus river system threaten Pakistan's water security. Bhutto had characterized the diversion of Indus waters as an assault on Pakistani history, culture, and civilization, with particular concern for the Sindh region.
The ongoing tensions over water resources reflect deeper strategic and political divisions between the two countries, with each side viewing water access as a critical national security issue. The suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty marks a significant escalation in India's approach to managing bilateral relations with Pakistan, particularly in the context of cross-border terrorism.
The exchange demonstrates how water resources have become weaponized in the broader geopolitical struggle between India and Pakistan, with both nations invoking military capabilities as part of their diplomatic rhetoric. The situation continues to evolve as both countries maintain hardline positions on their respective water rights and security concerns.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
27 minutes ago
- Hans India
Bihar's electoral overhaul: Balancing integrity and inclusion in India's democracy
The Election Commission of India's (ECI) recent initiative to undertake a Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar has ignited a fervent debate, blending legal imperatives with political undercurrents. Announced in June, this comprehensive exercise, the first of its kind in the state since 2003, aims to update voter lists with July 1, 2025, as the qualifying date. With Bihar's Assembly elections looming later this year, the timing has amplified concerns about potential disenfranchisement, particularly among migrant workers and marginalized communities. Yet, at its core, the SIR represents a statutory effort to safeguard the sanctity of India's democratic process—one that demands a balanced scrutiny of its legal foundations, procedural rigor, and societal impacts. The ECI's authority to conduct such revisions is firmly rooted in the Constitution. Article 324 grants the Commission sweeping powers over the 'superintendence, direction, and control' of elections, including the preparation and maintenance of accurate electoral rolls. This is reinforced by Article 326, which enshrines universal adult suffrage, entitling every Indian citizen aged 18 or above—barring disqualifications like non-residence or criminal convictions—to vote. These provisions underscore a commitment to inclusivity while empowering the ECI to eliminate inaccuracies that could undermine electoral fairness. Parliament has translated these constitutional ideals into actionable law through the Representation of the People Act, 1950. Section 21 of the Act explicitly authorizes the ECI to prepare and revise electoral rolls, a process elaborated in the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960. Under Rule 25, revisions can be intensive, summary, or hybrid, allowing flexibility based on need. An intensive revision, as chosen for Bihar, involves meticulous steps outlined in Rules 4 to 23, including door-to-door enumeration and verification. This ensures thoroughness, requiring enumerators to collect details from households and cross-check against a list of 11 specified documents, such as passports, driving licenses, or ration cards—expanded from seven in previous exercises, which the Supreme Court has noted as a 'voter-friendly' measure. The rationale for reviving an intensive approach after over two decades is straightforward yet profound. Bihar's population has surged, with urbanisation and migration reshaping its demographics. The 2003 revision, the last comprehensive one, predates significant shifts, including the exodus of millions for work opportunities elsewhere. Bogus entries—deceased voters, duplicates, or those who have relocated—persist as a perennial threat, potentially distorting outcomes and violating the 'one person, one vote' principle. The ECI's drive seeks to purge these anomalies while enrolling new voters, especially the youth turning 18. As of July 12, over 74 per cent of Bihar's approximately 7.9 crore electors had submitted enumeration forms, indicating robust participation in the process. This high response rate suggests the exercise is gaining traction, though challenges remain in reaching remote or transient populations. However, SIR has not escaped controversy. Critics, including civil society groups, allege it risks mass exclusion, with reports emerging of draft rolls containing errors like incorrect photographs or entries for deceased individuals. Petitions before the Supreme Court, led by the Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR), claim that around 65 lakh names were omitted from the draft roll without adequate justification, disproportionately affecting migrants, the poor, and minorities. These groups argue that the process violates statutory rights, as voters have a legal entitlement to remain on rolls unless proven ineligible. The exclusion of Aadhaar as a verification document has been praised for broadening options but questioned for its potential to complicate verification in a state where digital access varies. In response, the ECI has emphasised that SIR is a routine purification effort, not a deletion drive. It has assured the Supreme Court that no name will be removed without prior notice, a reasoned order, and appeal rights. The Commission maintains that it is not legally obligated to publish a separate list of excluded voters or reasons for omissions, viewing the draft roll as a provisional document open to corrections. During ongoing hearings, the apex court has sought details on the 2003 revision's methodology, signalling a desire for transparency in historical precedents. Notably, while individual voters have filed thousands of objections, no recognized political party has formally flagged errors in the draft, per ECI reports. This absence of partisan complaints underscores that the controversy may stem more from apprehension than widespread malpractice. The debate extends beyond Bihar, highlighting systemic tensions in India's electoral framework. Similar revisions in other states, like Andhra Pradesh and Telangana in recent years, have faced scrutiny for alleged biases, yet they have ultimately bolstered roll accuracy. The political stakes are high in Bihar: the state's 243 Assembly seats could see shifts if migrant voters—estimated at over two crore—are underrepresented. Demographic data from the 2011 Census, adjusted for growth, reveals that Scheduled Castes and Muslims, often economically vulnerable, form significant voter blocs; any perceived exclusion could erode trust in the system. Objectively, the ECI's actions align with global best practices for electoral hygiene. Countries like the United States and the United Kingdom periodically purge rolls to combat fraud, though with safeguards against voter suppression. In India, the ECI's recent delisting of 334 Registered Unrecognized Political Parties (RUPPs) as part of broader clean-up efforts reflects a proactive stance against electoral malpractices. However, implementation on the ground matters. House-to-house surveys, while thorough, can be susceptible to human error or bias in a polarized environment. Enhancing digital tools, such as the Voter Helpline app, could mitigate this, allowing self-verification and reducing dependency on enumerators. The Supreme Court's observations in related matters offer valuable guidance. In the ADR vs. ECI case on electronic voting machines, the court cautioned against 'blind distrust' that breeds scepticism, urging evidence-based reforms and trust-building through dialogue and transparency. As echoed in Paragraph 37 of that judgment, democracy thrives on harmony among citizens, judiciary, representatives, and electoral bodies. Para 38 expresses hope that the system will reflect the electorate's true mandate. These principles apply aptly here: while the ECI's authority to decide the timing and mode of SIR is exclusive, fostering public confidence requires proactive disclosure and inclusive outreach. Bihar's SIR embodies the delicate balance between electoral purity and inclusivity. Legally sound and procedurally robust, it addresses long-standing flaws in voter lists, yet its success hinges on equitable execution. As petitions unfold in the Supreme Court, stakeholders must prioritize evidence over rhetoric. A transparent, participatory process will not only fortify Bihar's upcoming polls but also reinforce India's democratic resilience. By embracing continuous improvement, as the apex court advocates, we can ensure every eligible voice is heard, unmarred by doubt or exclusion. (The writer is a senior Advocate)
Hans India
27 minutes ago
- Hans India
PM Modi raises pitch for ‘Samriddh Bharat'
New Delhi: Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Friday gave a clarion call for making a "Samriddh Bharat" by becoming self reliant in fields ranging from fighter jet engines to energy and Artificial Intelligence, as he announced a task force for next generation reforms, GST changes as big gift for Diwali, and a state-of-the art defence shield dubbed "sudarshan chakra." Modi's consecutive 12th Independence Day speech was focused on the theme of "aatmanirbharta" (self-reliance) at a time India and the world is facing growing US protectionism, as he highlighted the rising global selfish interest. "We should not waste our energy on shortening the line of any country. We have to make our line longer with full energy. The world will acknowledge our mettle if we can do it. (kisi doosre ki lakeer chhoti karne ke liye apni urja hamein nahin khapaani hai. Hamein poori urja ke saath hamari lakeer ko lamba karaa hai. Hum agar apni lakeer lambi karate hain to duniya bhi hamara loha manegi.)," Modi said in his 103-minute address from the ramparts of Red Fort on the country's 79th Independence Day. Citing his 25 years of experience as the head of a government, he said, "If we choose this path, then no selfish interest will ever be able to entrap us." Modi's longest Independence Day address for any prime minister was peppered with several announcements, including a national deep water exploration mission for self-reliance in energy and a high-powered demography mission to deal with the "serious crisis" of demographic changes effected by infiltrators. His sweeping call for "swadeshi" (Made in India), self-reliance and innovation in a gamut of sectors, including semiconductors, social media, fertiliser and pharma, came amid a strain in the country's ties with the US, with President Donald Trump doubling tariffs on Indian imports to a whopping 50 per cent after singling out India for purchase of Russian oil to pressure it on trade. Sporting a saffron turban, Modi, however, made no direct reference to the issue as he doubled down on his emphasis on self-reliance and "swadeshi". The task force on reforms will make time-bound recommendations for adapting India to become developed by 2047, he said. "It is the call of the hour that we need not fret in the times of crisis but should work to improve our abilities and accomplishments," he said. Indian manufacturers' mantra should be "daam kam, dum jyada" (less price, better quality), he added. India can do it, he said noting that toy producers have begun exporting after he had in a 'Mann ki Baat' episode called for boosting domestic production and the need for stopping their import. The prime minister likened his call for "Samriddh Bharat" (prosperous India) to the freedom fighters' goal of "Swatantra Bharat" (independent India).
Mint
27 minutes ago
- Mint
Trump-Putin meeting to GST reforms: How Indian stock market may react on Monday? EXPLAINED
Trump-Putin meeting: The most-awaited three-on-three Trump-Putin meeting ended in Alaska on Friday with a hope that the next round of meetings will be held in Moscow soon. However, the US President Donald Trump didn't walk out of the meeting as he had vowed ahead of the meeting, which signals development in the bid for a ceasefire in the Russia-Ukraine war. Apart from this, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi's announcement of GST reforms from the Red Fort in his Independence Day speech may also work as a positive domestic trigger for the Indian stock market. According to stock market experts, ice has been broken in the US-Russia bilateral relations as both global leaders (Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump) vowed to sit for another round of meetings. They said Donald Trump promised to leave the meeting if he didn't like Putin's approach. However, after the end of the Trump-Putin meeting, both leaders talked positively, which signals 'progress but no deal'. When it opens on Monday, they said the Trump-Putin meeting outcome is expected to be respected by the global markets, including Dalal Street. They also expected a positive response to the GST reforms that Narendra Modi announced in his 15th August speech on Friday. They predicted a positive opening on Dalal Street but doubt the Nifty 50 could break above the 24,800 hurdle. Decoding the outcome of the Trump-Putin meeting, Avinash Gorakshkar, a SEBI-registered fundamental analyst, said, "The most-awaited Trump-Putin meeting has ended with progress without any deal. Both leaders agreed to meet for the next round of talks, which is a good sign in bringing an end to the Russia-Ukraine war. Ahead of the meeting, the US President had vowed to walk out of the meeting if he didn't like Russian President Vladimir Putin's line of approach. However, after the end of the Trump-Putin meeting, both leaders talked positively, which may be a positive trigger for the global markets, including the Indian stock market." However, Gorakshkar maintained that there was no development on Trump's tariffs, and the fear of US tariffs is still around. Pointing towards the GST reforms announced by Narendra Modi in his Independence Day speech, Anuj Gupta, Director at Ya Wealth, said, "The Indian stock market has already discounted Trump's tariff, and any further negative could have happened if the Trump-Putin meeting had failed. However, in this 'progress with no deal' situation, the market is expected to remain unaffected by no big breakthrough on Trump's tariffs. However, a big domestic trigger is the GST reforms, which Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced in his Independence Day speech. This is expected to enable bulls to outshine bears on Monday, and we may see a positive opening when trading resumes on Dalal Street after a gap of three days." Advising investors to look at domestic consumption-driven segments, Dr VK Vijayakumar, Chief Investment Strategist at Geojit Investments Limited, said, "Domestic consumption-driven sectors like banking and finance, telecom, aviation, capital goods, hotels, FMCG, and cement will not be impacted by Trump's tariffs. But it is important that investors choose stocks that are fairly valued in these segments." On why Trump's tariff may not be a significant factor in the near-term, Gaurav Goel, Founder & Director at Fynocrat Technologies, said, "One reason for the market's stability is the strong and steady support from domestic institutional investors. They have been putting large amounts of money into Indian equities, acting as a cushion against external shocks. In May, DIIs bought ₹ 67,642 crore worth of stocks, in June ₹ 72,673 crore, in July ₹ 60,939 crore, and in August ₹ 51,899 crore. With this level of consistent buying, the market is finding the strength to stay stable." "Another factor is the strength and diversity of the Indian economy. Our growth does not rely on any single export market. Domestic consumption, services, manufacturing, and technology create a broad base that cannot be easily shaken by a single policy decision abroad. Even if the full set of proposed tariffs comes into effect, experts estimate the impact on India's GDP to be less than 0.2 per cent. This is a reminder of how small this challenge is in the context of our overall economy," Goel added. However, market experts maintained that Monday's upside would be limited, and the Nifty 50 index may not be able to break the 24,800 hurdle. "The Indian stock market may have a positive opening on Monday, but the rise will be limited and the Nifty 50 index may find it tough to break above the 24,800 hurdle," Avinash Gorakshkar said. Disclaimer: This story is for educational purposes only. The views and recommendations above are those of individual analysts or broking companies, not Mint. We advise investors to check with certified experts before making any investment decisions.
