Texas Cops Seized Photographs From a Museum and Launched Child Pornography Investigation
"It's shameful that government officials would use the criminal legal process to censor art and expression," Adriana Piñon the legal director of the ACLU of Texas said in a Wednesday statement. "This is a clear violation of the First Amendment and of the guardrails against abuse of the criminal justice system. Artistic expression should not be subject to the whim and punishment of government officials' personal taste."
Mann's photos were being exhibited at The Modern Art Museum of Forth Worth, as part of an exhibit called "Diaries of Home," which featured photographs from female and nonbinary artists that "probe preconceptions about domestic, familial, and communal spaces in the United States, which are often considered feminine spheres."
Intimate Family contains 13 photos depicting children in the nude. Some of the images displayed at the museum included "depictions of Mann's daughter jumping onto a picnic table in a ballet pose, Mann's daughter lying in bed with a stain from a nighttime accident, and Mann's son with a melted popsicle running down his body," according to the ACLU's press release.
The exhibit went up in November 2024 and was quickly met with controversy. In December 2024, Tarrant County Judge Tim O'Hare told The Dallas Express that the photos "should be taken down immediately and investigated by law enforcement for any and all potential criminal violations." State Rep. David Lowe (R–North Richland Hills) also told the paper "it is crucial that our legal framework leaves no room for predators to misuse the realm of art to display child nudity." In early January, the Forth Worth Report reported that four images had been seized and were now subject to an investigation. Weeks later, the images were still being held in a police storage facility.
"The images of children reported in the media at the Modern Art Museum of Fort Worth are deeply disturbing," O'Hare posted on X in January. "Sexual exploitation of a minor, including under the guise of 'art,' should never be tolerated. I have full confidence in law enforcement to thoroughly investigate this matter and take appropriate action. I will always be committed to protecting the most vulnerable members of society, our children."
The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), the National Coalition Against Censorship (NCAC), and the ACLU of Texas teamed up to send a letter to the Fort Worth Police Department demanding that the investigation be stopped and the photos returned.
"The Supreme Court has expressly rejected the suggestion that every depiction of nudity appeals to the prurient interest. Mann's images are not sexualized," the letter reads. "Like much art, the images' meaning may be ambiguous or controversial, there is no question they are intended to provoke thought and challenge viewers to engage with ideas, not to satisfy their sexual desires."
The letter also highlighted the clearly censorious nature of the police's decision to remove the photos from the museum. "It is hard to escape the conclusion that the Fort Worth Police Department seized the photos— removing them from the exhibit for the back half of its duration—at least in part to block their exhibition. Seizing the works was not necessary to preserve them as evidence, as the police could have easily accessed them online or photographed them in the museum. And the seizure came on the heels of complaints about the art by local officials and politicians," the letter reads. "Courts do not look kindly on bad-faith prosecutions that target artistic expression under the guise of combatting child pornography."
The post Texas Cops Seized Photographs From a Museum and Launched Child Pornography Investigation appeared first on Reason.com.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Texas judge blocks Ten Commandments in public schools with epic ruling that quotes Sonny & Cher, Kurt Vonnegut and Billy Graham
A federal judge in Texas has temporarily blocked state law requiring the Ten Commandments in every public school classroom, setting up a possible Supreme Court showdown after several Republican-led states have tried, and failed, to implement similar laws. The Texas law, which was set to take effect September 1, likely violates the First Amendment's prohibitions against government interference and endorsement of religion, according to Tuesday's order from District Judge Fred Biery. His colorful 55-page ruling quotes from Sonny & Cher, Greta Garbo and Kurt Vonnegut as well as Supreme Court rulings, historians and prominent faith leaders, from Billy Graham and Pat Robertson to the Buddha. 'Ultimately, in matters of conscience, faith, beliefs and the soul, most people are Garbo-esque,' he wrote, referencing her line 'I want to be alone' from the film Grand Hotel. 'They just want to be left alone, neither proselytized nor ostracized, including what occurs to their children in government-run schools.' Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton will appeal, his office told The Independent. Under legislation approved by Texas lawmakers and signed into law by Governor Greg Abbott earlier this year, all public elementary or secondary schools must 'display in a conspicuous place in each classroom of the school a durable poster or framed copy of the Ten Commandments.' A lawsuit was filed by a group of Texas families with Christian, Jewish, Hindu, Unitarian Universalist, and nonreligious backgrounds, including clergy, with children in public schools. The judge agreed with plaintiffs that those displays 'are likely to pressure' children 'into religious observance, meditation on, veneration, and adoption' of the state's favored religious doctrine while 'suppressing expression of their own religious or nonreligious background and beliefs,' according to the judge. Biety also agreed that 'these matters of individual conscience and the soul should be free of government interference and coercion.' The Ten Commandment won't necessarily be taught in schools, but 'the captive audience of students likely would have questions, which teachers would feel compelled to answer,' according to the judge. 'Teenage boys, being the curious hormonally driven creatures they are, might ask: 'Mrs. Walker, I know about lying and I love my parents, but how do I do adultery?'' the judge wrote. 'Truly an awkward moment for overworked and underpaid educators, who already have to deal with sex education issues … and a classic example of the law of unintended consequences in legislative edicts.' Biety's ruling — which traces the history of religious observation and persecution— asks whether that 'violent history gives rise to the question: 'Haven't we evolved?''' 'Other than size and longevity, the answer clearly is: 'Of course not,'' he wrote, adding 'The Beat Goes On' — with a footnote referencing the song from Sonny & Cher. He notes that 'those who immigrated to Texas were neither the first nor the last group to come to America in search of freedom from government-controlled religion,' pointing to a long line of state-imposed persecution. 'So it goes,' he wrote — with another footnote referencing Vonnegut's Slaughterhouse-Five. Rabbi Mara Nathan, the lead plaintiff in the case, said in a statement that 'children's religious beliefs should be instilled by parents and faith communities, not politicians and public schools.' Heather L. Weaver, senior counsel for the ACLU's Program on Freedom of Religion and Belief, said the ruling 'ensures that our clients' schools will remain spaces where all students, regardless of their faith, feel welcomed and can learn without worrying that they do not live up to the state's preferred religious beliefs.' In his conclusion, the judge offered an olive branch to his critics. 'For those who disagree with the Court's decision and who would do so with threats, vulgarities and violence, Grace and Peace unto you,' he wrote. 'May humankind of all faiths, beliefs and non-beliefs be reconciled one to another. Amen.' In a statement to The Independent, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said 'the Ten Commandments are a cornerstone of our moral and legal heritage, and their presence in classrooms serves as a reminder of the values that guide responsible citizenship.' 'Texas will always defend our right to uphold the foundational principles that have built this nation, and I will absolutely be appealing this flawed decision,' he added. Lawmakers in Arkansas have advanced similar legislation, and Oklahoma's chief school officials mandated copies of the Bible and Ten Commandments in all classrooms with 'immediate and strict compliance.' Last year, District Judge John Wheadon deGravelles paused a similar Louisiana law that had swiftly drawn legal challenges from civil rights groups anticipating a Supreme Court battle. Legislation to incorporate Christian teachings in public schools joins a nationwide effort from conservative special interest groups to move public funds into religious education, dovetailing with efforts by Donald Trump's administration and across the country to let families use taxpayer funds to send their children to private schools. Earlier this year, the Supreme Court reached a surprise tie in a case that could decide whether Oklahoma could open the first-ever taxpayer funded Catholic public charter school, which triggered a high-profile legal battle to decide whether public funds can be used to create religious schools — setting up a major test to the First Amendment's establishment clause. The 4-4 decision, from which Justice Amy Coney Barrett recused herself, upheld a lower-court ruling that effectively blocked the school's opening — for now. Solve the daily Crossword
Los Angeles Times
35 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Texas can't put the Ten Commandments in certain school districts' classrooms, judge says
Texas cannot require public schools in Houston, Austin and other select districts to display the Ten Commandments in every classroom, a judge said Wednesday in a temporary ruling against the state's new requirement. Texas is the third state where courts have blocked recent laws about putting the Ten Commandments in schools. A group of families from the school districts sought a preliminary injunction against the law, which goes into effect Sept. 1. They say the requirement violates the 1st Amendment's protections for the separation of church and state and the right to free religious exercise. Texas is the largest state to attempt such a requirement, and U.S. District Judge Fred Biery's ruling from San Antonio is the latest in a widening legal fight that's expected to eventually go before the U.S. Supreme Court. 'Even though the Ten Commandments would not be affirmatively taught, the captive audience of students likely would have questions, which teachers would feel compelled to answer. That is what they do,' Biery, who was appointed by President Clinton, wrote in the ruling that begins by quoting the 1st Amendment and ends with 'Amen.' The ruling prohibits the 11 districts and their affiliates from posting the displays required under state law. The law is being challenged by a group of Christian, Jewish, Hindu, Unitarian Universalist and nonreligious families, as well as clergy, who have children in the public schools. A broader lawsuit that names three Dallas-area districts as well as the state education agency and commissioner is pending in federal court. And although the ruling marks a major win for civil liberty groups, the legal battle is probably far from over. Texas Atty. Gen. Ken Paxton said he planned to appeal the ruling, calling it 'flawed.' 'The Ten Commandments are a cornerstone of our moral and legal heritage, and their presence in classrooms serves as a reminder of the values that guide responsible citizenship,' the Republican said in a statement, echoing sentiments from religious groups and conservatives who support the law. Texas has a Ten Commandments monument on the Capitol grounds and won a 2005 Supreme Court case that upheld the monument. The families who sued were represented by the American Civil Liberties Union, Americans United for the Separation of Church and State and the Freedom from Religion Foundation. 'The court affirmed what we have long said: Public schools are for educating, not evangelizing,' Tommy Buser-Clancy, senior staff attorney at the ACLU of Texas, said in a statement. A federal appeals court has blocked a similar law in Louisiana. A judge in Arkansas told four districts they cannot put up the posters, and other districts in the state said they're not putting them up either. In Louisiana, the first state that mandated the Ten Commandments be displayed in classrooms, a panel of three appellate judges in June ruled that the law was unconstitutional. Biery, the judge, cited both the Louisiana and Arkansas cases in his 55-page ruling. He also includes extensive historical references, quotes that range from the founding fathers to evangelist Billy Graham, and even a Rembrandt painting of Moses holding the stone tablets, alongside an image of actor Charlton Heston in the film 'The Ten Commandments.' Having the displays in classrooms, Biery wrote, would probably pressure children of the parents challenging them into adopting the state's preferred religion and suppressing their own religious beliefs. The judge said there are ways students could be taught the Ten Commandments' history without it being placed in every classroom. 'For those who disagree with the Court's decision and who would do so with threats, vulgarities and violence, Grace and Peace unto you,' he wrote. 'May humankind of all faiths, beliefs and non-beliefs be reconciled one to another.' DeMillo writes for the Associated Press.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Adams joins legal fight over ICE courthouse arrests
(The Center Square) — New York City Mayor Eric Adams has joined a legal challenge against the Trump administration's policy of arresting undocumented immigrants at city courthouses. The city's Legal Department has filed a legal brief in support of a lawsuit by the American Civil Liberties Union and other groups that asks a federal judge to block Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials from detaining immigrants who show up for scheduled hearings at a Lower Manhattan federal immigration building. Adams, a Democrat who has been criticized for backing Trump administration immigration policies, called the arrests "illegal" and said they have driven many "law-abiding" immigrants to avoid courts, the police and other basic city services for fear of detention. "From my first days as a rookie cop to my current role as mayor of New York City, my job is, and has always been, to keep law-abiding New Yorkers safe," Adams said in a statement. "We should allow New Yorkers to feel secure to attend legal proceedings in their pursuit to obtain legal status." Immigration enforcement actions in courthouses have been a flashpoint in pushback by Democrats and civil liberty groups to Trump's administration's immigration enforcement. To enter America from another country, if not a U.S. citizen, a visa or some other travel authorization is required to be presented at a port of entry. Advocates, court officials and even some judges have been accused of resisting attempts by ICE to apprehend suspects who show up for court hearings. New York City Comptroller Brad Lander, a Democrat who was then seeking the Democratic nomination to run for mayor, was arrested in June for allegedly assaulting a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent who was attempting to take an undocumented immigrant in a New York City courthouse into custody. He was let go when Democratic New York Gov. Kathy Hochul showed up at the ICE detention facility to demand his release. The Justice Department sued New York state in February over a state law that limits state cooperation with federal immigration authorities and again in June over the Protect Our Courts Act, which the DOJ said "shields dangerous aliens from being lawfully detained" and violates the Constitution by obstructing federal immigration operations. Those cases are still pending. In another lawsuit, the DOJ took New York City to federal court in July over its "sanctuary" policies that restrict cooperation with federal immigration crackdowns, accusing the city of shielding wanted criminals from deportation.
