
Investors shun long-term US bonds as hopes for aggressive Fed rate cuts fade
NEW YORK, June 16 (Reuters) - Bond investors, anticipating the Federal Reserve will hold interest rates steady again this week, are moving away from longer-dated Treasuries as they temper expectations for an aggressive easing given the lower chance of a U.S. recession.
Their flight away from the long end of the curve also reflects worries about President Donald Trump's tax and spending bill, which is being considered by the U.S. Senate.
On Wednesday, the U.S. central bank's policy-setting Federal Open Market Committee is widely expected to keep its benchmark overnight interest rate in the 4.25%-4.50% range at the end of a two-day meeting, as it tries to grapple with a mercurial Trump administration trade policy that could still boost inflation in the second half of the year.
But soft consumer and producer price readings in May, which so far have yet to show the effects of higher tariffs on inflation, have fanned expectations that the Fed could resume cutting rates soon.
Futures tracking the Fed's policy rate show higher odds that the central bank will deliver a pair of back-to-back rate cuts starting in September. Before the release of the latest inflation numbers, the market had priced in a cut in September followed by another one in December.
The Fed reduced rates three times in 2024 before pausing its easing cycle early this year.
"I don't necessarily want to go long duration," said Victoria Fernandez, chief market strategist and fixed income portfolio manager at Crossmark Global Investments in Houston.
While traders are betting the Fed's next rate cut will happen at its July or September meetings, Fernandez said she could see it happening "toward the very end of the year or even into next year."
Duration, expressed in number of years, shows how far the bond's value will fall or rise when interest rates move. In general, when rates fall, higher-duration bonds experience a greater increase in value compared to those with lower duration.
Long-duration bets typically involve buying assets on the back end of the curve on expectations of a decline in yields.
"There's a reason long rates (30-year Treasuries) are moving toward 5%, and that is because there's significant pressure in selling duration," said Neil Aggarwal, head of securitized products and portfolio manager at Reams Asset Management in Indianapolis.
"There are near-term concerns about volatility and from a short-term basis if you expect volatility to persist, it's difficult being long duration."
Thirty-year bond auctions were not well-received during the Treasury sales in April and May, amplifying the market's reticence about holding longer-dated debt. The long bond did see strong demand at last week's auction, helped in part by the rise in 30-year yields and easing volatility in the sector.
Positioning based on the latest J.P. Morgan Treasury Client Survey and active core bond fund indexes also suggested that long-duration positions have declined over the past two months.
Analysts said part of that move could be attributed to diminished expectations of a U.S. recession, which briefly increased in April following Trump's imposition of tariffs on imported products from around the world. Trump has since walked back most of the tariffs even as the U.S. and China affirmed a trade deal.
Goldman Sachs, for instance, last week trimmed its view of the probability of a U.S. recession in the next 12 months to 30% from 35% on easing uncertainty around Trump's tariff policies.
Trump's "One Big Beautiful Bill Act," which passed the U.S. House of Representatives and is being debated in the Senate, is likely to increase the deficit by $2.4 trillion over the next decade, Congressional Budget Office estimates showed, coming at a time when the U.S. debt as a share of gross domestic product has surged. Tariff revenue, however, should offset some of the deficit impact of the tax and spending bill, analysts said.
The prospect of even bigger deficits has added to concerns about the back end of the curve.
"There is a legitimate argument to expect steeper government curves in this cycle," said Danny Zaid, portfolio manager at TwentyFour Asset Management in New York.
Yield curve "steepeners" have been a popular trade since the Fed embarked on its easing cycle in late 2024. The strategy involves bullish bets on short-dated Treasuries, while reducing longer-dated exposure, which pushes yields on longer-dated Treasuries higher than short-term maturities.
"As investors, you should demand more compensation to fund a government that has a 120% debt-to-GDP ratio than a government that has 70% debt to GDP," Zaid said.
Investors are compensated with a higher yield for taking risk over a longer period.
"We think the curve can steepen some more," said Brendan Murphy, head of fixed income for North America at Insight Investment in Boston, referring to the five- to 30-year yield curve.
"We are overweight duration but concentrated more on the front end relative to the back end and more cautious about that 30-year part of the curve primarily due to uncertainty around the fiscal expansion and the potential for inflation to pick up due to some of this tariff policy."
Investors on Wednesday will also focus on the release of updated quarterly economic projections from Fed policymakers, including rate forecasts, which are issued in a chart known as the "dot plot" that reflects how much easing is expected. The "dots" from the March meeting showed a policy rate of 3.75%-4.00% by the end of 2025, or two quarter-percentage-point cuts.
Bond investors do not expect any changes to the Fed's policy rate forecast.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
17 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Trump Organization unveils $499 gold phone raising new concerns on conflicts of interest
Donald Trump has launched a mobile phone service and $499 gold smartphone, the latest monetization of his presidency by a family business empire now run by his sons. The Trump Organization unveiled Trump Mobile on Monday with a $47.45 monthly plan – both the service name and price referencing Trump as the 47th president. The company will also sell a gold-cased 'T1' smartphone in September etched with the American flag. The venture will be headed by his sons Donald Jr and Eric Trump, who took over the company after Trump transitioned to his second presidency. The mobile service joins Trump-branded watches, sneakers and Bibles as products capitalizing on his political brand, with the Trump sons indicating that more is to come. 'We are going to be introducing an entire package of products where people can come and they can get telemedicine on their phones for one flat monthly fee, roadside assistance on their cars, unlimited texting to 100 countries around the world,' Donald Trump Jr said at the Monday morning announcement at Trump Tower in New York. The news coincided with the 10-year anniversary of Trump's 2016 presidential campaign launch when he famously came down the escalator, and as the family business expands from real estate into digital media and telecommunications. The venture will operate through licensing deals that generated over $8m for the president in 2024, according to financial disclosures from Friday. The foray into phones raises new questions about conflicts of interest, with the president's family business entering a sector heavily regulated by federal agencies while Trump wields executive power over them. It creates a particularly difficult situation for Federal Communications Commission chairman Brendan Carr, who must now oversee regulatory matters affecting a network bearing his boss's name. The T1 smartphone runs Android 15 with mid-range specifications including a 6.8-inch display, 50MP camera and 5000mAh battery. At $499 it costs a third of the price of flagship iPhones, but appears to be marketed as a luxury device because of its gold casing. Notably, the T1 brings back the headphone jack, a feature largely abandoned by smartphone manufacturers over the years. On its website, Trump Mobile claims coverage matching major carriers Verizon, AT&T and T-Mobile, which collectively hold control of nearly the entire wireless market in the US. The smartphone market represents a challenging sector for new entrants, as Apple and Samsung – which are manufactured overseas primarily in China, Vietnam and India – dominate sales in America, according to research by Counterpoint from May.


Reuters
19 minutes ago
- Reuters
All US state attorneys general agree to $7.4 billion Purdue Pharma settlement
June 16 (Reuters) - The attorneys general of all 50 U.S. states, Washington, D.C. and four U.S. territories have agreed to a $7.4 billion settlement with bankrupt drugmaker Purdue Pharma, New Jersey Attorney General Matthew Platkin said on Monday. Purdue's payment is intended to resolve thousands of lawsuits alleging that its pain medication OxyContin caused a nationwide opioid addiction crisis. Platkin said members of the Sackler family, who own Purdue, have confirmed their plan to proceed with the settlement.


Reuters
44 minutes ago
- Reuters
Duracell sues Energizer over battery life claims
NEW YORK, June 16 (Reuters) - Duracell has sued Energizer, accusing its rival of misleading consumers in a nationwide TV and online ad campaign about whose alkaline batteries last longer. In a complaint filed in Manhattan federal court, Duracell, owned by Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway (BRKa.N), opens new tab, said it has suffered irreparable harm and lost customer goodwill from Energizer MAX ads featuring Energizer's (ENR.N), opens new tab sunglasses-clad, drum-beating pink bunny. Duracell objected to claims that Energizer MAX outlasts Duracell Power Boost batteries by 10%, "beats" Duracell, is "proven to last longer," and "Lasts longer. 'Nuff said." It said Energizer based those claims solely on a comparison of AA batteries under the nonprofit American National Standards Institute's personal grooming standard. The claims "necessarily imply the false message that Energizer MAX batteries outlast all Duracell batteries," and represent "a clear effort by Energizer to expand its market share--at Duracell's expense," Duracell said. Energizer did not immediately respond on Monday to requests for comment. The complaint was filed on Friday night. Duracell accused Energizer of false advertising under federal and New York unfair competition laws. It is seeking unspecified compensatory and punitive damages, including lost profits, and an injunction requiring "corrective advertising." Duracell is based in Chicago, and Energizer in St. Louis. The companies have battled in court before. In 2019 and 2020, Duracell and Energizer sued each other in the Manhattan court over performance claims in ads for Duracell Optimum and Energizer MAX batteries. Both lawsuits were resolved and voluntarily dismissed in December 2020. The case is Duracell US Operations Inc v Energizer Brands LLC, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 25-05020.