'Hate and outrage' over Maradona death mistrial ruling
'Hate and outrage' over Maradona death mistrial ruling
Julieta Makintach, one of three judges presiding over the Maradona case, is said to have potentially broken a string of ethics rules. Photo: AFP
After weeks of hearings and testimony from over 40 witnesses, an Argentine court has nullified the trial of late football legend Diego Maradona's medical team due to a scandal over a TV miniseries.
A new trial will have to start from scratch, with three new judges, in a case already long delayed into Maradona's death in 2020, allegedly due to medical negligence.
Judge Julieta Makintach was forced to step down from the case, which began on March 11, this week after it emerged she had been involved in a documentary miniseries about the case, potentially breaking a string of ethics rules.
Her colleague, Maximiliano Savarino, annulled the trial on Thursday, saying Makintach's behavior had "caused prejudice" to proceedings that have already heard hours of painful, sometimes tearful, testimony from witnesses, including Maradona's children.
"I am not calm. I am angry. I hate them!" the footballer's daughter Jana Maradona said outside the court on Thursday.
Ex-partner Veronica Ojeda described the events as "outrageous".
But she added: "if I have to do it [testify] a thousand times more, I will."
Maradona – considered one of the world's greatest ever players – died in November 2020 at the age of 60 while recovering from brain surgery.
He was found to have died of heart failure and acute pulmonary edema – a condition where fluid accumulates in the lungs – two weeks after going under the knife.
His seven-strong medical team is on trial over the conditions of his home convalescence, described by prosecutors as grossly negligent.
No date has been set for the new trial, but the prosecution has said it hopes for a restart this year. (AFP)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTHK
a day ago
- RTHK
'Hate and outrage' over Maradona death mistrial ruling
'Hate and outrage' over Maradona death mistrial ruling Julieta Makintach, one of three judges presiding over the Maradona case, is said to have potentially broken a string of ethics rules. Photo: AFP After weeks of hearings and testimony from over 40 witnesses, an Argentine court has nullified the trial of late football legend Diego Maradona's medical team due to a scandal over a TV miniseries. A new trial will have to start from scratch, with three new judges, in a case already long delayed into Maradona's death in 2020, allegedly due to medical negligence. Judge Julieta Makintach was forced to step down from the case, which began on March 11, this week after it emerged she had been involved in a documentary miniseries about the case, potentially breaking a string of ethics rules. Her colleague, Maximiliano Savarino, annulled the trial on Thursday, saying Makintach's behavior had "caused prejudice" to proceedings that have already heard hours of painful, sometimes tearful, testimony from witnesses, including Maradona's children. "I am not calm. I am angry. I hate them!" the footballer's daughter Jana Maradona said outside the court on Thursday. Ex-partner Veronica Ojeda described the events as "outrageous". But she added: "if I have to do it [testify] a thousand times more, I will." Maradona – considered one of the world's greatest ever players – died in November 2020 at the age of 60 while recovering from brain surgery. He was found to have died of heart failure and acute pulmonary edema – a condition where fluid accumulates in the lungs – two weeks after going under the knife. His seven-strong medical team is on trial over the conditions of his home convalescence, described by prosecutors as grossly negligent. No date has been set for the new trial, but the prosecution has said it hopes for a restart this year. (AFP)
RTHK
a day ago
- RTHK
Ex-Goldman Sachs banker gets two years over 1MDB theft
Ex-Goldman Sachs banker gets two years over 1MDB theft Former Goldman Sachs chief of southeast Asia operations, Timothy Leissner, arrives at the US District Court for Eastern District of New York for his sentencing. Photo: AFP A former Goldman Sachs banker has been sentenced to two years in US federal prison for his role in a US$4.5 billion scheme to ransack a Malaysian state investment fund. Tim Leissner, at his sentencing in Brooklyn federal court on Thursday, apologised to the people of Malaysia, who he called the 'real victims' of the scheme. 'The funds raised more than a decade ago could have profoundly benefited the nation and its citizens,' he said in a statement read in court and provided by his lawyers. 'Instead, due to my greed – and the greed of those involved alongside me – they were misappropriated.' Prosecutors said Leissner and other Goldman Sachs bankers helped the Malaysian investment fund known as 1MBD, or the 1Malaysia Development Berhad state fund, raise US$6.5 billion through bond sales. But they say more than US$4.5 billion of the funds were stolen and laundered through bribes and kickbacks. The spoils bankrolled extravagant purchases, from wild parties to lavish spending on jewels, art, a superyacht and luxury real estate, prosecutors have said. They also helped finance the 2013 Martin Scorsese film 'The Wolf of Wall Street' that starred Leonardo DiCaprio. The scandal led to the fall of Malaysian prime minister Najib Razak's government in 2018. Najib was later convicted by a Malaysian court of abuse of power and other crimes related to the scandal and sentenced to 12 years in prison. Leissner had pleaded guilty in 2018 to bribing government officials in Malaysia and Abu Dhabi. He served as a key government witness in the trial of Roger Ng, a fellow former Goldman Sachs banker who was sentenced in 2023 to 10 years in federal prison. (AP)
RTHK
a day ago
- RTHK
Smokey Robinson counter-sues against rape allegations
Smokey Robinson counter-sues against rape allegations Smokey Robinson and his wife Frances at a pre-Grammy gala in Beverly Hills, California, in 2023. File photo: AFP American singer Smokey Robinson has filed a defamation lawsuit against four former housekeepers who accused him of rape and prompted a police investigation. Robinson and his wife, Frances Robinson, filed the counterclaim on Wednesday in Los Angeles Superior Court against the women and their lawyers, whose allegations, they say, were 'fabricated in an extortionate scheme'. The filing is a fast and forceful legal and public pushback from the 85-year-old Motown music luminary in response to the women's May 6 lawsuit and a May 15 announcement from the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department that its special victims bureau is 'actively investigating criminal allegations' against Robinson. The Robinsons also filed a motion to strike the women's lawsuit. The women are seeking at least US$50 million, alleging Smokey Robinson repeatedly raped and sexually assaulted them in his home when they worked for him between 2007 and 2024. They said Frances Robinson, a co-defendant, enabled him and created an abusive workplace. The counterclaim opens with friendly text messages from the women to contradict their claims against Robinson, whose songs, including 'Tears of a Clown' and 'The Tracks of My Tears," established him among the biggest hitmakers of the 1960s. The filing says the women 'stayed with the Robinsons year after year,' vacationed with them, celebrated holidays with them, exchanged gifts with them, asked for tickets to his concerts, and sought and received help from them, including money for dental surgery, financial support for a disabled family member and 'even a car'. The filing - which includes photos from the vacations and gatherings as exhibits – says that despite the couple's generosity, the women 'secretly harboured resentment for the Robinsons and sought to enrich themselves through the Robinsons' wealth'. John Harris and Herbert Hayden, attorneys for the former housekeepers, said the defamation lawsuit 'is nothing more than an attempt to silence and intimidate the survivors of Mr Robinson's sexual battery and assault. It is a baseless and vindictive legal manoeuvre designed to re-victimise, shift blame and discourage others from coming forward'. The lawyers said they intend to get the Robinsons' lawsuit thrown out by invoking California's laws against using the courts to silence and intimidate people who sue. The four women, whose names are withheld in their lawsuit, each allege that Robinson would wait until they were alone with him in his Los Angeles house and then sexually assault and rape them. One woman said she was assaulted at least 20 times while working for Robinson from 2012 until 2024. Another said she worked for him from 2014 until 2020 and was assaulted at least 23 times. (AP)
