It's marrow wars! Jeremy Corbyn battles Angela Rayner over Labour's sell-off of England's allotments
The former Labour leader accused the Deputy Prime Minister of putting 'the nail in the coffin' for the 'precious' community spaces.
Mr Corbyn, the MP for Islington North who has launched a new left-wing party to rival Labour, is a keen gardener and uses an allotment near his north London home.
He has gone to war with Ms Rayner after it was revealed the Deputy PM had agreed for eight allotment sites across England to be sold since last year's general election.
The veteran politician lashed out at Ms Rayner, who is also the Housing, Communities and Local Government Secretary, for approving the slew of allotment sales.
So-called 'statutory' allotment sites owned by local councils are protected from development or sale under the Allotment Act 1925, except with ministerial sign-off.
In an article for The Telegraph, Mr Corbyn - who has previously descibed marrows as his favourite vegetable - wrote: 'News that Angela Rayner may approve allotment sales will fill many with deep dismay.
'Allotments have always been under threat from developers. Now, that threat seems to have Government backing, which makes the future of these precious spaces even more perilous.'
Mr Corbyn said the popularity of allotments had 'grown out of opposition to enclosures and the privatisation of common land' in previous centuries.
He also noted how there are 'at least 100,000 people' on waiting lists for allotments across the country.
'Once lost, they never return,' he added. 'Their loss makes us all poorer, as we become more and more detached from how food is grown and how nature interacts with us.
'Allotments provide a vital space for community cohesion, biodiversity and social solidarity.
'These parcels of land, that cannot be individually fenced, provide growing space for many people.
'Many people have no access to their own garden, and an allotment gives them the opportunity to grow vegetables and fruit and observe nature.
'Allotments are particularly important for people who experience stress and mental health problems.'
Mr Corbyn acknowledged that 'social housing is desperately needed' as Ms Rayner attempts to fulfil Labour's pledge to build 1.5million new homes within five years.
But he warned: 'We need not sacrifice these vital green spaces to build it.
'Is this Government going to put the nail in the coffin of the joy of digging ground for potatoes on a cold, wet February Sunday afternoon? The battle for the grass roots is on!'
Mr Corbyn's attack on the Government comes after his recent launch of a new party, temporarily known as 'Your Party', with fellow ex-Labour MP Zarah Sultana.
Ms Rayner was recently revealed to have approved the sale of allotments in Somerset, Oxfordshire, Hertfordshire, Nottinghamshire, West Sussex, Derbyshire, and Kent.
In Storrington, West Sussex, there are plans to build 78 new houses on a former allotment site.
A spokesman for the Ministry for Housing, Communities and Local Government said that councils should only sell off allotments 'where it is clearly necessary and offers value for money'.
He added: 'We know how important allotments are for communities, and that is why strict criteria is in place to protect them, as well as school playing fields.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
17 minutes ago
- Telegraph
How we could pay for Reeves's race for growth
Labour made no secret of wooing businesses ahead of the general election last year, promising to cut red tape to boost Britain's economic growth. However, the Government's deregulation drive since coming into power has rung alarm bells with consumer groups. James Daley, of consumer group Fairer Finance, said: 'We've been increasingly concerned by the Government's deregulation agenda over the past few months. 'While we all want to see a return to sustainable economic growth, it's a mistake to think that the key to this is removing consumer protections that have been thoughtfully built up over the course of several decades.' This year, Rachel Reeves has been accused multiple times of putting the needs of the financial services industry before consumers. The Chancellor attempted to intervene in the Supreme Court case on the car finance scandal in January, fearing a negative judgment for banks could reflect badly on Britain as a place to do business. She was reportedly considering overruling the Supreme Court if it decided to hit lenders with a £44bn compensation bill. In the end this was not needed because the Supreme Court largely sided with banks. The Treasury said that it intervened over concerns that a judgment in favour of consumers could reduce the availability of car finance for those who need it. But Liberal Democrats MP Bobby Dean told The Guardian the attempt to intervene was 'disgraceful' and sent a 'bad message' to consumers. Prioritising the City Now, Ms Reeves is understood to be pushing for Revolut to become a fully authorised bank as quickly as possible, despite lingering concerns about the app bank's reputation on fraud prevention. It was named in more fraud reports than any other major bank in 2023-24, according to data from Action Fraud, and The Telegraph revealed last year that Refund had pushed back against refunds for some scam victims despite recommendations by the Financial Ombudsman Service (Fos). Revolut said it was continually enhancing its security and prevented over £600m in potential fraud against customers in 2024. Revolut was granted a provisional licence last year after a three-year wait but has yet to become a fully-fledged bank. The Chancellor is desperate for a potential $65bn (£56bn) flotation to happen in London instead of New York. She had tried to secure a meeting with regulators and Revolut but this was blocked by Bank of England governor Andrew Bailey amid concerns about political interference. Retirements at risk The Treasury has also been accused of putting retirements at risk in order to accelerate economic growth. Under the Mansion House Accord, pension providers agree to invest at least 10pc of so-called 'default' funds in private markets by 2030. The Government estimates this will unlock up to £50bn for the UK economy. But Tom Selby, of stockbroker AJ Bell, said there was a risk this could leave savers worse off in retirement. 'The Government has chosen to conflate its understandable, but increasingly desperate, desire to deliver economic growth with other people's pensions by pushing workplace schemes to increase their allocations to higher risk, often higher cost, illiquid assets such as private equity. 'While it has stopped short of mandating investments in these assets, it has created a power to do this if it doesn't get what it wants, essentially putting a gun to the head of pension schemes to do this voluntarily. 'There is, of course, a world where this approach works and delivers better returns for members and more investment for key UK infrastructure for the Government. But it is also entirely possible that shoe-horning money into illiquid UK investments will deliver lower returns for savers, which would ultimately mean millions of people get less from their pension in retirement.' 'Firms over fairness' At her Mansion House speech in July, Ms Reeves said that rules and red tape were a 'boot on the neck' of British businesses. But aspects of her financial services strategy – dubbed the Leeds Reforms – have been lambasted by consumer groups. Mr Daley said: 'It's particularly alarming to hear talk of plans to scrap the protections that were put in place only a few years ago after the financial crisis.' Ms Reeves has proposed weakening so-called 'ring-fencing' which separates retail banking services from investment banking activities. This regime was introduced in 2019 as a result of the 2008 financial crisis to shield customers' deposits from financial risks emerging elsewhere in banking groups. The Leeds Reforms also include a crackdown on the Fos, the body responsible for settling disputes between businesses and consumers. Ms Reeves wants the Ombudsman to refer to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) on ambiguous complaints and give the regulator the power to intervene in mass redress events. The Chancellor said this is to ensure the Fos 'no longer acts as a quasi-regulator'. But consumer advocacy group, the Transparency Taskforce, has warned that increased cooperation between the Fos and FCA could lead to unfair decisions for customers in cases where businesses have technically followed FCA rules but still acted unfairly. In a letter to the Treasury Select Committee, the group wrote: 'This represents a fundamental shift from principles-based regulation to a rigid, legalistic approach that prioritises certainty for firms over fairness for consumers.' Diluting the Consumer Credit Act Separately, the consumer association Which? has raised concerns about the Government's plans to reform the Consumer Credit Act. The Act, which sets out customers' protections in credit agreements, played a key role in the car finance scandal. Despite siding with lenders, the Supreme Court found that consumers could still bring claims under the Act where lenders paid 'excessive' commissions to dealers. But the Treasury is reviewing the Act in order to better align it with the FCA's rules. There are some concerns this could lead to the weakening of protections in the CCA. Rocio Concha, of Which?, said the Government should 'tread carefully with its plans to reform this important piece of legislation'. She added: 'Far from being a blocker to growth, consumer protections are essential for a healthy, functioning economy.' A Revolut spokesman said: 'We are progressing through the final stages of mobilisation and continue to work constructively with the Prudential Regulation Authority. Given Revolut's global scale, this is the largest and most complex mobilisation ever undertaken in the UK. A thorough review is an expected part of the process and getting this right is more important than rushing to meet a specific date. We are looking forward to launching a fully regulated UK bank for our millions of UK customers this year.' A Treasury spokesman said: 'We are balancing growing the economy – our number one mission – with strong consumer protections to deliver for working people. The Leeds Reforms will help more people get on the housing ladder, drive better returns for savers and ensure the Fos provides a cost-free route for consumers to resolve disputes without acting as a quasi-regulator.'
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Police outnumber anti-migrant protesters outside Islington hotel
Police officers outnumbered anti-migrant protesters outside a hotel in Islington where a protest was being held in support of refugees on Friday 8 August. Around 80 anti-racism demonstrators from Stand Up to Racism turned up outside the London hotel, where asylum seekers are believed to be housed by the government. 'Immigration has brought a great growth and diversity to Britain. And we are richer for the people that have come here,' said Claudia Webbe, a former MP for Leicester East who was in attendance at the demonstration. An increased police presence is expected over the weekend amid concerns that anti-asylum seeker protests and counter-protests could lead to violence and disorder.
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Derbyshire leader says special needs 'overdiagnosed' in schools
Parents have accused the leader of Derbyshire County Council of "ignorance" after he claimed children were being "overdiagnosed" with special educational needs. Alan Graves, who began leading the council when Reform UK took control after the local election in May, also suggested some schools encouraged parents to apply for things their children did not were 6,790 children in Derbyshire with Education, Health, and Care plans (EHCPs) in place in 2024 but that number had risen to almost 8,000 by the spring of this authority's SEND services are currently being monitored by the government after a damning Ofsted report last year. The council's costs to support children in special schools rose by £15m to about £38m in 2024-25, according to council to the BBC, Graves said he agreed with the party's national leader Nigel Farage, who previously said there was a "massive" overdiagnosis for "general behavioural disabilities"."I personally think there are too many people in the [SEND] system," Graves said."I think there are reasons for that and it's to do with schools getting extra money for dealing with that."Most people are just about on the spectrum but they're coping."Graves said while many children did need support, there was an "ideological" element to the issue. "What I'm saying to [parents] is if you've applied for it, the council will deal with that situation," he said."At the end of the day, we have to deal with things within a legal framework. That doesn't mean we shouldn't have a discussion about how things should be."We need to make sure, as a local authority, as a government, that we're spending the money in the right places."Sometimes people have to cope with those issues. I possibly feel that maybe even I'm on the spectrum I've never had any help with it." 'Ignorant myth' Mel Merritt, head of policy and campaigns at the National Autistic Society, said Graves was "spreading misinformation". "Children with special educational needs and disabilities, including autistic children, are not being overdiagnosed," she said."They face huge delays and long fights to get the most basic support."Graves acknowledged he did not have any evidence for his claims on overdiagnosis, but said the Labour government's intention to reform the SEND system showed there was an issue. Some parents in Derbyshire were critical of his Green, a retired university lecturer whose son Fin missed two years of school because of problems accessing support for autism and mental health difficulties, said the claims were "a myth based on ignorance". "I started teaching in 1993", he said. "Autism was rarely diagnosed, knowledge was limited and provision poor."The result was disruptive pupils, poor learning, emotionally traumatised children and social difficulties - not to mention huge challenges for parents."Since that time, medical science has advanced, diagnosis has improved and so has provision for those needing it."This means that needs are met, resulting in better attendance, achievement, stability and success - not just for students with conditions such as ADHD and autism, but for all pupils." Emma Wheeler, who has faced lengthy delays seeking to get her daughter Phoebe support for her autism, called the comments "terrifying". "As parents, we shouldn't be second guessing the quality of our children's futures," she said. "Comments like this not only damage the public's perception of what it's like to have additional needs, but how hard we have to fight to protect what they are entitled to." The Education Policy Institute said there were a combination of factors contributing to rising numbers of SEND include scientific advances allowing children born with disabilities to lead healthier, longer lives, increased poverty and increased diagnosis of some Jo Hutchinson, director for SEND and additional needs at the institute, said many children were still falling through gaps in the system."Our research finds that children are missing out on the help that they need," she said, citing a "lottery" for SEND support in schools across England."It is time for a renewed focus on the preparation of school staff to understand and support children's social and emotional needs as well as their academic development."
