logo
Ottawa inks initial contract for new River-class destroyers with Irving

Ottawa inks initial contract for new River-class destroyers with Irving

Yahoo08-03-2025

OTTAWA — The federal Liberal government signed an initial deal with Irving Shipbuilding for the Royal Canadian Navy's new River-class destroyers.
The implementation contract is worth $8 billion for the first six years and only covers part of the tab for the first three ships -- which will eventually cost $22.2 billion.
Vice-Admiral Angus Topshee hailed it as a major step forward for the project meant to replace the Navy's aging destroyers.
The news comes amid a flurry of news from Ottawa on procurement and appointments, and lands while Parliament is currently on pause while the Liberal party selects its next leader.
The party chooses its replacement for Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Sunday amid speculation of an expected early election call sometime after the new leader is sworn in.
A new government would have most likely compounded existing delays to the contract, and Defence Minister Bill Blair had previously said he planned to have the contract signed by the end of last year.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published March 8, 2025.
Kyle Duggan, The Canadian Press

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Taiwan coast guard, military drill to better face China's 'grey zone' threat
Taiwan coast guard, military drill to better face China's 'grey zone' threat

CNBC

time10 hours ago

  • CNBC

Taiwan coast guard, military drill to better face China's 'grey zone' threat

Taiwan's coast guard held drills with the military on Sunday to better practice joint operations in the face of what the government in Taipei says is a growing "grey zone" threat from China, which claims the island as its own territory. Democratically governed Taiwan has repeatedly complained about activities such as undersea cable cutting and sand dredging by China around the island, designed to pressure it without direct confrontation. It is often Taiwan's coast guard that scrambles first to respond. The drills in the southern port city of Kaohsiung, overseen by President Lai Ching-te, simulated the seizing of a ferry by "international terrorists". The coast guard worked with an interior ministry rescue helicopter and army medevac helicopter to board and take back control of the boat and evacuate casualties. A navy anti-submarine helicopter flew over the scene as the drill ended, along with the medevac and rescue helicopters, the first time they have flown together in such a scenario, the coast guard said. "Taiwan has been facing constant grey intrusion from China, but our coast guard colleagues have always been on the front line to enforce the law and protect the lives and safety of the people of Taiwan," Lai told the audience for the drills, which included the top U.S. diplomat in Kaohsiung, Neil Gibson. "The government will continue to consolidate the strength of all departments and strengthen the resilience of the entire society to defend national security and safeguard Taiwan's democracy and freedom," Lai said. Taiwan's coast guard, which would be pressed into military service in the event of war with China, is also routinely sent out to shadow Chinese ships during Beijing's war games around the island. The coast guard, like the navy, is in the midst of an expansion and modernisation programme. Its new Anping-class corvettes, which began being commissioned in 2020, are based on the navy's Tuo Chiang-class warships. They are state-of-the-art, highly manoeuvrable stealth vessels meant to take out larger warships while operating close to Taiwan's shores. The Anping-class ships, one of which took part in the drill, have space for launchers for the Taiwan-made Hsiung Feng anti-ship and sea-to-land missiles, as well as added equipment for rescue operations. Taiwan's government rejects Beijing's sovereignty claims, saying only the island's people can decide their future.

'They're worried': Liberal MP plans to raise concerns about Modi visit to Carney
'They're worried': Liberal MP plans to raise concerns about Modi visit to Carney

Yahoo

time19 hours ago

  • Yahoo

'They're worried': Liberal MP plans to raise concerns about Modi visit to Carney

OTTAWA — A Liberal MP says he intends to raise concerns to Prime Minister Mark Carney about the decision to invite India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi to Canada as part of a meeting of G7 leaders later this month. Sukh Dhaliwal represents the Surrey, B.C., riding where Sikh activist Hardeep Singh Nijjar was killed outside of a temple in June 2023, and whose death Canada has linked to the Indian government. Dhaliwal says he has received dozens of calls and more than 100 emails from constituents expressing concern about Modi's plans to attend the upcoming G7 summit in Alberta, at Carney's invitation. 'They're worried. They're worried about their safety, they're concerned about the justice in Mr. Nijjar's case, as well,' he told National Post in an interview late Friday. Former prime minister Justin Trudeau told the House of Commons in September 2023 that Canada had 'credible allegations' that agents acting on behalf of the Indian government were involved Nijjar's death. Last fall, the RCMP said it also had evidence linking Modi's government to violence unfolding in Canada, including organized crime and murders. Dhaliwal said he has heard other Liberal MPs also express concern about Modi's upcoming visit, but declined to divulge details to protect their privacy. He said he intends to raise the concerns he has been hearing from constituents with Carney or his team, and will be in Ottawa next week for the ongoing sitting of Parliament. 'He's willing to talk,' Dhaliwal said of the prime minister. 'He's willing to listen to his MPs, that's what he has promised because he has always said that he's interested in the voice from the grassroots, not the message coming from the top to the grassroots.' 'I will certainly raise this with him or his team.' A statement from Carney's office in response to questions from National Post didn't directly address Dhaliwal's concerns, but said 'Canada's sovereignty and national security is paramount.' 'As Prime Minister of the fifth largest economy and the world's most populous country, Prime Minister Modi was invited to participate in these critical discussions,' the statement reads. Carney also defended his decision to invite Modi to the G7 at a Friday press conference earlier in the day, saying India was central to supply chains. He said he discussed the matter with other G7 countries. Modi said on social media that 'India and Canada will work together with renewed vigour, guided by mutual respect and shared interests.' Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre backed the decision for Modi to attend, saying Canada needs to work with India on security and trade. Meanwhile, the World Sikh Organization, which advocates for Sikh Canadians, denounced the decision, with its legal counsel, Balpreet Singh, saying it amounts to a 'betrayal.' Four Indian nationals have been charged in Nijjar's death. India has denied the accusation Canada made about having any involvement in his killing. It had considered Nijjar to be a terrorist. Nijjar was a prominent activist in the Khalistan movement, which has pushed to establish a separate Sikh state in India's Punjab province. Carney declined to say on Friday whether he believed Modi was involved in Nijjar's assassination, saying it would be inappropriate for him to comment on the matter given the fact that legal proceedings were underway. Dhaliwal said he does not support the decision to have Modi in Canada, but believes he should offer a 'commitment that his government or his agents of India, will never, ever intervene into the lives of Canadians.' India's prime minister should also agree to 'full cooperation' in the investigation into Niijar's death. Last fall, Canada and India expelled each other's diplomats after citing RCMP evidence linking Indian government agents to crimes in Canada. Canada had requested that India waive diplomatic immunity to allow police to investigate, which the federal government said did not happen. Carney said on Friday that he and Modi in their recent phone call, agreed to 'law enforcement to law enforcement dialogue. He also noted that 'some progress' had been made on issues of 'accountability.' Dhaliwal said the RCMP has been clear in its concerns about the links between the Indian government and violent crimes taking place in Canada. He also pointed to Justice Marie-Josée Hogue's report into foreign interference that named India as one of the top countries attempting to meddle in Canada's democratic process. The invitation to Modi touches on the rule of law and fundamental rights, he added. 'We cannot sacrifice those values.' National Post staylor@ Mark Carney defends inviting Modi to G7, prompting shock from Sikh organization Carney prepared to sit over the summer to pass new bill to fast-track major projects Get more deep-dive National Post political coverage and analysis in your inbox with the Political Hack newsletter, where Ottawa bureau chief Stuart Thomson and political analyst Tasha Kheiriddin get at what's really going on behind the scenes on Parliament Hill every Wednesday and Friday, exclusively for subscribers. Sign up here. Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.

LEDREW: Tyranny over, Liberals once again free to disagree with prime minister
LEDREW: Tyranny over, Liberals once again free to disagree with prime minister

Yahoo

time21 hours ago

  • Yahoo

LEDREW: Tyranny over, Liberals once again free to disagree with prime minister

Debate and differences of opinion are permitted once again in the Liberal Party – the children are no longer in charge. Canada is no longer run by a cockwomble. What a difference a mature prime minister makes! A prime minister who does not pick the weakest for cabinet so that his PMO will be totally in charge. A prime minister who can obviously change his mind, all the way from 'net-zero' to thinking of utilizing resources. A prime minister who will not impoverish Canadians and embarrass Canada by telling other heads of state that there is 'no business case' for exporting LNG to needy nations with lots of cash to pay us. Refreshingly, we now have a natural resources minister – Tim Hodgson – who has travelled to the once-separating Alberta to support new oil and gas infrastructure to trade in overseas markets and supply energy to Eastern Canada! How novel – jobs and riches for Canadians. LILLEY: Mark Carney offers words – Pierre Poilievre's words – but we need action GOLDSTEIN: Carney can't fix Canada's underperforming economy on his own LILLEY: Trudeau lowered bar so much, Carney gets credit for being an adult Under the regime of the last ten years, ideas that may be contrary to the dogma of the PMO could not even be broached. The late Bill Graham, an experienced and tested and worldly intellect, and former Liberal leader, was once told in no uncertain terms by some kid in the PMO that his advice on a complex issue was not necessary because 'we have this, thank you very much.' This closure of the mind was aided and abetted by appointees in the PMO who did not have the wherewithal to think through even the simplest situations. Remember the SNC-Lavalin scandal? I seriously doubt that any lawyers in the new PMO will be contacting prosecutors in any Crown office in Canada in an attempt to change a decision on criminal charges. Senior and thoughtful Liberal senators were removed from the Liberal caucus – their views not needed. Only members of parliament were allowed in caucus – people who either had their positions because of the PM or wanted a promotion that only the PM could offer, gutless supplicants who would never offer up an opinion differing from the official PMO stand. The Liberal Party itself was reduced to an insignificant triviality, its supporters cowed into silence, because if you dared offer a differing viewpoint then you were considered disloyal, and banished – or at least branded as no longer a Liberal. I had turned down government appointments, and was not seeking invitations to state dinners in Ottawa, so over the last decade I could be critical of many Trudeau positions that now, after he has been dumped, many others suddenly seem to understand were idiotic. And for that difference of opinion with the Trudeau government, lifelong friends, many of whom had partaken of my hospitality over the years, who had enjoyed the perks of power from being in favour in Ottawa (gotta love those government jets), would actually turn their heads at the sight of me – or not invite me to events that I had helped create decades ago. Several dowagers of the party tried to rip strips off me. Friends tell me that the big shots of Ottawa and Montreal hate me with a passion for daring to challenge the Trudeau government. I was 'no longer a Liberal.' The truth is that I am a Liberal – I believe in well-managed government, fiscally prudent, socially progressive, encouraging of debate, with an eye on providing the freedom and impetus to build a better Canada. I believe in the rule of law – not the fiat of unnamed, well-paid, political helpers. Much to the detriment of my finances, I have volunteered tens and tens of thousands of hours of tough slugging in the service of the Liberal Party. Now that things are returning to some degree of normalcy, I would gladly do so again, and encourage others to do so – politics is a noble calling. Canada, and the debate, needs you.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store