Taiwan coast guard, military drill to better face China's 'grey zone' threat
Democratically governed Taiwan has repeatedly complained about activities such as undersea cable cutting and sand dredging by China around the island, designed to pressure it without direct confrontation.
It is often Taiwan's coast guard that scrambles first to respond.
The drills in the southern port city of Kaohsiung, overseen by President Lai Ching-te, simulated the seizing of a ferry by "international terrorists". The coast guard worked with an interior ministry rescue helicopter and army medevac helicopter to board and take back control of the boat and evacuate casualties.
A navy anti-submarine helicopter flew over the scene as the drill ended, along with the medevac and rescue helicopters, the first time they have flown together in such a scenario, the coast guard said.
"Taiwan has been facing constant grey intrusion from China, but our coast guard colleagues have always been on the front line to enforce the law and protect the lives and safety of the people of Taiwan," Lai told the audience for the drills, which included the top U.S. diplomat in Kaohsiung, Neil Gibson.
"The government will continue to consolidate the strength of all departments and strengthen the resilience of the entire society to defend national security and safeguard Taiwan's democracy and freedom," Lai said.
Taiwan's coast guard, which would be pressed into military service in the event of war with China, is also routinely sent out to shadow Chinese ships during Beijing's war games around the island.
The coast guard, like the navy, is in the midst of an expansion and modernisation programme.
Its new Anping-class corvettes, which began being commissioned in 2020, are based on the navy's Tuo Chiang-class warships. They are state-of-the-art, highly manoeuvrable stealth vessels meant to take out larger warships while operating close to Taiwan's shores.
The Anping-class ships, one of which took part in the drill, have space for launchers for the Taiwan-made Hsiung Feng anti-ship and sea-to-land missiles, as well as added equipment for rescue operations.
Taiwan's government rejects Beijing's sovereignty claims, saying only the island's people can decide their future.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gizmodo
38 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
Howard Lutnick Calls CHIPS Act a ‘Giveaway to Rich Companies' Like Intel
The U.S. government could get a 10% equity stake in Intel in exchange for more funds from the CHIPS Act, according to Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, who appeared on CNBC Tuesday. Lutnick was pressed about whether that would be a worse deal than what Intel had previously received under the Biden-era manufacturing plan, and the commerce secretary seemed more than happy to acknowledge it was. 'Of course it's worse, of course it's worse…' Lutnick said, laughing. CNBC host David Faber asked if that made it difficult for U.S.-based tech giant Intel to actually compete against companies like Taiwan-based TSMC—a concern because chip manufacturers overseas are eating Intel's lunch. But Lutnick didn't buy the argument. 'The CHIPS Act was just a giveaway to rich companies,' Lutnick said. 'I mean, why in the world is the United States of America taking money and giving it to companies like TSMC, which is worth a trillion dollars? I mean, why would we give them money to come to America?' The CHIPS Act passed with bipartisan support in 2022 and allocated $39 billion for subsidies in an effort to spur chip manufacturing in the U.S. and better compete with China. TSMC received $6.6 billion in grants to expand chip production in the U.S. under the law, while Intel has received about $7.9 billion, according to CNBC. Intel has struggled in recent years, announcing plans last month to lay off about 15% of its staff and dramatically slowing its expansion, which means much of the money it has available hasn't been handed over yet under the terms of the legislation. Lutnick insisted that Trump has secured better deals with technology companies, while Biden has been just handing out money without getting more for the U.S. government. The commerce secretary said he wanted Intel to succeed, but it was going to come with strings. 'The Biden administration literally was giving Intel for free and giving TSMC money for free,' Lutnick said. 'And all these companies just giving them money for free. And Donald Trump turns that into saying, 'Hey, we want equity for the money. If we're going to give you the money, we want a piece of the action for the American taxpayer.'' The New York Times notes that turning $10.86 billion in grants for Intel into equity (about 10% of Intel's $100 billion worth), would be one of the largest U.S. government interventions into private industry since the 2008 financial crisis, when the government poured billions into Chrysler and General Motors to save auto manufacturing jobs. Lutnick was asked if the government would get any governance role in Intel with a 10% stake, and he said they would not. In fact, he treated it as a ridiculous question, insisting 'we're just converting what was a grant under Biden into equity.' But it's not a ridiculous question, and Faber pointed out the government received a 'golden share' on the U.S. Steel deal, which allows Trump to veto corporate decisions he doesn't like. That kind of intervention obviously makes Wall Street a little nervous. CNBC host Carl Quintanilla read excerpts from a recent Wall Street Journal editorial titled 'The Nationalization of Intel,' which referred to the Trump regime's plans as 'corporate statism.' From the article: Details of that potential investment are vague, but you can bet the feds wouldn't be passive investors. Intel's stock rallied last week on the news, perhaps because investors figure the company will now be too big to fail. They're probably right. Once the government acquires a stake in Intel, the politicians will have an incentive to keep pouring on subsidies so they wouldn't have to admit a mistake. At the same time, the Administration's conditions for the equity investment may also make it harder for Intel to undertake needed changes to become more competitive. Politicians don't like to preside over plant closures or employee layoffs. See Renault, the French car maker, for that political lesson. Lutnick just laughed it off, indignantly pointing out that 'we were just giving away the money' under the previous terms of the CHIPS Act. But the legality of any equity stake would likely be challenged by both Intel shareholders and competitors in the industry, according to the Times. President Trump has leaned heavily on Intel, firing off a post on Truth Social about CEO Lip-Bu Tan and his alleged links to China. The president even called for Tan's resignation, saying there was 'no other solution to this problem,' but seemed to back off that demand last week after meeting with the CEO. Lutnick insisted on CNBC that Trump's approach was necessary and much better than anything Biden had accomplished, a common refrain among Trump's supporters. 'How could that not be smarter, better, and more important for the American taxpayer than just free money for $100 billion, trillion-dollar companies… makes no sense. Donald Trump is fixing what Biden got completely, totally, and utterly wrong,' Lutnick said.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Analysis-China's overcapacity crackdown faces litmus test in solar sector
By Joe Cash and Colleen Howe BEIJING (Reuters) -China's efforts to curb industrial overcapacity face their first test in the indebted and bloated polysilicon sector, a key cog in solar cell production, where analysts say it is easiest for Beijing to intervene but still difficult to succeed. Under the plan, devised by industry players in the presence of Chinese regulators, big producers will pool 50 billion yuan ($7 billion) to buy out the least efficient facilities and shut them down, then form a cartel to halt relentless price wars. Ideally, when prices rise, the loss-making producers will turn profitable and reimburse the debt incurred in the process. Reduced output and higher polysilicon costs would force solar panel makers - which can produce roughly twice as much annually as the world buys and have been a source of trade tensions between China and the West - to consolidate. But analysts see risks at every stage of this plan. First, it is unclear if the industry can agree who's in or who's out of the cartel. GCL Technology Holdings, one of the biggest producers, said earlier this month cartel planning was close to wrapping up but declined to provide details of the other participants. Banks - whose incentive to finance this acquisition is to ensure that what they rate as a "safe" sector doesn't turn to "risky" - would likely be involved in the process, said Dan Wang, China director at Eurasia Group. Analysts warn local authorities, who have strived to fulfil Beijing's strategic green energy vision by handing out subsidies, tax breaks and cheap land to the sector, may not want the solar supply chains on their turf to shut. "Which local government is going to let go of their industry first?" said Max Zenglein, senior economist for the Asia-Pacific at The Conference Board research group. "They're going to be very cautious." Finally, even if the cartel does form, any success creates the conditions for failure: after prices climb, members might be tempted to raise output and reap the profits. Reformers face all these risks despite the industry having fewer players and fewer supply chain inputs than most other sectors in the world's second-largest economy, where overcapacity is endemic and deflationary, and threatens trade relations and long-term growth. "Success is hardly a foregone conclusion," Gavekal Dragonomics analysts Tilly Zhang and Wei He said in a note. If the overcapacity crackdown "fails to get traction in polysilicon, it will struggle in the many other industries" where the government has less capacity to foster swift changes, they said. GCL's peer Tongwei declined to comment. Polysilicon producers Daqo New Energy and TBEA did not respond to requests for comment. The solar and metals industry associations, the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC)- China's state planner - and the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology also did not respond to requests for comment. IS EVERYONE GAME? Over the past five years, the top four Chinese manufacturers alone built about two-thirds of the industry's capacity, which stood at 3.25 million metric tons at the end of 2024, according to Bernreuter Research, a consultancy. In 2025, Bernreuter anticipates an average utilisation of 35%-40%, down from 57% last year. Morningstar estimates about 965,000 tons of polysilicon capacity was built or is still under construction this year, citing the China Photovoltaic Industry Association. Past attempts to get the solar industry to self-regulate have failed. Last October, the solar industry body proposed a price floor for solar modules, but the temptation for manufacturers to undercut competitors proved too enticing. The NDRC called for a ban on new production in an online meeting in February. Still, Karamay, a city in the northwestern region of Xinjiang announced a 3 billion yuan solar module manufacturing plant as recently as May, Chinese media reported. The Xinjiang energy regulator did not respond to phone calls from Reuters. A new 140,000-ton polysilicon manufacturing plant in Qinghai, a major provincial investor, also started test operations in March, according to a trade media report. The energy regulator for northwestern China, which includes Qinghai, did not respond to a faxed request for comment. PAIN THRESHOLD In the event that the polysilicon cartel overcomes industry and local government opposition, it can raise prices to levels that the least competitive firms in the downstream solar panels sector cannot afford, forcing their exit, analysts say. "Unless I see a lot of defaults all of a sudden really shrinking the size of the industry, I don't see how this is going to work," said Alicia Garcia-Herrrero, Asia-Pacific chief economist at Natixis. She said that would test the Chinese leadership's tolerance for a bloodbath in an industry that it had championed as a national priority. The case for protecting strategic priorities also applies to other sectors, from electric vehicles and batteries to shipbuilding, all with supply chains much more complex than solar. "It's very easy to build capacity to burn money, but then to scale it down and direct that in a healthy manner is much more difficult," said The Conference Board's Zenglein. ($1 = 7.1815 Chinese yuan renminbi) Sign in to access your portfolio
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
China restricts AI across the country to prevent kids cheating, America could learn from it
China now turns off AI for the whole country during exam weeks. That's because the Chinese Communist Party knows their youth learn less when they use artificial intelligence. Surely, President Xi Jinping is reveling in this leg up over American students, who are using AI as a crutch and missing out on valuable learning experiences as a result. It's just one of the ways China protects their youth, while we feed ours into the jaws of Big Tech in the name of progress. Advertisement When Chinese students sat for gaokao exams — intense four day college placement tests — in June, AI companies Alibaba, ByteDance, Tencent, and Moonshot all shut off useful features for would-be cheaters, including a photo-upload function that solves exam questions for you. 6 Chinese students sit for intense four day gaokao exams to determine what colleges they will attend. Getty Images 'China is a generally techno-optimist country,' Scott Singer, a tech scholar at the Carnegie Endowment for National Peace, told The Post Advertisement 'That said, the government will clamp down when it thinks technology will cause societal harm and when certain uses run counter to the country's interests. And China's government has shown it's not afraid to clamp down on its tech companies when it believes the circumstances require it.' All Chinese users who attempted to use the feature during exam days received an error message, according to Bloomberg. None of the companies that modified services made any public statement about the freeze in service, and none responded to request for comment from The Post. Moonshot could not be reached for comment. 6 Tristan Harris discussed China's regulation of artificial intelligence on Real Time with Bill Maher. Real Time with Bill Maher Advertisement Center for Humane Technology co-founder Tristan Harris said on Real Time with Bill Maher earlier this month that the move is 'actually really smart, because what it means is that students during the year can't just rely on AI to do all their homework.' Harris, a former design ethicist at Google turned Big Tech whistleblower, says that American kids, by contrast, are suffering learning losses from AI: 'We are seeing kids who are in a race. If the other kids in their class are cheating… they're gonna start cheating and using AI to outsource their thinking.' The science backs this up. A June MIT study suggests that AI degrades critical thinking skills. Researchers found that people who wrote essays with AI had less brain activity while doing work, retained less of the content, and outsourced more and more of their workload to AI over time. 6 High school teacher Murphy Kenefick says AI is a 'fight every assignment' in his classroom. Courtest of Murphy Kenefick Advertisement 'It's a fight every assignment,' Murphy Kenefick, a Nashville high school literature teacher, told The Post. 'I've caught it about 40 times, and who knows how many other times they've gotten away with it.' AI optimists often argue that, if we pump the breaks on AI, China will just surpass us. But Harris argues that whatever country learns to better regulate the new tech will be the real victor — because they'll have smarter citizens. 'What's guiding this is the race between the US and China — if we don't build it, we're just gonna lose to the country that will,' he explained. 'But this is a mistake, because [the winner is] actually who's better at governing the technology.' He added, 'We beat China to social media. Did that make us stronger or did that make us weaker?' 6 People who use AI for assignments have less brain activity while completing work, according to a recent MIT study. Alina – Harris is right. The US might have been cutting edge on rolling out platforms like Instagram and YouTube, but we were also cutting edge in hooking our kids and turning them into doom-scrolling zombies. China ultimately came out with the heroin of social media: TikTok. But, unlike us, they've always taken great care to protect their populace from harm. The CCP exported TikTok — with its twerking trends and dangerous challenges, while giving their own citizens a modified, less addictive, and more pro-social version. Advertisement 6 The CCP has heavily regulated youth access to technology under Xi Jinping. REUTERS Douyin, the Chinese iteration, has voice reminders and interruptions for users who scroll for too long. Teens under 14 are limited to only 40 minutes a day and are shown inspirational content, like science experiments, patriotic videos, and educational content, according to Harris. Douyin also censors information deemed counter to national interests, including content from economists who were critical of the Chinese economy, according to the New York Times. TikTok declined to comment on this matter. Advertisement Unlike the American government, the CCP wields authoritarian control over their populace and their tech companies. America shouldn't copy them wholesale. 6 Chinese citizens only have access to the Douyin app instead of TikTok. Mojahid Mottakin – But China is cunning, clever, and forward-looking. If they've decided that endless scrolling on TikTok and homework help from AI is bad for their kids, it's probably bad for ours too. 'China is correct to take the risks of AI seriously, not just for education but for society as a whole,' Anthony Aguirre, co-Founder and Executive Director of the Future of Life Institute, told The Post. Advertisement 'The United States will have very different ways of addressing this, but the answer can't be to do nothing. Lawmakers must step up now with clear safeguards to protect children and society from repeating the same mistakes we did with social media.' As we unleash AI — which has the potential to be the most transformative modern technology ever invented — onto the world, we must take great care to do so cautiously, especially when it comes to our youth. If we fail to, the next generation in China may leave their tech-addled counterparts in America in the dust. Perhaps the real arms race is the long game.
