Belgium seeking to try ex-official over killing of Congolese prime minister Lumumba
Belgian prosecutors said Tuesday that they were seeking to put a 92-year-old former diplomat on trial over the 1961 killing of Congolese leader Patrice Lumumba.
Etienne Davignon is the only one still alive among 10 Belgians who were accused of complicity in the murder of the independence icon in a 2011 lawsuit filed by Lumumba's children.
If he goes on trial, Davignon would be the first Belgian official to face justice in the more than six decades since Lumumba was murdered.
A fiery critic of Belgium's colonial rule, Lumumba became his country's first prime minister after it gained independence in 1960.
But he fell out with the former colonial power and with the United States and was ousted in a coup a few months after taking office.
He was executed on January 17, 1961, aged just 35, in the southern region of Katanga, with the support of Belgian mercenaries.
His body was dissolved in acid and never recovered.
Davignon, who went on to be a vice president of the European Commission in the 1980s, was a trainee diplomat at the time of the assassination.
(FRANCE 24 with AFP)
Read more on FRANCE 24 EnglishRead also:DR Congo inters independence hero Lumumba's remains after national homageRemains of Congolese independence leader Lumumba returned home
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
France says it cannot save contraceptives US plans to destroy
France said Friday it could not seize women's contraception products estimated to be worth $9.7 million that the United States plans to destroy, after media reports suggested the stockpile would be incinerated in the country. The contraceptives -- intended for some of the world's poorest countries, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa -- were purchased by the US foreign aid agency USAID under former president Joe Biden. But France's health ministry told AFP Friday there was no legal way for it to intervene. The administration of Biden's successor Donald Trump, which has slashed USAID and pursued anti-abortion policies, confirmed last month it planned to destroy the contraceptives, which have been stored in a warehouse in the Belgian city of Geel. According to several media reports, the unexpired products were to be incinerated in France at the end of July by a company that specialises in destroying medical waste. France's government has come under pressure to save the contraceptives, with women's rights groups calling the US decision "insane". The health ministry told AFP that the government had "examined the courses of action available to us, but unfortunately there is no legal basis for intervention by a European health authority, let alone the French national drug safety authority, to recover these medical products. "Since contraceptives are not drugs of major therapeutic interest, and in this case we are not facing a supply shortage, we have no means to requisition the stocks," it added. The ministry also said it had no information on where the contraceptives would be destroyed. - Leaving Belgian warehouse - Sarah Durocher, head of the French women's rights group Family Planning, told AFP that some contraceptives had already left the Belgian warehouse. "We were informed 36 hours ago that the removal of these boxes of contraceptives had begun," Durocher said Thursday. "We do not know where these trucks are now -- or whether they have arrived in France," she added. "We call on all incineration companies not to destroy the contraceptives and to oppose this insane decision." French company Veolia confirmed to AFP that it had a contract with the US firm Chemonics, USAID's logistics provider. But Veolia emphasised that the contract concerned "only the management of expired products, which is not the case for the stockpile" in Belgium. The products, mostly long-acting contraceptives such as IUDs and birth control implants, are reportedly up to five years away from expiring. - Outrage over decision - The US decision has provoked an outcry in France, where rights groups and left-wing politicians have called on their government to stop the plan. "France cannot become the scene of such operations -- a moratorium is essential," an opinion piece in the French daily Le Monde said Friday. Signed by five NGOs, it condemned the "absurdity" of the US decision. Among them was MSI Reproductive Choices, one of several organisations that have offered to purchase and repackage the contraceptives at no cost to the US government. All offers have been rejected. Last week, New Hampshire's Democratic Senator Jeanne Shaheen pointed to the Trump administration's stated goal of reducing government waste, saying the contraceptives plan "is the epitome of waste, fraud and abuse". A US State Department spokesperson told AFP earlier this week that the destruction of the products would cost $167,000 and "no HIV medications or condoms are being destroyed". The spokesperson pointed to a policy that prohibits providing aid to non-governmental organisations that perform or promote abortions. The Mexico City Policy, which critics call the "global gag rule", was first introduced by President Ronald Reagan in 1984. It has been reinstated under every Republican president since. Last month, the US also incinerated nearly 500 metric tons of high-nutrition biscuits that had been meant to keep malnourished children in Afghanistan and Pakistan alive. pan-mep-dl/jj
New York Times
2 days ago
- New York Times
EU court rules CAS decisions can be reviewed by national courts
The European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruled Friday that decisions made by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) can now be reviewed by national courts to ensure compliance with European Union (EU) law. The ruling means that certain decisions from governing bodies such as FIFA can be challenged outside of Switzerland. If the legislation or rules of world football's governing body are deemed to 'prevent the national courts or tribunals from exercising their powers,' said courts or tribunals are now 'required to disapply that legislation or those rules'. Advertisement CAS, an institution independent of any sports organisation, handles significant legal sporting cases such as doping and contract disputes. The court is based in Lausanne, Switzerland. Officials and clubs had previously been bound to accept verdicts made by CAS. Switzerland's supreme court decides upon CAS verdicts which have been challenged, but have rarely overturned the verdicts. The ECJ said in a statement that national courts or tribunals of member states 'must be empowered to carry out, at the request of individuals or of the court's or tribunal's own motion, an in-depth judicial review as to whether arbitral awards made by CAS are consistent with EU public policy'. The verdict directly relates to the 10-year legal battle between FIFA and Belgian club RFC Seraing, who, alongside Maltese investment fund Doyen Sports, opposed the governing body's rules on third-party ownership of the economic rights of players. FIFA imposed several registration bans and a fine of 150,000CHF ($184,700) on Seraing, sanctions which were upheld by CAS and the Swiss Federal Supreme Court. The club subsequently put the case before the Belgian court of first instance and court of appeal, but found it could not carry out a new assessment of the compatibility of the verdict with EU law, with CAS' decision holding the authority of res judicata — effectively meaning it cannot be pursued further. After the club put the case before the court, the ECJ ruled that such authority is incompatible with EU law. It said: 'The application of rules of this kind deprives individuals of the possibility of obtaining, from the courts or tribunals of the Member States, effective judicial review of such arbitral awards.' In quotes carried by the Associated Press, Seraing's lawyer Jean-Louis Dupont said the club should be compensated for the sanctions imposed on it by FIFA and said the implications of the ECJ ruling challenge the legality of all 'forced arbitrations' by mandated international sports federations. Advertisement 'In summary, the (court) has definitively ended the procedural deception used by international sports federations to evade the proper application of EU law through the imposition of compulsory arbitration outside the EU,' Dupont said. CAS issued a statement Friday saying it acknowledges the ECJ's ruling that its awards 'should be limited to EU public policy only' while adding that only six per cent of the court's decisions are appealed to the Swiss Federal Tribunal (SFT). 'ICAS also acknowledges recognition by the CJEU that sports arbitration is a legitimate mechanism ensuring a uniform treatment of sporting disputes and a consistent application of sporting rules,' the statement added. The ECJ's ruling on Friday marks another landmark verdict under EU competition law. In the last two years, it challenged the authority of UEFA and FIFA by ruling the governing bodies acted unlawfully in blocking the creation of the proposed Super League, while ruling last year in the Lassana Diarra case that some FIFA rules regarding players transfers were acting contrary to EU law in relation to freedom of movement. FIFA declined to comment when approached by The Athletic.
Washington Post
2 days ago
- Washington Post
Trump administration weighs fate of $9M stockpile of contraceptives feared earmarked for destruction
BRUSSELS — President Donald Trump's administration says it is weighing what to do with family planning supplies stockpiled in Europe that campaigners and two U.S. senators are fighting to save from destruction. Concerns that the Trump administration plans to incinerate the stockpile have angered family planning advocates on both sides of the Atlantic. Campaigners say the supplies stored in a U.S.-funded warehouse in Geel, Belgium, include contraceptive pills, contraceptive implants and IUDs that could spare women in war zones and elsewhere the hardship of unwanted pregnancies.
