JAG entry case: Women playing significant role in armed forces, Centre tells SC
Women have been playing a significant role as part of India's armed forces including in shaping the country's response to hostilities like what was done in Balakot and that as the shape of warfare changes, their roles too will advance, the Centre on Wednesday told the SC.
'Women are playing a very important role… Balakot strike was engineered by a woman sitting in the control role. So, the face of warfare is changing. It will change,' Additional Solicitor General Aishwarya Bhati told a bench of Justices Dipankar Datta and Manmohan.
The court was hearing a pending plea by two women challenging the notification dated January 18, 2023, for the JAG (Judge Advocate General) Entry Scheme 31st Course, inviting applications from Law Graduates. The duo said they had secured ranks 5 and 6 in the common selection process but will not be able to make it to the selection list as 6 of the 9 vacancies are for men and 3 for women. The Centre had earlier said that the criteria for selection in JAG from 2012-2022 was 70 percent men and 30 percent men but will be 50:50 from 2013-2033.
The court said this will still not make the process gender neutral as seats continue to be divided into male and female vacancies. Justice Manmohan said, 'once you allow them in JAG, you will have to allow it in (all other positions)…why are you making a discrimination that they will not be posted in A area, B area. Why can't you deploy them everywhere?'
Bhati said it is a governmental policy and said things will change when the nature of warfare also changes.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
35 minutes ago
- India Today
11 years of PM-led NDA 'golden period', says BJP; Congress sees broken promises
As the BJP-led National Democratic Alliance (NDA) government completed 11 years in power, Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Monday said that the government's focus throughout has been on improving the lives of the poor and delivering development for all. The milestone also marked one year of PM Modi's third term as Prime a statement issued on the occasion, PM Modi said that schemes like Ujjwala Yojana, PM Awas Yojana, Ayushman Bharat, Jan Aushadhi, and PM Kisan Samman Nidhi have given "new wings to the hopes" of Indians. "Every effort in these 11 years has been made with devotion and a service spirit to ease the lives of citizens," he India's emergence as a global economic and strategic force, the Prime Minister said the country is now the fastest-growing major economy and a significant voice on global issues like climate change and digital innovation. "We are proud of our collective success but at the same time, we look ahead with hope, confidence and a renewed resolve to build a Viksit Bharat," he said, reiterating the NDA's guiding principle of 'Sabka Saath, Sabka Vikas, Sabka Vishwas, Sabka Prayas'. The Centre also released a detailed e-book outlining its achievements over the past 11 years across various Home Minister Amit Shah echoed the sentiment, calling the 11 years under PM Modi a "golden period" marked by "resolve, endeavour and dedication to public service." "The Modi government has proved that when the leadership is clear, the resolve is firm and the intent is driven by public service, new records of service, security and governance are created," the Home Minister said in a post on president JP Nadda also praised Prime Minister Narendra Modi's 11 years in office, saying the work done by the government under his leadership should be written in "golden letters"."The Congress-led UPA regime was marked by corruption, scams and appeasement politics. Work done by the government under the leadership of Prime Minister Modi in the past 11 years was extraordinary, and should be written in golden letters," Nadda 11 YEARS DEALT DEEP BLOW: CONGRESSThe Congress launched a scathing attack on the PM Modi-led government, accusing it of inflicting serious damage on India's democracy, economy, and social harmony over the past 11 president Mallikarjun Kharge, in a post on X, alleged that the BJP regime has "smeared the ink of dictatorship" on every page of the Constitution, claiming that the essence of democratic governance has been systematically eroded under the NDA rule."The BJP-RSS has weakened every constitutional institution and attacked their autonomy. Whether it is going against public opinion and toppling governments through the back door or forcibly imposing one-party dictatorship, during this period, the rights of the states have been ignored and the federal structure has weakened," Kharge Chief Minister Siddaramaiah on Monday slammed the Narendra Modi-led NDA government as it marked 11 years in power, saying it had "failed to fulfil promises" and deserved "zero marks" for performance."PM Modi is surviving only because of continuous campaigning. What happened to demonetisation? Who benefited from it? He promised Achhe Din, where are they? What happened to the promise of providing two crore jobs every year? He also assured the resolution of farmers' issues, what happened to that? Why did farmers protest for a year if their issues were being addressed?" Siddaramaiah Watch
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
SC refuses immediate hearing as Tamil Nadu accuses Centre of withholding over Rs 2,150 crore in school funds
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court has declined an urgent hearing request from the Tamil Nadu government regarding their plea against the central government. The state claims that Rs 2,151 crore in central education funds under the Samagra Shiksha Scheme for 2024-2025 is being withheld by the Centre. The state government sought immediate intervention from the Supreme Court in this matter on Monday. The dispute centers around the allocation and disbursement of funds meant for education initiatives in Tamil Nadu under the federal education scheme. A bench comprising Justices Prashant Kumar Mishra and Manmohan took note of the fact that the state government filed the petition in May alleging withholding of central funds for 2024 and this year also. "There is no urgency and it can be taken up after the 'partial working days' (the new name of summer vacation)," the bench said. In May, the Tamil Nadu government moved the top court against the Centre for allegedly withholding the funds. The DMK government's plea, filed against the Union Ministry of Education, invokes Article 131 of the Constitution which provides exclusive jurisdiction to the top court to hear pleas between the Centre and one or more states, or between one or more states. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch vàng CFDs với sàn môi giới tin cậy IC Markets Tìm hiểu thêm Undo The state government alleged the Centre attempted to force the implementation of the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 and the associated PM SHRI Schools Scheme which it strongly objected to, particularly the contentious three-language formula. The top court, therefore, was urged to declare that the NEP and the PM SHRI Schools Scheme are not binding on the plaintiff state unless and until a formal agreement is entered into between the plaintiff and the defendant for their implementation within Tamil Nadu . The lawsuit has also sought a declaration that the action of the Centre to link Tamil Nadu's entitlement to receive funds under the Samagra Shiksha Scheme to the implementation of the NEP, 2020, and the PM SHRI Schools Scheme within the state are unconstitutional, illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable . It has also urged the top court to declare the Centre's letters of February 23, 2024 and March 07, 2024 as illegal, null, void ab initio and not binding on the state government. The plea sought a direction to the Centre to pay "Rs 2,291,30,24,769 (two thousand two hundred and ninety-one crore thirty lakhs twenty-four thousand seven hundred and sixty-nine) within a time frame to be fixed by this court" along with a future interest of 6 per cent per annum on the "principal sum of Rs 2,151,59,61,000 (two thousand one hundred and fifty-one crore fifty nine lakh and sixty one thousand) from May 1, 2025 until realisation of the decree". The dispute stems from the non-release of central funds under the Scheme, a flagship centrally sponsored programme for school education aimed at universalising quality education. The Project Approval Board (PAB) of the Ministry of Education had approved a total outlay of Rs 3,585.99 crore for Tamil Nadu for FY 2024 25, of which the Union Government's committed 60 per cent share amounted to Rs 2,151.59 crore. The plea said despite this approval, no instalments have been disbursed by the Centre as yet. The Centre, it said, unilaterally linked the release of these funds to Tamil Nadu's full implementation of NEP 2020 and the signing of an MoU for the PM SHRI Schools Scheme, conditions which were neither part of the original Samagra Shiksha Scheme nor agreed upon by the state. The reason for such non-disbursement is that the defendant has linked the release of Samagra Shiksha Scheme funds with the implementation of national education policy and NEP exemplary PM SHRI Schools' Scheme despite the fact that these policy/scheme are separate schemes, it said. Referring to the impact of non-release of Samagra Shiksha funds, the plea said paying salaries was crucial in maintaining competent and motivated teachers and supporting staff. It directly impacts the quality of education provided to students and contributes to overall societal development by nurturing the next generation with the skills and knowledge needed for success, it added. PTI Is your child ready for the careers of tomorrow? Enroll now and take advantage of our early bird offer! Spaces are limited.
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
SC rejects urgent hearing in Tamil Nadu's plea against Centre over edu funds
The Supreme Court on Monday rejected a plea by the Tamil Nadu government seeking an urgent hearing in its suit against the Union government for allegedly withholding over ₹2,000 crore in funds under the Samagra Shiksha Scheme (SSS). The Tamil Nadu government had described the Centre's move as 'coercive tactics' to force the state to implement the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020. 'For how long has this fund not been given? What is the urgency now?' a bench of justices Prashant Kumar Mishra and Manmohan asked senior advocate P Wilson, who mentioned the matter on behalf of the Tamil Nadu government, seeking an expedited listing. As Wilson flagged the constitutional right to free and compulsory education of nearly 48 lakh students in the state being adversely impacted due to the withholding of the fund, the bench remained unconvinced and declined the request, saying: 'The plea is rejected.' The brief exchange took place during the Supreme Court's ongoing summer recess, now designated as a period of 'partial court working days' where only two to three benches sit and only matters of pressing urgency are usually considered, in addition to some old cases where both sides have given their consent to argue during the break. The regular functioning of the top court will resume on July 14. Filed under Article 131 of the Constitution, Tamil Nadu's suit accuses the Centre of linking its annual share under the SSS to the implementation of the NEP 2020 and the PM SHRI Schools Scheme -- a condition the state calls 'unconstitutional, arbitrary and coercive.' According to the suit, the Project Approval Board had approved a total outlay of ₹3,585.99 crore for Tamil Nadu under SSS for the financial year 2024–25, of which ₹2,151.59 crore was to be the Centre's 60% share. The state claims this amount was not released solely because of its principled opposition to NEP 2020. Tamil Nadu, ruled by the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK), has been a vocal critic of the NEP, particularly its three-language formula, which the state believes undermines its two-language policy rooted in Tamil linguistic pride and regional identity. 'The Union Government seeks to coerce the State to implement the NEP-2020 throughout the State in its entirety and to deviate from the education regime followed in the State,' the suit submitted, while asserting that SSS is a standalone scheme that should not be tied to compliance with any other policy. The suit further alleged that the withholding of funds 'cripples the implementation of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009,' directly impacting 43.9 lakh students, 2.2 lakh teachers, and over 32,000 school staff in the state. The state's legal team has argued that the Centre's move violates the spirit of cooperative federalism and amounts to an 'usurpation' of the state's constitutional powers to legislate on education, which falls under Entry 25 of the Concurrent List. Tamil Nadu has also urged the Supreme Court to declare that the implementation of NEP and the PM SHRI Schools Scheme, which mandates full compliance with NEP, is not binding on the state. It has sought a direction to the Centre to immediately release ₹2,291 crore (including interest), claiming the delay is 'not only illegal but also violative of constitutional morality.' While the plea for an urgent hearing has now been declined, the main suit continues to be listed for regular hearing. The standoff comes amid a broader constitutional tussle between the Tamil Nadu government and the Union government. On April 8, the Supreme Court struck down Tamil Nadu governor RN Ravi's controversial move to reserve 10 re-enacted state bills for presidential assent, and the matter is now part of a presidential reference pending before the top court.
