Kamala Harris mocked for post celebrating one-year anniversary of failed presidential campaign
One year ago Monday, then-President Joe Biden announced via social media that he would be dropping out of the presidential race. He shortly thereafter endorsed Harris, who went on to become the Democratic nominee for the 2024 presidential election.
Harris celebrated the anniversary by writing a post on X with photos from her past campaign.
"One year ago today, I began my campaign for President of the United States. Over the 107 days of our race, I had the opportunity and honor to travel our nation and meet with Americans who were fighting for a better future. And today, millions of Americans continue to stand up for our values, our ideals, and our democracy. Their courage and resolve inspires me. Whether you are attending a protest, calling your representatives, or building community, I want to say: Thank you. We are in this fight together," Harris wrote.
Actor Jeff Daniels Laments Kamala Harris' Loss, Suggests She Would Have Governed Like Abraham Lincoln
Many social media users were not as impressed, with some pointing out that she neglected to reference Biden in the photos or the post.
Read On The Fox News App
"You didn't get a single primary vote. How very democratic," Twitchy's Amy Curtis wrote.
RNC Research, managed by the Republican National Committee, posted, "Becoming the presidential nominee without getting a single vote is not the flex you think it is."
Washington Free Beacon investigative reporter Chuck Ross joked, "lol. complete Joe Biden erasure."
Political commentator Link Lauren agreed, "No mention of Biden again. Really trying to erase her association with him. She was there in lockstep with that failing administration. I don't have amnesia."
Democratic Party Catapulted Into 'New Phase Of A Cold War' In One-year Wake Of Biden's Unprecedented Dropout
"I wonder what caused that campaign to begin on July 21," National Review senior writer Dan McLaughlin remarked.
"'One year ago today, I began my campaign for President of the United States.' Oh wow, I remember that. What did Drew Barrymore call you? Momala? Oooh, and Beyonce endorsed you, right? How did you work out? Did you win?" author John Hawkins joked.
"Your failure and reputation were complete," Townhall.com columnist Kurt Schlichter wrote.
Fox News Digital reached out to Harris' team for comment.
FEC filings showed the Harris campaign spent more than $1 billion in three months, including spending on celebrity influencers, radical activist groups and private jets. She lost to President Donald Trump in November.Original article source: Kamala Harris mocked for post celebrating one-year anniversary of failed presidential campaign
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The Democratic Party's Brand Is Cooked
Voters have increasingly little faith in the Democrats, a new Wall Street Journal poll found, with the party reaching its lowest favorability rating in more than three decades. Voters overwhelmingly believe that Republicans are better able to handle key issues in Congress than Democrats. The survey found that the majority of voters, 63 percent, have an unfavorable view of the Democratic Party. Only 33 percent hold a favorable view. This is the most unpopular that Democrats have been according to Journal polls dating back to 1990. As President Donald Trump enacts an increasingly authoritarian agenda and provides little economic benefit to the average American, Democrats are hopeful anti-Trump backlash will give them a strong showing in the 2026 midterm election. While slightly more people expect to vote for Democrats next year than Republicans, according to the Journal poll, Democrats' overall favorability has only dropped since Trump took office. 'The Democratic brand is so bad that they don't have the credibility to be a critic of Trump or the Republican Party,' John Anzalone, a Democratic pollster who worked on the survey, told the Journal. 'Until they reconnect with real voters and working people on who they're for and what their economic message is, they're going to have problems.' Anzalone's firm, which consulted for both President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris' presidential campaigns, worked on the survey with Trump pollster Tony Fabrizio. According to the survey, voters think Republicans in Congress are more capable at handling the economy, inflation and rising prices, tariffs, immigration, 'illegal' immigration, the Russia-Ukraine war, and foreign policy. On the topic of 'illegal' immigration, 48 percent have their faith in Republicans and 24 percent choose Democrats. Democrats scored higher on health care and vaccine policy. Both parties tied at 37 percent on the issue of looking out for middle class families. 'As much as I fully believe that Democrats are not doomed for all eternity, I also believe that many Democrats aren't quite grappling with the serious credibility problems the party still faces,' Democratic operative Tré Easton posted on X. 'The podcasts and everything are real cute, but we've got work to do.' Democrats also scored low in a Quinnipiac poll released earlier this month. In that survey, approval of congressional Democrats reached a new low of 19 percent, with 72 percent of voters saying they disapproved. 'This is a record low since March 2009 when the Quinnipiac University Poll first began asking this question of registered voters,' the university wrote. The Quinnippiac poll found that even registered Democrats disapproved of the party: Thirty-nine percent approved of how Democrats in Congress were handling their jobs, while 52 percent disapproved. Among registered Republicans, 77 percent approved of how Republicans are operating in Congress. In the findings from the Journal, voters are mixed on Trump. About half, or 55 percent, of voters say the country is headed in the wrong direction. This is down from 70 percent in January, meaning voters have become more optimistic since Trump took office, yet Trump is not wildly popular. He has a favorability rating of 45 percent, and an unfavorability rating of 52 percent. A total of 46 percent approve of what Trump is doing as president, and 52 percent disapprove. Fifty-three percent disapprove of Trump's handling of the economy, while 44 percent approve. On the issues of inflation, tariffs, immigration, looking out for middle class families, health care, vaccine policy, foreign policy, and the Russia-Ukraine war, voters disapprove of the job Trump is doing. On the topic of 'illegal' immigration, though, 51 percent approve and 49 percent disapprove. The Republican Party is not wildly popular either, though, with 54 percent of voters having an unfavorable view, compared to the 43 percent who have a favorable view. More from Rolling Stone Trump Claims Someone May Have Forged His Signature on Birthday Letter to Epstein I Worked With Stephen Colbert. Here's Why His Cancellation Should Scare You Yes, America Is an Oligarchy Best of Rolling Stone The Useful Idiots New Guide to the Most Stoned Moments of the 2020 Presidential Campaign Anatomy of a Fake News Scandal The Radical Crusade of Mike Pence
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
When will NASA get a permanent leader and why is it taking so long?
Six months into President Trump's second term, name almost any federal agency and it has an ambitious leader carrying out significant change. Except NASA. The world's premier space agency does have significant change in its forecast, based on President Trump's spending plan, but it still has no permanent leader. That absence at the top has increased concern among the agency's 18,000 or so employees as the president proposed a $6 billion agency-wide funding cut, as well as a 47% cut to NASA science missions – although Congress has pledged to put some of that back in. This week, 287 NASA employees signed a letter warning of "catastrophic impacts" to America's space ambitions. They addressed it to acting NASA administrator Sean Duffy, who also leads the Department of Transportation. He's the second acting administrator since Trump took office, and according to some experts, there's a good chance he may hold that role through the end of 2025 or even take on the dual role of NASA leader and Transportation head on a permanent basis. "It is unusual to have multiple acting administrators before confirmation," Mary Guenther, head of Space Policy at Progressive Policy Institute, told FLORIDA TODAY. Sean Duffy, who was confirmed as head of Department of Transportation in January, was put in as interim NASA administrator on July 9, taking over from previous acting administrator and former Kennedy Space Center director Janet Petro. "I don't think its common to have someone who has already been Senate confirmed, but for a different position -- a dual hat role -- trying to oversee NASA and something else," said Guenther. Bill Nelson was the last NASA administrator, resigning after Trump took office. What happened to Jared Isaacman's NASA nomination? It didn't start out this way when Trump took office. It looked like not only was NASA in line to get a new administrator fairly quickly but Trump's initial pick generated excitement in the space community. Trump's initial choice was billionaire businessman and and private astronaut, Jared Isaacman, who was close to SpaceX CEO Elon Musk, who was leading Trump's Department of Government Efficiency at the time. But on May 31, Trump dropped Isaacman, citing loyalty issues. Isaacman had moved forward to a final Senate vote with a favorable Senate committee vote of 19-9, and large support in the space industry. Trump said he was concerned that Isaacman had donated to Democratic campaigns. The change came around the same time as Trump and Musk had a very public falling out. "Now they have to find somebody else," said Space Policy analyst and historian, John Logsdon. "And that somebody else has to deal with what Trump wants to do with NASA." He said it's become clear that all Trump appointees are being assessed on loyalty. "These nominations -- just finding the right person, vetting them, all that jazz, usually takes a couple of months," said Guenther. "I would suspect we have a little bit longer to go." Guenther believes how long may depend, in part, on how well Duffy can handle running both NASA and the Department of Transportation. If he is successful, there could be less of a rush to get someone to NASA more quickly. How soon might NASA get a permanent administrator? There are multiple ways the next few months could play out. Guenther expects the whole process of assessing the situation and interviewing candidates to extend over the next few months. Then after a candidate is identified, there comes the Senate nomination process and vote, which can take time as was seen with Isaacman. For him, that lasted from January until his nomination was dropped in late May. "Once you get the nomination, you have to schedule the hearing and confirmation vote," said Logsdon. "It's a time consuming process." Guenther said she'd be surprised to see a confirmed administrator on the job this calendar year. She noted that may be a pessimistic way to look at it. One thing that could speed it up is if there had been another previously vetted candidate waiting in the wings even while Isaacman was proceeding through the nomination process. But it's not clear if such a candidate exists. "I think it's clear from the way Isaacman's nomination was pulled, there is a desire for loyalty − someone who is a strong proponent of the budget proposal that President Trump put forward," said Guenther. A White House budget proposal put NASA's annual budget as $18.8 billion beginning in 2026, down from the $24.8 billion this current year. The proposal includes massive cuts to science missions. Space Science will see a cut of $2.2 billion while Earth Science is set to see a $1.1 billion cut. Recently, U.S. Senate and House members approved appropriations bills which would keep NASA's annual budget at $24.9 billion. The White House proposal had also called for an end to NASA's SLS after the Artemis III moon landing in favor of commercial alternatives − however, the "big, beautiful bill" signed by Trump now allows for the Artemis IV and V missions. While it's not clear exactly what demands the administration wants from the next NASA leader, Guenther believes the candidate must be an advocate for commercial space. This means bringing in more of the private sector for NASA contracts. Logsdon said it's possible that Duffy could just assume both the Transportation and NASA jobs permanently. "He's just not confirmed as NASA Administrator, but he's been confirmed by the Senate as Secretary of Transportation, so I do not think they need to go through another hearing nomination, hearing confirmation. He's already there," said Logsdon. Should Duffy be picked to run both NASA and the Department of Transportation, the process could be expedited -- and, Logsdon said, it made sense that Petro was replaced. "If the Trump White House wanted to put Duffy in as administrator, and dual him with transportation, then Petro had to go," said Logsdon. Looking back in history: Waits for NASA leaders It's not unheard of for the space agency to be without a permanent leader for some time. Sean O'Keefe wasn't sworn in as NASA administrator until December 2001, 11 months after George W. Bush took office during his first term. Fred Gregory served as acting administrator during the wait. Gregory was then sworn in as deputy administrator. Looking back further, Richard Truly was not sworn in as NASA administrator until July 1989, serving under George H.W. Bush. "There's not one clear pattern," said Logsdon. "There have been several past instances where the nomination came in late." The best example of the nomination coming in late is James Beggs, who was nominated by President Reagan in June 1981. Six months after Reagan took office, Beggs was sworn in as NASA Administrator one month later. For now, it remains to be seen how long that wait will be during this second Trump administration. Brooke Edwards is a Space Reporter for Florida Today. Contact her at bedwards@ or on X: @brookeofstars. This article originally appeared on Florida Today: NASA still without a permanent administrator. Here's what could happen.
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Ed Miliband eyes battery bonanza to cut wind farm costs
Ed Miliband will plough hundreds of millions of pounds into battery storage technology as the cost of ordering wind farms to shut down spirals out of control. GB Energy, which is backed by the taxpayer, will use a chunk of its newly minted budget to invest in energy storage systems as households and businesses are forced to foot the bill to prevent the creaking power grid from getting congested. More than £700m has been spent so far this year on switching off wind farms to avoid overloading the grid as well as firing up alternatives to keep the lights on. This is up from about £450m over the same period in 2024, with the money ultimately coming from energy bills. Officials are also keen to ensure clean power remains reliable during periods of high demand. An industry source said: 'How do you get around the fact that the wind blows one day, doesn't blow the next? They have to keep switching off the turbines because they can't store the energy. GB Energy think they've got a role to play in trying to fund the innovation.' The Energy Secretary is presiding over the drive as part of a £4bn push by GB Energy into emerging technologies. The push into battery storage technology is understood to be one of GB Energy's three big priorities, with half its £4bn innovation budget being deployed to bring more of the UK's net zero supply chain onshore. The Government is hoping to create hundreds of new jobs in areas such as Scarborough, North Yorkshire, which is reinventing itself as a service hub for the offshore wind industry. Experts say large amounts of energy storage will be needed for net zero, as countries move away from readily dispatchable gas or coal-fired power stations to intermittent sources such as wind and solar farms. More storage on the grid should also help to prevent situations where grid operators are forced to pay wind farms to switch off when the network is too busy to accept their power. Instead, battery operators would be able to snap the electricity up cheaply and store it for later. There is particular need for so-called long-duration storage that can be deployed over weeks rather than days to counter periods of 'dunkelflaute', when cloudy skies and stagnant wind conditions reduce the output of renewables. Under Mr Miliband's plan for a clean power system by 2030, the amount of long-duration energy storage is expected to rise from about three gigawatts today to between four and six gigawatts – enough to power millions of homes. Traditional lithium ion batteries are not ideal for this owing to their high cost and relatively short-term output, as well as degradation over time and the large numbers that would need to be built. Possible alternatives include 'flow' batteries, which store energy in liquid electrolytes, pumped hydro storage, compressed air storage, heat storage such as thermal bricks or molten salt, and caves that can be used to store hydrogen. The push into battery storage technology comes after Mr Miliband abandoned controversial plans to charge southern households more for electricity than those in the North amid a backlash from wind farm owners. Advocates claimed that zonal pricing would also have cut bills for all households overall by removing the need for £27bn of grid upgrades and axing the payments made to wind farms to switch off. Wind turbines have been built faster than grid capacity over the past decade, leaving Britain's infrastructure struggling to move electricity from Scottish wind farms to where it is needed in the South. A spokesman for GB Energy said: 'Long-duration energy storage is vital to a clean, secure, and affordable energy future for the UK. 'GB Energy sees opportunity to invest in both proven technologies like pumped hydro and emerging innovations such as flow batteries and liquid air storage. By stepping in early, we can unlock private capital, accelerate delivery, and back British supply chains.' Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
