Rachel Reeves to splash billions in North and Midlands under major rule change
Chancellor Rachel Reeves is expected to reprioritise funding outside of London and the South East - with tens of billions of pounds of investment in road, rail and green energy projects
Rachel Reeves is preparing to divert billions of pounds of investment into the North and the Midlands by rewriting key Treasury rules.
The Chancellor will use next month's Spending Review to reprioritise funding outside of London and the South East of England - unlocking tens of billions of pounds of investment in road, rail and green energy projects. She recently told The Guardian she was planning "£113bn more in capital spending than the plans we inherited" from the Tories.
It comes amid alarm from Labour MPs over the threat from Reform UK in their heartlands and the prospect of cuts to day-to-day spending in unprotected Whitehall departments.
Treasury value-for-money rules assess investment in areas where the economy is already doing well as having the biggest impact on growth.
Critics say the rules in the so-called Green Book bake in a bias towards the South East, favouring an expansion of the Tube to a tram network in a northern city.
But Ms Reeves committed to review these rules earlier this year, with the announcement expected alongside the Spending Review in mid June.
Speaking in January, she said: 'As the metro mayor of Liverpool, Steve Rotherham, has called for, we will review the Green Book and how it is being used to provide objective, transparent advice on public investment across the country, including outside London, and the South East. This means that investment in all regions is given a fair hearing by the Treasury that I lead.'
Boris Johnson ordered a review of the rules to allow an infrastructure boom in the North of England in a bid to cling onto Red Wall voters that backed the Tories in the 2019 election. But the changes never materialised.
This week, Keir Starmer said Nigel Farage's party was Labour's biggest electoral threat and dismissed the Tories as "sliding into the abyss".
On a visit to St Helens, the PM said Reform's economic plans risked a repeat of the market mayhem caused by Tory PM Liz Truss.
Mr Starmer said: "He [Farage] set out economic plans that contained billions upon billions of pounds of completely unfunded spending, precisely the sort of irresponsible splurge that sent your mortgage costs, your bills and the cost of living through the roof. It's Liz Truss all over again."
Reform's local election performance has sparked jitters in both Labour and Tory circles after the party seized control of 10 English councils and won the Runcorn and Helsby by-election by just six votes.
However officials pushed back on the idea that the Chancellor's plans were a response to Reform - pointing to Ms Reeves's commitment to a review in January.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
2 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Scots now so scunnered they want to set the world on fire with Reform
It's the same impulse that prompts people to take to the streets with Molotov cocktails or creep out of their beds in the dead of the night and fell a centuries-old sycamore. They are acts born of frustration and battered self-esteem, and they provide a temporary release. But then you wake up and see that nothing has changed. Except now the last community centre on your estate has all its windows panned in, and there's a vast emptiness where once there stood a tree. If the panic of SNP and Labour canvassers is anything to go by, the constituency of Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse is teetering on the brink of just such self-immolation. In the by-election prompted by the death of Christina McKelvie, it now seems likely Reform will come second, and no longer inconceivable it could win, giving Holyrood its first Reform MSP. In a dilapidated street next to a shuttered off-licence, Nigel Farage's gurning face leers down from a billboard that reads 'Hamilton Needs Reform'. If the party does well, it won't be down to his personality; polls and vox pops suggest most Scottish voters still consider him 'an a***hole'. It will be because some people are so scunnered with the calcification of Scottish politics, they want to set the world on fire, while others are too scunnered to head to the polling booths and extinguish the blaze. This didn't happen with Ukip. In 2016, Scotland seemed largely immune to the allure of British nationalism, rejecting its manifesto of xenophobia and backing Remain by a ratio of 3:2. For a significant number of people back then, the answer to Farage's question: 'Who is really running [your] country?' wasn't Europe, but Westminster, while the anti-establishment party promising to cut them loose was the SNP. READ MORE: Dani Garavelli: A good death is an extension of a good life Dani Garavelli: Even for great writers, the pursuit of truth is perilous Dani Garavelli: Voters are done with politicians who talk big and act small ALMOST 10 years on, the SNP *is* the establishment party, tarnished by fraud allegations and paralysed by its own longevity. It failed to deliver on its promises, just as Labour had done before it, leaving its voters in a pilotless plane, floundering around for the eject button. For some in Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse, the eject button appears to be Reform, which is running neck and neck with Labour nationally. But we already know — from bitter experience — that populist leaders like Farage and Donald Trump build their electoral brand on a tissue of hate and lies. They offer us scapegoats and an outlet for our (self) contempt. They dangle the illusion of control in front of our faces like a hypnotist's watch. They conjure up six impossible things before breakfast. They swear they'll make our country great again while bringing it to its knees. Those who vote for them drink at a waterhole they know has been poisoned, then complain when they suffer have been handed lesson after lesson on how this ends. We have watched while Brexit wrecked trade, reduced EU immigration (but not net migration, despite Farage's odious 'Breaking Point' poster) and distanced us from Europe at precisely the point where Russia's invasion of Ukraine required a show of strength. What happened to the £350m a week that was supposed to transform the NHS? Where is the promised renaissance of marginalised working class enclaves like Sunderland? Lies, lies and more lies: that's all these parties offer. And if Brexit doesn't convince you, just look across the Atlantic: US citizens deported, foreign leaders antagonised, democracy hijacked. There's no dividend for those who voted Republican. According to various studies, the average family will be $4,000 dollars a year worse off as a result of Trump's tariffs. Around 275,000 people lost their jobs in March alone. Is your life in a rut? Do you crave upheaval? Well this is what it looks like, and it ain't pretty. In Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse, the lies and race-baiting has already begun. Last week, Farage produced an ad that claimed Anas Sarwar had promised to prioritise the Pakistani community when he had done no such thing. It's a slander to falsely accuse another person of an obsession with race, and a piece of hypocrisy when the obsession is yours and yours alone. But Farage doesn't care. Rather he thrives on it because whipping up hatred is what he does best. He doesn't care that his policies don't stack up economically either, because he knows people believe what they want to believe, and because he presents himself as a free spirit, unshackled by focus groups and the other constraints of traditional party policies. Nationally and locally, Labour hasn't done itself any favours. Starmer allowed the Reform leader to dictate the terms of the debate, chasing his anti-immigration policies and rhetoric up a blind alley. Now Farage is nipping at the heels of Starmer's U-turns, pledging to end the two-child cap and reinstate the winter fuel payments. Only *Farage* didn't prevaricate for the best part of a year, nor is he obliged to demonstrate how he would fund them. Refused to appear IN Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse, the party has sold itself short by fielding a candidate who seems to wish he was anywhere but a parliamentary election. At a time when all left-ish parties should be waging war on the right, Davy Russell has refused to appear at hustings and an STV debate. He appears apathetic about the prospect of ceding second place to Reform's Ross Lambie. Lambie's campaign statement includes the line: 'We are not daft; we know someone is up to no good if they'd rather spend £5,000 on being illegally smuggled into the country than spend £50 on a budget flight,' which makes no sense at all. The SNP have played a better game (aided by Labour who have gifted them the opportunity to call the contest 'a two-horse race'). In Katy Loudon, they have a decent candidate, and — while Labour are tussling over the same turf — they have set themselves up in opposition. Describing Farage as a 'clear and present danger', John Swinney said: 'It's time to unite behind our shared principles…and refuse to be divided by a man determined to destroy the values we hold dear.' This line is likely to be effective with liberal metropolitan types (like me) although disenfranchised voters who want a break from the status quo might prefer him to focus on what can be done to breathe life back into the clever move has been to draw attention to Reform's antipathy towards the Scottish Parliament. Swinney says Farage would use the party's Holyrood MSPs to bring down the institution they had been elected to. Perhaps Farage thinks this would be popular given Scots' own frustrations. But — like members of a fractious family — it's fine for us to rain curses down upon our 'tinpot' parliament, but hell mend any outsider who tries to diminish it. Devolution fears FARAGE should remember that, in 1997, devolution was not contentious; it was the settled will of the nation. Relinquishing power prised from Westminster would be a funny way for us to take back control. Perhaps voters leaning Reform-wards see a vote for Lambie as a one-off protest - something they can rescind at next year's Holyrood elections. But Farage's party has a particular momentum right now and once that juggernaut starts careening down the hill, it will be difficult to stop. The same is true of attacks on Holyrood. Sure, we should be pushing Scottish politicians to raise their game; but if we were to allow devolution to slip from our grasp, it would be difficult to reclaim it. It's something that requires protection, like democracy, as America is discovering to its cost.
Press and Journal
2 hours ago
- Press and Journal
Inside Aberdeenshire council chaos as Nigel Farage picks Tories apart
Aberdeenshire was a rare glimmer of hope for the Tories at the last local elections but that optimism is at risk of evaporating entirely while the Reform party surges. Four councillors have defected, and others are backing Nigel Farage, while the administration wobbles. And now the Reform leader himself is coming to the north-east for a campaigning visit as he hopes to tempt more politicians and voters, while exploiting anger over the future of oil and gas. How did it get to this point in the troubled Aberdeenshire Council administration? The Press and Journal has spoken to party insiders across the local political divides, who paint a picture of a team struggling with bitter feuds and defections. 'It's an absolute shambles,' one council insider told the Press and Journal. 'The administration is about to implode.' The simmering tensions really bubbled over in May when council leader Gillian Owen was forced to quit as local Tory group leader after she branded her own colleagues 'f***ing b*****ds'. Stewart Adams stepped in to replace her. But sources say there's no guarantee he'll head the council when Ms Owen formally leaves her post. That's not expected to happen until the council meets on June 26. In the 2022 council elections, the Tories returned 26 members in Aberdeenshire and retained control of the local authority. They currently rule with support from the Liberal Democrats and an aligned group of seven independent councillors. But that agreement looks precarious ahead of crunch negotiations after four Tory defections to Reform and further exits from the party locally. It's understood the Lib Dems and independents want to revisit their current cooperation agreement. If that doesn't work, options are limited and could rely on a partnership with the SNP. Aberdeenshire Lib Dem leader Anne Stirling has been touted as a possible council chief. 'She's a formidable force,' said one council insider. 'She's a very strong leader.' Publicly, the Lib Dems are staying tight-lipped on anything formal. Gwyneth Petrie, who leads the SNP in Aberdeenshire, said her party is 'open' to talks. 'There is no stability,' she told the P&J. 'A change would be welcome. 'It's clear the Tories are a very unhappy and disjointed group.' That unhappiness became apparent when two former Conservatives, Mark Findlater and Laurie Carnie, joined Reform last year. They were the first councillors to defect to Nigel Farage's party in Scotland. More recently they were joined by Ellon's John Crawley and East Garioch councillor Dominic Lonchay. Bitter feuds and lasting recriminations mean it's unlikely Reform councillors will work with the Tories. Mr Findlater, for example, led Aberdeenshire Council for the Tories until he was ousted in 2023. Reform insiders go further. They say they don't care if the Conservative administration collapses – even if it lets the SNP in the back door. 'We're between the devil and the deep blue sea at the moment,' a Reform source said. 'It really doesn't matter.' Aberdeenshire's Reform contingent is instead looking to the 2027 local elections. 'We'll be able to hold our own, and be a force,' the source told us. The Tories are no kinder to ex-Reform colleagues. Sources claim their old friends achieved little as councillors prior to defection. One said Mr Lonchay only joined Reform because he failed vetting to run for the Tories in next year's Holyrood election. Another source claimed Mr Lonchay 'threw his toys out the pram'. Despite the upheaval, the Conservative group just wants to appear like business as usual. A Tory spokesperson said: 'Under Stewart's leadership, we will continue to focus on the priorities that matter to the people of Aberdeenshire.' On Monday, Mr Farage will open a new front in that contest. He's expected to be in the city in the morning before joining the campaign in the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse Scottish Parliament by-election.
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Starmer: Wave of investments will make military an ‘integrated fighting machine'
Sir Keir Starmer has pledged a wave of new investments to turn the armed forces into a 'formidable, integrated fighting machine' as part of the Government's defence review. The Prime Minister said he would invest in a military that is 'more integrated, more ready, more lethal than ever'. As part of the review, due to be published on Monday, the Government has pledged £1.5 billion to set up at least six factories, and will support the procurement of up to 7,000 UK-built long-range weapons. The move is in response to the review's call for an 'always on' munitions production capacity that could be scaled up quickly. The new funding will see UK munitions spend hit £6 billion during this Parliament and support around 1,800 jobs throughout the country. Sir Keir called the review a 'radical blueprint' that would drive forward investments in shipbuilding, drone technology and cyber defences. Preparing for the threats of tomorrow means 'bringing together every capability we have, from drones, to artillery, to human instinct and intelligence, into one formidable, integrated fighting machine,' he wrote in The Sun. 'To achieve this, we are announcing a wave of new investments in our Armed Forces across land, air and sea.' He said Labour would end the 'disgraceful hollowing out' of the armed forces. 'We will invest in a fighting force that is more integrated, more ready, more lethal than ever — putting Britain back where it belongs as a leader in defence and a leader in Nato. 'We will provide better kit for our warriors when they are fighting abroad — so that they can use the full range of conventional and technological capabilities.' Defence Secretary John Healey said the Government would embrace the recommendations in the review and make defence an 'engine for economic growth'. It will urge the the Ministry of Defence to lay the industrial foundations to boost weapons stockpiles to meet the demand of 'high-tempo' warfare. More than £1.5 billion in extra funding will go to military homes in response to the review. The cash will be spent on urgent repairs such as fixing boilers and roofs, and other issues including tackling damp. 'Our forces make extraordinary sacrifices to keep us safe and to serve this country and yet for years, we've forced their families to live in substandard homes,' Mr Healey said on a visit to military accommodation in Cambridgeshire. The Conservatives criticised the investment in munitions factories as too slow. Shadow defence secretary James Cartlidge said the Chancellor has used the strategic defence review to put an 'effective freeze' on new orders for military kit. 'It's a bit rich of Labour to talk about 'always on' munitions production when procurement has been largely switched off for the past year,' he said. He added: 'Of course, we welcome investment in new munitions factories, but we don't know when they will be ready, only that these orders should have been placed months ago. 'Ultimately, we need to see greater ambition for the pace and scale of rearmament our armed forces require, given the threats we face and the need to replace inventory gifted to Ukraine. 'That means 3% of GDP by the end of this parliament, and Labour properly prioritising defence spending – instead of seeking to outspend Reform on welfare.'
