Huda Beauty's Easy Bake Setting Spray is here – and we were front row at the Paris party
This is the setting spray Huda herself never thought she'd make… until she had to. 'The number one product request from our community was a setting spray. But not any setting spray – an Easy Bake Setting Spray,' she revealed.
The Big Reveal
Via Canva Pro, Supplied
Picture this: The pink carpet is rolled out, the cameras are flashing, and Huda herself, glowing under the Parisian lights, drops the real tea on why this product almost didn't happen. 'Honestly, I was against it!' she confesses with a laugh. 'I don't love setting sprays – they don't work for me as I'd always start to see my pores. But my team created an amazing product. They packed this with rice starch, mineral clay, and five types of hyaluronic acid to create a blurring veil. Even without makeup, skin looks fresh – it's the only setting spray I'll use.'
Why This Spray Is Everything
Supplied
If you're addicted to the Easy Bake Loose Powder, prepare to lose your mind. This spray is that iconic formula, but in a bottle. Think: 16-hour wear, blurred pores, and a soft-focus finish that laughs in the face of sweat and humidity.
The magic? It's alcohol-free and fragrance-free to keep skin happy, packed with rice starch and mineral clay to blur pores and control shine, and loaded with five types of hyaluronic acid for serious hydration.
If This Spray Had a Theme Song…
We had to ask: Huda, what's the anthem for this game-changer? Without missing a beat, she sang: 'We are the champions, my friends!' And a beauty champion it most certainly is.
Final Verdict?
And after seeing it in action (and dancing the night away in Paris without a single touch-up), we're officially declaring it the only setting spray worth the hype.
Here's everything you need to know about Huda and Mona's new podcast!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Khaleej Times
7 hours ago
- Khaleej Times
British actor Terence Stamp, Superman villain, dies aged 87
Terence Stamp, who made his name as an actor in 1960s London and went on to play the arch-villain General Zod in the Hollywood hits "Superman" and "Superman II", has died aged 87, his family said on Sunday. The Oscar-nominated actor starred in films ranging from Pier Paolo Pasolini's "Theorem" in 1968 and "A Season in Hell" in 1971 to "The Adventures of Priscilla, Queen of the Desert" in 1994 in which he played a transgender woman. The family said in a statement to Reuters that Stamp died on Sunday morning. "He leaves behind an extraordinary body of work, both as an actor and as a writer that will continue to touch and inspire people for years to come," the family said. "We ask for privacy at this sad time." Born in London's East End in 1938, the son of a tugboat stoker, he endured the bombing of the city during World War Two before leaving school to work initially in advertising, eventually winning a scholarship to go to drama school. Famous for his good looks and impeccable dress sense, he formed one of Britain's most glamorous couples with Julie Christie, with whom he starred in "Far From the Madding Crowd" in 1967. He also dated the model Jean Shrimpton and was chosen as a muse by photographer David Bailey. After failing to land the role of James Bond to succeed Sean Connery, he appeared in Italian films and worked with Federico Fellini in the late 1960s. He dropped out of the limelight and studied yoga in India before landing his most high-profile role - as General Zod, the megalomaniacal leader of the Kryptonians, in "Superman" in 1978 and its sequel in 1980. He went on to appear in a string of other films, including "Valkyrie" with Tom Cruise in 2008, "The Adjustment Bureau" with Matt Damon in 2011 and movies directed by Tim Burton.
Harpers Bazaar Arabia
3 days ago
- Harpers Bazaar Arabia
The Capri Comeback: Why We're All Buying Cropped Pants For Pre-Fall
Worn by vintage style icons like Audrey Hepburn to modern day muses like Hailey Bieber, the capri pant refuses to be pegged to just one era Every so often, fashion resurrects a piece we thought we'd left behind for good. This season, that comeback star is the capri pant, the cropped mid-calf silhouette that was a wardrobe staple in the early 2000s and, if we go further back, a defining piece for style icons of the 50s and 60s. Only now, they've returned sleeker and infinitely more modern. Today's capris are nothing like the versions we remember from the past. Designers have reworked and reimagined them with precise tailoring, richer fabrics and cuts that are more flattering. Labels like Prada, Miu Miu, and The Row have all incorporated capris into their recent collections, each offering their own interpretation, from structured minimalist designs to playful, embellished versions. This isn't a fleeting micro-trend pulled from the depths of your teenage wardrobe. What sets them aside is their versatility – they're equally at home at a gallery opening, on a weekend coffee run, or at a sultry soirée. Pair them with a crisp button down and ballet flats for a polished look, or swap in a structured blazer for a chic, workwear take on the trend. Part of their renewed appeal lies in fashion's current penchant for timeless, investment worthy dressing. Capri pants embody the kind of style that does not belong to a single moment, they have been worn by everyone from Audrey Hepburn to modern day muses like Hailey Bieber, yet they never feel tied to one era. Instead, they act as a blank canvas for whatever mood you're in. While trends often swing between extremes, oversized looks one season, skin tight shapes the next, capris sit confidently in the middle. They're sleek but not severe, playful but can still be polished up. This versatility makes them a rare piece that can be worn over and over – the ultimate hybrid piece to pack for a long weekend. Capri pants aren't just back — they're the transition piece of the season. Effortless yet refined, they will make your shift from summer into autumn styling feel infinitely easier.
The National
3 days ago
- The National
Remembering the summer of Blur and Oasis … and the attention war that followed it
Thirty years ago, the UK was gripped by a battle of the bands – reminding us that the past really is a foreign country and they definitely do things differently there. Blur and Oasis, the pre-eminent Britpop music acts of the era, released their respective singles Country House and Roll With It on August 14, 1995. Such was the popularity of the two bands at the time that if the release dates of their songs had been staggered, then both would have claimed the coveted number one spot in the weekly charts. But when Blur and Oasis chose the same day for release, only one could claim top spot. In this pre-streaming era of 1995, weekly sales were the hard currency of the day and the Blur-Oasis contest ensured nearly 500,000 copies of the two singles combined were sold that week, a huge number in a time when about 70,000 sales pretty much guaranteed a number one hit in the UK. The rising tide lifted all the boats that week, as single sales raced to record heights for the decade. Country House won out, with the UK finding out the results through the Sunday evening radio broadcast of the chart countdown. Anyone old enough to recall the 'Britpop battle' in the UK will have a memory of the extraordinary late summer of 1995, when those two bands occupied the entire cultural space. Maybe your memory might be jogged still further when the moment is dramatised in The Battle stage play, which will open in the UK next year. The contest set up the most binary moment in households across Britain, particularly as it tugged at the class and geographic schisms of UK society, apparently pitting northern, working-class Oasis against southern, middle-class Blur – or surly Mancunians and chirpy Londoners, as some described it. Yes, the mid-90s really were a peak moment in derogatory labelling. John Harris's 2003 book, titled Britpop: Cool Britannia and the Spectacular Demise of English Rock, describes the week in which the bands locked horns as a period that birthed 'an outpouring of comment and coverage that turned Britpop into an inflated caricature of itself', while noting that the two singles in question were close to being their worst work of that era by both bands. Contemporary critics also described both singles as lacklustre – describing Country House as mod pastiche and Roll With It as stadium rock quality – not that it mattered much given those level of sales and the fevered interest in the bands. Decades later, Roll With It doesn't appear on Spotify's popular Oasis songs list, but Country House does show on Blur's streaming platform roll of honour. Oasis have been entertaining huge crowds on their revival tour this summer and have played Roll With It on every night so far, according to Set List data. Blur, meanwhile, played Country House to generous applause during their Abu Dhabi Grand Prix post-race set a decade ago, providing a relatively rare outing for the song. It didn't feature at all during their last live outings at Coachella in April 2024. Roll With It may be a firm fan favourite this summer, but it wasn't the favourite in that summer week of 1995. Blur claimed victory in the chart battle, but within months Oasis were said to have won the war, by dint of superior album and concert ticket sales. Less than a year later, the Manchester band were playing two huge sold-out concerts at Knebworth House, while Blur appeared to wear the spoils of that August 1995 victory wearily. Beyond the nostalgia and the moderately ripping yarn of that 1995 moment, what else is there to take away from a peculiarly British cultural moment? First, it reminds us how radically the metrics of success have changed over time. In the streaming era, the battle is almost irrelevant; it is the war for long-term dominance and overall consumption and attention that matters. And yet, in a playlist and suggested-for-you driven world, the individual song is as important as ever in the compounding nature of the subscription economy. Those millions of listens your favourite artist accrues every month are more likely to have been gathered from cleverly selected platform playlists than from the 20th-century tradition of listening to an album from start to finish. The mid-90s were a peak time for tribalism and the primary way of showing your colours was to actively go out and buy physical media. People still wanted to own the music they loved in those days, something far removed from the habits of now. As the relative popularity of those two songs on platforms shows us, there can also be unlikely twists and turns in the history of a popular release. Oasis's song for the ages, Wonderwall, released later in 1995, didn't make it to number one on the UK singles chart either, but is one of the top 3 most streamed songs from the 1990s, only bettered by a pair of songs that also did not top the charts when released. The 1980s provides other examples of the same trend and underscores, perhaps, that past performance is not indicative of future results. Back in 1995, a piece published in The Telegraph the day after the result was known compared it to the fuss to 30 years before, when the Rolling Stones and The Beatles were chart rivals and speculated that 'it seems unlikely that, in 2025, either Blur's or Oasis's offerings will have earned similar status in the rock n roll pantheon'. Some might say, predictions are a fool's errand.
