logo
Will becoming a city help Brownsville and its neighbors thrive? Residents are split

Will becoming a city help Brownsville and its neighbors thrive? Residents are split

Miami Herald27-07-2025
At the corner of Northwest 27th Street and 54th Avenue in Brownsville sits a plot of land that was supposed to have a grocery store atop it.
It has changed hands many times and suffered through many broken promises, Kenneth Kilpatrick told the Miami Herald as he drove through the community of more than 16,000 residents.
Scattered throughout the neighborhood are a few corner stores. There are two flea markets at a nearby shopping center that includes a Foot Locker, a dd's Discounts, and a few fast food chains. Not one major grocery store is in the area.
To get fresh produce, Kilpatrick has to go to neighboring Hialeah. In fact, for any entertainment – see a movie, eat at a sit-down restaurant, or any recreational fun – he has to leave the neighborhood. And the one shopping center the area does have isn't enough to sustain the community, he said.
The vacant land, lack of grocery store, entertainment and ideal shopping options are a few of the reasons Kilpatrick, president of the Brownsville Civic Neighborhood Association, wants to see if it's feasible for the neighborhood, along with five other neighboring unincorporated communities in Miami-Dade County, to become a city.
'Quality of life has been an issue in Brownsville for decades,' he said. 'It's public safety, it's infrastructure, like a grocery store, better schools, better everything from your sidewalks to your street lighting, the parks and having funded programs for children, programs for seniors.'
Kilpatrick now sits on the North Dade Municipal Advisory Committee that is tasked with the job of determining if the area has the tax base to thrive as a city. The efforts shifted into high gear after the neighborhood came under threat of annexation by Hialeah, which commissioned a feasibility study to determine if annexing 150 acres of Brownsville would generate revenue for the city back in 2023. Residents packed Hialeah city hall meetings pushing back against the annexation, which ultimately was dropped.
RELATED: After dodging Hialeah annexation, this historically Black neighborhood wants to be a city
The committee will be composed of members from each of the six communities, which include Brownsville, Gladeview, Gratigny, Little River Farms, North Shore, and Twin Lakes/Northshore Gardens. They are set to have their first meeting Tuesday, but not everyone is sure cityhood is the right path. They worry about increased property taxes and question the area's ability to generate revenue.
'There's nothing to draw any major businesses that want to come here, unless we invite them to come and develop some of the areas along Seventh Avenue,' said Little River Farm Homeowners Association president Munir Ingram. 'But what are people going to come here to do?'
Still, Kilpatrick said there are potential benefits. 'You can create business districts in your city,' he said. 'You can create entertainment destinations and places for leisure all within the purview of your city limits, I think, if you have the right visionaries and right people at the helm, if you have the tax revenue. That's the biggest thing.'
READ: Homeowners in Little Haiti are aging. Here's what the next generation is facing
'Our fair share'
Brownsville is a community dear to Kilpatrick, whose roots in the community go back decades. His grandfather, George Kilpatrick, was a business leader in the community and founded the first merchant store, along with Neil Adams, Spic and Span, in the late 1940s.
Originally called Browns Subdivision, the area was a farming development platted by W.L. Brown during the 1920s. The community became a model of Black home ownership and was home to Homeowner's Paradise, a subdivision where wealthy Black people lived. The community has birthed Black political stalwarts, such as the late Gwen Cherry, the first Black woman elected to the Florida legislature, and Joe Lang Kershaw, the state's first Black state legislator after Reconstruction.
Kilpatrick moved to Brownsville 12 years ago, and described it as once a bedroom community. The predominantly Black area, like most in Miami-Dade county, has seen changes: it's become increasingly rental with the rise of Airbnbs. According to U.S. census data, about 31 percent of the units in Brownsville are owner-occupied, 69 percent are renter-occupied. Nearby Gladeview, which has about 14,000 residents, is a similar situation: 27.5 percent of its homes are owner-occupied and the remaining 72.5 percent of residents are renters.
Despite the lack of big box businesses in the area and a shrinking homeowner base, Kilpatrick believes that incorporation could resolve some of the issues Brownsville and surrounding neighborhoods are experiencing because it would allow their tax dollars to go toward infrastructure that would benefit the community. Kilpatrick said it could also help with zoning.
'If you don't want a bunch of 28-story condominium apartments in your neighborhood, cityhood kind of helps you to balance that right because you control the zoning,' he said.
As Kilpatrick drives through the neighborhood, he stops at the historic Lincoln Memorial Cemetery, Miami's historic Black cemetery. He stops to talk to Jessie Wooden, the owner of the cemetery who made its preservation a personal mission. Wooden, who lives 10 minutes outside of Brownsville, said he's optimistic about the area potentially becoming a city.'We just want our fair share given to our constituents and what they deserve in the community and to preserve the community that so many that came before me have built,' he said.
'What is the benefit?'
While most of the residents living in the proposed incorporation zone agree on the area's issues, not everyone is convinced becoming a city will solve any of them.
Huddled inside the living room of Richard and Jannie Johnson's home sat a dozen of Little River Farms homeowners who had a list of reasons why they don't see incorporation leading to much change, citing the lack of a tax base, shrinking homeownership, and too few businesses to attract new residents or visitors.
The Johnsons have lived in Little River Farm for 50 years and have seen the changes in their community, which used to be predominantly white with few Cuban and Black families. They watched as one by one, homes were built and the community grew. Residents eventually formed a homeowners association to take care of their neighborhood.
But the area has become plagued with developers looking to build upward and investors looking for cheap property to rent out.
Longtime resident Everlina Chandler said many properties are being sold to developers and apartment buildings are being put on top of the land. 'No one is buying or purchasing homes anymore, and that brings down the property value in the neighborhood,' she said. 'They're just renting. So they don't care about their property value or how the community looks, the beautification of the neighborhood that will attract younger families.'
RELATED: Residents divided on idea of historically Black Miami neighborhoods becoming a city
'You won't attract any of those types of people because everything is for rent,' Chandler continued. 'And those who own, they're elderly now, and they can't afford to keep the neighborhood up and purchase things to make the neighborhood better.'
Jannie Johnson said she's also worried about the increase in property taxes. And while residents bemoaned having to leave the community to find basic needs such as groceries or entertainment, they're not convinced they have the tax base to be able to be a city, given the types of businesses in the area.
Little River Farms HOA president Munir Ingram said there are also environmental concerns that impact their community, such as converting to septic, illegal dumping, and the threat of development encroaching on their lakes.
In the nearby Gratigny neighborhood, residents raised the same issues. Gratigny Homeowners Association president Joyce Brown said there are several unknowns for residents, including how much taxes will go up should it be found that they can become a city.
'There are going to be some changes,' she said. 'But what is the benefit? I don't think the benefit is going to be worth it.'
Longtime resident of Gratigny, Mary Bennett, 92, said she recalled a time when the neighborhood itself didn't have lights and sidewalks. The community petitioned the county to bring streetlights and pavement to the areas.
Standing outside her well-manicured lawn, Bennett said she's more concerned about the threat of high rises coming into the quiet enclave. 'I don't like what I see going on in other neighborhoods, meaning skyscrapers. If you're going to build a home, where is the parking? Where are these people who are living in these 12 stories? Where are they gonna park? That's a problem.'
'We need to make an informed decision'
Felicia Mayo-Cutler grew up in the North Shore neighborhood and described it as one of the few communities where well-off Black professionals lived. Nestled near Miami Shores, Mayo-Cutler has lived in the community since she was 2, only leaving when she went off to college before returning in 1990. She now owns a home in the community alongside the parents of the children she grew up with and serves as vice president of the North Shore Community Association.
She noted that the community, once predominantly Black community, has seen demographic changes. Nearby construction has led to people driving through the neighborhood and taking an interest in homes in the area.
'It's still predominantly Black, however, the newer residents are not,' she said, adding that North Shore is still a neighborhood of predominantly homeowners. She estimated there are about 250 homes in the community.
Mayo-Cutler, who will sit on the committee to explore cityhood, said she wants to weigh the options before deciding if she's for it, adding she sees added benefits in controlling tax dollars, but said she's pleased with some of the services provided by the county. 'We need to know what the options are, as well as share that information with our commissioner so she can make an informed decision as well,' she said.
Trameka Rios, who handles social media for the Little River Farms community and will sit on the MAC, is of a similar mindset, and also understands the concerns of residents as her husband grew up in the neighborhood and his family owned a corner store in the community. They now live in his childhood home.
Still, she emphasized that she hopes they can be open to the process and give the committee a chance to determine if becoming a city is even viable.
'My biggest thing is to give it a chance,' she said. 'If it doesn't work, we tried it, and if it does work, then we can all collectively come together and see what we want to have happen in our area.'
But Brown, with Gratigny, said if the area doesn't incorporate, she thinks the various neighborhoods will eventually find themselves annexed by various cities – precisely the fear that led Kilpatrick and others to push for incorporation.
'We just will fight it and delay it as much as possible,' she said. 'But I think eventually it will happen.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump taking executive action on university data requirements — targeting race-based admissions
Trump taking executive action on university data requirements — targeting race-based admissions

CNN

timea few seconds ago

  • CNN

Trump taking executive action on university data requirements — targeting race-based admissions

President Donald Trump is expected to take executive action Thursday to expand the type of admissions data given to the federal government from colleges and universities — a move aimed at boosting transparency regarding race-based admissions, a senior White House official said. In a presidential memorandum, Trump is directing Education Secretary Linda McMahon to revamp a longtime US higher education database called the Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System, which conducts surveys reviewing trends in areas like tuition and fees, admissions considerations, enrollment and financial aid. The memorandum, the senior official said, instructs McMahon to 'expand the scope of required reporting for institutions' admissions data in order to provide adequate transparency' and to 'increase accuracy checks' on that data. In June of 2023, the Supreme Court ruled that colleges and universities can no longer take race into consideration as a specific basis for granting admission, a landmark decision overturning long-standing precedent that has benefited Black and Latino students in higher education. But since that decision, the White House official said, there is not enough admissions data available from universities, raising 'concerns about whether race is actually used in admissions decisions in practice.' The expanded data, the official said, is expected to verify that. It comes as Trump is more broadly pushing for policy changes at colleges and universities, including over Diversity, Equity and Inclusion initiatives. The Trump administration has heralded multi-million-dollar deals in recent days with Brown University and Columbia University, and it remains engaged in a pair of lawsuits with Harvard University. As part of the deal with Columbia University, the school agreed to provide the federal government with admissions data showing 'both rejected and admitted students broken down by race, color, grade point average, and performance on standardized tests.' Thursday's executive action appears to codify that for all other institutions receiving federal funding.

Why School Desegregation Still Matters In The Digital Age
Why School Desegregation Still Matters In The Digital Age

Forbes

time13 minutes ago

  • Forbes

Why School Desegregation Still Matters In The Digital Age

School desegregation is an old topic and, frankly, one few people want to talk about. It forces us to confront uncomfortable memories of the past. To discuss desegregation, you must acknowledge a system that, for more than a century, assigned Black students to separate schools based solely on their race. These schools were consistently equipped with older, outdated books, substandard facilities, and fewer supplemental educational services compared to predominantly White schools in the same districts. This led to fewer opportunities. Educational inferiority was institutionalized and permitted by law. To suggest that desegregation remains relevant today is even more uncomfortable because it forces us to admit that more than 70 years after Brown v. Board of Education, many of the conditions above still exist. To confound this situation further, the advance of education technology has caused an evolution in inequality that simply carries on the ugly legacy of segregation. As of today, more than 100 school desegregation cases remain open in the federal court system. Nearly all are located in the southern United States. These open cases mean continued education inequality on the basis of race for far too many students.. But today's barriers to educational access reflect both the era we live in and the technologies that define it. In a society increasingly powered by the internet, access to Wi-Fi is a persistent challenge for many families in these districts. The shiny new laptops distributed to students in wealthier areas are a luxury many predominantly Black districts cannot afford. And in this digital age, poverty begets digital exclusion, which in turn begets more profound educational inequity. The current Department of Justice's answer to these open desegregation cases is simple: deny their relevance and push for their closure. I won't dispute that some of these federal court cases may be outdated and should be closed. At the Southern Education Foundation (SEF), we hope to see the day when they can all be closed because the conditions that required them have been corrected. That is the aspiration. But for every situation where a court could rightfully close one of these desegregation cases, I believe there are others where the facts require continued federal court intervention. The calculus has changed. From a thirty-thousand-foot view, the courts have already weighed in. When the U.S. Department of Education tried to terminate the grant that funds SEF's Equity Assistance Center–South, we challenged them in court. Why? Title IV of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 mandates the creation of what were originally called Desegregation Assistance Centers for the purpose of dismantling the Jim Crow system of segregation, specifically in public education. By mistakenly targeting the Desegregation Assistance Centers in its campaign against Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion, the Trump Administration is effectively eliminating a critical component of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The courts agreed with our position and issued a preliminary injunction against the Department of Education's continued termination of the grant to operate the desegregation assistance center. Shortly thereafter, the Department of Education reinstated our grant. SEF is now conducting an in-depth analysis of several districts still under desegregation orders to develop technical assistance plans that will finally bring these systems into compliance with federal law. Once complete, we will present these plans to the courts to help close these cases in a way that centers on the students. Because these cases began forty or more years ago, before the coming of the digital age we are now experiencing, the new compliance plans must incorporate the new education technology that, unfortunately, is not effectively accessible to students in most of the school districts involved in these open federal court cases. And so we return to the uncomfortable topic of school desegregation. The Black community saw hard-fought gains during the era of busing in the 1970s and 1980s—gains that some might even call a form of reparations. Where integration was implemented successfully, academic outcomes improved for Black and White students alike. But at the same time, we must also acknowledge what was lost. During desegregation, many White families fled rather than send their children to racially integrated schools. They were often followed by more affluent Black families. Black educators lost jobs, Black administrators were displaced, and many schools in Black communities were closed. What remained were large numbers of disadvantaged students attending increasingly under-resourced schools in disinvested communities. The issue has grown more complex in recent years, as changing demographics and evolving definitions of opportunity have, at times, obscured the particular harm that desegregation efforts were meant to address. While I fully acknowledge the barriers faced by other marginalized communities in this country, it is essential to note that none were subjected to the uniquely brutal institution of slavery. Black people were the targets of Jim Crow segregation. Black people were the focus of the post-Civil War amendments to the U.S. Constitution. Black people fought for and were the focus of the Supreme Court decision in Brown v. Board of Education, and subsequently, the Civil Rights Act of 1964. So yes, school desegregation still matters. In many ways, it is more important than ever. Today, the challenge is different. MacBooks have replaced textbooks. Spotty Wi-Fi access has become as harmful as a leaking roof. The digital divide, due to the sheer speed of technological advancement, can leave students behind faster than ever before. Without intervention, we risk reproducing the very inequities we set out to eliminate decades ago. Our current Secretary of Education, Linda McMahon, has said she supports equality but not equity. Let's take her at her word. Let's ask whether students in these districts with open federal court desegregation orders truly have equal educational opportunity. In far too many places, the answer is no.

Pierogi vendor delivers retort after Alan Dershowitz dustup on Vineyard
Pierogi vendor delivers retort after Alan Dershowitz dustup on Vineyard

Boston Globe

time30 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

Pierogi vendor delivers retort after Alan Dershowitz dustup on Vineyard

Miskevich said that when Dershowitz, a longtime summer resident on the Vineyard, approached the Good Pierogi booth that day, 'what was in the forefront of my mind was the fact that this was the high-profile attorney who represented' Epstein and other 'predators and abusers.' Advertisement He said Dershowitz 'consciously decided' to defend and associate with people accused of abusing and harming women. Miskevich said selling pierogi to Dershowitz, who also represented O.J. Simpson, would've been tantamount to endorsing 'his decisions and statements.' 'I have no desire to argue about the legal system in the U.S., or one's right to a fair trial,' Miskevich said. 'But I personally know too many sexual abuse survivors.' Miskevich said Dershowitz's appearance at the booth caused him to 'pause and question my willingness to sell to him, and when I did, he began to harass us, misgender me, and film us without our consent.' Miskevich, who's nonbinary, added that the 'aggression and threats of groundless litigation have been followed by the distribution of defamatory flyers where we conduct business, in an effort to further cement falsehoods.' Advertisement A request for comment was sent to Dershowitz on Thursday morning. In a video statement last week, Dershowitz, who famously had 'And he said 'no,'' Dershowitz said. 'I said 'oh, you you've run out of pierogi? Too bad. [The vendor said] 'no no no, we have plenty of pierogi. I just won't sell them to you.'' Dershowitz said he asked for an explanation, and the vendor replied, ''I won't sell them to you because I don't approve of your politics. I don't approve of who you've represented. I don't approve of who you support.'' Dershowitz said he asked what specifically was objectionable about his political views, but the vendor wouldn't elaborate. 'The clear implication was that he opposed me because I He said that after being refused service, he 'said to the people who were approaching the tent where he was selling his pierogi, 'do you really want to buy pierogi from a guy who won't sell it to somebody based on his politics? I think that would be wrong. You wouldn't buy from somebody who didn't sell to Black people, or gay people, or transgender people, or anything like that.'' In Tuesday's statement, Miskevich said, 'I do not wish to argue with Mr. Dershowitz about Israel. ... I, Krem, am Jewish. Members of my immediate family live in Israel. I love Shabbat and making challah. My friends call me 'Rabbi Krem,' and I have personal relationships with both Rabbis on-island.' Advertisement However, Miskevich added, 'We stand against those who harm or seek to harm others as well as those that would defend them.' The statement followed a Monday X post from Dershowitz in which he called Miskevich an 'antisemite.' 'Don't patronize anti-semites who refuse to sell to Jewish Zionists,' Dershowitz said. 'Fight back against bigotry.' Don't buy perogies tainted with the poison of antisemitism As I correctly suspected, the bigot who refused to sell me perogi — Krem Miskevich — is a notorious anti-semite who is part of an anti-semitic organization that protests Jewish — not only Israeli— cultural events and… — Alan Dershowitz (@AlanDersh) Meanwhile the Martha's Vineyard Times posted video footage of another encounter Dershowitz had at the Good Pierogi booth on Wednesday. With photographers snapping away, Dershowitz said he was asking to make a purchase in an effort to help 'restore community' on the island. Miskevich told Dershowitz the things he'd been saying online about the business were objectionable, and the lawyer said they were true. 'You have proof that I am an antisemite?' Miskevich said. 'You protested the Jewish culture festival last year, which had nothing to do with Israel, with Zionism,' Dershowitz said. Miskevich said they 'disagree' with the suggestion that the demonstration was antisemitic. Dershowitz's association with Trump has In August 2021, Dershowitz and David, the comic and creator of 'Curb Your Enthusiasm,' had a tense back and forth at the Chilmark General Store, according to the New York Post's Advertisement 'We can still talk, Larry,' Dershowitz reportedly said to David on the porch of the store after attempting to greet him. Dershowitz and David used to be friends, Dershowitz later dished to Page Six. 'No. No. We really can't,' David reportedly said. Material from prior Globe stories was used in this report. Travis Andersen can be reached at

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store