
Israeli politician critiques the Gaza war's toll on Palestinians and sparks an outcry
The ensuing controversy underscored how little the war's toll on Gaza's civilians has figured into the public discourse in Israel — in stark contrast to the rest of the world.
Advertisement
Speaking to the Israeli public radio station Reshet Bet, Golan — a former general — said Israel was becoming a pariah state and cautioned that 'a sane country doesn't engage in fighting against civilians, doesn't kill babies as a hobby and doesn't set for itself the goals of expelling a population.'
After the outcry, he said he was referring to the conduct of Israel's far-right government in his remarks, not of its soldiers.
A rare focus on the plight of Palestinian civilians
Golan's words were a shock to the system because, outside of the country's politically marginalized left, criticism focused on Palestinian civilian suffering and deaths has rarely been spoken publicly in Israel.
The reasons for this include: the trauma Israelis still feel over Hamas' deadly attack on Oct. 7. 2023, Jewish citizens' deep faith in the righteousness of the military, dozens of hostages remain in Gaza and soldiers are dying to rescue them.
Advertisement
Criticism of the war has focused overwhelmingly on Netanyahu. His opponents believe his own political motives have dictated war strategy and his failure to reach a deal with Hamas to release all the hostages — an accusation he denies.
'Part of the Israeli public and media outlets are still trapped in an obsession over the initial shock that started this war,' said Ehud Olmert, a former prime minister and fierce critic of the current government. 'But this is changing and it's just a matter of time.'
Public opinion polls show that most Israelis support ending the war in exchange for the release of the remaining 58 hostages held by Hamas, around a third of whom are said to be alive.
Opponents of the war have tended to focus on concerns over the fate of the remaining hostages and the risk of soldier casualties in a campaign that many feel has run its course.
While Olmert disputed Golan's choice of words, he said the essence of his remarks 'reflects what many people think.'
Israelis are still traumatized by Hamas' attack
After Hamas' 2023 attack, in which 1,200 people were killed and 251 taken hostage, Israelis rallied behind the military. They saw the war as a just response to the deadliest attack in Israel's history. Many Israelis cannot imagine a future where Hamas remains intact.
Israel's retaliatory war in Gaza has killed more than 53,000 people, mostly women and children, according to local health authorities, whose count doesn't differentiate between combatants and civilians. The fighting has displaced 90% of the territory's roughly 2 million population, sparked a hunger crisis and obliterated vast swaths of Gaza's urban landscape.
Advertisement
While international media coverage has largely focused on the war in Gaza and its toll on civilians there, in Israel the media still devotes heavy attention to the Oct. 7 attack itself and the hostage crisis. Photos of those still held captive line the streets.
Stories about the plight of Palestinian civilians are less prominent, and largely avoid the harshest images emanating from Gaza. Most outlets repeat the official line that Hamas is solely to blame for the civilian toll.
For many Jewish Israelis, it is hard to fathom that their own children, most of whom must enlist in Israel's military, could be committing the crimes that Golan described.
All that has helped solidify a national narrative that views the war as an existential struggle.
'When you fight a war of existence, you don't much think about the suffering of the enemy,' said Shmuel Rosner, a senior fellow at the Jewish People Policy Institute, a Jerusalem think tank.
Golan's words have sparked outcry before
A former deputy chief of staff of the military, Golan's words have sparked outcry in the past. The most notable occasion was a 2016 speech marking Israel's Holocaust remembrance day, when he compared what he said was an increasingly illiberal atmosphere in Israel to that of Nazi-era Germany.
On Oct. 7, Golan donned his uniform and grabbed a gun to help battle militants during Israel's flailing first response to Hamas' assault. Olmert called him 'one of Israel's greatest warriors.'
Golan is not the first public figure to have made such remarks about Israel's conduct in Gaza.
Former defense minister and military chief of staff Moshe Yaalon accused Israel of ethnic cleansing during a major operation last year. Zehava Galon, a former leader of a dovish political party, highlighted the deaths of thousands of children at a recent protest in Tel Aviv.
Advertisement
But unlike them, Golan has his political future at stake, lending more weight to his words.
Pictures of dead Palestinian children
Netanyahu said Golan's words 'echoed disgraceful antisemitic blood libels.' Benny Gantz, an opposition leader, said Golan's remarks were extreme and false and called on him to recant and apologize, which he did not do. Yair Lapid, another opposition leader, said Golan's words were 'a gift to our enemies.'
Rosner said Golan's wording was 'uncareful' and that instead of triggering introspection, they prompted a media debate over Golan himself and the damage his remarks might cause to Israel.
But they could resonate among the steadfast anti-war protest movement, said Alma Beck, an activist who is part of a small contingent of demonstrators who have been holding up pictures of Palestinian children killed in Gaza ever since Israel ended a ceasefire in March. She said the group began as 20 people and has grown to 600, still just a fraction of the thousands attending the broader anti-government protests.
Beck said the protest movement has been receptive to messages that focus on the Palestinian toll, and more signs with that message have been held up by demonstrators in recent weeks. Their main criticism remains that Netanyahu is continuing the war to appease his governing partners and ensure his own political survival.
'I think there is a shift. I think people are starting to connect the dots,' she said, while noting that the bulk of Israeli society hasn't changed. 'I hope that it will only grow.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
Ignore Greta Thunberg's Circus, There's a Real Path to Help Gaza
Sometimes it takes a self-indulgent public-relations stunt to remind us of what's important. Monday's inevitably intercepted aid flotilla to Gaza was one of those occasions. As the organizers of the convoy intended, the detention of the Madleen — a yacht carrying irrelevant quantities of humanitarian aid — grabbed international headlines. Climate activist Greta Thunberg was among those held; in this made-for-selfies drama, she told followers she'd been 'kidnapped' and called those watching to pressure the Swedish government into getting her released. That's right: Call Sweden, help me. Israel's PR machine whirred into action just as quickly. There was a pledge to make Thunberg and the rest of her 'hate' flotilla watch film footage of the atrocities Hamas committed on Oct. 7, 2023. Photos appeared of Israeli soldiers handing the Madleen's passengers water and buns. Quite frankly, a plague on them both. Here's what was happening at the same time that actually matters. There is, at long last, just a glimmer of hope for ending Gaza's suffering, because the two villains behind the prolonging of the conflict — Hamas and the extremists of Israel's coalition government — are both under growing stress. Hamas has reveled in the slaughter it brought upon Palestinians by the sheer savagery of its October terrorist spectacular. Yet there are growing signs of dissent within the strip. The arming of Palestinian clans organized under an umbrella called the Popular Forces to take on Hamas and protect aid distribution points faces enormous hurdles by association with Israel, but has provided that opposition with teeth. Hopes for Hamas's marginalization remain faint; to succeed, this support for an alternative power base among Palestinians needs to be part of a much wider Israeli strategy that doesn't, as yet, exist and would demand its military withdrawal. This has been missing since the start of the war, because almost any iteration would require offering ordinary Palestinians and Gulf State leaders some plausible hope for Gaza's future. That would include the promise, no matter how distant, of a Palestinian state alongside Israel's, as well as putting the Palestinian Authority in charge of Gaza. Neither is a step that the most right-wing government in Israel's history is willing to take. But even Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, one of the world's great political survivors, may not be able escape for much longer the squeeze between what a majority of Israelis want and his coalition members are willing to accept. This is only in part about a growing desire among Israelis to prioritize ending the war and the return of all remaining hostages. The immediate risk to Netanyahu lies in coalition demands that he write into law the exemption from military service enjoyed by ultra-orthodox men who study the Torah. The strains of war, combined with explosive population growth among deeply religious so-called Haredi Jews has made this policy toxic among those who do have to serve. If he drives the legislation through, Netanyahu and his Likud party can kiss goodbye to re-election. If he doesn't, the Shas party — a fellow member of the ruling coalition — threatens to force an early election anyhow. So Israel's prime minister faces a choice. He can double down yet again on his tactic of expanding Israel's multi-front war to distract attention from his failures in Gaza, this time by attacking Iran's nuclear sites. He could go on letting ultra-right cabinet members such Minister of National Security Itamar Ben-Gvir define Israeli war aims in Gaza as 'occupation, settlement and the encouragement of voluntary emigration' by its Palestinian population, as he did again last week. At home, Netanyahu can likewise just go on polarizing the nation and doing his level best to discredit the courts holding him to account over charges of fraud. Last week, Justice Minister Yariv Levin again promoted so-called reforms to resolve a non-existent war between judicial 'tyranny' and 'the people.' There is no judicial tyranny in Israel, only constitutionally mandated checks on executive abuse of power. There is no 'people,' just the limited mandate Likud received from 23.4% of the Israeli electorate in 2022. The controversy over Haredi draft exemptions makes doubling down to retain power a risky political path for the prime minister, too. It could leave him holding the can for destroying Israel's democracy, inviting charges of war crimes for starving civilians of aid and turning the world's only Jewish state into an international pariah akin to apartheid-era South Africa. A majority of Israelis would never forgive him. Knowing he may face elections as soon as November, there's an opportunity to persuade Netanyahu to accept a different set of political risks by ending the war in a way that gets the remaining hostages home, brings relief to Palestinians and engages the Gulf States in Gaza's reconstruction. Peace, reunited families, the marginalization of Hamas, a revival of the Abraham Accords and Israel's military successes in Lebanon under Netanyahu are the stuff of election campaigns, win or lose. International attention should focus entirely on cajoling Israel's prime minister to take that chance — not some meaningless propaganda circus in the Mediterranean.


The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
House approves pair of resolutions condemning antisemitic attack in Colorado
The House on Monday approved a pair of resolutions condemning the antisemitism attack in Boulder, Co., as the chamber looks to crack down on the spate of incidents targeting Jewish individuals. The first resolution, led by Rep. Jeff Van Drew (R-N.J.), was adopted in a 400-0-2 vote, with just Reps. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) and Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) voting 'present.' The second measure, spearheaded by Rep. Gabe Evans (R-Colo.), cleared the chamber in a 280-113-6 vote, with 113 Republicans voting 'no.' 'Antisemitic violence will not be ignored, excused, or tolerated in the United States of America,' Van Drew wrote on X after the vote. While both measures were adopted in a bipartisan fashion, the resolution sponsored by Evans drew Democratic ire. Lawmakers were frustrated that Rep. Joe Neguse (D-Colo.), who represents Boulder, was not included as a co-sponsor of the legislation. Some also took issue with the inclusion of details about the suspect, Mohamed Sabry Soliman's, immigration status. Evans' resolution also said the attack 'demonstrates the dangers of not removing from the country aliens who fail to comply with the terms of their visas,' leaning into the politically polarizing issue of immigration. And it 'expresses gratitude' to the Immigration and Customs Enforcement 'for protecting the homeland.' 'In times like these I would have hoped that my colleagues would be willing to come together to properly honor the victims, to condemn antisemitism as I have said and as our resolution does. It's not hard to do the right thing, Mr. Speaker,' Neguse said on the House floor. 'And the question that Mr. Evans should answer is why? Why not join his two other Republican colleagues in Colorado and join the bipartisan resolution that thanks the Boulder Police Department, that thanks the FBI? The purpose of these resolutions is to unite the congress, not divide it.' Neguse and other members of the Colorado congressional delegation — including two Republicans — introduced their own resolution condemning the attack last week. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) said the Evans resolution was 'not a serious effort.' 'Who is this guy? He's not seriously concerned with combating antisemitism in America,' Jeffries said. 'This is not a serious effort. This guy is going to be a one-term member of Congress. He's a complete and total embarrassment.' Soliman was charged with 118 counts of attempted murder after he threw Molotov cocktails at a group of people who were gathered peacefully and calling for the release of Israeli hostages taken by Hamas amid the Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel. He was also charged with a federal hate crime after acknowledging that he planned the attack for a year and said he 'walked to kill all Zionist people.' In a statement on X after the vote, Greene said she voted 'present' on Van Drew's resolution because Congress has not condemned hate crimes against other groups of Americans. 'Antisemitic hate crimes are wrong, but so are all hate crimes. Yet Congress never votes on hate crimes committed against white people, Christians, men, the homeless, or countless others,' Greene wrote. 'Tonight, the House passed two more antisemitism-related resolutions, the 20th and 21st I've voted on since taking office. Meanwhile, Americans from every background are being murdered — even in the womb — and Congress stays silent. We don't vote on endless resolutions defending them.' 'Prioritizing one group of Americans and/or one foreign country above our own people is fueling resentment and actually driving more division, including antisemitism,' she added. 'These crimes are horrific and easy for me to denounce. But because of the reasons I stated above, I voted present.'


Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
75 Democrats Express 'Gratitude' to ICE in Antisemitism Vote Amid LA Unrest
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Seventy-five Democrats broke ranks on Monday, joining Republicans in voting for a House resolution condemning antisemitism and expressing "gratitude" for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and other law enforcement personnel. Why It Matters Monday's vote comes as Los Angeles is reeling from days of political unrest after ICE raided several downtown city neighborhoods and arrested more than 50 people. The arrests are part of the Trump administration's broader crackdown on undocumented migrants, which has also swept up people who are legally permitted to be in the United States. President Donald Trump has deployed 4,000 National Guard troops to L.A. since the protests started unfolding and has also mobilized 700 Marines to respond if the strife escalates. What To Know Monday's resolution condemned this month's antisemitic attack in Boulder, Colorado, in which the suspect, Mohamed Sabry Soliman, faces 118 criminal charges, accused of targeting a march calling for the return of Israeli hostages in Gaza. The resolution also "affirms that free and open communication between State and local law enforcement and their Federal counterparts remains the bedrock of public safety and is necessary in preventing terrorist attacks; and expresses gratitude to law enforcement officers, including U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement personnel, for protecting the homeland." Of the 212 Democrats in the House, 113 voted against the resolution, which was introduced by Republican Representative Gabe Evans. Seventy-five Democrats voted in favor of the measure, including Representative Joe Neguse, who represents the district where the Boulder attack occurred. Six lawmakers—five Democrats and one Republican—voted "present." This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow.