Motorola's New Moto G Power Could Use a Bit More Power
There are two main areas of improvement. First, the Moto G Power finally has an IP rating of IP68/69, meaning it has been tested to survive water jets and submersion. It will survive heavy rain and an accidental drop in the pool. These ratings are often only available on pricier phones, so it's good to have that peace of mind.
Second, Motorola promises two Android operating system upgrades alongside three years of security updates. That's a huge change considering I complained about the poor update strategy in Motorola phones four years ago . Mind you, it could stand to be longer, but it's a start. This means that for the first time, a Moto G phone can enjoy two OS updates, which often include new features. Thankfully, the Moto G Power 2025 launched with the current Android 15 version, so this phone will get Android 16 and Android 17, though don't expect the updates to arrive fast.
Speaking of software, the user interface is clean and relatively pain-free. However, like previous Moto G phones, there's a boatload of pre-installed bloatware. You can uninstall all of it—and you'll want to take the time to do it as it can save some storage space.
Battery life is great—the 5,000-mAh cell roughly lasts two days with average use, though on days when I used the phone for navigation, music streaming, and lots of Instagram Reels-ing, it dipped to approximately 30 percent by bedtime. My favorite perk is that I can recharge it with a wireless charger, and this Moto G remains one of the few sub-$300 phones with the capability.
Photograph: Julian Chokkattu
The rest of the reasons you may want this phone over other devices remain: It still has a headphone jack for all you cord lovers; it keeps the microSD card slot—on top of the built-in 128 GB of storage—if you often use a lot of storage; and the near-field communication sensor (NFC) lets you make contactless payments so you can leave the wallet at home. Good Looks
One thing Motorola did get right again is design. The vegan leather (aka plastic) texture on the back mixed with the wonderful green color elevates this simple-looking phone into something more. It has character and stands out from the sea of boring black slabs, not to mention it feels much nicer to hold.
Over on the back is where you'll also find three cameras, though one is just an ambient light sensor. The main camera is a 50-megapixel sensor and it's joined by an 8-MP ultrawide that also doubles as a macro camera. The primary shooter is decent. Enable Motorola's Night mode and it can take some solid low-light images, though the results can be blurry if you don't stay still enough, and colors are muddy. Skin tones and white balance are problematic too, but these are common issues with phone cameras at this price bracket.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Tensions between the US and China have delayed Apple's AI rollout in China, FT reports
The Financial Times claims that the Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC) is delaying the introduction of AI services by Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) and Alibaba in China. A wide view of an Apple store, showing the range of products the company offers. Their February deal to incorporate AI technologies into iPhones in China is on hold due to geopolitical tensions resulting from U.S. President Donald Trump's trade war. Consumer-facing AI technologies need regulatory permission, and the CAC has not yet given its approval to these applications. The business is facing diminishing iPhone sales in China due to increased local competition, particularly from Huawei, which has integrated DeepSeek's AI models into its handsets. The firm is at a disadvantage to its AI-enabled Android rivals due to its lack of sophisticated AI technologies, such as ChatGPT-powered features and Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL)'s postponed "Apple Intelligence." More pressure is added by Trump's recent pronouncement of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US that are not produced locally. New software improvements are anticipated during Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL)'s WWDC event, which takes place from June 9–13. While we acknowledge the potential of AAPL as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 10 High-Growth EV Stocks to Invest In and 13 Best Car Stocks to Buy in 2025. Disclosure. None. Sign in to access your portfolio
Business Insider
7 hours ago
- Business Insider
DeepWho? DeepSeek rolled out even more powerful, cheap AI tech. If you missed it, you're not alone.
DeepSeek updated its R1 AI model a few days ago. It performs better and it's still cheaper than most other top models. Did you miss it? I missed it. Or I saw the news briefly and then forgot about it. Most of the tech industry and investors greeted the launch with a giant shrug. This is a pretty stark contrast to early 2025 when DeepSeek's R1 model freaked everyone out. Tech stocks plunged and the generative AI spending boom was seriously questioned. This time, DeepSeek's rollout "came and went without a blip," Ross Sandler, a top tech analyst at Barclays, wrote in a note to investors. "The stock market couldn't care less," he added. "This tells us that the investment community's level of understanding on the AI trade has greatly improved in just five short months." An unscientific DeepSeek poll I polled my colleagues on Business Insider's tech team on Friday, just to see if I'd been spending too much time watching Elon Musk and Donald Trump argue on social media (rather than doing my real job). Here are some of their responses: One editor said they didn't notice DeepSeek's update, but now they feel guilty for not spotting it. (Solid thinking. Only the paranoid survive in journalism). Another colleague said they knew about it from their quick headline scans, but didn't read too much into it. A tech reporter saw a Reddit thread about it, scanned it, and didn't think about it again. Another reporter said they missed it entirely. So, it barely registered. And these folks are glued to tech news every second of the day. Why does no one really care now? DeepSeek's latest R1 model is probably the third best in the world right now, so why isn't it making waves like before? Sandler, the Barclays analyst, noted that DeepSeek's latest offering is not quite as cheap as it used to be, relatively speaking. It costs just under $1 per million tokens, which was roughly 27 times cheaper than OpenAI's o1 model earlier this year. Now, DeepSeek's R1 is "only" about 17 times cheaper than the top model, according to Barclays research and data from Artificial Analysis' AI Intelligence Index. This illustrates a broader and more important point. Something I've been telling you about since last year: Most top AI models are roughly similar in performance because they've mostly been training on the same data from the internet. This makes it hard to stand out from the crowd, based just on performance. When you leap ahead, your inventions and gains are incorporated quickly into everyone else's offerings. Price is important, yes. But distribution is becoming key. If your employer has an enterprise ChatGPT account, for instance, you're highly likely to use OpenAI models at work. It's just easier. If you have an Android smartphone, you'll probably be talking to Google's Gemini chatbot and getting responses from the search giant's AI models. DeepSeek doesn't have this type of broad distribution yet, at least in the Western world. Was the AI infrastructure freakout misplaced? Then, there's the realization that "reasoning" models, such as DeepSeek's R1 and OpenAI's o3, require a massive amount of computing power to run. This is due to their ability to break requests down into multiple "thinking" steps. Each step is a new kind of prompt that is turned into a huge number of new tokens that need to be processed. The DeepSeek freakout in January happened mostly because the tech industry worried that the Chinese lab had developed more efficient models that didn't need as much computing infrastructure. In fact, this Chinese lab may have instead helped popularize these new types of reasoning models, which might require even more GPUs and other computing gear to run.
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Google Going to Trial After Doing Something Super Sketchy to Android Users
In the information age, data is gold — and Google has enough to make King Midas blush. But in this new economic paradigm, all that data comes at a price: privacy lawsuits. To amass its wealth, Google's been caught collecting personal information from users even in incognito mode, tracking location data even when location tracking is off, collecting children's personal information in violation of child safety laws, and selling millions of Americans' health data to a healthcare conglomerate — and that's just a taste. Now, Reuters reports that Google's going to trial in California after a class action lawsuit representing some 14 million state residents alleged the company gathered personal data from their phones even when they were off. The suit alleges that Google enables Android phones to send and receive info "for Google's own purposes," draining users' cellular data as they do. While the California suit is unique for going to trial, it's just one of 50 separate state class action lawsuits being brought against the tech company. Altogether, there are billions of dollars on the line. It's a big case with some major implications: can the companies that sell our phones — and in Google's case with Android, create the underlying operating system — decide whether or not we can ever turn them off? Google's response is telling. Rather than deny that it had collected data on powered-off Androids, it's saying that Android users gave their consent to Google's "passive" data harvesting when they agreed to the company's terms of service agreement, which is required to use the phone. Google is also challenging the core of the plaintiffs' argument — basically, that cell phone data doesn't count as personal property under California law. And if it isn't, then there's nothing wrong with Google taking it without permission. Ultimately, there's a lot of money riding in how the state classifies that nebulous data. George Zelcs, a lawyer representing the plantiffs, told Reuters that Android users aren't arguing against data collection when the phones are on and the apps are fired up. Instead, he notes that "these phone users unknowingly subsidize the same Google advertising business that earns over $200 billion a year." Googles usual tactic when it's caught nabbing data — to settle out of court for millions or sometimes billions of dollars — probably won't fly here, as the timeline reaches all the way back to 2016. With millions of defendants and unfathomable quantities of data at play, any sort of settlement is likely to run in the "tens of billions," according to Reuters. Time will tell whether that's less costly than if Google were to lose all that juicy data altogether. More on law: A Mother Says an AI Startup's Chatbot Drove Her Son to Suicide. Its Response: the First Amendment Protects "Speech Allegedly Resulting in Suicide"
