Google Going to Trial After Doing Something Super Sketchy to Android Users
But in this new economic paradigm, all that data comes at a price: privacy lawsuits. To amass its wealth, Google's been caught collecting personal information from users even in incognito mode, tracking location data even when location tracking is off, collecting children's personal information in violation of child safety laws, and selling millions of Americans' health data to a healthcare conglomerate — and that's just a taste.
Now, Reuters reports that Google's going to trial in California after a class action lawsuit representing some 14 million state residents alleged the company gathered personal data from their phones even when they were off.
The suit alleges that Google enables Android phones to send and receive info "for Google's own purposes," draining users' cellular data as they do. While the California suit is unique for going to trial, it's just one of 50 separate state class action lawsuits being brought against the tech company. Altogether, there are billions of dollars on the line.
It's a big case with some major implications: can the companies that sell our phones — and in Google's case with Android, create the underlying operating system — decide whether or not we can ever turn them off?
Google's response is telling. Rather than deny that it had collected data on powered-off Androids, it's saying that Android users gave their consent to Google's "passive" data harvesting when they agreed to the company's terms of service agreement, which is required to use the phone.
Google is also challenging the core of the plaintiffs' argument — basically, that cell phone data doesn't count as personal property under California law. And if it isn't, then there's nothing wrong with Google taking it without permission.
Ultimately, there's a lot of money riding in how the state classifies that nebulous data.
George Zelcs, a lawyer representing the plantiffs, told Reuters that Android users aren't arguing against data collection when the phones are on and the apps are fired up. Instead, he notes that "these phone users unknowingly subsidize the same Google advertising business that earns over $200 billion a year."
Googles usual tactic when it's caught nabbing data — to settle out of court for millions or sometimes billions of dollars — probably won't fly here, as the timeline reaches all the way back to 2016. With millions of defendants and unfathomable quantities of data at play, any sort of settlement is likely to run in the "tens of billions," according to Reuters.
Time will tell whether that's less costly than if Google were to lose all that juicy data altogether.
More on law: A Mother Says an AI Startup's Chatbot Drove Her Son to Suicide. Its Response: the First Amendment Protects "Speech Allegedly Resulting in Suicide"
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
27 minutes ago
- CNBC
I've coached leaders at Google and Amazon: Highly successful people use 5 phrases to 'command attention'
Certain people seem to walk into a room and immediately command attention. Their word choices and tone convey both confidence and competence. They don't even look like they're trying too hard. This can be puzzling — even frustrating — if you're smart and experienced, but feel as if you don't get the recognition you deserve. The good news is that top performers' success isn't magic, and their communication style can be learned. As the author of "Managing Up" and a workplace psychology expert who's spent the last 15 years coaching leaders at Google, Amazon, and other Fortune 500 companies, I've identified specific patterns that give you an air of authority, even before you have the matching job title. When you speak with this level of clarity and conviction, others naturally start looking to you for leadership and respecting you more. Here are five phrases that people with authority use and why they work so well to gain influence. You might speak up and share a rambling narrative that sounds something like this: "Well, first I looked at the budget, and then I realized we also need to consider the timeline, plus there's the vendor situation to think about, and I've been going back and forth on whether we should…" Your audience is left to figure out what matters most. Instead of communicating in long, flowing explanations, use structure to present possible solutions and make a clear recommendation. This can sound like: In an effort to sound humble, you might preface your ideas with tentative phrases like, "I might be missing something…" or, "I could be off base here…" This can undermine your credibility and make others more likely to dismiss your insights. Even if you don't know the answer or feel caught off guard, focus on what you know. This builds trust in your professional judgment. For example: Many professionals I work with are the reliable workhorses of their organizations. They go above and beyond in their roles, yet are often overlooked for promotions and leadership opportunities. The disconnect typically comes down to emphasizing activities instead of outcomes when they talk about their work. If you say, "I updated the customer database," or, "I trained the new team members," you're describing what you did, but not why it matters to the business. Instead, highlight the end results of your efforts. You might say: The most effective communicators I've coached have mastered the art of making clear calls to action. They understand that they're writing and presenting to busy decision-makers who need to know exactly what's expected of them. Avoid ending your messages with vague phrases like, "Let me know your thoughts," or, "Feel free to reach out with questions." Be specific about the action you'd like the person to take. For instance: Those with leadership acumen read the room. They don't ignore or push harder when a C-level executive seems hesitant. They probe deeper to uncover objections and concerns. When you sense resistance, try asking questions like: The answers often reveal important information about workplace politics, competing priorities, or past experiences that can completely reshape your strategy and ultimately make it — and you — more successful.
The Verge
27 minutes ago
- The Verge
HTC is getting in on AI glasses, too
With Meta, Google, Samsung, and maybe even Apple working on AI-powered glasses, smart spectacles are quickly becoming the hottest gadget in tech. Now, even HTC is jumping in on the trend with a new pair of Vive Eagle smart glasses that come with built-in speakers, a 12MP ultrawide camera, and an AI voice assistant. The Vive Eagle glasses are currently only available for purchase in Taiwan, but they seem like a direct rival to Meta's Ray-Ban and Oakley smart glasses. They come with AI-powered image translation, which lets wearers ask the Vive AI voice assistant to translate what they're seeing into 13 different languages. Other features include the ability to record reminders, ask for restaurant recommendations, and take notes (sound familiar?). HTC says its Vive Eagle glasses weigh just 49 grams, around the same as Meta's Ray-Ban smart glasses. The Vive Eagle glasses cost around $520 USD and come equipped with Zeiss sun lenses, with options for a red, brown, gray, or black frame. It's not clear when — or if — HTC plans on bringing these smart glasses to North America or Europe, but Meta might have some competition if it does. Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All by Emma Roth Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All AI Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Gadgets Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All News Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Tech Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Wearable
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
OpenAI's Latest Model Is Attempting To Become A Medical Thought-Partner
OpenAI has moved rapidly in releasing newer generations of its flagship AI model. Getty Images Last week, OpenAI launched its newest model, GPT 5. The company announced that this latest iteration is its most advanced model, including significantly improved deep reasoning and understanding capabilities. Furthermore, the new model is meant to be faster while having the ability to provide more personalized and curated responses for users. One of the most notable aspects that the company focused on with the announcement is the significant improvement in the new model's ability to navigate healthcare related topics and questions. In fact, the model has apparently surpassed all previous iterations in performance as graded by OpenAI's own HealthBench paradigm, the company's healthcare rubric that it developed to track model progress in the field of healthcare. According to the company, GPT 5 is capable of 'proactively flagging potential concerns and asking questions to give more helpful answers,' transitioning itself from being purely a query based system to more of a conversational thought partner: 'think of it as a partner to help you understand results, ask the right questions in the time you have with providers, and weigh options as you make decisions.' Why is this important? As artificial intelligence systems are becoming more mainstream, users are increasingly relying on them for more personalized and accurate answers. Healthcare remains one of the most important and prevalent subjects that users make queries about on the internet. AI systems such as GPT serve this purpose well, especially as incremental improvements in models significantly further the conversational experience. According to the company, 'GPT‑5 responds empathetically, organizes and explains information clearly for a non-expert, and proactively flags important factors that would help provide a more detailed follow-up answer.' This is overwhelmingly the trend among AI companies, given that technology giants have become privy to the fact that the healthcare experience for the average consumer has become significantly strained; thus, they also see it as a sizable opportunity for AI driven chat agents to fill consumer experiential gaps. Google's MedGemma collection of models has done a significant amount of work in being able to accurately comprehend large amounts of medical text and image data. This is particularly important for the healthcare field, especially for enterprises use-cases, as healthcare data is largely unstructured and frequently found in a variety of different modalities. Organizations can use these models to better augment their capabilities and glean insights from large datasets, in addition to collaborating on routine tasks such as clinical decision support, triaging, basic diagnostics and even determining treatment capabilities. The growth in the accuracy and efficacy of these models raises an important question, however: will the traditional healthcare workflow soon become a tiered system, where these AI systems will be the frontline providers for non-emergent queries, while trained, human physicians will be reserved for more emergent, acute and complex diagnostics? With how overburdened the healthcare system currently is and will continue to be given the impending physician shortage, this is certainly not out of the realm of possibilities. Especially as Moore's law is increasingly playing out (the cost of compute will continue to become cheaper over time as technology and chips become more advanced), there is significant opportunity for artificial intelligence systems to severely disrupt the traditional economics of how the healthcare system runs today. The important question, however, will be how far society values the sophistication and ease of using these models as opposed to the traditional physician visit.
