logo
How do I approach Revenue about modest tax debt stretching back many years?

How do I approach Revenue about modest tax debt stretching back many years?

Irish Times01-07-2025
I am writing to you on behalf of an elderly neighbour who confided to me that he is worried about
unpaid taxes
over a period of two decades.
This man returned to Ireland approximately 20 years ago and initially paid tax as a PAYE worker. He later worked ad hoc as a consultant, engaging a local accountancy firm to do his tax returns. It subsequently transpired that the money he paid to the accountant to pay
Revenue
had not been paid.
He has no pension pot or assets and has basically fallen on hard times after complying, he says, with all tax
requirements throughout his working life.
I gather that instead of contacting Revenue to find a solution, he buried his head in the sand and somehow fell through the tax net.
READ MORE
His only other employment was a number of casual cash-in-hand jobs until he reached pension age, which he did well over a decade ago. He has paid no tax on his Irish pension or on his UK pension.
He wants to rectify the situation, but is not in a position to pay back the unpaid tax and any additional fines. He has no assets aside from modest savings, which he wants to be used for his funeral.
Someone told him that his family in England will have to pay the taxes. He is deeply worried that he will face public shame, prosecution and imprisonment.
[
Long delays in UK pension buyback programme leave people worrying they could miss out
Opens in new window
]
Any suggestions on how he can approach Revenue and how they might handle the situation would be much appreciated.
Ms P.S.
Your neighbour has found himself in a very unfortunate position which, inadvertently or not, he has actually made worse. However, it is important that he realise there will be no shaming, no imprisonment and, as long as he approaches them – rather than waiting to see if they will catch him – no prosecution.
And no one is going to be chasing his family in the UK. If he dies with all this balance outstanding, Revenue could demand payment from his estate. If there were not enough to meet the full bill, that would be Revenue's loss at that stage, not an issue for his family – although there clearly might be no inheritance.
You can certainly see how it happens. A compliant taxpayer finds himself in Revenue debt through absolutely no fault of his own but, given limited means, chooses to hunker down rather than engage.
Almost always, the intention is to 'get around to doing something about it', but weeks become months, months become years, and making that call just seems to get more difficult. Passage of time makes the taxpayer feel almost complicit in the crime and the non-payment.
From what you say, the initial 'problem' concerned a period of a little over a year and, given what you say about the issue being the failure of his accountant to pass on funds handed over to meet tax liabilities, rather than any active omission, he would have been assured of a very sympathetic hearing.
Yes, the legal onus for meeting tax liabilities is his, not his accountant's, but in the circumstances outlined, an accommodating payment plan would have been easy to arrange.
His failure to do so then, or at any time since, has created the potential to exacerbate the issue. Firstly, Revenue will want to know what he did after that time. From the timeline you provide, there would not have been much time between his accountant's fraud against him and his reaching retirement age, but even so, they'll be curious.
Then there is the pension income. You don't indicate how much this is, but he apparently has pensions from both Ireland and Britain, so may well be over the tax exemption limit of €18,000 – even if he is not on a full pension from either state.
[
Why are some people paying income tax at almost 70%? Their pension pot is too big
Opens in new window
]
It's important not to exaggerate the issue. At all times, he appears to have been living fairly modestly with little spare cash or savings – so much so that he never felt able to even agree a repayment plan with Revenue.
In terms of shame and fear, I have no doubt he is feeling far worse now than he ever would if this had been resolved. As his tax debt is very unlikely to be beyond €50,000, he needs to know that he will not appear in any tax defaulters' list, never mind face imprisonment.
If only for the sake of his own mental health, he really does need to sort all this out.
The good news for him is that there is help out there. My strong advice is that he go initially to the Money Advice and Budgeting Service (Mabs). This State-funded network specialises in dealing with people who are struggling with debt.
It is free of charge and totally confidential.
Mabs are contactable by phone and also have a network of offices across the State, providing face-to-face meetings which, I would suggest, would make more sense for this gentleman. You can find his local office
here
, together with their phone numbers, to arrange an appointment.
Otherwise, he can call their national helpline on
0818 07 2000
or email
helpline@mabs.ie
. That helpline is open from 9am to 8pm.
He should first gather any relevant documents he has and a list of the relevant dates. If some paperwork is missing or the dates are fuzzy, no worries – don't let that put him off meeting Mabs.
The service can help him with contacting the Revenue. Once that is done, there are various approaches available under personal insolvency legislation. These include a debt relief notice, a voluntary arrangement, a debt settlement arrangement, or a personal insolvency arrangement.
If your neighbour's means are as limited as he tells you, he may in fact not end up paying anything but, even if his means do allow repayment of some of the debt over time, the arrangements under the personal insolvency legislation are designed to ensure he has sufficient money for his personal needs.
These arrangements were not in place when your neighbour's woes began, but they offer him a structured and dignified way to put all this behind him and not live with the stress that currently has him living in fear.
Please send your queries to Dominic Coyle, Q&A, The Irish Times, 24-28 Tara Street, Dublin 2, or by email to
dominic.coyle@irishtimes.com
, with a contact phone number. This column is a reader service and is not intended to replace professional advice
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

TikToker has injury award raised after video of him dancing disregarded over lack of evidence
TikToker has injury award raised after video of him dancing disregarded over lack of evidence

Sunday World

timean hour ago

  • Sunday World

TikToker has injury award raised after video of him dancing disregarded over lack of evidence

Appeal court cited lack of evidence as to when footage was shot TikTok influencer Mario Pompa (37) successfully sued Hilton Foods (Ireland) Ltd in Dundalk Circuit Court in February this year. Mr Pompa claimed he had to stop working in 2022 due to an ongoing neck, back and shoulder injury he sustained after regularly carrying bags ­weighing up to 25kg. He alleged the injuries happened during 13-hour shifts in the company's spice room, where spices are mixed for sausage production. Former meat-factory worker Mario Pompa sued his employers Hilton Foods (Ireland) Ltd over a shoulder tear sustained while carrying heavy loads He was awarded a total of €17,958 including €11,000 for his shoulder, €5,000 for the neck and back pain, and €1,958 in special damages. Hilton Foods, which was insured by Aviva, subsequently appealed the decision. While the defendant accepted ­liability, it was argued that Mr Pompa was exaggerating his injuries. Clips of the plaintiff posted on his TikTok account showed him using a SkiErg machine, weightlifting and doing assisted chin-ups at a gym in September 2021 – a month before he told a GP from the Injuries Resolution Board that he hadn't been able to go to a gym since 2020 – were previously shown to the court. Stock photo: Reuters Videos of him dancing were also ­posted online. In her ruling, Ms Justice Sara Phelan said it was possible that the videos were made, saved as drafts and posted at a later date. 'In the absence of evidence as to when these videos were made, I must disregard the videos,' she told the appeals court sitting in Dublin. Regarding discrepancies in some of Mr Pompa's evidence, Ms Justice Phelan noted how English is not his first language as he is originally from Slovakia. She said his 'thought process was a little delayed by reason of this' and it was 'not surprising' that after five years he did not remember exactly what he had told his GP. Ms Justice Phelan said she could not penalise him for the lack of detail in the medical reports about him going to the gym because none of the doctors were called to give evidence. Read more Therefore, the judge was not able to ascertain what questions were asked during the consultations. 'I am satisfied that having observed him, heard his evidence and looked at the medical reports, that he did not exaggerate his symptoms or the severity of his injuries,' she said. An MRI scan had shown he had ­suffered a deep tear in his shoulder, which she was satisfied was caused by his work at Hilton Foods. While she considered the injuries to be in the minor range, she said she had to depart from the personal injury guidelines because she did not believe his injury made a substantial recovery within two years. 'The minor range does not provide for substantial resolution outside of two years,' she said. Mr Pompa was awarded a total of €18,250 including €14,000 for his shoulder injury, €2,500 for his neck, back and arm complaints, and €1,750 in special damages.

Three men charged in relation to seizure of €340,700 in cash
Three men charged in relation to seizure of €340,700 in cash

Irish Times

time5 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Three men charged in relation to seizure of €340,700 in cash

Three men have appeared in court charged in connection with the seizure of more than €340,700 in cash in Drumcondra, north Dublin on Friday. Mohamed Alsourani (43), Anas Altahlh (40) and Issa Al Aboud (43) appeared before Dublin District Court on Saturday evening. The three men are charged with being in possession of the cash knowing or believing it was the proceeds of criminal conduct. Gardaí told the court that the men were stopped in a taxi while on the way to Dublin Airport after the Garda Response Team received confidential information. The men had arrived in Ireland on July 22nd and stayed in a room in a hotel in the north inner city. The court heard two of the men are Syrian-Swedish citizens and that an Arabic translator would be required for the third man. READ MORE Judge Anthony Halpin refused bail for the three men while legal aid was granted. They will appear before Cloverhill District Court for mention on July 30th.

Man (40s) hospitalised following assault in Dublin city centre
Man (40s) hospitalised following assault in Dublin city centre

Irish Times

time6 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Man (40s) hospitalised following assault in Dublin city centre

Gardaí have confirmed that they are investigating an assault in Sean McDermott Street in Dublin 1 in which a man in his forties suffered 'serious injuries.' The assault took place at around 10pm on Friday. The injured man was transferred by ambulance to Beaumont Hospital where he continues to receive treatment. No arrests have been made and enquiries are ongoing. Anyone who witnessed this incident or has information relating to the assault is asked to contact Mountjoy Garda Station on 01 666 8000 or the Garda Confidential line on 1800 666 111.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store