logo
Blanketing an entire continent with forests: Why planting trees cannot make up for fossil fuel emissions

Blanketing an entire continent with forests: Why planting trees cannot make up for fossil fuel emissions

LeMonde13 hours ago

Scientists have been repeating it for years: The top priority in the fight against climate change should be to reduce greenhouse gas emissions rather than relying on methods to absorb CO 2 once it is in the atmosphere. A study published on Thursday, June 19, drives the point home, just hours after a group of climate scientists announced that the goal of limiting global warming to 1.5°C was now out of reach. The study demonstrates "the insurmountable challenges" that fossil fuel companies would face if they had to offset their future CO 2 emissions, for instance, by planting trees.
Published in Nature Communications Earth & Environment, the study uses as its starting point the known coal, oil and gas reserves held by the 200 largest fossil fuel companies. According to the Fossil Free Funds database, burning these reserves would generate 673 billion metric tons of CO 2 – far more than the remaining carbon budget to limit warming to 1.5°C (130 billion metric tons).
In recent years, more and more fossil fuel companies have highlighted their ambition to achieve net zero emissions through offsetting projects. The British oil company Shell, for example, plans to offset about 120 million metric tons per year by 2030. An analysis published in 2023 by the UK-based Carbon Brief website also demonstrates the extent to which the largest companies, particularly those in the energy sector, base their strategies on these methods.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Blanketing an entire continent with forests: Why planting trees cannot make up for fossil fuel emissions
Blanketing an entire continent with forests: Why planting trees cannot make up for fossil fuel emissions

LeMonde

time13 hours ago

  • LeMonde

Blanketing an entire continent with forests: Why planting trees cannot make up for fossil fuel emissions

Scientists have been repeating it for years: The top priority in the fight against climate change should be to reduce greenhouse gas emissions rather than relying on methods to absorb CO 2 once it is in the atmosphere. A study published on Thursday, June 19, drives the point home, just hours after a group of climate scientists announced that the goal of limiting global warming to 1.5°C was now out of reach. The study demonstrates "the insurmountable challenges" that fossil fuel companies would face if they had to offset their future CO 2 emissions, for instance, by planting trees. Published in Nature Communications Earth & Environment, the study uses as its starting point the known coal, oil and gas reserves held by the 200 largest fossil fuel companies. According to the Fossil Free Funds database, burning these reserves would generate 673 billion metric tons of CO 2 – far more than the remaining carbon budget to limit warming to 1.5°C (130 billion metric tons). In recent years, more and more fossil fuel companies have highlighted their ambition to achieve net zero emissions through offsetting projects. The British oil company Shell, for example, plans to offset about 120 million metric tons per year by 2030. An analysis published in 2023 by the UK-based Carbon Brief website also demonstrates the extent to which the largest companies, particularly those in the energy sector, base their strategies on these methods.

'Light from Absolute Nothingness': Scientists Achieve Historic First by Creating Photons in a Virtual Quantum Vacuum
'Light from Absolute Nothingness': Scientists Achieve Historic First by Creating Photons in a Virtual Quantum Vacuum

Sustainability Times

time14 hours ago

  • Sustainability Times

'Light from Absolute Nothingness': Scientists Achieve Historic First by Creating Photons in a Virtual Quantum Vacuum

IN A NUTSHELL 🌟 Scientists at the University of Oxford simulated light creation from nothing by disturbing the quantum vacuum with intense lasers. at the University of Oxford simulated light creation from nothing by disturbing the with intense lasers. 💡 The study demonstrates how virtual particles in empty space can interact with laser energy to form new light waves . . 🔬 Advanced simulations using the OSIRIS program revealed the potential to explore high-energy physics beyond the Standard Model. beyond the Standard Model. 🌌 This research challenges traditional notions of emptiness and could lead to breakthroughs in light manipulation and advanced laser technology. In a groundbreaking achievement, scientists at the University of Oxford have simulated the creation of light from nothing, challenging our understanding of the universe. Utilizing powerful computer simulations, they have demonstrated how intense laser beams can disturb the quantum vacuum, leading to the emergence of light without any physical matter. This fascinating discovery taps into the strange predictions of quantum physics, suggesting that empty space is far from empty. Instead, it's a realm filled with invisible energy fluctuations and virtual particles. This research has significant implications for high-energy physics and advanced laser systems, potentially altering our fundamental understanding of reality. Making Light from Nothing To grasp this remarkable achievement, one must first reconsider the concept of a vacuum. In classical physics, a vacuum is an empty space devoid of air, particles, or light. However, quantum physics paints a different picture. It suggests that even the emptiest space is teeming with fleeting virtual particles, particularly pairs of electrons and positrons that appear and vanish in mere moments. According to the study authors, 'the quantum vacuum is filled with energy fluctuations from which virtual electron-positron pairs arise.' These virtual particles usually remain unseen but can interact with real energy under specific conditions. The researchers aimed to simulate this interaction using a high-powered program called OSIRIS, which functions as a virtual laboratory where quantum physics rules are meticulously played out. Their objective was to recreate a theoretical phenomenon known as vacuum four-wave mixing. In this process, multiple laser beams crisscrossing in a vacuum can polarize the virtual particles, allowing the beams to mix and generate new light waves. Remarkably, this occurs without adding any material, as if new light is born from a field of invisible, flickering particles. 'Thousands of Eggs Discovered Alive': Underwater Volcano Reveals Massive Alien-Like Cluster That Leaves Marine Biologists Speechless Emptiness Might Explain Many Mysterious Concepts If the current research is successfully replicated in physical experiments, it could provide insights into physics beyond the Standard Model, including the nature of dark energy, the structure of spacetime, and interactions between light and matter at extreme energies. This research might even pave the way for technologies that control light with unprecedented precision. However, the quantum effects simulated in this study are incredibly delicate and challenging to observe in a noisy laboratory environment. Moreover, the powerful lasers involved could vaporize most materials, necessitating careful planning before conducting physical experiments. Simulations like this are invaluable as they help scientists determine the precise conditions required for such experiments before investing in costly, high-risk endeavors. The researchers now plan to apply their virtual approach to explore more exotic pulse shapes and laser beam patterns, using their simulations as a roadmap for future experiments. Ultimately, this research may help us transform the void of space into something tangible, beginning with a simple beam of light. The findings of this study are published in the journal Communications Physics. 'Confirmed for the First Time': Scientists Turn Light Into a Never-Before-Seen Solid With Reality-Bending Quantum Properties The Role of Advanced Simulations Advanced simulations have become crucial tools in modern scientific research, enabling scientists to explore phenomena that are currently beyond our experimental capabilities. In this study, the OSIRIS program allowed researchers to conduct detailed 3D simulations, providing insights into the behavior of virtual particles under extreme conditions. By simulating the effects of petawatt-level lasers, the team demonstrated how laser beams could interact with the quantum vacuum, leading to the creation of new light. These simulations not only offer a glimpse into the potential future of high-energy physics but also highlight the importance of computational models in advancing our understanding of complex scientific concepts. As technology continues to evolve, simulations will likely play an increasingly vital role in scientific discovery, helping researchers push the boundaries of what is possible and explore the mysteries of the universe. 'Super-Earth Could Host Life': Stunning New Planet Found in Habitable Zone Ignites Hopes of a Second Earth Beyond Our Solar System Implications for Future Research The successful simulation of light emerging from nothing opens new avenues for future research in quantum physics and beyond. This discovery challenges traditional notions of emptiness and suggests that the quantum vacuum is a dynamic realm filled with untapped potential. As scientists continue to explore the intricacies of the quantum vacuum, they may uncover new ways to manipulate light and energy, leading to breakthroughs in high-energy physics and advanced laser technology. Moreover, this research could inspire new theories about the fundamental nature of reality, prompting scientists to reevaluate existing models and explore uncharted territories in physics. As we push the boundaries of our understanding, the possibilities for innovation and discovery are boundless. How will these new insights into the quantum vacuum shape the future of science and technology, and what other hidden wonders might we uncover in the vast expanse of space? Our author used artificial intelligence to enhance this article. Did you like it? 4.5/5 (29)

Exclusive: At-home spit test certified as a contraceptive in Europe
Exclusive: At-home spit test certified as a contraceptive in Europe

Euronews

time2 days ago

  • Euronews

Exclusive: At-home spit test certified as a contraceptive in Europe

A new at-home spit test appears to be as effective as birth control pills at preventing pregnancy – and it will soon roll out across Europe, Euronews Health has learned. The device from Inne, a Berlin-based women's health tech company, has been available for years as a fertility-monitoring tool designed to help people boost their chances of pregnancy. Called Minilab, it works by tracking users' progesterone, the sex hormone that plays a role in fertility, via daily changes in their saliva. Now, Minilab can also be used to prevent pregnancy, after a small study showed the device was 92 per cent effective – about on par with birth control pills, but without any of the side effects. 'Progesterone can be used for conception or contraception,' Eirini Rapti, Inne's chief executive and founder, told Euronews Health in an exclusive interview. But 'there was no reliable saliva testing' on the market, she said. So Rapti and her team decided to create it themselves. The British Standards Institution, which reviews medical device manufacturers in Europe, certified Inne's Minilab this month, meaning it can now be sold as a contraceptive device as well as a fertility tracker. Inne plans to roll out the device in the European Union in September, with sales in the United Kingdom to follow. The device is part of a new wave of women's health apps that have gained steam in recent years by infusing tech into fertility awareness, in a bid to make these contraceptive methods more effective, scientifically rigorous, and personalised. Key competitors like Natural Cycles – which, in 2017, became the EU's first certified contraceptive app – rely on temperature readings to track hormonal levels. But Rapti said saliva, as 'hardcore biological data,' is more accurate because it isn't affected by, for example, having a fever or working up a sweat. Meanwhile, blood tests are considered the gold standard for hormone tracking, but some research indicates saliva could be a promising alternative because it is cheaper, faster, and can be done easily at home. The Minilab device is fairly easy to use. Around the same time each day, the user spits into a test strip and inserts it into a small, sleek device that measures their progesterone. That data feeds back into an app, which learns about their hormonal fluctuations over time. That allows it to identify their fertile window, or the approximately six days per month when they are most likely to get pregnant. 'It's similar technology to COVID tests with antibodies, or pregnancy tests,' Rapti said. In the company's observational study, more than 200 women in Germany used the Minilab for six months. They were advised not to have unprotected sex on days the app said they were fertile, and asked to record their sexual activity. Eleven women got pregnant, but two were excluded from the analysis for violating the study guidelines. Others had unprotected sex on days the app identified as high risk for pregnancy, Rapti said. 'We did not have a case where our system gave the wrong ovulation day, or the wrong fertile day,' Rapti said. The findings translate to an effectiveness rate of 92 per cent, meaning that if 100 women used the Minilab as a contraceptive for one year, eight could expect to become pregnant. That's about the same as birth control pills or the contraceptive patch, and more effective than condoms (82 per cent). But it's far less effective than non-hormonal intrauterine devices (IUDs), sometimes called copper coils (more than 99 per cent). Notably, the study – which has not yet been published in a peer-reviewed, academic journal – did not include a control or comparison group, so Inne can't definitively prove that the device is what prevented pregnancy. Other methods of birth control have also been researched for decades, which means it can be difficult to directly compare Inne's results. But if the findings hold up over longer periods of time and with larger groups of people, it would make Minilab equally effective as Natural Cycles, the only other app-based contraceptive on the European market. The approach is also not for everyone. Women should not use Minilab if they have irregular menstrual cycles or were pregnant or breastfeeding within the past three months, the company said. It said women interested in switching from a hormonal contraceptive – such as birth control pills or certain IUDs – should wait at least two months before starting Minilab to allow their hormones to return to natural levels. Minilab already has thousands of users in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland, Rapti said. Eventually, she hopes to add testing for cortisol – the stress hormone – as well as testosterone and vitamins, to help women track their health throughout their lives, not only around pregnancy. 'If you have three or four years of data,' Rapti said, 'you can really start building some intelligence'. People who use cannabis or its synthetic cousin, cannabinoids, are twice as likely to die from heart problems as those who abstain from the drugs, new research has found. Recreational cannabis use remains illegal in most of Europe, but it is the region's most commonly used drug. An estimated 8.4 per cent of adults – 24 million people – used cannabis in the past year, according to the European Union Drugs Agency (EUDA). Cannabis is generally stronger and more diverse than in past decades, with users having a choice between smoking marijuana, edibles, cannabis concentrates, and cannabinoids, which are synthetic psychoactive drugs with a high concentration of Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the active ingredient in cannabis that makes people feel high. That has prompted concern about the potential health consequences of modern cannabis – and the new study, published in the journal Heart, is the latest to show they carry weight. In addition to the doubled mortality risks, cannabis use is tied to a 20 per cent higher risk of stroke and a 29 per cent higher risk of heart attacks or other types of acute coronary syndrome, which is when blood flow to the heart is severely restricted, the study found. The findings raise 'serious questions about the assumption that cannabis imposes little cardiovascular risk,' Stanton Glantz and Dr Lynn Silver, researchers at the University of California at San Francisco who were not involved with the study, said in a written comment. For the analysis, a French research team assessed real-world data from 24 studies conducted between 2016 and 2023. Most participants were between the ages of 19 and 59, and cannabis users were more likely to be younger and male compared with people who did not use the drug. Notably, most of the studies were observational, meaning researchers can't say that cannabis use causes heart problems directly. There was also a high risk of bias in most of the studies. More research is needed to understand exactly how cannabis is linked to heart problems, and whether the risks differ based on the type of cannabis someone uses. Despite the limitations, the study authors said their analysis is among the most comprehensive yet to probe the possible link between cannabis and heart problems in the real world. Glantz and Silver pushed for health warnings on cannabis products and protections against secondhand smoke exposure, particularly as countries relax their cannabis laws and the drug becomes more easily available. 'Cannabis needs to be incorporated into the framework for prevention of clinical cardiovascular disease,' they said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store