logo
Where is the money going to help ‘Atlanta Move Forward?' Here's what we found

Where is the money going to help ‘Atlanta Move Forward?' Here's what we found

Yahoo29-01-2025

Atlanta council members grilled the Atlanta DOT after an audit showed some concerning findings about a major infrastructure package.
In May 2022, Atlanta voters approved a set of ballot measures to make big investments in the city's infrastructure. But only a fraction of that has been spent, according to a report by the city auditor.
'The sentiments that went through me were anger, embarrassment, but then, more importantly, a feeling of defeat,' Councilman Alex Wan said.
Councilmembers expressed frustration and concern at a meeting Wednesday that the Moving Atlanta Forward Plan may seem to be falling behind.
'This is a city of Atlanta problem that has stretched on for decades,' Councilman Amir Farokhi said.
Councilmembers brought up 'Renew Atlanta,' which was an infrastructure package from 2015 that ran behind schedule.
Voters approved the Move Atlanta Forward proposal back in 2022.
Atlanta officials said at the time that the measures approved by voters included two bonds and a special sales tax renewal, greenlighting a $750 million funding effort for transportation, recreation, public safety, and the arts.
TRENDING STORIES:
Truck spills piles of 'undeliverable' mail on side of I-285 in Cobb County
DoorDash driver vanishes after making delivery in Clayton County
Man who refills vending machines at GA high school accused of using AI to create nude images of kids
Funds were split between a $400 million infrastructure bond and a $350 million TSPLOST extension, effectively a $0.04 tax on every $10 purchase for retail transactions in Atlanta, according to city officials.
Now, the Atlanta City Auditor's Office reports less than 10% has been spent.
The auditor's report found that 'as of August 2024, $47 million had been spent on Moving Atlanta Forward projects, less than 10% of project funds.'
The Atlanta Department of Transportation says they have spent more money since then. However, the dashboard shows the program has since paid $69 million on projects, or 9.3% of the approved funds.
In their examination of the funding package, the auditor's office found that projects were slow to progress and that districts with the least amount of spending had higher poverty levels than the others.
'That was eye-opening but not shocking,' Councilman Antonio Lewis said.
The Atlanta Department of Transportation says some projects have not made it to construction because they are more complex than others and need additional community input.
The mayor's office indicated weather may have caused some delays, and emergency repairs forced some projects to be prioritized over others.
The report also found that there was not a central oversight mechanism, and having one 'may improve consistency across the three project delivery departments.'
Those departments are Transportation, Enterprise Asset Management, and Parks and Recreation.
Due to the audit's findings, the office made several recommendations to help the programs get back on track, for oversight, spending tracking, and overall project management.
According to the audit's highlights, the recommendations were either agreed to or partially agreed to, with completion dates set for June 2025 at the latest.
However, Council members expressed apprehension about if the projects would be completed.
'I've heard from a number of constituents that they are giving up, we are just giving up that we are actually going to get these projects,' Wan said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Competition Bureau sues DoorDash, accuses firm of misleading customers with fees
Competition Bureau sues DoorDash, accuses firm of misleading customers with fees

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Competition Bureau sues DoorDash, accuses firm of misleading customers with fees

TORONTO — Canada's competition watchdog is suing DoorDash Inc. and its Canadian subsidiary for marketing its online delivery services at a lower price than what consumers actually wind up paying. The Competition Bureau says an investigation found DoorDash customers were unable to purchase food and other items at prices advertised on DoorDash's websites and mobile apps because of mandatory fees added at checkout. The extra charges range from service and delivery fees to amounts sought for couriering things a further distance or placing smaller orders. The bureau says the charges were sometimes framed as if they were taxes and resulted in consumers paying higher prices than advertised, amounting to a deceptive practice known as drip pricing. The bureau alleges DoorDash used drip pricing for close to a decade, making nearly $1 billion from mandatory fees paid by customers. It wants the company to stop the practice, cease portraying fees as taxes, pay a penalty and issue restitution to affected consumers, but DoorDash says the requests are "misguided" because it does not hide fees from consumers or mislead them in any way. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 9, 2025. Tara Deschamps, The Canadian Press Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Canada's Competition Bureau suing DoorDash over prices, discounts
Canada's Competition Bureau suing DoorDash over prices, discounts

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Canada's Competition Bureau suing DoorDash over prices, discounts

OTTAWA (Reuters) -Canada's Competition Bureau said on Monday it was suing DoorDash and its Canadian subsidiary for allegedly advertising misleading prices and discounts. The bureau said in a statement that it found that consumers were unable to purchase food and other items at the advertised price on DoorDash's websites and mobile applications due to the addition of mandatory fees at checkout. The bureau said it was suing to stop DoorDash from what it called deceptive price and discount advertising. It is seeking a penalty from the companies and wants them to offer restitution to affected consumers. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Competition Bureau sues DoorDash for allegedly advertising misleading prices and discounts
Competition Bureau sues DoorDash for allegedly advertising misleading prices and discounts

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Competition Bureau sues DoorDash for allegedly advertising misleading prices and discounts

GATINEAU, QC, June 9, 2025 /CNW/ - The Competition Bureau is taking legal action against DoorDash Inc., and its subsidiary DoorDash Technologies Canada Inc., for promoting their online delivery services at a lower price than what consumers actually have to pay. A Bureau investigation found that consumers were unable to purchase food and other items at the advertised price on DoorDash's websites and mobile applications due to the addition of mandatory fees at checkout. This practice is commonly known as drip pricing and is deceptive because consumers are not presented with an attainable price upfront. DoorDash charges consumers numerous mandatory fees to deliver orders made online, including service fees, delivery fees, expanded range fees, small order fees and regulatory response fees. As a result, consumers end up paying higher prices or receiving lower discounts than advertised. The company has been engaging in the alleged conduct for close to a decade, acquiring nearly $1 billion in mandatory fees from consumers. The Bureau also alleges that the way certain fees are represented on the company's platform give the impression that they are taxes, where, in reality, they are charges imposed at DoorDash's discretion. Today, the Bureau filed an application with the Competition Tribunal seeking, among other things, for DoorDash to: stop the deceptive price and discount advertising; stop portraying fees as taxes; pay a penalty; and issue restitution to affected consumers who purchased food and other items through DoorDash's platform. Quotes "Parliament has made it clear that businesses must not engage in drip pricing by advertising unattainable prices and then adding mandatory fees. The Competition Bureau has been fighting against this misleading practice for years. Our litigation against DoorDash is another example of our efforts to ensure consumers are not misled and can trust the prices they see online. We urge all businesses to review their pricing practices and make sure they comply with the law." Matthew Boswell Commissioner of Competition Quick Facts DoorDash Inc., and its subsidiary, DoorDash Technologies Canada Inc., operate an online delivery platform that connects consumers and merchants. The company enables consumers to order food and other items from local restaurants, grocery stores and convenience stores through their websites and mobile applications and facilitates delivery of those orders. Amendments to the Competition Act came into force on June 23, 2022, which explicitly recognize drip pricing as a harmful business practice. It is against the Competition Act to advertise unattainable prices that do not include mandatory fixed charges or fees unless those charges or fees are imposed by the government on purchasers, such as sales tax. In September 2024, the Competition Bureau won a deceptive marketing case against Cineplex for making false or misleading price representations by engaging in drip pricing. The Competition Tribunal ordered the company to pay $39 million and stop the conduct at issue. Prior to the June 2022 amendments, the Bureau has taken action against drip pricing for many years under the Deceptive Marketing Practices provisions of the Competition Act. The Bureau issued a consumer alert to raise awareness and reporting of drip pricing. We strongly encourage anyone who suspects that a company or individual is making false or misleading price claims to report it by using the Bureau's online complaint form. Associated Links Drip pricing and the Competition Act Deceptive marketing practices – Cases and outcomes Consumer and business alerts General information: Request for information | Complaint form Stay connected: X (Twitter) | Facebook | LinkedIn | YouTube | RSS Feed | Email Distribution List The Competition Bureau is an independent law enforcement agency that protects and promotes competition for the benefit of Canadian consumers and businesses. Competition drives lower prices and innovation while fueling economic growth. SOURCE Competition Bureau View original content: Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store