Heathrow warned it cannot afford a third runway
Heathrow has been warned that it cannot afford a third runway without loading the business with billions of pounds more debt.
In a damning new report, the ratings agency S&P Global said the planned expansion will potentially imperil the airport by significantly increasing its borrowings, which are are already as high as nearly £20bn.
As well as increasing debts, S&P said the project would also lead to higher passenger charges at Heathrow, which are already among the highest in Europe.
According to S&P, this 'could lead to a weakening of Heathrow's competitive position relative to other European hubs' – raising fresh concerns over the airport's status as a global transport hub.
Heathrow has insisted that the planned expansion will not need any financial support from the taxpayer, although S&P claims it will not be able to afford a third runway without a significant cash injection from its shareholders.
The airport's backers are largely made up of overseas investors, led by French private equity giant Ardian, the Qatar Investment Authority and Saudi Arabia's Public Investment Fund.
S&P said: 'Notwithstanding Heathrow's strong regulatory environment and superior competitive position, we believe that our issue ratings on Heathrow's debt have limited headroom for significant additional leverage.
'In our view, the new runway would be difficult to finance without strong equity backing.'
Concerns over how Heathrow will pay for a third runway have emerged just months after Chancellor Rachel Reeves backed the £20bn project, as she stepped up efforts to boost economic growth.
Heathrow is set to submit plans for the expansion later this year, with chief executive Thomas Woldbye claiming that the third runway could be in use by 2035.
Plans could see the airport's capacity increase from 80m passengers a year to 140m in an expansion costing between £20bn and £25bn, according to S&P.
Mr Woldbye has said that a third runway would lead to lower air fares for passengers because it would remove flight capacity limits that are responsible for inflating prices.
Meanwhile, the airport's latest annual reports show that Heathrow has just over £19bn worth of debt across the business, which led to more than £600m in finance costs last year alone.
However, these did not prevent the airport from posting profits of £917m from total revenues of £3.6bn.
A Heathrow spokesman said: 'Expanding Heathrow will be entirely privately funded, and as such must be financeable. Policy changes, including adjustments to the regulatory regime for a third runway, will be key to delivering the project successfully.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
30 minutes ago
- Reuters
Poland cancels acquisition process for 32 Black Hawk helicopters
WARSAW, June 6 (Reuters) - Poland has cancelled the procurement procedure for the purchase of 32 more Lockheed Martin S-70i Black Hawk helicopters for the Polish Army, the Polish Armament Agency said on Friday. "Maybe it is necessary to acquire other equipment in its (helicopters') place such as drones, or tanks, or some kind of communication," agency spokesman Grzegorz Polak told Reuters. Polak added that "some correction" was needed when the geopolitical situation and state security interests required other tasks to be carried out. Poland launched negotiations for the acquisition of 32 S-70i Black Hawk helicopters, produced by Lockheed Martin's Polish arm PZL Mielec, in 2023 under the previous Law and Justice (PiS) government, opens new tab. PiS lawmaker Mariusz Blaszczak, who was defence minister in the previous government, labelled the decision a "disgrace" in a post on X, saying it would slow down the replacement of the helicopter fleet. In August 2024 Poland signed a contract with the U.S. to buy 96 AH-64E Apache attack helicopters. Under the deal with the U.S. government the helicopters would provide new combat capabilities in terms of target engagement and reconnaissance, and will replace Poland's post-Soviet Mi-24 helicopters. Polak said the Armament Agency obtained equipment in accordance with Polish army plans, which are classified. It was not the Armament Agency that set procurement priorities, he added.
BBC News
31 minutes ago
- BBC News
How the Glazer family cost Manchester United £1.2bn
On 28 June 2005, the Glazer family completed their takeover of Manchester United Football loaded the club with debt, and over the next 20 years, BBC Verify has found about £1.2bn has been spent on debt interest, debt repayments, dividends and fees to the fund the deal, the Glazers borrowed millions of pounds from hedge funds and left the club with debts of £ year on, the club had already paid £53.2m in debt interest to its lenders and in fees to the Glazer family. June 2025 marks the 20th anniversary of the Florida-based Glazer family taking full control of the Premier League was a deeply controversial takeover from the beginning because of the financial implications for 22 June 2005, the Glazer family paid £790m to buy out the club's exiting shareholders and to remove the club from the London stock it was a deal mainly funded by borrowed money and loaded £604m in debts on to the club, which had previously had borrowings of only £ club's board had warned, external in April 2005 about the dangers of this amount of debt, saying it was not "prudent" and risked "a downward spiral in both team and financial performance".The takeover provoked protests from fans, which continue to this by BBC Verify - based on an analysis of the club's published accounts and stock market announcements - show that since the Glazer family's acquisition of the club in June 2005 it has paid out:£815m in debt interest repayments£166m in dividends to shareholders£10m in management and administration fees to Glazer family companies£197m in external net debt repaymentsThis means that, in total, £1.187bn in cash left the club between 2005 and 2024 which it is reasonable to argue would not have done so in the absence of the Glazer is a conservative estimate, too, because it does not include various fees to banks, financial advisers and other financing costs, including currency also does not include the cash that has left the club in the form of directors' the Glazers re-listed a portion of the the club's shares on the New York Stock Exchange in 2012, £125m has also been paid out in compensation to the club's half of the directors were Glazer family members, it's likely half of this sum - about £63m - went to Verify asked the club to comment on the findings and they said they would leave the accounts to speak for themselves. Have the Glazers added value? The Glazer family can legitimately point to the fact they have significantly grown the value of the club over the past two the Glazers' two decades of full ownership, United's annual commercial revenues have risen more than fivefold - from £55m in 2006 to £303m in 2024. This is reflected in the implied market value of the Glazers acquired United for £790m. The stock market implied value of the club in May 2025 was more than £ the financial terms of the sale of a stake in the club to Sir Jim Ratcliffe in 2024 implies an overall valuation of £ family can also point to the fact that, under their ownership, the club has spent more than £2bn on signing new players since 2012. This compares well with expenditure by most of the club's rivals, external over that the pitch, United have won 15 major trophies under the Glazers, but only five have those have come since the retirement of legendary former manager Sir Alex Ferguson in season they finished 15th in the Premier League - the lowest they have ended a campaign since a year in the second tier in was acknowledged in the club's quarterly accounts, released on executive officer Omar Berrada said it had been "a difficult season in the Premier League, which we all know fell below our standards and we have a clear expectation of improvement next season". How much have the Glazers invested themselves? The Glazers mainly used borrowed money to buy the club in 2005, but the accounts show they also put in £273m of their own they have invested no money of their own investments in the squad have come from the club's own internally generated cash resources and from debt secured on the club directly and on the ownership shares in the family have also realised considerable value from their 2012 and 2022 the Glazer family sold £555m in shares in the club, including the proceeds of a £150m 2012 listing on the New York Stock the sale proceeds, £484m went to them directly, though £71m went to partially pay down the debt they took out to buy the club. What has happened to the debt? In 2005, Manchester United PLC's total gross debt was just £ Glazers' leveraged buyout increased the gross debt listed in the accounts to £604m in 2006 - this was partially secured on the club's assets directly, and partially secured on the Glazer family's ownership have been been some major refinancing of the debt over the two decades, including in 2010 and 2015. But in 2024, the club's gross debt still stood at £547m. Other measures of debt which factor in the future cost of transfers put this figure at almost £ annual interest costs since 2005 have been £42m with costs of £37.2m in the most recent financial year of 2023-24. How has Jim Ratcliffe's involvement affected the finances of the club? In 2024, the Glazer family sold £732m in shares to Ratcliffe, leaving him with roughly a 30% ownership stake and control of the football part of the deal, Ratcliffe injected a further £236m of his own funds directly into the club for investment into the infrastructure of their Old Trafford additional investment was not funded by additional Jim told the BBC in March 2025 the club had been set to run out of money by the end of this year, forcing him to drastically cut costs.
BBC News
31 minutes ago
- BBC News
Man Utd prepare to make 'disciplined investment' to strengthen squad
Manchester United are prepared to make what they privately describe as "disciplined investment" in Ruben Amorim's squad to deliver demanded improvement next released their third quarter financial statement on included a £20m reduction in wages compared to the same point in 2024, part of which is due to a redundancy programme that will eventually see around 450 staff members losing their jobs. That contributed to a small operating profit of £700,000, compared to a loss of £66.2m 12 months was also a £2.7m "exceptional costs" payment, which the club say is related to the exits of some senior revenue for the nine months to 31 March is £502.3m, down just over 3%.Borrowings, excluding the amount owed in transfer fees, is £ reduction in costs is significant because, as minority owner Sir Jim Ratcliffe previously pledged, it creates space to invest in the first sources say the figures prove "difficult decisions" around staffing are now starting to bear fruit and that wage reduction, plus other savings, allow for "disciplined investment" in Amorim's squad. They say the club is committed to complying with the Premier League and Uefa's financial club, who have missed out on European qualification for only the second time since English clubs returned following the Uefa ban in 1990, have already agreed a deal to sign Wolves forward Matheus Cunha from Wolves for £62.5m. Negotiations with Brentford are also continuing over Cameroon forward Bryan their worst domestic performance since the 1973-74 relegation season, United chief executive Omar Berrada is demanding immediate improvement."We had a difficult season in the Premier League, which we all know fell below our standards," he said. "We have a clear expectation of improvement next season."
