logo
Court hearing could determine whether tenants retrieve belongings after fire destroyed Fort Worth apartment complex

Court hearing could determine whether tenants retrieve belongings after fire destroyed Fort Worth apartment complex

CBS News11 hours ago
A court hearing could determine whether tenants of the Cooper Apartment complex will be allowed to retrieve belongings left behind after a six-alarm fire destroyed much of the building in June.
The hearing comes as dozens of tenants have filed a lawsuit against the complex's owners and managers, alleging negligence and a lack of communication in the aftermath of the fire.
Attorney Katie Steele, who represents many of the tenants, said her clients simply want accountability and the chance to salvage what remains.
"I think my clients deserve to be able to have hope," Steele said, adding that tenants have endured "zero communication" and were only able to get answers after filing the lawsuit.
At the center of Tuesday's hearing in the 48th District Court was Steele's request for injunctive relief... specifically, a temporary restraining order to stop the destruction of remaining property or demolition of the scene.
"We understand that there is structural remediation that needs to happen in order to avoid a collapse of the building," Steele said. "However, that cannot be at the expense of my clients' possessions."
Some tenants received notices from the Cooper that their items would be disposed of, regardless of whether they considered them irreplaceable. Several testified Tuesday, sharing emotional stories of loss.
Miriam Zarza, a tenant, said she is still waiting for answers about her three pets that were inside during the fire.
"The only thing I care about is the remains and just being able to put them to rest after all this chaos," she said.
Steele argued that a restraining order would allow tenants possible eventual access to their units, either to go inside themselves or to hire professionals, if cleared safe.
Attorneys for the complex declined to be interviewed but told the court their goal is also to save as much of the building as possible and return items to tenants.
Steele and her clients said that the plan has never been clearly communicated.
"That information has changed since this has all been happening," Steele said. "At first, they were telling me the building was actively coming down and it was not going to be possible."
Opposing counsel presented a witness who testified about the structural integrity of the building, showing photos of apartments left in ruins.
They argued that collapse remains a real concern and that any retrieval effort would have to follow strict weight limits for each floor to ensure safety.
The hearing resumes on Wednesday, Aug. 20.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bombshell texts reveal Jeanine Pirro is no fan of Sean Hannity, alleging he storms into the Oval Office ‘like he owns the place'
Bombshell texts reveal Jeanine Pirro is no fan of Sean Hannity, alleging he storms into the Oval Office ‘like he owns the place'

Yahoo

time4 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Bombshell texts reveal Jeanine Pirro is no fan of Sean Hannity, alleging he storms into the Oval Office ‘like he owns the place'

U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia Jeanine Pirro once labelled her fellow Fox News anchor Sean Hannity an 'egomaniac' and bragged about helping President Donald Trump, according to newly-released bombshell text messages. Pirro is at the center of a lawsuit brought by the voting machine manufacturer Smartmatic against Fox, in which the former is seeking $2.7 billion in damages for what it alleges do the network's anchors spread falsehoods and conspiracy theories about its products in the aftermath of Trump's defeat to Joe Biden in the 2020 presidential election. Fox settled a similar defamation lawsuit with Dominion Voting Systems in 2023 for $787.5 million but has insisted that Smartmatic's suit is without merit. 'The evidence shows that Smartmatic's business and reputation were badly suffering long before any claims by President Trump's lawyers on Fox News and that Smartmatic grossly inflated its damage claims to generate headlines and chill free speech,' the network said in a statement. 'Now, in the aftermath of Smartmatic's executives getting indicted for bribery charges, we are eager and ready to continue defending our press freedoms.' The texts gathered by the company concerning Pirro were released as part of an unredacted court filing on Tuesday and paint a fascinating picture of life behind the scenes at Fox. In one message sent by Pirro in September 2020 to Ronna McDaniel, the then-chair of the Republican National Committee, she bragged, 'I work so hard for the party across the country. I'm the Number 1 watched show on all news cable all weekend. I work so hard for the President and party.' In another message on October 27, she told a friend that Hannity had stormed into the Oval Office of the White House 'like he owns the place, throws his papers on the Pres desk and says, you don't mind if I use your private bathroom, and walks into bathroom within Oval and uses it.' She continued: '[He] Looks at me and says, I got to talk to him… It's all abt him, period. No one else matters.' Smartmatic also argues in its suit that Pirro served as an information conduit to Sidney Powell, the self-styled 'Kraken' attorney at the forefront of claims that Biden's victory at the polls was achieved by fraud, citing a message in which she encourages the lawyer to 'keep fighting.' The texts further reveal that Jerry Andrews, the producer of Pirro's show Justice with Judge Jeanine, warned her against making false claims about the election on air. 'You should be very careful with this stuff and protect yourself given the ongoing calls for evidence that has not materialized,' he told her. Pirro was then angered when Fox decided against running an episode on November 7 and wrote to Hannity: 'I'M TIRED OF THE CENSORSHIP AND I'M EMBARRASSED BY HOW THEY CALLED THIS ELECTION.' Hannity replied by observing: 'Fox News promoting u every 5 seconds. It's hilarious.' According to Smartmatic, Pirro otherwise acknowledged in a deposition that the 2020 election was not stolen, agreed that it had been 'fair and free' and that the company did nothing wrong. 'I believe that there's been no showing that Smartmatic engaged in any problems,' she said, according to the filing, which also quoted her as answering 'I do' when asked by the company's lawyers whether she believed Biden was 'legitimately elected.' Elsewhere, Pirro is seen complaining to the president's son Eric Trump that her ex-husband, Albert Pirro, was not initially granted a pardon by Trump over his tax evasion conviction and calling former New York City police commissioner Bernard Kerik, who was granted clemency, 'a selfish bastard,' writing to Kerik's girlfriend: 'I DON'T CARE [ABOUT] ANYONE ELSE.' Other Fox anchors mentioned in the suit include Jesse Watters, who texted his fellow presenter Greg Gutfeld in December 2020: 'Think about how incredible our ratings would be if Fox went ALL in on STOP THE STEAL.' More cautious was Bret Baier, who, according to the filing, messaged executive Jay Wallace accusing Maria Bartiromo of Fox Business of airing falsehoods and declaring: 'None of that is true as far as we can tell. We need to fact-check this crap.'

Video shows ICE agents pulling man from car in Minneapolis and arresting him
Video shows ICE agents pulling man from car in Minneapolis and arresting him

CBS News

time6 minutes ago

  • CBS News

Video shows ICE agents pulling man from car in Minneapolis and arresting him

Immigration agents pulled an undocumented man from the passenger seat of a car in Minneapolis on Friday. They say they arrested him because he showed "a reckless disregard for the safety of others." That dramatic arrest was caught on camera near the Walker Art Center. The video is about two minutes long and shows the struggle that ensued as concerned community members watched and recorded, including Cynthia Daggett. "They may have had a warrant, it may have been a legitimate stop, but very hard to trust that," Daggett said. Immigration and Customs Enforcement wouldn't answer if it had a warrant or not, but immigration attorney Gloria Contreras Edin says ICE is operating within the law. "It is clear that ICE has the authority to arrest someone without any written documentation handed to an individual before the arrest," Contreras Edin said. In a statement, ICE officials said: "For more than two decades, illegal alien Javier Yanez Morales, has put the public at risk for repeatedly and selfishly choosing to drink and drive, showing reckless disregard for the safety of others. This same disregard extends to immigration law which Morales has violated for just as long. Morales has been illegally entering the United States as far back as 1998, but despite being previously deported to Mexico he continued to commit crimes including domestic assault and false reporting. When ICE officers moved to take him into custody in Minneapolis, he resisted arrest. A passenger who interfered only escalated the situation, creating unnecessary danger for themselves, bystanders, and the officers." WCCO has confirmed Morales was charged with DWI with a blood alcohol level of 0.08 in July. Arrests like these are reigniting debate as federal immigration authorities promise to step up enforcement across the country, especially in sanctuary cities. "Sanctuary cities are sanctuaries for criminals," President Trump's border czar Tom Homan said. "The sanctuary cities are going to get exactly what they don't want, more agents in the communities and more worksite enforcement. Why is that? Because they won't let one agent arrest one bad guy to jail," Horman added. A 2017 Minneapolis city ordinance prevents city employees like police from proactive immigration enforcement. Earlier this summer, a federal raid on Lake Street raised concerns about police cooperation with ICE. An audit published earlier this month found the city did not violate its separation ordinance.

How DOGE Set Up a Shadow X Account for a Government Agency
How DOGE Set Up a Shadow X Account for a Government Agency

WIRED

time6 minutes ago

  • WIRED

How DOGE Set Up a Shadow X Account for a Government Agency

Aug 20, 2025 6:30 AM In February, DOGE affiliates at the SBA set up an X account and solicited whistleblower complaints. 'It's like having a crazy uncle who decides to be the cops,' a government auditor tells WIRED. Less than two weeks after Donald Park and Edward Coristine, two members of the so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), entered the Small Business Administration (SBA), a new account appeared on X: @DOGE_SBA. The SBA has had an official X account since 2010. It frequently posts updates and reshares posts from the agency's administrator, former Republican senator Kelly Loeffler. But according to documents obtained under a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request and shared exclusively with WIRED, it was a member of DOGE itself that started and ran the new X account. Not only did DOGE seemingly do so without involving the government workers who normally manage an agency's external communications, but in at least one case, they appeared to accept a complaint from a potential whistleblower over direct message. It is yet another example of how DOGE has operated as a seemingly separate and unaccountable body within government agencies. According to sources familiar with government operations, social media accounts, as well as other public-facing channels, have typically been managed by an agency's communications staff. An SBA social media manager, though, appeared to be completely unaware of the account. In an email on March 6, he emailed his colleagues with a link to the @DOGE_SBA X account, writing, 'How did I not see this before?' According to an email dated February 16, Park, one of the two DOGE operatives at SBA, appears to have set up the @DOGE_SBA account, receiving an email confirmation from X for adding a phone number, which was redacted, to their account. (After Musk purchased the company, he changed its policies to allow only premium subscribers to use two-factor identification via SMS.) On that same day, the account pinned a repost of one shared by the DOGE X account, asking the public for help identifying instances of waste, fraud, abuse. 'Please DM insight for reducing waste, fraud, and abuse, along with any helpful insights or awesome ideas, to the relevant DOGE affiliates,' the post read. A tab labeled 'Affiliates' on the DOGE X page lists 32 X accounts for the DOGE missions at various agencies, including the Department of Homeland Security, the Social Security Administration, the Department of Housing and Urban Development, and the SBA, among others. 'Help us fight fraud, waste, and abuse to benefit US taxpayers and small businesses across America. DMs are open!' the DOGE_SBA account wrote in its first and only post, echoing DOGE's X account, which still regularly posts about how the so-called agency has been saving the government money by canceling contracts and services. Park, Coristine, the SBA, and its communications team did not respond to requests for comment. A former US government public affairs official, who spoke to WIRED on the condition of anonymity to protect their identity, says that it would be highly unusual for a government employee to be running any kind of front-facing social media account without the knowledge of the public affairs staff. 'Social media has always been sort of highly contested territory in government agencies. As it was becoming a bigger and bigger thing, more and more people wanted to use it, other people within a department would see it as a means of control,' they say. 'In terms of DOGE, we all saw DOGE come in and do things that they had no right to do.' There is also already an established way to report federal waste, fraud, and abuse within the SBA. Like nearly every government agency, the SBA has an Office of the Inspector General (OIG), which has the authority to investigate and audit SBA programs. But X direct messages contained in the documents obtained through the FOIA request show that at least one person did report possible instances of waste, fraud, and abuse to the @DOGE_SBA X account. In one message, a user reached out asking how they could report a former employer, claiming they had 'misused a PPP loan,' referring to the Paycheck Protection Program, which was offered to businesses at the height of the Covid-19 pandemic. Instead of referring the user to the OIG, the @DOGE_SBA account told the user to 'report it here.' 'Imagine you have a crazy uncle and he says, 'I'm going to be the cops, send me your tips,'' says a government auditor who spoke to WIRED on the condition of anonymity because they are not authorized to speak to the press.' That's essentially what's going on here. The fact that they're getting these OIG complaints, there's no long-term accountability, there's no long- term vested interest in the success of whatever agency they're at.' Nikhel Sus, deputy chief counsel at Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), the nonprofit that submitted the FOIA request for the documents, claims that this behavior shows that 'DOGE is a freestanding entity within the government. It is completely unchecked. It's not subject to any oversight, including from within the agencies that reportedly are employing them or that they are detailed to.' CREW has submitted FOIA requests for correspondence on the X accounts created by DOGE for the Department of Education, the Environmental Protection Agency, the General Services Administration, Housing and Urban Development, the Internal Revenue Service, the Office of Personnel Management, the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Social Security Administration, the State Department, and the Department of Agriculture. Only the SBA has responded with documents, and the SEC responded saying that there were no documents associated with the accounts to produce. 'Communications to and from the DOGE Team X accounts, the DOGE agency accounts, are federal records,' says Sus. 'They have to be preserved under the Federal Records Act, and they have to be made available to the public on FOIA.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store