Quality of PAP ministers 'leaves very much to be desired': Chee Soon Juan
Asserting that he has 'no interest in conducting PAP bashing', Dr Chee said that he had to list the scandals 'only because our PAP ministers keep running the propaganda that they are exceptional and they don't need an opposition to hold them accountable'.
Speaking about controversies such as the way then-Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong handled an affair between two MPs, the use of TraceTogether data, the NRIC number disclosures, he said:
'My message is not that the PAP, this government, is 100 per cent bad, or that it is 100 per cent good. What I want to get across to you, is that the PAP is most certainly not the exceptional party that it says that it is.'
Calling on ministers to be humble and recognise that Singapore needs an opposition, he added, 'Most of all, acknowledge and accept the fact that the PAP needs meaningful opposition in parliament to govern Singapore better.'
He also criticised relying on 'astronomical salaries' to prevent ministers from falling into 'the seductive hands of corruption'. He said, 'We must educate our ministers that corruption is bad and that if they are caught, there are consequences, period. We don't pay them exorbitant salaries to not be corrupt. We elect our leaders based on their moral rectitude. Anything less, and we are better off without them.'
Calling on voters to refrain from having blind faith in the ruling party, he said, 'Blind faith allows society into thinking that things are fine when they are clearly not, and worse, that there is no alternative to the PAP.'
He also appealed to voters to 'be bold, be brave, be on the right side of history', saying, 'Let us lead not with fear, but with faith in our people. Let us lead not by clinging on to the past, but by focusing boldly in the future.'
The veteran opposition figure who is mounting a one-on-one challenge at Sembawang West SMC added, 'Times have changed, and the people want openness and transparency. They want to be reasoned with, not talked down to.
'They want and demand a more democratic system, one where the government censors less and listens more.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
AsiaOne
2 hours ago
- AsiaOne
'We both want the best for Singapore': Ex-NMP Calvin Cheng resolves differences with ex-SDP chairman over Gaza comments, Singapore News
Former Nominated Member of Parliament Calvin Cheng has settled his claim for defamation against former Singapore Democratic Party chairman Jufrie Mahmood. Cheng sued Mahmood over a Facebook post made in March this year about Cheng's comments on activists who disrupted a Meet-the-People Session in Chong Pang. Mahmood had said that Cheng, who proposed sending the activists to Gaza as long as they did not return, was an Islamophobe and a threat to racial and religious harmony to Singapore. Cheng has since apologised for his comments and said he should have been more sensitive. On Mahmood's accusations, Cheng said in April that they were "factual inaccuracies" and "outright lies", and took legal action against him. In a Facebook post on Tuesday (Aug 12), Mahmood said that he has met with Cheng to "speak to each other frankly and civilly". He added that he has retracted all of his statements against Cheng after accepting he is "neither a racist nor an Islamophobe". "While I thought Mr Cheng was insensitive, which he accepts, I now recognise that I was too harsh in some of my other comments," he said. "In light of our meeting and further information made available to me, we both agreed to resolve our differences amicably and the court case." [embed] Separately, Cheng confirmed in a Facebook post the same day that Mahmood had retracted all of the statements made against him. 'Gaza is a divisive and emotive issue. But as Singaporeans, we can agree to disagree,' he said. 'I met up with Mr Jufrie at my lawyers' offices. We agreed we both want the best for Singapore.' [embed] [[nid:716602]] Chingshijie@
Straits Times
15 hours ago
- Straits Times
Ex-NMP Calvin Cheng resolves differences with ex-SDP chairman after latter retracts comments
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Former NMP Calvin Cheng (right) and former SDP chairman Mohamed Jufrie Mahmood said they have resolved their differences amicably. SINGAPORE – Former Nominated MP Calvin Cheng and former Singapore Democratic Party chairman Mohamed Jufrie Mahmood have resolved their differences amicably. In separate Facebook posts on Aug 12, the two men said they met to talk after Mr Cheng sued Mr Jufrie for defamation and were able to agree to disagree. In March, Mr Cheng made remarks about activists who had turned up and caused a scene at a Meet-the-People Session in Chong Pang. Mr Cheng had proposed sending them to Gaza as long as they did not return. Mr Jufrie then claimed that Mr Cheng had a track record of anti-Muslim sentiment and supported genocide, among other comments. In April, Mr Cheng then came out to say he was deeply remorseful for his initial comments and that he should have been more sensitive. He added that some other statements were wrongly attributed to him and that he had to take legal action as the untrue statements were damaging to him. One of the people he took action against was Mr Jufrie. On Aug 12, Mr Jufrie posted that both he and Mr Cheng have strong opinions about the situation in Gaza. He said they agreed to meet and were able to have a pleasant discussion, after which he accepted that Mr Cheng is neither a racist nor an Islamophobe. 'While I thought Mr Cheng was insensitive, which he accepts, I now recognise that I was too harsh in some of my other comments,' said Mr Jufrie. 'In (the) light of our meeting and further information made available to me, we both agreed to resolve our differences amicably and the court case.' He said he retracted his previous statements that criticised Mr Cheng's character and that implied he had committed criminal offences. Mr Cheng posted a photo of the two men standing side by side and noted Mr Jufrie's retractions. He said: 'Gaza is a divisive and emotive issue. But as Singaporeans, we can agree to disagree. 'We agreed we both want the best for Singapore.'
Independent Singapore
19 hours ago
- Independent Singapore
Forum on reimagining Singapore's electoral system set for Aug 23
Photo: Screengrab/ SINGAPORE: A discussion on electoral reform will be held at The Projector in Golden Mile Tower from 2:00 to 4:30 p.m. on Aug 23. The Singapore Democratic Party's Chee Soon Juan and Dr James Gomez will be giving addresses, and there will also be a standalone lecture on the state of overseas voting in Singapore. The panel discussion includes former Workers' Party Member of Parliament Leon Perera and political scientist Elvin Ong. Jeremy Tan, who contested in Mountbatten SMC as an independent candidate in the May 3 polls, and Jo Teo are also panellists at the event. Ahmad Amsyar will moderate the discussion. Tickets to the event are free. More details may be found here . 'Do we get the government we vote for? Where do we draw the line? Who wields the pen? Will smaller GRCs lead to greater minority representation? With only 47% of Gen Zs approving of the results of GE2025, should the voting age be lowered? What is a reasonable notice period for the release of electoral boundaries? Is a voter in Jalan Kayu more powerful than a voter in Bukit Panjang? Out of over 200,000 overseas Singaporeans aged 21 and above, how many actually voted?' are some of the questions to be raised during the discussion. In a Facebook post on Aug 7, Mr Perera wrote that electoral reform is an important subject worth having on a national level, given that electoral outcomes affect everyone's quality of life. He asked whether Singapore's electoral laws 'help to generate fair, representative political outcomes that make for stable, sustainable politics.' 'There are those who say that this is the wrong question to ask. Some say that it is the nature of politics that governing parties would always seek to bend the rules in their favour,' he added. The former MP also asked if 'thoughtful citizens' should not seek better rules governing elections, instead of opposition parties merely using their 'tenacity, resilience and ingenuity to work within these (often changing) rules that sometimes disadvantage them and try to win.' See also Jamus Lim backs WP chief's S$1,300 minimum wage proposal Meanwhile, in a blog post on Aug 5, Dr Gomez underlined the need to establish an independent election commission, which has been 'widely recognised as an international best practice recommended by the UN Electoral Assistance Division and the intergovernmental organisation International IDEA,' he wrote, adding, 'For Singapore, this represents a long-overdue but essential first step toward genuine electoral reform.' /TISG Read also: SDP launches petition to reform Singapore's electoral system including abolishing GRC system () => { const trigger = if ('IntersectionObserver' in window && trigger) { const observer = new IntersectionObserver((entries, observer) => { => { if ( { lazyLoader(); // You should define lazyLoader() elsewhere or inline here // Run once } }); }, { rootMargin: '800px', threshold: 0.1 }); } else { // Fallback setTimeout(lazyLoader, 3000); } });
