Moroccan Competition Council targets Glovo for anti-competitive practices
The general rapporteur of the Competition Council announced on Wednesday that formal grievances have been issued to a company accused of anti-competitive practices in Morocco's digital meal delivery market, both nationally and locally.
The notice, issued under Article 29 of Law 104.12 on the freedom of prices and competition (as amended and supplemented), marks the start of an adversarial process and ensures the company's right to a fair defense, according to a statement from the general rapporteur.
The same statement noted that, in line with its legal mandate under the Constitution, Law 20.13 on the Competition Council, and Law 104.12, the Council opened an investigation on February 19, 2024, through decision 20/D/2024, to examine allegations of anti-competitive practices in the digital meal ordering and delivery market across Morocco.
The investigation found evidence of anti-competitive behavior by Glovo, a major player in the sector. The alleged practices include abusing its dominant market position, exploiting the economic dependence of its business partners, and engaging in unfairly low pricing.
The statement also made clear that the notice of grievances does not prejudge the final outcome. The final decision rests with the Council's board, which will rule after a fair and thorough investigation, ensuring the company's right to defend itself.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Morocco World
5 days ago
- Morocco World
Glovo Faces Antitrust Allegations in Morocco's Food Delivery Market
Doha – The Competition Council of Morocco has officially notified GlovoApp Morocco of several grievances regarding alleged anticompetitive practices in the digital food ordering and delivery platform market. The notification follows an investigation initiated by the Council's self-referral decision number 20/D/2024 dated February 19, 2024. The investigation stems from a surprise inspection of Glovo's Casablanca offices on October 22, 2024. This operation was authorized by the King's Prosecutor and conducted with support from the National Judicial Police Brigade. According to the Council's Rapporteur General, the investigation revealed evidence of anticompetitive practices by Glovo. The company is accused of abusing its dominant market position, exploiting the economic dependency of its commercial partners, and implementing unfairly low pricing strategies. The notification opens a contradictory procedure phase that guarantees Glovo's defense rights. The constitutional institution, headed by Ahmed Rahhou, clarified that this notification does not prejudge the final decision, which can only be determined by the Council's board. Glovo, a Spanish-origin delivery platform, quickly responded to the allegations in a statement released Thursday. The company acknowledged receiving the notification while stressing that it 'does not prejudge the Council's final decision.' Read also: Glovo Maroc Sees 40% Surge in Summer Deliveries The food delivery platform stated it 'fully respects the ongoing procedure, as governed by current regulations.' Glovo reaffirmed 'its deep commitment to Morocco' and its desire to 'maintain the best relationships with its entire ecosystem — partners, delivery drivers, and customers — and Moroccan authorities.' 'We remain committed to respecting fair competition rules, transparency, innovation, and service quality to contribute to the development of our sector, which is in constant technological evolution, in a win-win dynamic,' Glovo concluded in its statement. Since establishing operations in Morocco, Glovo has transformed the local home delivery landscape. Morocco represents the company's fourth-largest market globally. The platform currently works with more than 6,500 business partners and 4,500 couriers throughout the kingdom. Article 7 of Law No. 104-12 on freedom of prices and competition prohibits behaviors that aim to 'prevent, restrict or distort competition.' The law specifically forbids imposing 'unjustified commercial conditions' or 'minimum resale prices.' According to the Competition Council, such practices risk harming offer diversity, innovation, and consumer rights. The final decision will be made by the Council's board after conducting a contradictory investigation respecting the defense rights of the concerned party and following a Council session. The board alone will determine whether the alleged grievances are well-founded. This regulatory action aims to preserve the competitive balance of the market in the interest of consumers and proper economic functioning. Tags: Council of competitionFood DeliveryGlovo in Morocco
Ya Biladi
5 days ago
- Ya Biladi
Moroccan Competition Council targets Glovo for anti-competitive practices
The general rapporteur of the Competition Council announced on Wednesday that formal grievances have been issued to a company accused of anti-competitive practices in Morocco's digital meal delivery market, both nationally and locally. The notice, issued under Article 29 of Law 104.12 on the freedom of prices and competition (as amended and supplemented), marks the start of an adversarial process and ensures the company's right to a fair defense, according to a statement from the general rapporteur. The same statement noted that, in line with its legal mandate under the Constitution, Law 20.13 on the Competition Council, and Law 104.12, the Council opened an investigation on February 19, 2024, through decision 20/D/2024, to examine allegations of anti-competitive practices in the digital meal ordering and delivery market across Morocco. The investigation found evidence of anti-competitive behavior by Glovo, a major player in the sector. The alleged practices include abusing its dominant market position, exploiting the economic dependence of its business partners, and engaging in unfairly low pricing. The statement also made clear that the notice of grievances does not prejudge the final outcome. The final decision rests with the Council's board, which will rule after a fair and thorough investigation, ensuring the company's right to defend itself.
Ya Biladi
09-05-2025
- Ya Biladi
Moroccan competition council probes 20-year sardine market collusion
The Competition Council announced on Thursday the launch of an investigation to determine the existence of alleged anti-competitive practices in the industrial sardine supply market. «As part of its duties and responsibilities defined by the Constitution, Law No. 20-13 relating to the Competition Council, and Law No. 104-12 on freedom of prices and competition — as amended and supplemented — aimed at regulating market competition and protecting consumer interests, the Competition Council has initiated an investigation into potential anti-competitive practices in the industrial sardine supply market», stated a communiqué from the Council's general rapporteur. Investigative actions carried out by the Council's instruction and inquiry services have gathered sufficient evidence suggesting the existence of anti-competitive agreements among several actors in the industrial sardine supply chain. These agreements reportedly aimed to restrict competition in the sector over a 20-year period. Specifically, they involved the concerted fixing of first-sale prices of industrial sardines — undermining free market pricing by artificially inflating or deflating prices — and the coordinated allocation and limitation of production, restricting market access and the free exercise of competition by other players. Accordingly, the general rapporteur of the Competition Council stated that, in line with Article 29 of Law No. 104-12, grievances have been formally notified to 15 professional organizations allegedly involved in these practices. These organizations include shipowners, processing units engaged in the industrial transformation of fish, and wholesalers purchasing seafood products at first sale for market distribution.
