
Minister ‘hugely disappointed' as talks to agree UN plastics treaty fail
But the gavel came down in overtime on Friday morning with no deal reached after negotiators struggled to break a deadlock over key issues.
The biggest sticking point has been whether the treaty should impose caps on producing new plastic or focus instead on things such as better design, recycling and reuse.
In a statement later on Friday, Ms Hardy said: 'I'm hugely disappointed that an agreement wasn't reached, but am extremely proud of the way the UK worked tirelessly until the end to seek an ambitious and effective treaty.
'Plastic pollution is a global crisis that no country can solve alone, and the UK is committed to working with others at home and abroad to protect the environment and pave the way to a circular economy.'
The UK was part of the 'high ambition coalition' which was calling for binding obligations on reducing production and consumption, sustainable product design, environmentally sound management of plastic waste, and clean-up of pollution.
But a smaller number of powerful oil and gas producing nations including Saudi Arabia and Kuwait oppose production limits, which they consider outside the scope of the treaty.
Inger Andersen, executive director of the UN Environment Programme (UNEP), said the talks had been a 'hard-fought 10 days' against the backdrop of geopolitical complexities, economic challenges, and multilateral strains.
'However, one thing remains clear: despite these complexities, all countries clearly want to remain at the table,' he said.
'While we did not land the treaty text we hoped for, we at UNEP will continue the work against plastic pollution – pollution that is in our groundwater, in our soil, in our rivers, in our oceans and, yes, in our bodies.'
'We did not get where we wanted, but people want a deal. This work will not stop, because plastic pollution will not stop.'
UNEP Executive Director @andersen_inger at the close of the second part of #INC5 in Geneva.
Watch the full media stakeout: https://t.co/rpSs6tao6T… pic.twitter.com/Ik1OGpIh0Y
— UN Environment Programme (@UNEP) August 15, 2025
Over the past few days, Luis Vayas Valdivieso, chairman of the negotiating committee, gathered views from the representatives of 184 countries before writing two drafts of treaty text.
But countries ultimately rejected both as the basis for negotiations after they failed to bridge the major rifts between different groups of nations.
Mr Vayas Valdivieso said: 'Failing to reach the goal we set for ourselves may bring sadness, even frustration.
'Yet it should not lead to discouragement. On the contrary, it should spur us to regain our energy, renew our commitments, and unite our aspirations.'
Every year, the world makes more than 400 million tonnes of new plastic, and that could grow by about 70% by 2040 without policy changes. About 100 countries want to limit production.
Many have said it is also essential to address toxic chemicals used to make plastics.
Once in the environment, plastic waste can entangle, choke or be eaten by wildlife and livestock, clog up waterways and litter beaches, while bigger items break down into microplastics, entering food chains.
Producing plastic, primarily from fossil fuel oil, also has a climate impact, with the World in Data and OECD saying 3.3% of global emissions is down to the production and management of global plastics.
The best way to manage waste is to generate less or none in the first place.
It's time to act! Let's ban single-use plastic & #SaveOurOcean 🌊 pic.twitter.com/hQskAroXH3
— United Nations Geneva (@UNGeneva) August 14, 2025
Since talks began in 2022, countries have taken part in several rounds of negotiations to reach consensus on tackling the issue.
The Geneva talks were arranged after what was originally meant to be the final round of talks in Busan, South Korea, similarly ended without a deal in November.
It is understood another round of negotiations could be organised when the location and money for it is found.
Environment campaigners, politicians and a coalition of businesses praised the high ambition countries for holding the line for a strong deal and said no treaty was better than a weak one, but they warned of the urgency to tackle the growing crisis.
Graham Forbes, Greenpeace's head of delegation at the talks, said: 'The inability to reach an agreement in Geneva must be a wake-up call for the world: ending plastic pollution means confronting fossil fuel interests head-on.
'We cannot continue to do the same thing and expect a different result. The time for hesitation is over.'
UK Green Party peer Natalie Bennett said: 'The draft treaty was the product of intense lobbying by the chemical and plastics industries backed by key petroleum states. These vested interests should never have been allowed near the talks in the first place.
'An ambitious treaty, which leads to decisive action to cut plastic production, is absolutely essential and the UK Government must lead the way in closing the door on oil-producing states and fossil fuel and chemical corporations from future talks.'
The Business Coalition for a Global Plastics Treaty, which represents 200 companies including Nestle, PepsiCo Walmart, Tetra Pak and Unilever, said it was 'disappointed' by the lack of an agreement, but said there is 'cause for optimism'.
Rebecca Marmot, chief sustainability and corporate affairs officer at Unilever, said: 'The strong alignment among governments, business and civil society groups calling for a treaty with harmonised regulations across the full lifecycle of plastics is encouraging.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
5 hours ago
- BBC News
Wetin be Israel controversial E1 settlement plan, wey threaten to 'bury di idea of Palestinian state'?
Plans for a controversial settlement project wey Israeli far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich say go "bury di idea of a Palestinian state" don spark widespread criticism. Di so-called E1 scheme to build 3,401 homes in di occupied West Bank - between East Jerusalem and di Maale Adumim settlement - don dey frozen for decades amid fierce opposition. Di vast majority of di international community consider di settlements illegal under international law, although Israel dispute dis. On Wednesday, Smotrich bin back di scheme, call di decision a "historic achievement". Di Palestinian foreign ministry don call di plan "an extension of crimes of genocide, displacement and annexation" - accusations Israel long don reject. Di UN, the EU and various kontries, such as di UK and Turkey, don also criticise di E1 settlement plan and called for am to dey stopped. Wetin be di E1 settlement plan? Settlements na one of di most contentious issues between Israel and di Palestinians. Di E1 settlement project, first dey proposed under Yitzhak Rabin in di 1990s, begin wit initial plans for 2,500 homes. In 2004 e bin dey expanded to around 4,000 units along wit commercial and tourism facilities. Between 2009 and 2020 new phases dey announced, including land confiscations, design plans and road construction. But di proposals dey frozen each time due to international pressure. Why e dey so controversial? Developing di E1 area long don dey seen as effectively blocking di establishment of a Palestinian state. Dat na sake of say di E1 site strategic position: e separate areas south of Jerusalem from those to im north and go prevent a contiguous Palestinian urban area wey connect Ramallah, East Jerusalem and Bethlehem. According to di Israeli group Peace Now, wey dey monitor settlement activity in di West Bank, di new housing units go represent a 33% increase in di size of di Maale Adumim settlement, wey currently get population of around 38,000 residents. Di project go connect di residential area to surrounding industrial zones and go pave di way for expanding Israeli control over large parts of di West Bank, according to Peace Now. Di group tok say di final approval hearing for di E1 settlement plan go hold next Wednesday by a technical committee wey don already reject all objections to di proposals. Wetin be di occupied West Bank? Di West Bank na di land between Israel and di River Jordan and na home to an estimated three million Palestinians. Along wit East Jerusalem and Gaza, e be part of wetin dey widely known as di Occupied Palestinian Territories. E get about 160 Israeli settlements, housing about 700,000 Jews, in di West Bank and East Jerusalem. Di Palestinians don always oppose Israel presence in dis areas. Israel still get overall control of di West Bank, but since di 1990s, a Palestinian govment - known as di Palestinian Authority - don run most of im towns and cities. Since Hamas attack on Israel on 7 October 2023, Israel pressure on West Bank Palestinians don increase sharply, wey justify as legitimate security measures. In June, di UN recorded di highest monthly injury toll of Palestinians in over two decades - state say 100 Palestinians don dey injured by Israeli settlers. During di first half of 2025, e bin record 757 settler attacks wey bin result in Palestinian casualties or property damage – a 13% increase on di same period in 2024. Palestinians and human rights groups also accuse di Israeli security forces say dem fail for dia legal duty as occupiers to protect Palestinians as well as dia own citizens - not just turning a blind eye to settler attacks, but even join in, according to a 2024 report from Human Rights Watch. Israel claims say di Geneva Conventions wey forbid settlement for occupied territories no apply - a view disputed by many of im own allies as well as international lawyers. Palestinians want all Israeli settlements to dey removed as dey see di occupied West Bank as land for a future independent Palestinian state. However, di Israeli govment no recognise di right of di Palestinians to have dia own state and argue say di West Bank na part of di Israeli homeland. In July 2024, di top court of di UN, di International Court of Justice (ICJ), tok say Israel kontinu presence in di Occupied Palestinian Territories dey illegal and Israel should withdraw di settlers. Among im oda far-reaching conclusions, di court tok say Israeli restrictions on Palestinians in di occupied territories constitute "systemic discrimination based on, inter alia, race, religion or ethnic origin". Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu say court don make a "decision of lies". "Di Jewish pipo no be occupiers in dia own land - not in our eternal capital Jerusalem, nor in our ancestral heritage of Judea and Samaria [di West Bank]", Mr Netanyahu tok for statement. How di world don react to di E1 plan? Following im announcement on di plan, Smotrich bin thank US President Donald Trump and Ambassador Mike Huckabee for dia support, affirm say, in im view, di West Bank na "one inseparable part of di Land of Israel promised by God". E also tok say di Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu support im plans to bring one million new settlers into di West Bank. Di Palestinian Ministry of Foreign Affairs condemned di E1 project, call am an attack on di unity of Palestinian territory and a blow to di possibility to establish a state. Tok na say di plan undermine geographic and demographic cohesion and entrenches di division of di West Bank into isolated areas wey dey surrounded by colonial expansion, making annexation easier. In response to di plans to build in di E1 area, di US State Department tok say "a stable West Bank keep Israel secure and dey in line wit dis administration goal to achieve peace in di region". However, di UN and di EU don instead urge Israel not to progress di plan. Di UN tok say construction in di E1 area go sever di northern and southern West Bank, "severely undermine di prospects for di realization of a viable, contiguous Palestinian State". Kaja Kallas, di EU foreign policy chief, tok say di E1 new settlement plan "further undermine di two-state solution while e be breach of international law". UK Foreign Minister David Lammy bin oppose di plans, say dey go "divide a future Palestinian state in two and mark a flagrant breach of international law". Turkey foreign ministry also condemn di decision, say e "disregards international law" and targets di "territorial integrity" of di state of Palestine. Egypt bin call di project a "flagrant violation of international law and Security Council resolutions." Di Jordanian Ministry of Foreign Affairs also oppose di scheme, describe am as assault on di "inalienable right of di Palestinian pipo to establish an independent and sovereign state based on di 4 June 1967 borders, wit East Jerusalem as im capital". Di E1 announcement come shortly afta various kontries, such as France and Canada, say dey plan to recognise one Palestinian state later dis year. Currently most kontries - 147 of di UN 193 member states - formally recognise a Palestinian state. UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer say di UK go also recognise a Palestinian state in September unless Israel meet certain conditions, including agreeing to a ceasefire in Gaza and revive di prospect of a two-state solution. Following di announcement of di E1 new settlement plan, Smotrich tok say go be "no state to recognise". "Whoever in di world dey try to recognise a Palestinian state today go receive our answer on di ground. No be wit documents nor wit decisions or statements, but wit facts. Facts of houses, facts of neighbourhoods," e add. Additional reporting by Alla Daraghme and Muhannad Tutanji from BBC News Arabic.


The Independent
10 hours ago
- The Independent
Iran to begin new talks with UN nuclear watchdog
Iran will continue talks with the UN nuclear watchdog, with another round of negotiations expected in the coming days, Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei told state media on Monday. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) inspectors have been unable to access Iran's nuclear sites since their bombing by Israel and the US during a 12-day conflict in June. Despite this, IAEA chief Rafael Grossi maintains that inspections remain his top priority. "We had talks (with the IAEA) last week. These talks will continue and there will be another round of talks between Iran and the agency probably in the coming days," Baghaei said. Tehran has accused the IAEA of effectively paving the way for the Israel-U.S. attacks with a report on May 31 that led the IAEA's 35-nation Board of Governors to declare Iran in breach of its non-proliferation obligations. The Islamic Republic has long denied Western suspicions of a covert effort to develop nuclear weapons capability, saying it remains committed to the Non-Proliferation Treaty that mandates peaceful uses of atomic energy for signatories. "The level of our relations (with the IAEA) has changed after the events that took place, we do not deny that. However, our direct," Baghaei said during a televised weekly news conference. Last month, Iran enacted a law passed by parliament suspending cooperation with the IAEA. The law stipulates that any future inspections of Iranian nuclear sites needs approval by Tehran's Supreme National Security Council.


The Independent
12 hours ago
- The Independent
Tens of thousands gather in Israel to demand hostage return deal
Hundreds of thousands of Israeli protesters demonstrated across the country on Sunday, demanding a deal to free hostages held in Gaza. The protests were fuelled by frustration over government plans for a new military offensive in Gaza, which many fear could further endanger the remaining 20 hostages believed to be alive. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said that ending the war without defeating Hamas would delay the release of any hostages, while his finance minister criticised the demonstrations as harmful. Protesters blocked major highways, lit bonfires, and gathered outside official buildings, leading to 38 arrests by police. The demonstrations occurred amid reports of Israeli forces killing aid-seekers in Gaza and warnings from the UN about severe starvation levels due to insufficient aid.