Texas Longhorns have best odd in nation to win national title according to ESPN FPI
Texas Longhorns have best odd in nation to win national title according to ESPN FPI
As part of the buildup for the college football season, ESPN has released its FPI rankings for 2025. Which team do the super computers in Bristol, CT think will win the national championship? It's the Texas Longhorns led by new starting quarterback Arch Manning.
According to ESPN, the Football Power Index (FPI) "is a predictive rating system that estimates each FBS team's strength (in points per game relative to the national average) on offense, defense and special teams, making adjustments for starters lost, recruiting talent and other personnel changes. Those numbers are then plugged into the schedule, and everything is simulated 20,000 times to track each team's odds of winning its conference, making the playoff and advancing through to the national title."
After the 20,000 simulations were run for this season, the Longhorns ended up on top. Texas has the top FPI rating at 28.5. ESPN gives the Longhorns an 8.9% chance of going undefeated with a projected record of 10.4-2.1. UT has a 34.1% to win the SEC, an 83.9% chance of making the 12-team college football playoff, an astounding 37.7% chance to make the national title game and a 24.1% chance to win it all.
The Georgia Bulldogs have the second best FPI at 26.6 with a 17.9% chance to win the national championship. The Alabama Crimson Tide, Ohio State Buckeyes and Penn State Nittany Lions round out the top five.
Follow us on X (formerly Twitter) at @LonghornsWire.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indianapolis Star
an hour ago
- Indianapolis Star
Will small-market Finals bother the NBA? Not necessarily. 'This is the league's future here'
OKLAHOMA CITY – Big stars. Small markets. That's been the verdict on these NBA Finals since the Pacers closed out the Eastern Conference playoffs over the weekend and sealed their place opposite Oklahoma City in this year's NBA Finals. And in the most basic telling, that is an accurate summation of the forthcoming series. But the public's (and the media's) love of easily digestible Nielsen ratings and viewership numbers glosses over what is in many ways a more nuanced discussion. Will Indianapolis and Oklahoma City make for a less commercially successful Finals? Not necessarily. It's important to acknowledge upfront there is some truth to the basic maxims of the TV-market discussion. In most cases, yes, pulling a major audience share like New York, Chicago, Boston, Los Angeles or even Dallas-Fort Worth makes for a better-watched series. That just doesn't paint a full picture, according to Patrick Crakes, a former senior vice president at Fox Sports who now runs his own media consulting firm. 'The NBA Finals is a national event. It's better to have a base from big-market teams, from a mass of viewing, but the whole ecosystem is much more complicated than that,' Crakes said. Think of a television distribution deal as an ecosystem serving three key constituencies: The league (the rights seller), the carriers (Turner Sports, ESPN, etc.) and the distributors (Comcast, DirecTV, YouTube TV, etc.). Those constituencies are concerned with their own self-interests, yes, but in many cases, those interests overlap or align. These deals are also negotiated as large packages, with inventory (games) from the regular and postseasons all bundled together. ESPN/ABC did not secure the rights solely to these Finals. The money culled from the Finals is just a portion of the overall measure of the commercial success of the deal in a fiscal year. Per Crakes, advertising often constitutes approximately 20-30% of the overall financial pie, a meaningful number but not a decisive one. And much of that income that's attached to the playoffs is derived not from the showpiece Finals, but from the early rounds, where TV partners broadcast the largest sheer quantity of games. Yes, bigger markets in later rounds makes a difference, but sometimes not as much of one as a busy, engaging start to the postseason. Good, long series in rounds one and two will fill the advertising-dollars bucket long before the Finals. Short, uncompelling sweeps can leave a hole no big-city viewership or last-minute dramatics will fill. 'Postseason economics, a lot of it gets determined by the first couple rounds. That's where all the inventory is,' Crakes said. There are also headwinds untethered to a market share, or an individual sport's popularity. The rapidly fragmenting viewer ecosystem has prompted small dips in ratings for even America's most popular sports. Consumers no longer need easier-to-quantify access points to live sports like traditional carriers (Comcast, DirecTV, and so forth), with cord cutters eating into wider TV share. More fans come to games via social media, be it through highlights, real-time updates or other links back to the games themselves. There is an extent to which these Finals will be impacted by shifting viewer habits no matter the markets involved, whether it's No. 1 New York, No. 25 Indianapolis or No. 47 Oklahoma City (per SportsMediaWatch). Which circles back to one of Crakes' basic points: The Finals can also appeal across a wider base irrespective of market size. 'If you think about a total package of how NBA rights work,' Crakes said, 'it's important to keep in mind that small-market finals, like what we're about to see, that feature some of the game's best young players, that are going to be around for the next 15 years, being showcased, is not a bad thing for the league.' Shai Gilgeous-Alexander's star turn this season has included a scoring title, his first-career MVP nod and a center-stage role for the winningest team in the NBA. There has been perhaps no more compelling individual storyline in these playoffs — certainly in the Eastern Conference — than Pacers star Tyrese Haliburton's ascension into the elite tier of the league's guards. Around them orbit meaningful subplots (Jalen Williams' remarkable year, Pascal Siakam's impact in Indy, the dynamism presented by Indiana's backcourt depth, Chet Holmgren's continued development). The sport by nature puts fewer players on the floor, offering a bright spotlight to its stars. And unlike in football or baseball, those stars are often involved in games for long stretches, unfettered by offense-defense swaps or at-bat limits. In many ways it's easier to sell stars in the NBA, so long as they deliver their best. Whether the uniforms they wear say New York, Indiana or OKC, compelling performances from those players will go a long way toward determining the commercial success of the series upcoming. 'This is the league's future here,' Crakes said. 'The Thunder are fantastic. If the Pacers give them a series, my guess is everybody gets interested, even in New York and L.A., and it carries along just fine.' Which leads into the most fundamental determining factor in this discussion: The series has to entertain. Crakes worked at Fox Sports in October 2000, when the Yankees and Mets delivered their famed 'Subway Series." Top to bottom, the company was energized by the prospect of capturing a compelling championship dominating the country's biggest market. Instead, despite the fact that every game was decided by one or two runs, national interest never materialized. The favored Yankees eased to a 4-1 series win in front of a national audience that delivered what was at that time the lowest-rated World Series in history. 'The thing was a giant dud, because the rest of the America (wasn't interested),' Crakes said. 'You can be the dog that caught the car when you wish for these things.' Which means, of course, the same can be said in the opposite direction. Oklahoma City and Indiana have been, across the season's final months, arguably the two best teams in the NBA. Their records since Jan. 1 are first (Thunder) and fourth (Pacers) in the NBA. The Thunder finished with the league's best record and, while Indiana's path might have been smoothed slightly by Boston's bow-out, by almost any measure the Pacers have been playing championship-level basketball for five months. If that continues in this series — if Indiana can stand toe-to-toe with Oklahoma City and turn this into a six- or seven-game series — it will drive viewership everywhere. Likewise, an uneventful series decided in five games or fewer wouldn't do well, regardless. 'The real component in how successful something like this is, is a seven-game series,' Crakes said. 'That's where the gold is. Game 6, Game 7, and if we get to that with this series, this Finals will do just fine.' Of course, there's an extent to which the Finals will own the airwaves anyway. With football in hibernation, and baseball entering its summer dog days, the NBA Finals are virtually always a ratings winner. Crakes pointed out there can be long-term benefits for the league in small-market success. The last decade has seen Cleveland, Toronto, Denver and Milwaukee all win the NBA championship, strengthening the league's exposure in those markets and suggesting efforts to even the playing field between big- and small-market teams are paying dividends. 'The system's working. The small-market teams are figuring out ways to compete with the big-market teams,' Crakes said. 'This is an opportunity for these smaller markets to continue to have a deeper relationship with the NBA.' As with so much in sports, the impact of this series will be determined foremost by what the NBA makes of it. Does Oklahoma City complete a season of dominance? Do the league's two best teams at this time of year deliver a compelling Finals? Does this mark the transcendent moment for one of the NBA's young stars? All those things can, in the long term, matter as much as raw viewer data. The tendency to compare across years is reflexive. The sport's ownership of the national stage at this point in the annual calendar, though, is undeniable. 'This is going to be a gigantic number,' Crakes said. 'It's going to rate better than anything else, probably anything else at this point in the summer, and the economics are already largely in the bank.'
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Jason Kelce Turns Heads With Personal Announcement on Wednesday
Jason Kelce Turns Heads With Personal Announcement on Wednesday originally appeared on Athlon Sports. Jason Kelce has been active during retirement, working through various business ventures in the television, entertainment and brewing scenes. Advertisement After playing 13 seasons with the Philadelphia Eagles, Kelce accepted a role as a broadcaster on ESPN's "Monday Night Countdown." He's also an investor and brand ambassador for Garage Beer and Underdog Apparel. Kelce also recently announced that "Beer Bowl is back," getting fans hyped for the third year of the $50K grand prize. "Beer Bowl is back ladies and gentlemen, look forward to seeing this years competitors!" Kelce said. "As with the previous two years, the winning team will receive 50K. May the best degenerates win." Upon the release of the announcement, some fans took to social media, sharing their thoughts on Jason Kelce's latest news. Advertisement "Can't wait to see clips from it," said one fan. "Let's gooooo," said another fan. "Let's goooooo," mentioned someone else. "Such a great episode today!!! Shaq is the black Kelce fantastic show with great stories," commented another. "May the best DEGENERATES win," chimed in another. "Degenerates .. lmao," added someone else. Former Philadelphia Eagles center Jason Lee-Imagn Images Jason Kelce explained the Beer Bowl upon the release of the announcement, mentioning that he's partnered with the Eagles Austin Foundation. "Beer Bowl is back," Kelce said. "For those of you that don't know what Beer Bowl is, every year me and the Eagles Autism Foundation and a bunch of Eagles go and do an event down at the shore on Wednesday, a guest bar-tending event. Well we started doing an event on Thursday called Beer Bowl that has been associated with this podcast... We need teams to be submitted. Beer Bowl will be held on Thursday, June 26. We need 92 percenters to send us your team submission videos." Advertisement Related: Patrick Mahomes Turns Heads with Personal Announcement on Sunday Related: Patrick Mahomes Had No Words for Brittany Mahomes' New Post on Sunday This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jun 5, 2025, where it first appeared.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Kendrick Perkins dishes on why 2025 Thunder is best in franchise history
The post Kendrick Perkins dishes on why 2025 Thunder is best in franchise history appeared first on ClutchPoints. Before the Oklahoma City Thunder defeated the Minnesota Timberwolves 4-1 to reach the NBA Finals, ESPN's Kendrick Perkins crowned Shai Gilgeous-Alexander the franchise's best player ever. Perkins doubled down on that take. After watching Gilgeous-Alexander lead the Thunder in Game 5 at the Paycom Center, Perkins says this year's Oklahoma City team is a deeper roster compared to his 2012 squad. Advertisement When asked to compare the two, 13 years removed from the last Thunder team to reach the NBA Finals, Perkins explained why this year's group gets the edge over Kevin Durant, Russell Westbrook, James Harden, and Perkins' 2012 squad, per ESPN's NBA Today. 'I got this year's Thunder team, 2025, and it's no knock to ours in 2012,' Perkins said. 'Their depth. You talk about bringing in a Cason Wallace, Alex Caruso, guys who are gonna get into you defensively, and all of a sudden you have a guy like Jalen Williams, who's not afraid to mix it up, who was crucial for them in that Denver Nuggets series against Jokic. They're just too deep. We're talking about one of the greatest defensive teams in NBA history.' Despite the Hall of Fame careers Durant, Westbrook, and Harden are leading, Perkins explained why the 2024-25 Thunder team as a whole would win in a hypothetical best-of-7 series. 'Now, it's no knock when it comes down to what Russ or KD, or James brought to the table, or even Serge Ibaka, but this team is just more polished,' Perkins added. 'They have more adults in the room than just have old souls. They act like they've been there before, and that's the scary part, and that's why I give them the edge. But it would go seven games.' Advertisement The Thunder enter the NBA Finals with a 12-4 record. Kendrick Perkins doubles down on strong SGA, Thunder take Alonzo Adams-Imagn Images ESPN analyst Kendrick Perkins doubled down on his take on Thunder All-Star Shai Gilgeous-Alexander. Before his former team clinched the NBA Finals, Perkins labeled Gilgeous-Alexander the greatest Thunder player in franchise history. While predicting the Thunder to win the NBA Finals, Perkins says it'll solidify Gilgeous-Alexander as the greatest player in the franchise's history. 'He will be the greatest Thunder ever. Yes, past Kevin Durant and Russell Westbrook,' Perkins said. 'Third consecutive season of averaging over 30 shooting over 50% from the field, scoring title, MVP, conference MVP, going to the NBA Finals, winning the championship, and he's going to win Finals MVP.' Perkins also believes the title would solidify Gilgeous-Alexander's place in the league's top-tier level of superstars.
