logo
OPEC+ may discuss oil output hike larger than 411,000 bpd for July, sources say

OPEC+ may discuss oil output hike larger than 411,000 bpd for July, sources say

Reuters3 days ago

LONDON/MOSCOW, May 30 (Reuters) - OPEC+ may discuss an increase in oil output for July at its meeting on Saturday larger than the 411,000 barrels per day (bpd) increases it made for May and June, sources familiar with OPEC+ talks told Reuters.
Eight OPEC+ countries have been raising output more rapidly than earlier planned, even though the extra supply has weighed on prices. The strategy of group leaders Saudi Arabia and Russia is partly to punish over-producing allies and to win back market share, Reuters has reported.
On Saturday, the eight members may decide to increase output by 411,000 bpd for July, OPEC+ sources have told Reuters. Two more sources familiar with OPEC+ talks and two OPEC+ delegates said they could also discuss a larger increase.
Kazakhstan's statement on Thursday that it won't cut production has sparked debate in OPEC+, some of the sources said on Friday, with one saying that this factor may tilt discussions towards a larger output hike on Saturday.
All sources declined to be identified by name due to the sensitivity of the matter. OPEC and authorities in Russia and Saudi Arabia did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Friday.
United Arab Emirates Energy Minister Suhail Mohamed Al Mazrouei, asked about the plan for July output on Tuesday, said OPEC+ was doing its best to balance the oil market and needed to be mindful of rising demand.
Kazakhstan has been pumping hundreds of thousands of barrels over its OPEC+ target for months, a factor that has angered other OPEC+ members and helped sway a decision by the group to proceed with plans to hike output in April, sources said at the time.
OPEC+ wants it to compensate by making further cuts, but on Thursday Russia's Interfax news agency cited Kazakhstan's deputy energy minister as saying that the country has informed OPEC that it does not intend to reduce production.
Oil prices fell to a four-year low in April below $60 per barrel after OPEC+ said it was accelerating its output hike in May and as U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs raised concerns about global economic weakness. Since then prices have recovered to about $65.
OPEC+, which includes OPEC members and allies such as Russia, has made deep output cuts since 2022 to support the market. Eight members of the group have been increasing production since April to unwind some of those cuts.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ukraine and Russia end latest round of direct peace talks in Istanbul
Ukraine and Russia end latest round of direct peace talks in Istanbul

BreakingNews.ie

time17 minutes ago

  • BreakingNews.ie

Ukraine and Russia end latest round of direct peace talks in Istanbul

The latest round of direct peace talks between Russia and Ukraine has ended after just over an hour, according to Russian state media and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Speaking in Vilnius, Lithuania, Mr Zelensky said a new release of prisoners of war was being prepared. Advertisement The second round of negotiations in just over two weeks in Istanbul came after a string of attacks over the weekend and expectations were low for any significant progress on ending the three-year-old war.

Ukraine is gaining the upper hand. Putin will be terrified
Ukraine is gaining the upper hand. Putin will be terrified

Telegraph

time41 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Ukraine is gaining the upper hand. Putin will be terrified

Ukraine's extraordinary attack deep inside Russia has, at a stroke, rewritten the rules of modern war. On Sunday a swarm of small drones, each costing under $500, rose over four Russian airfields deep inside Siberia and the Arctic and destroyed over forty strategic bombers reportedly worth over $7 billion. Thanks to meticulous planning, sophisticated military imagination and an underdog's boldness of vision, Kyiv's forces have landed a stunning blow on their far stronger opponent, opening a new chapter in the history of human conflict. The question that will be haunting Putin is – what's next? Ukraine's famously stone-faced chief of military intelligence, or HUR, Major-General Kyrylo Budanov, has built his covert operations forces into a weapon as deadly, if not more so, than Israel's Mossad, its only international rival. And like the Biblical champion Goliath, it is precisely the vast lumbering size of Russia that makes it fatally vulnerable to small but precisely aimed projectiles from David's small but deadly slingshot. Many of the details of Sunday's drone operation come from the Ukrainian side, so may be taken with a pinch of salt. But the basic logistics of the strike are in no doubt. Ukrainian military engineers, possibly already inside Russia, covertly loaded dozens of explosives-laden drones into special compartments set into the roofs of standard 40-foot steel shipping containers. Using a network of haulage companies set up for the purpose, Ukrainian operatives recruited truck drivers via commercial apps to drive their loads to specific designations next to military airfields thousands of miles away from the Ukrainian border. At a predetermined time the drones buzzed into the air and headed for the airfields with their deadly payloads – to the amazement of the Russian drivers, some of whom posted profanity-laced mobile phone footage of their own rigs – and suddenly transformed into mobile drone-launch platforms. First-person footage from the drones released by the HUR shows the unmanned aerial vehicles carefully lining up over fuel tanks in the bombers' wings before closing in for the kill. Military drone specialists have speculated that the drones were not targeted remotely by human operators but were rather programmed by artificial intelligence to recognise the distinctive shape of Russian Tu-22 and Tu-95 strategic bombers, making them invulnerable to electronic jamming. If the sci-fi novelty of the strikes seems like something out of the dystopian world of Black Mirror, the revolutionary implications for the future of warfare are plain enough. A world where multibillion dollar pieces of sophisticated military hardware can be eliminated en masse by drones light enough to be held in one hand and simple enough to assemble in a garage is one where the conventional balance of power has been upended forever. What should really be worrying Putin is how target-rich his country is for Kyiv's drone hunters. His economy is dependent on a vast network of oil and gas wells pipelines, pumping stations, refineries, storage depots and shipping terminals. Many such facilities have already been targeted by older generation long-range drones, which resemble slow-moving miniature civilian aircraft loaded with explosives. These were launched from inside Ukraine and were vulnerable to anti-missile defences and radio jamming – though a few succeeded in scoring psychologically important hits, for instance a bullseye right on the roof of the Kremlin's Senate Palace back in May 2023. Imagine the devastating power of the new Ukrainian drones, pre-programmed with visual coordinates and launched from just a few hundred yards from their targets, on airports, bridges, factories and military headquarters. The HUR has, like Mossad, also shown a steely disregard for moral niceties in pursuit of revenge. Back in October 2022 a Russian truck driver was recruited as an unwitting suicide bomber as he picked up a commercial payload across the Kerch Bridge linking Russia proper with occupied Crimea. The container was packed with explosives, seriously damaging the bridge and killing the driver. Suicide bombing by false-flag recruitment has become an HUR signature. Last week a man reportedly recruited to honeytrap a senior Russian commander via a gay dating app was blown up, along with his target, with a bomb concealed in a hidden camera he had been given to wear supposedly to record the liaison. Until this year, Kyiv's allies and sponsors in Washington had frowned on this kind of borderline terror activity for fear of provoking Russian escalation. The CIA was furious when a team of six Ukrainian divers intentionally destroyed the Nord Stream pipeline in September 2022 (though Western intelligence, fearful of a backlash against continued support for Ukraine, kept publicly quiet about the operation). But with the Trump administration disengaging from both material support for Kyiv and control over the Ukraine's war effort, the gloves are now off.

Man who burned Koran outside Turkish embassy while shouting 'f*** Islam' found guilty of public order offence
Man who burned Koran outside Turkish embassy while shouting 'f*** Islam' found guilty of public order offence

Daily Mail​

time42 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Man who burned Koran outside Turkish embassy while shouting 'f*** Islam' found guilty of public order offence

A man who set fire to a copy of the Koran outside the Turkish consulate in London has been convicted of a religiously aggravated public order offence. Hamit Coskun, 50, who shouted 'f*** Islam', 'Islam is religion of terrorism' and 'Koran is burning' while holding the flaming Islamic text above his head, was ordered to pay £240 as a result of his conviction. He was found guilty of a public order offence motivated by 'hostility towards members of a religious group, namely followers of Islam'. Coskun was also found guilty of using disorderly conduct 'within the hearing or sight of a person likely to have caused harassment, alarm or distress', contrary to the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 and section 5 of the Public Order Act 1986. Responding to the verdict, Shadow Justice Secretary Robert Jenrick said: 'This decision is wrong. It revives a blasphemy law that parliament repealed. 'Free speech is under threat. I have no confidence in Two-Tier Keir to defend the right of the public to criticise all religions.' Conservative MP Nick Timothy added: 'We now have a blasphemy law in this country. 'Parliament never voted for it. The country doesn't want it. 'I will introduce a Bill to put a stop to all this next week.' Last week in court, Coskun's lawyer Katy Thorne KC argued that the Crown Prosecution Services were trying to effectively reintroduce and expand blasphemy laws in the United Kingdom. The CPS argued that Mr Coskun was not being prosecuted for burning the book, it was the combination of his insulting remarks about Islam and the fact he did it in public. The court also heard how Coskun, who is an atheist, was attacked by a passerby who was allegedly holding a knife, on February 13 after he had set fire to the religious text. Footage shown in court and captured on a mobile phone appeared to show a man approach Coskun while allegedly holding a bladed object. The man then chased Coskun and spat at him and kicked him after he had fallen over and dropped the Koran, the court heard. In the video Coskun's alleged attacker could also be heard saying: 'Burning the Koran. It's my religion, you don't burn the Koran.' Giving his verdict, District Judge McGarva said about Hamit Coskun: 'Your actions in burning the Koran where you did were highly provocative, and your actions were accompanied by bad language in some cases directed toward the religion and were motivated at least in part by hatred of followers of the religion.' Coskun, who is now in hiding and has both Kurdish and Armenian heritage, had to flee his home country of Turkey two and a half years ago to escape persecution, the court was told. He argued he was protesting against the 'Islamist government' of Turkish president Recep Tayyip Erdogan. The National Secular Society (NSS) and the Free Speech Union jointly paid Mr Coskun's legal fees. Responding to the ruling, NSS Chief Executive Stephen Evans said: 'The outcome of this case is a significant blow to freedom of expression and signals a concerning capitulation to Islamic blasphemy codes.' A spokesperson for the Free Speech Union continued: 'This is deeply disappointing. 'Everyone should be able to exercise their rights to protest peacefully and to freedom of expression, regardless of how offensive or upsetting it may be to some people. 'The Free Speech Union and the National Secular Society intend to appeal this verdict and keep on appealing it until it's overturned. If that means taking it all the way to the European Court of Human Rights, we will do so." 'Religious tolerance is an important British value, but it doesn't require non-believers to respect the blasphemy codes of believers. 'On the contrary, it requires people of faith to tolerate those who criticise and protest against their religion, just as their values and beliefs are tolerated.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store