North Carolina legislature leaves after passing Helene aid package, but still no budget
RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) — The North Carolina legislature wrapped up the chief portion of its annual session Thursday, passing another Hurricane Helene aid package this week after Republican majorities pushed through divisive bills to eliminate diversity, equity and inclusion programs and target transgender rights.
Lawmakers in the ninth-largest state also fell short on completing their primary responsibility — enacting a two-year budget by July 1.
There's no risk of a government shutdown, and House and Senate negotiators will keep meeting to reach budget agreements. Other legislation can be voted on when lawmakers return occasionally, possibly starting next month. More vetoes from Democratic Gov. Josh Stein likely will be waiting.
Chambers remain far apart on 2-year budget
House and Senate Republicans are split on competing budget bills they approved in the spring. Teacher and state employee pay, the scope of tax cuts and vacant government position eliminations are among the disagreements. Each package would spend $32.6 billion in the upcoming fiscal year and $33.3 billion in the next.
'The massive details behind each of our budgets doesn't allow us quick and urgent resolution,' GOP Rep. Donny Lambeth, a chief budget writer, told colleagues Wednesday.
The inability of budget writers to work out a stopgap spending measure that usually contains noncontroversial or critical spending provisions gave fodder to Democrats.
'The people of North Carolina should expect better of us,' Rep. Deb Butler said. 'We have one job and that's to pass a budget, and we haven't done that.'
Any final budget goes to Stein, whose own budget proposal spent more and froze planned income tax cuts. With the GOP one House seat shy of a veto-proof majority, Republicans will seek a final budget that enough Democrats support to override.
Next Helene spending installment finalized
Before adjourning, House and Senate Republicans hammered out another tranche of state funds to assist with Helene recovery in the mountains.
Not including federal aid, the General Assembly already has appropriated or allocated more than $1.6 billion in recovery funds since last September's historic storm.
This latest allotment — approved unanimously and now heading to Stein — moves $700 million to the state's Helene relief fund and appropriates $500 million of that. There's also nearly $1 billion more allocated in federal water and sewer grants and state transportation money with a focus on Helene repairs.
Stein had urged lawmakers this week to set aside their differences 'and get this relief out the door.'
GOP focused on eliminating DEI programs
Cutting diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives were a major priority for GOP lawmakers. State agencies, local governments, public K-12 schools and higher education institutions would be impacted if the bills become law.
Training, staff positions and hiring decisions that incorporate DEI are banned in state agencies under one bill. The legislation also would outlaw those agencies or local governments from using state funds for DEI programs. Two other bills would bar 'divisive concepts' and 'discriminatory practices' across public education in the state.
Republicans have repeatedly said DEI programs have strayed too far from their original goal and create unfair treatment.
'When it's done right, it opens a door for more students to compete fairly,' Sen. Michael Lee, the bill's sponsor, said in committee Tuesday. 'When it's done wrong, it prioritizes identity over ability.'
But Democrats said the legislation will 'chill' state employees' speech and may reverse progress for students of color who weren't historically afforded certain opportunities.
'A multiethnic, diverse society has to learn how to grapple with things that can make you feel uncomfortable,' Rep. Brandon Lofton said on Wednesday. 'This bill puts an end to that.'
Shrimp ban proposal gets loud
It was shrimp that elicited a giant response from the public this week.
A bill pushed by the state Senate would ban shrimp trawling — which uses a cone-shaped net to scoop up the crustaceans — inshore and within a half-mile (.8 kilometers) of coastal North Carolina shorelines.
Proponents say shrimp trawling has negative environmental impacts, such as killing juvenile fish populations and disrupting ecosystems.
But several coastal Republican legislators were outraged, saying the bill would completely devastate North Carolina's shrimping industry. About 75% of North Carolina shrimp are caught inshore, according to the North Carolina Local Food Council.
Hundreds of shrimp industry members and their allies on Tuesday crowded inside and outside the Legislative Building to oppose the bill. A dozen semitrailers — draped with banners like 'NC Seafood for All. No Trawl Ban' — circled the building and blasted their horns for hours.
Bill opponents cheered Wednesday outside a House Republican caucus meeting where members said they decided not to act on the bill.
Many bills get over the finish line, head to the governor
Legislators gave final approval this week to a host of bipartisan bills, such as a measure sought by the governor to require public school districts to pass policies barring students from having cellphones turned on during instructional time. There would be exceptions.
Others were divisive, like a bill prohibiting state funds for gender-affirming care for prisoners and stating there are only two sexes. Another measure would allow private school boards to authorize a trained, permitted adult to carry a handgun on a school's campus for security.
These measures now head to Stein's desk. The governor vetoed three GOP measures last week. No override attempts have yet occurred.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

21 minutes ago
Key Medicaid provision in Trump's bill is found to violate Senate rules. The GOP is scrambling
WASHINGTON -- The Senate parliamentarian has advised that a Medicaid provider tax overhaul central to President Donald Trump's tax cut and spending bill does not adhere to the chamber's procedural rules, delivering a crucial blow as Republicans rush to finish the package this week. Guidance from the parliamentarian is rarely ignored and Republican leaders are now forced to consider difficult options. Republicans were counting on big cuts to Medicaid and other programs to offset trillions of dollars in Trump tax breaks, their top priority. Additionally, the parliamentarian, who is the Senate's chief arbiter of its often complicated rules, advised against various GOP provisions barring certain immigrants from health care programs. Republicans scrambled Thursday to respond, with some calling for challenging, or ever firing, the nonpartisan parliamentarian, who has been on the job since 2012, though GOP leaders dismissed those views. Instead, they worked to revise the various proposals. 'We have contingency plans," said Majority Leader John Thune of South Dakota. Friday's expected votes appeared to be slipping, but Thune insisted that 'we're plowing forward.' But Democrats, who are unified against package as a tax giveaway for the wealthy at the expense of American safety net programs, said the procedural decisions would devastate the GOP package. Sen. Ron Wyden, the top Democrat on the Senate Finance Committee, said the Republican proposals would have meant $250 billion less for the health care program, 'massive Medicaid cuts that hurt kids, seniors, Americans with disabilities and working families.' The outcome is a setback as Senate Republicans race toward a weekend session to pass the bill and send it back to the House for another vote before Trump's Fourth of July deadline. Trump hosted House Speaker Mike Johnson and other GOP lawmakers in the East Room at the White House joined by truck drivers, firefighters, tipped workers, ranchers and others that the administration says will benefit from the bill. "We don't want to have grandstanders,' Trump said of the GOP holdouts. Trump said there are 'hundreds of things' in the emerging package of tax breaks, spending cuts and bolstered money to carry out his mass deportation plans. 'It's so good.' At its core, the big bill, which has passed the House and is now being revised in the Senate, includes $3.8 trillion in tax breaks that had been approved during Trump's first term, but will expire in December imposing a tax hike if Congress fails to act. To help offset lost revenues, Republicans are relying on steep cuts to health care and food stamps, and imposing new fees on immigrants. GOP leaders were already struggling to rally support for Medicaid changes that some senators said went too far and would have left millions without coverage. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has said more than 10.9 million more people would not have health care under the House-passed bill; Senate Republicans were proposing deeper cuts. After the parliamentarian advised against the the Medicaid provider tax change Republicans said they would try to revise the provision to make it acceptable, perhaps by extending the start date of any changes. They are rushing to come up with similar adjustments to other proposals that have run into violations, including one to change the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or food stamps. It's all delaying action on the bill, but Republican leaders have little choice. They are counting on the health care restrictions to save billions of dollars and offset the cost of trillions of dollars in tax cuts. Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., the Budget Committee chairman rejected calls to fire the parliamentarian, and said in statement he was working with the office to "find a pathway forward." States impose the so-called provider tax on hospitals and other entities as a way to help fund Medicaid, largely by boosting the reimbursements they receive from the federal government. Critics say the system is a type of 'laundering,' but almost every state except Alaska uses it to help provide the health care coverage. The House-passed bill would freeze the tax, while the Senate would cut the tax that some states are allowed to impose. Several GOP senators have opposed cutting the Medicaid provider tax, saying it would hurt rural hospitals that depend on the money. Hospital organizations have warned that it could lead to hospital closures. Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., among those fighting the change, said he had spoken to Trump late Wednesday and that the president told him to revert back to the earlier proposal from the House. 'I think it just confirms that we weren't ready for a vote yet,' said Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., who also had raised concerns about the provider tax cuts. More than 80 millions people in the United States use the Medicaid program, alongside the Obama-era Affordable Care Act. Republicans want to scale Medicaid back to what they say is its original mission, providing care mainly to women and children, rather than a much larger group of people. To help defray lost revenues to the hospitals, one plan Republicans had been considering would have created a rural hospital fund with $15 billion as back up. Some GOP senators said that was too much; others, including Sen. Susan Collins of Maine, wanted at least $100 billion. The parliamentarian has worked around the clock since late last week to assess the legislation and ensure it complies with the so-called Byrd Rule, named for the late Sen. Robert C. Byrd of West Virginia. It essentially bars policy matters in budget reconciliation bills. If leaders moved ahead without altering the provisions that have been found to violate the rules, those measures could be challenged in a floor vote, requiring a 60-vote threshold to overcome objections. That would be a tall order in a Senate divided 53-47 and with Democrats unified against Trump's bill. 'It's pretty frustrating,' said Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fla., who wants even steeper reductions. Overnight Wednesday the parliamentarian advised against GOP student loan repayment plans, and Thursday advised against provisions those that would have blocked access for immigrants who are not citizens to Medicaid, Medicare and other health care programs, including one that would have cut money to states that allow some migrants into Medicaid. Earlier, proposals to cut food stamps were ruled in violation of Senate rules, as was a plan to gut the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. But Sen. Kevin Cramer, R-N.D., said there's no desire to challenge the parliamentarian's advice. 'It the institutional integrity,' he said. 'Even if I'm convinced 100% she's wrong."
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US House committee subpoenas Harvard over tuition costs
(Reuters) -The U.S. House Judiciary Committee sent a subpoena to Harvard University on Thursday seeking documents and communications for its probe into tuition costs and financial aid for Ivy League students. A letter to Harvard President Alan Garber, signed by committee chairman Jim Jordan and U.S. Representative Scott Fitzgerald, both Republicans, described Harvard's response to previous requests for documents as inadequate and said the committee needs the documents "to fulfill its oversight and legislative responsibilities." A spokesperson for Harvard said in a statement: "We are disappointed that the Committee has chosen to issue a subpoena and believe it is unwarranted, unfair and unnecessary." It added: "There is no basis for an allegation of collusion in Harvard's setting of tuition and financial aid." The investigation into tuition is part of a larger fight between Harvard and the White House and Congress, including over cuts to federal funding and efforts to block foreign students from attending the university. President Donald Trump has said he is trying to force change at Harvard - and other top-level universities across the U.S. - because in his view they have been captured by leftist "woke" thought and become bastions of antisemitism. The subpoena comes as part of an investigation by the Republican-controlled U.S. House Judiciary Committee into whether Harvard and other Ivy League schools broke antitrust laws by raising tuition costs. "We are concerned that Ivy League member institutions appear to be collectively raising tuition prices while engaging in perfect price discrimination by offering selective financial aid packages to maximize profits," the letter to Harvard's Garber said. U.S. Representative Jamie Raskin, a Democratic member of the Judiciary Committee, called the investigation "plainly ridiculous" and "based on pathetically weak allegations." The Harvard spokesperson said the school has produced thousands of pages of documents on its tuition-setting process and financial aid. While the Judiciary Committee said it had received hundreds of requested documents, it added that some of them contained publicly available facts and lacked specific information that was desired.
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Iran trying to 'save face' following US strike on nuclear sites, expert says
As the total damage to three Iranian nuclear sites continues to be assessed, one Middle East expert says that Iran's stated assessment only reinforces U.S. and Israeli views. Israel, which has said the strikes set the Iranian nuclear program back years, has the greatest resources in place to make a determination and the most incentive to get the facts right, Jacob Olidort, director of the Center of American Security at the America First Policy Institute, told Fox News Digital. "Both the US and Israel say they achieved their objectives," Olidort said. "Israel presumably had planned around this for many years, and Israel says it has met its objectives, which is destroying Iran's ability to enrich uranium." The U.S. launched a surprise strike using B-2 stealth bombers and bunker-buster bombs on Iran's Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan nuclear facilities on Saturday. Hegseth Tears Into Reporters, Alleging They 'Cheer Against Trump' And Iran Strikes Some media reports have pushed back on the Trump administration's claims that the sites were destroyed and set Iran back years in its quest to achieve a nuclear weapon. Read On The Fox News App Iran's Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmail Baghaei on Wednesday told Al Jazeera that "our nuclear installations have been badly damaged, that's for sure," though he refused to go into detail. Israel-iran Conflict: Live Updates Olidort said that "everything Iran is doing now is to save face." 'The Mission Was Accomplished': Senate Republicans Push Back Against Leaked Report On Iran Strikes "We should never take anything Iran says at face value, but their assessment can only reinforce the views of Israel and the U.S. view," he said. The head of the U.N. nuclear watchdog, International Atomic Energy Agency Director Rafael Grossi, reiterated on Thursday that the damage done by Israeli and U.S. strikes at Iranian nuclear facilities "is very, very, very considerable." "I think annihilated is too much, but it suffered enormous damage," Grossi told French broadcaster RFI. The Associated Press contributed to this article source: Iran trying to 'save face' following US strike on nuclear sites, expert says