Trump praises Noem's disaster response – because he saw her on TV
Trump and First Lady Melania Trump are visiting Kerr County on Friday to survey the devastation in the Lone Star State that left 121 people dead and 173 missing.
However, their arrival coincides with reports that the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)'s response to the disaster was delayed by three days due to a new rule instigated by Secretary Noem.
The secretary's order, intended to rein in excessive spending, dictated that she must personally sign off on contracts and grants worth more than $100,000, something she only did in relation to the Texas disaster on Monday, leading to delays to the relief effort that may have cost lives as rescue workers battled flood waters that had laid waste to local housing and a children's summer camp.
Florida Democratic Rep. Jared Moskowitz has already called on the House committees on Homeland Security and Transportation and Infrastructure to investigate whether Noem's order held up proceedings.
NBC's Kristen Welker interviewed the president on Thursday night and said: 'There are these reports that have come out that Secretary Noem, I guess, had to have sign-off on FEMA expenditures, and they may have delayed some of the response.'
Trump answered: 'I don't know anything about it. We were right on time. We were there. In fact, she was the first one I saw on television.
'She was there right from the beginning, and she would not have needed anything. She had the right to do it, but she was literally the first person I saw on television.'
He continued: 'That morning, when we all woke up and saw this tragedy that took place during the evening. And she was right on the ball. She's done a great job.'
Noem, whose Department of Homeland Security (DHS) oversees FEMA, reacted angrily to CNN's reporting on her handling of the disaster, calling it 'fake news' and the network itself 'absolute trash' during an interview on Fox and Friends.
Before that, she responded to criticism of the agency on Wednesday for sending a fraction of the personnel to Texas that the state itself has deployed to address the crisis – 70, compared to 1,750 – by insisting that the federal government does not manage natural disasters, but rather that they are the responsibility of individual states.
'We come in and support them, and that's exactly what we did here in this situation,' she said.
Completing a bad week for Noem and FEMA, the agency's acting administrator, David Richardson, has been reported as missing in action, having failed to visit Texas, sparking concern about how his agency is run and whether he has effectively handed over responsibility to the secretary.
FEMA was created to 'prepare for, protect against, respond to, recover from, and mitigate against the risk of natural disasters' and its leader would ordinarily be expected to play a prominent organisational role and be out in front of the cameras to give regular updates.
The Independent has contacted FEMA and DHS for comment.
Last year, Trump threatened to shut the agency down altogether, commenting at a campaign event in June: 'We want to wean off of FEMA, and we want to bring it down to the state level.
'A governor should be able to handle it, and frankly, if they can't handle it, the aftermath, then maybe they shouldn't be governor.'
Asked earlier this week whether he is still sharpening the axe for FEMA, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt was evasive and said only: 'The president wants to ensure American citizens always have what they need during times of need. Whether that assistance comes from states or the federal government, that is a policy discussion that will continue.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
3 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Vinay Prasad returns to FDA days after leaving under pressure from Laura Loomer
Vinay Prasad is returning to his role overseeing vaccine, gene therapy and blood product regulation at the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) a little more than a week after he left the agency. 'At the FDA's request, Dr Vinay Prasad is resuming leadership of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research,' Department Health and Human Services spokesperson Andrew Nixon said in a statement to Reuters. Prasad left the agency on 30 July after just a few months as director of the center. Stat News first reported the return of Prasad. Prasad, an oncologist who was a fierce critic of US Covid-19 vaccine and mask mandates, was named the center's director by the FDA's commissioner, Marty Makary, in May. Criticism of Prasad's tenure intensified around the agency's handling of a gene therapy for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) from Sarepta Therapeutics. The FDA-approved therapy played a role in the death of two teens who had advanced DMD. After a third death in a separate experimental gene therapy from the company, the FDA asked Sarepta on 18 July to stop all shipments of the approved DMD therapy, saying it had safety concerns. The FDA changed course on Sarepta on 28 July and said shipments to the main group of patients for the drug could restart. Laura Loomer, a far-right influencer and conspiracy theorist with outsized sway over Donald Trump, had called Prasad a 'progressive leftist saboteur' who was undermining the agency's work. Two days before Prasad stepped down last month, Loomer had released misleadingly edited audio to suggest that that Prasad had admitted sticking pins in a Trump voodoo doll, when the full audio made it clear that he was talking about the kind of thing an imagined liberal Trump-hater would do. Loomer reacted to the news of Prasad's return on Saturday by renewing her attacks on him in a social media post in which she promised to produce 'exposes of officials within HHS and FDA' in the weeks ahead. 'There are several Senate Confirmation hearings coming up and I have multiple oppo books ready for distribution!' she wrote. Prasad was a physician who joined the agency from the University of California, San Francisco. He has had stints at the National Cancer Institute and the National Institutes of Health. The FDA and other health agencies have seen multiple shake-ups in recent months under the leadership of health secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr.
The Independent
34 minutes ago
- The Independent
A top Federal Reserve official says dour jobs data backs the case for 3 rate cuts
A top official at the Federal Reserve said Saturday that this month's stunning, weaker-than-expected report on the U.S. job market is strengthening her belief that interest rates should be lower. Michelle Bowman was one of two Fed officials who voted a week and a half ago in favor of cutting interest rates. Such a move could help boost the economy by making it cheaper for people to borrow money to buy a house or a car, but it could also threaten to push inflation higher. Bowman and a fellow dissenter lost out after nine other Fed officials voted to keep interest rates steady, as the Fed has been doing all year. The Fed's chair, Jerome Powell, has been adamant that he wants to wait for more data about how President Donald Trump 's tariffs are affecting inflation before the Fed makes its next move. At a speech during a bankers' conference in Colorado on Saturday, Bowman said that 'the latest labor market data reinforce my view' that the Fed should cut interest rates three times this year. The Fed has only three meetings left on the schedule in 2025. The jobs report that arrived last week, only a couple of days after the Fed voted on interest rates, showed that employers hired far fewer workers last month than economists expected. It also said that hiring in prior months was much lower than initially thought. On inflation, meanwhile, Bowman said she is getting more confident that Trump's tariffs 'will not present a persistent shock to inflation' and sees it moving closer to the Fed's 2% target. Inflation has come down substantially since hitting a peak above 9% after the pandemic, but it has been stubbornly remaining above 2%. The Fed's job is to keep the job market strong, while keeping a lid on inflation. Its challenge is that it has one main tool to affect both those areas, and helping one by moving interest rates up or down often means hurting the other. A fear is that Trump's tariffs could box in the Federal Reserve by sticking the economy in a worst-case scenario called 'stagflation,' where the economy stagnates but inflation is high. The Fed has no good tool to fix that, and it would likely have to prioritize either the job market or inflation before helping the other. On Wall Street, expectations are that the Fed will have to cut interest rates at its next meeting in September after the U.S. jobs report came in so much below economists' expectations. Trump has been calling angrily for lower interest rates, often personally insulting Powell while doing so. He has the opportunity to add another person to the Fed's board of governors after an appointee of former President Joe Biden stepped down recently.
Telegraph
35 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Why Alaska is a winner as Trump-Putin summit venue
When Donald Trump teed up the location for his meeting with Vladimir Putin, he insisted it would be 'a very popular one for a lot of reasons'. It had been expected that the two leaders would travel to neutral territory for the talks, with Putin himself having suggested the United Arab Emirates. But while the choice to host the meeting on US territory may have come as a surprise, the decision to use Alaska appears to be a win for both leaders. On the surface it might appear a show of strength for Mr Trump: Putin is the one travelling to him. But there are also notable perks for the Russian president. Holding the meeting in the US means Putin can avoid flying over hostile countries at a time when he has been the subject of an International Criminal Court (ICC) arrest warrant for two years. It also sets up a possibility of Mr Trump reciprocating by visiting Russia, an invitation having already been extended to him by Putin. And the venue choice has gone down well with political leaders in Alaska too. Mike Dunleavy, the Republican governor, said he welcomes Alaska hosting the meeting, describing the north-western state as a 'bridge between nations'. Alaska, he said, 'is the most strategic location in the world' given its close proximity to Russia and it 'stands ready to host this historic meeting'. 'Russia and US are close neighbours' Dan Sullivan, one of the state's two Republican senators, echoed this sentiment, while Yuri Ushakov, a high-ranking aide to Putin, described the state as the 'logical' meeting point. 'Russia and the US are close neighbours, sharing a common border,' Mr Ushakov said in a statement, according to the TASS agency. He added: 'It seems quite logical for our delegation simply to fly across the Bering Strait and for the important and anticipated summit of leaders of these two countries to take place precisely in Alaska.' The only hint in the US of the grave concerns engulfing Europe and Ukraine about the upcoming talks, which the US president suggested will involve discussions of the 'swapping of territories' without Volodymyr Zelensky being given a seat at the table, was reflected by Lisa Murkowski, the state's senior senator. The Republican is an ardent supporter of Ukraine, who previously said the idea of Mr Trump 'walking away' from Ukraine to embrace Putin made her 'sick to my stomach'. Responding to news of the meeting, she wrote on X: 'While I remain deeply wary of Putin and his regime, I hope these discussions lead to genuine progress and help end the war on equitable terms.' Friday's visit will be the first time Putin has visited the US in a decade, having attended the UN General Assembly in New York during Barack Obama's second term. John Herbst, the former US ambassador to Ukraine, told The Telegraph he thinks Putin was 'happy' to give Mr Trump the win on location because the US president is treating his Russian counterpart 'gently'. 'The details suggest many upfront compromises by Ukraine merely to get a ceasefire, which, by its very nature, is almost never permanent, and no Russian concessions,' he said. While it might appear that the suggestion of Alaska came from the Trump administration, some experts say the idea originated from Moscow. Nina Khrushcheva, international affairs professor at the New School in New York, said her contacts in Moscow had suggested Kirill Dmitriev, Putin's envoy, had suggested it. 'It's such a show for Trump' 'Everybody thought it would be the third country, probably, Saudi Arabia, or something like that, so it was an absolute shock, but it's brilliant,' Ms Khrushcheva said. 'For Trump, it's brilliant. I mean, it's such a show, he's on his territory, so for Trump it is great.' Ms Khrushcheva added that it is also an 'amazing thing' for Putin as he 'just crosses the pond and he's there', rather than having to fly over other countries. By flying into the US, which does not recognise the jurisdiction of the ICC, the Russian leader does not risk being arrested. Putin last year travelled to Mongolia, an ICC state, and faced no consequences, with the court accusing the country of having 'failed' to cooperate. The symbolism of holding the talks in Alaska, can be interpreted in several ways. It is not only the closest US state to Moscow, but the Last Frontier State used to be Russian territory. Tsar Alexander II sold Alaska to the US in 1867 for $7.2m, and Russian nationalists have long dreamed of reclaiming it. Andrew Jackson, who was the US president at the time of the sale, has long been a hero of Mr Trump, who returned his portrait to the Oval Office within days of returning to office. Ms Khrushcheva suggested Alaska serves as a 'symbol' of the beneficial trade relationship on which the Kremlin wishes to embark with Washington. But the US's annexation of Russian territory could also offer Putin some ammunition if he wants to make a public dig at Mr Trump.
