Cambodia Urges Immediate Ceasefire with Thailand Amid Border Bloodshed
Cambodia's UN ambassador, Chhea Keo, emphasized the nation's demand for an unconditional and immediate ceasefire, stating 'We ask for an immediate ceasefire—unconditionally—and we also call for a peaceful solution to the dispute,' following a closed session of the Security Council, attended by both Cambodian and Thai representatives.
Meanwhile, the sound of artillery strikes continued to echo from the Cambodian side of the border on Friday. In Oddar Meanchey province, one civilian, a 70-year-old man, was killed, and five others sustained injuries. Human Cost of the Conflict
The conflict has exacted a heavy toll on human lives, with Thailand's health ministry reported that over 138,000 people have been evacuated from its border regions. The ministry also confirmed 15 fatalities, including 14 civilians and one soldier, with an additional 46 wounded, among them 15 troops.
Fighting resumed in three areas on Friday, according to the Thai army as Cambodian forces initiated heavy weapons fire, utilizing field artillery and BM-21 rocket systems. Thai troops responded with appropriate supporting fire. Diplomatic Efforts and Accusations
Thai Foreign Ministry Spokesman Nikorndej Balankura revealed that the fighting began to subside by Friday afternoon, stating that Bangkok remained open to discussions, potentially with Malaysia's assistance. 'We are ready, if Cambodia would like to settle this matter via diplomatic channels, bilaterally, or even through Malaysia, we are ready to do that. But so far, we have not had any response,' he said, prior to the UN meeting.
Malaysia currently chairs the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), a regional bloc to which both Thailand and Cambodia belong. Earlier, acting Thai Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai cautioned that an escalation could lead to war, though he noted that it remained limited to clashes for now. Thai artillery damaged this pagoda in Oddar Meanchey province
Both nations accused each other of initiating the conflict as Thailand specifically charged Cambodia with targeting civilian infrastructure, including a hospital hit by shells and a petrol station struck by at least one rocket.
At the UN, Cambodia's envoy questioned Thailand's assertion that his country, militarily smaller and less developed, had started the conflict, stated, '(The Security Council) called for both parties to (show) maximum restraint and resort to a diplomatic solution. That is what we are calling for as well.' A History of Border Disputes
This recent fighting marks a dramatic escalation in a long-standing dispute between the two neighboring countries with both Thailand and Cambodia are popular destinations for millions of foreign tourists. Their shared 800-kilometer border has dozens of contested areas.
Previous conflicts erupted between 2008 and 2011, resulting in at least 28 deaths and displacing tens of thousands of people. A UN court ruling in 2013 seemingly settled the issue for over a decade. However, the current crisis began in May when a Cambodian soldier was killed in a new clash. People fled their homes on both sides of the border after the latest violence erupted
Thursday's fighting concentrated on six locations, according to the Thai army, including areas around two ancient temples. Ground troops, supported by tanks, battled for territorial control. Cambodia launched rockets and shells into Thailand, while Thai forces deployed F-16 jets to strike military targets across the border.
In Samraong, a Cambodian town 20 kilometers from the border, with families fleeing in vehicles with their children and belongings as gunfire erupted. Pro Bak, 41, expressed his fear, stating, 'I live very close to the border. We are scared.' He was taking his wife and children to a Buddhist temple to seek refuge.
Short link :
Post Views: 91
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Arabiya
an hour ago
- Al Arabiya
UN Security Council to meet on Gaza hostages: Israeli ambassador
The UN Security Council will hold an emergency session on the hostages in Gaza, Israel's ambassador said Sunday, as outrage built over their fate in the war-torn enclave, where experts say a famine is unfolding. Danny Danon, Israel's ambassador to the United Nations, posted the announcement on social media amid anger over videos showing two of the hostages held by Palestinian militant group Hamas emaciated. Danon said that the Council 'will convene this coming Tuesday for a special emergency session on the dire situation of the hostages in Gaza.' The videos make references to the calamitous humanitarian conditions in Gaza, where UN-mandated experts have warned a 'famine is unfolding.' Israel has heavily restricted the entry of aid into Gaza, while UN agencies, humanitarian groups and analysts say that much of what Israel does allow in is looted or diverted in chaotic circumstances. Many desperate Palestinians are left to risk their lives seeking what aid is distributed through controlled channels. Earlier Sunday, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu requested the help of the International Committee of the Red Cross to get food to the hostages. In response, Hamas said that it would allow the agency access to the hostages but only if 'humanitarian corridors' for food and aid were opened 'across all areas of the Gaza Strip.' The Al-Qassam Brigades said it did 'not intentionally starve' the hostages, but they would not receive any special food privileges 'amid the crime of starvation and siege' in Gaza. Over recent days, Hamas and its ally Islamic Jihad have released three videos showing two hostages seized during the October 7, 2023 attack on Israel that triggered the ongoing war. The images of Rom Braslavski and Evyatar David, both of whom appeared weak and malnourished, have fueled renewed calls in Israel for a truce and hostage release deal.
Arab News
12 hours ago
- Arab News
Fair climate finance requires debt reform
When delegates from around the world convened in Bonn, Germany, for the 62nd session of the UN Climate Change Subsidiary Bodies, the specter of sovereign debt loomed large. For African countries, in particular, debt is no longer a problem unfolding in parallel with escalating climate shocks and widening development deficits, but rather the key obstacle to effective crisis responses. Debt reform and climate finance are two sides of the same coin. According to the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, African countries owe $655 billion in external debt, while debt-service payments have more than doubled since 2010, driven by rising interest rates and currency depreciation. This year, the continent's collective debt-service bill will amount to a whopping $79 billion. In 2023, 34 African countries spent more on debt service than on health or education, let alone disaster relief or green infrastructure. Comprehensive debt cancelation is a prerequisite to progress on sustainable development. But it is only the beginning. Shaped by colonial power dynamics, the global financial architecture is practically designed to entrench inequality. When issuing loans to developing economies, institutions like the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank often impose conditions that constrain these countries' fiscal space and hardwire austerity into domestic policy. Short-term relief thus comes with long-term shackles. Many believe that mobilizing private investment is the key to closing the climate finance gap. 'Derisking' climate finance and attracting private capital through tools such as green bonds and blended finance are among the G20's flagship priorities. The decision on the New Collective Quantified Goal on Climate Finance, made at COP29 in Baku last year, likewise emphasizes the importance of private sector participation. South Africa, which assumed the G20 presidency in December 2024, has echoed this approach. For example, at the G20 finance ministers' meeting in February, South African President Cyril Ramaphosa called on the private sector, together with international financial institutions and development banks, to implement 'innovative financing and insurance mechanisms' aimed at scaling up funding for disaster prevention and post-disaster reconstruction. But the private sector has long struggled to engage effectively in climate negotiations or identify viable projects that serve climate, development and commercial objectives simultaneously. Since the infrastructure projects that are needed to strengthen climate resilience mature over a period of 20 to 30 years, countries need reliable access to long-term finance. But credit markets operate on three to five-year time horizons, meaning that borrowers often end up scrambling for more capital, which can be both unpredictable and expensive. According to the ONE Campaign, the average interest rate on bonds for African countries in 2021 was 5.78 percent, compared to 1.14 percent on loans from the World Bank. These countries will pay $56 billion in additional interest over the lifetime of loans contracted in 2017 to 2021, compared to what they would have paid if they had borrowed at World Bank rates. The much-touted 'blended finance' model does not solve this problem, because it often combines public and private funds in ways that leave countries exposed to credit market risk. Private finance is structurally biased against the Global South, owing partly to fundamental flaws in sovereign risk assessments. Mohamed Adow The real issue is that private finance is structurally biased against the Global South, owing partly to fundamental flaws in sovereign risk assessments. If the private sector is to help close the climate finance gap without trapping developing countries in cycles of repayment and dependency, we must first resolve the information asymmetries that enable credit rating agencies and institutional investors to define 'risk' in ways that penalize developing economies. Ramaphosa — who has voiced support for reforming global credit-rating systems — should help spearhead this process. At the same time, however, we must recognize the limits of private capital, particularly when it comes to financing for adaptation and loss and damage. There is no substitute for a major expansion of grants and public financing. The responsibility for tackling biases in the global financial system falls on the entire international community — not least the advanced economies that are now cutting their climate aid budgets. Nonetheless, African countries must take more responsibility for driving change. Africa has often failed to take a unified approach to global issues and maximize its collective bargaining power. Consider the Baku to Belem Roadmap — a joint initiative by the COP29 and COP30 presidencies to deliver at least $1.3 trillion in climate finance annually by 2035. Though the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change Secretariat and the COP30 presidency began regional consultations on the roadmap in February, inviting stakeholders to share their input, Africa has not submitted an aligned position or set of recommendations. Meanwhile, many African countries pursue bilateral debt deals in isolation, while others are entangled in opaque and protracted restructuring processes like the G20's Common Framework for Debt Treatments. Zambia's debt restructuring, for example, dragged on for more than three years. What is needed now is for African countries to build a consensus around a common agenda that links COP30 to the G20. Priorities must include comprehensive debt cancelation for climate-vulnerable countries; the reform of credit rating systems and capital cost structures that unfairly penalize African economies; and the greater use of instruments such as grants to finance climate action. A global taxation regime, which could use revenues to fund resilience in developing economies, should also be on the table. Such efforts should build on existing initiatives and proposals, such as the proposed UN Framework Convention on Sovereign Debt, which would offer a credible, cooperative and rights-based approach to debt reform. The Africa Climate Summit, convening in Addis Ababa this September, will serve as an important moment to cement progress and speak with a unified voice in advance of COP30. Along with South Africa, the African Union — now a permanent member of the G20 — should play a leading role in this process, steering global debates toward the creation of a financial system that reflects today's multipolar realities, not the colonial dynamics of the past. This is a matter of justice, not charity. And, with developing economies on the front line of the climate crisis, it could not be more urgent.
Leaders
13 hours ago
- Leaders
Israeli Ground Forces Storm Syria in Bold Weapons Raid
Israeli military forces executed targeted ground raids inside southern Syria, as troops seized significant weapon caches and questioned individuals suspected of arms trafficking, the military said in a statement on Sunday. This operation marks the latest Israeli cross-border incursion since the fall of President Bashar al-Assad. Details of the Mission The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) confirmed troops completed 'a mission involving on-site questioning of several suspects' near the Israeli-annexed Golan Heights. Israeli forces simultaneously entered four locations within the Hader area during the operation. Furthermore, soldiers successfully located numerous weapons trafficked by the suspects, the military detailed. Released military footage depicted uniformed Israeli troops operating at night, utilizing armored vehicles and moving on foot. Consequently, an Israeli army division remains actively deployed in the region to continue operations to prevent terrorist entrenchment in Syria, aiming specifically to protect Israeli civilians and Golan Heights residents. Recent Actions Israel significantly bolstered its presence on the Golan Heights late last year, following the Islamist-led offensive that ultimately toppled Syrian President Assad in December. Troops moved into the UN-patrolled buffer zone separating Israeli and Syrian forces since their 1973 war. The IDF previously launched strikes against Syrian government targets. In July, Israel bombed forces in Damascus and Sweida province, compelling a Syrian withdrawal from the south amid intense sectarian violence. Israel claimed it acted to defend the Druze community; however, some diplomats and analysts argue the true goal involved weakening the Syrian military and pushing the new government away from the border. Israel initiated hundreds of strikes on Syrian military sites after Assad's overthrow. The government stated its objective was preventing advanced weapons transfers to new authorities, whom Israel considers jihadists. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu persistently demands the full demilitarization of southern Syria. Short link : Post Views: 16
