New Plymouth residents say proposed water charge changes will be unfair
Photo:
LDR / Emily Ireland
New Plymouth councillors have been told proposed changes to how water is charged for will be unfair to people living in apartments or on cross-lease sections with multiple dwellings.
Currently ratepayers are charged a flat $547 for water, but from 2027 they will be billed at least in part according to volume of water used.
Council is considering three options for how those charges would be levied.
Fixed charge plus a volumetric charge or a fixed charge plus a volumetric charge with a daily allocation of water (100 litres) or fully volumetric charging.
Council received more than 1000 written submissions on the proposals and heard oral presentations at a hearing on Monday.
Elaine Gill spoke on behalf of the residents of the Liardet Apartments in the inner-city.
She said the 25 apartments - a mix of one to three bedroom apartments, nine of which were rentals, one an AirBnB and 15 owner-occupied - would have just one water meter installed for the whole building.
"We want individual council-supplied water meters for each apartment... and there is space where our water is supplied for a meter to be installed."
If that wasn't possible the block's residents wanted a fixed charge - based on average residential use in New Plymouth - with volumetric charging.
Gill
worried about how water use would be calculated
.
"It's totally unfair. There is a need to recognise that each apartment is different, each has a different number of people living there.
"We have one apartment with three bedrooms and one person living in there and one apartment with two bedrooms that has five people living there, and obviously their water usage is going to be very different."
Councillor Sam Bennett asked Gill if the apartment owners would be willing to pay to install individual meters.
Gill didn't think that was a fair solution either.
"If we are talking about equity, if we had 25 individual dwellings in Westown they would all have their own water meter [installed by council].
"Why is it that because we are all packed up one on top of the other that we can't have the same consideration."
John Staddon owned rental properties on a cross-leased section and had received a letter from council saying only one meter would be installed and water costs shared between the dwellings.
"My concern is that the definition of shared needs some further clarification. For example, where there are two properties on a cross-lease section would sharing be on a 50-50 basis?
"If so, what consideration would be made should one of the properties have a family of four, both parents working, two cars, maybe a spa pool, and the other occupant a widow on superanuation?
"The use of water by the family would be far higher than the other occupant. A 50-50 share in this scenario is not equitable. Unless there is a formula that recognises the size of the dwelling and number occupants 50-50 sharing is wrong."
Staddon said every dwelling should have its own meter just as they did for electricity and for gas.
"Payment for electricity or gas is not shared and neither is phone or internet connection, so why then should water charges be."
Staddon said as a landlord he would be willing to drop rents if part of the water charge was removed from his rates bill, but he was not willing to pay for the installation of additional meters.
Veronica Edwards also owned a cross-lease section with two independent households on it.
"Under the current plan we're stuck with one meter. I believe this approach is neither fair or just for people living in multiple dwellings."
Mayor Neil Holdom said that for every dollar invested in meters, council expected to make savings of between $4 and $5 over the life of the meter "but in some cases to install meters in every property it may cost us $4000 to $5000 in plumbing, maybe more".
Submitter Hannah-Miriam Knuckey said if council insisted that additional meters be paid for by property owners it should pay the upfront costs and allow people to pay the meter off via their rates - interest free - over five to 10 years.
Council had so far installed more than 23,000 roadside water meters at a cost of $24 million.
It was envisaged they would eventually save council $40 million in capital expenditure by encouraging efficient water use and identifying leaks.
The meters had already been credited with identifying 180 leaks, saving 1.75 million litres of water daily in New Plymouth, where water usage was up to two times that of other similar-sized communities.
Council would decide on a charging system in August.
A year-long "mock billing" trial would start in July next year to allow households to monitor water use, fix leaks and prepare for volumetric charging in beginning July 2027.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
36 minutes ago
- RNZ News
State of Auckland report slams city
economy culture 40 minutes ago Auckland risks being cast into obscurity as "a global city" according to a just released report. Committee for Auckland director Mark Thomas spoke to Ingrid Hipkiss.
Techday NZ
an hour ago
- Techday NZ
CEH Hall of Fame 2025 report shows ethical hackers impact
EC-Council has released the CEH Hall of Fame 2025 Industry Report, providing analysis on the career trajectories and global impact of the top certified ethical hackers. The CEH Hall of Fame 2025 Industry Report reviews data gathered from 481 cybersecurity professionals - ranging from entry-level analysts to CISOs - who have undertaken EC-Council's Certified Ethical Hacker (CEH) credential. The report focuses on how the CEH certification has contributed to career advancement, enhanced industry recognition, improved hands-on proficiency, and broadened skills for cybersecurity practitioners worldwide. To select the Hall of Fame 2025 inductees, EC-Council started with candidates scoring at least 90% on the CEH certification exam. This pool was refined to 460 finalists from 93 countries, with selection based on leadership, contributions to the cybersecurity community, innovation in threat mitigation, and visible career progression. Of these, 100 professionals have been inducted into the Hall of Fame, representing what EC-Council describes as the vanguard of ethical hacking expertise. The report draws extensively on the professional experiences of these finalists and inductees. It quantifies the impact of CEH certification, stating that 98% of all surveyed ethical hackers credited the certification for a shift in their cybersecurity careers. Other statistics include 95% of participants reporting significant salary growth following their certification and 86% seeing increased job opportunities as a direct result of pursuing this training. Furthermore, 91% of respondents consider the credential to offer a competitive edge over other cybersecurity certifications. Highlighting the workplace value of ethical hacking credentials, the report states that 100% of Hall of Fame recipients experienced increased respect and recognition at work post-certification, with an equal percentage stating they would recommend the CEH programme to their peers. In terms of skills and practical application, the report shows that 99% of the Hall of Fame group found the programme's virtual labs played a critical role in building real-world hacking competencies, and 97% cited the CEH's effectiveness in addressing emerging security threats and trends. Notably, these professionals are contributing expertise at companies including Cisco, Microsoft, and Google. The findings also reference industry challenges, such as the projected cybersecurity talent shortage, which is expected to reach 4 million by 2026. By providing in-depth training across areas like network security, web application security, and AI-driven threat detection, EC-Council positions the CEH and related programmes as part of the solution to this skills gap. This year's Hall of Fame showcases the extraordinary caliber of cybersecurity professionals shaping the future of global digital defense. These inductees have elevated ethical hacking to a strategic discipline, where their expertise not only protects critical systems but actively drives organizational growth, resilience, and trust. Their leadership exemplifies how technical excellence, and forward-thinking are now essential to navigating the digital world with confidence. Speaking to the report's broader implications, Jay Bavisi, Group President of EC-Council, added, "The CEH Hall of Fame 2025 Industry Report not only reflects the incredible achievements of these professionals but also signals the growing influence of ethical hackers in shaping the future of cybersecurity. As these leaders continue to advance their expertise, they are setting new standards for the profession and ensuring organizations are prepared to thrive in a rapidly evolving digital world." The company has outlined its intention to maintain the pace of change in the sector by launching the Certified Ethical Hacker Powered with AI Capabilities programme. Built on the "Learn, Certify, Engage, and Compete" framework, the programme incorporates immersive labs, practical simulations, and professional pathways to more than 45 recognised cybersecurity job roles, with a focus on equipping participants to combat sophisticated contemporary threats. The CEH Hall of Fame 2025 Industry Report concludes that certified ethical hackers are playing a vital role in shaping organisational preparedness, with nearly all respondents noting increased career mobility and professional recognition post-certification. The certification's global reach and the experiences of those recognised in the report underline its role as a formalised route to advancement and impact within the cybersecurity profession.
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Commerce Commission takes Foodstuffs North Island to court over alleged 'cartel conduct'
The Commerce Commission said the supermarket chain did not deal with the supplier in good faith. Photo: 123RF The Commerce Commission is taking Foodstuffs North Island and its subsidiary Gilmours Wholesale to court over what it believes is cartel conduct. The regulator said it would shortly file civil proceedings against the big grocery suppliers under the Commerce Act and Grocery Industry Competition Act (GICA). The regulator said the parties set up a supply agreement with a hospitality customer that effectively blocked competition by another supplier. Commission chair John Small said the commission took allegations of cartel conduct seriously. "Cartel conduct harms consumers through higher prices or reduced quality, and it harms other businesses that are trying to compete fairly," Small said. "In this instance, the supplier wanted to provide a competitive supply channel, but this was stopped by the agreement with FSNI and Gilmours. "We do not tolerate this kind of behaviour and will not hesitate to take court action, where appropriate." In addition, the commission said the parties did not deal with the supplier in good faith. Grocery commissioner Pierre van Heerden said that behaviour could be in breach of the Grocery Supply Code. "The Grocery Supply Code was introduced to address the power imbalance between the major supermarkets and their suppliers," van Heerden said. "The major supermarkets are the largest customers for most grocery suppliers. This creates a reluctance for suppliers to call out bad behaviour or push back on the supermarkets for fear of damaging relationships or losing access to supermarket shelves. "The Commission is acutely aware of the risk suppliers may face coming forward and has ways to protect their identity and business. "We have anonymous reporting tools for cartels and GICA and encourage anyone concerned to use these ways of contacting us." The commission said it would not be providing further comment on the case at this time, as the matter was before the court. Foodstuffs North Island has been asked for comment. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
