EU Commission discusses curbs on Israel research funding amid Gaza pressure
Multiple EU countries said last week that Israel was not living up to its commitments under an agreement with the European Union on increasing aid supplies to Gaza and asked the Commission to put concrete options on the table.
The proposal was mentioned in a published agenda of Monday's meeting of the College of Commissioners, the top decision-making body of the European Union's executive. But the Commission has not explained it in detail.
EU and Israeli officials had no immediate comment on the proposal.
Israel has been participating in the EU's research programs since 1996, taking part in thousands of joint research projects over the past decades.
Earlier this month, EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said Israel had agreed to expand humanitarian access to Gaza, including increasing the number of aid trucks, crossing points and routes to distribution hubs.
But in a tense meeting of European ambassadors in Brussels last week, countries including France, the Netherlands and Spain said not enough was being done, according to diplomats.
Earlier this month, EU officials presented a list of options that the bloc could pursue to put pressure on Israel but the bloc has so far refrained from pursuing any of them.
Israel on Sunday announced a halt in military operations for 10 hours a day in parts of Gaza and new aid corridors, while Jordan and the United Arab Emirates have airdropped supplies into the enclave.
But officials and aid groups remain concerned and say much more needs to be done to alleviate the dire humanitarian situation in Gaza.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Al Arabiya
35 minutes ago
- Al Arabiya
Israel army chief vows to keep expressing military's stance ‘without fear'
Israeli military chief Lieutenant General Eyal Zamir vowed on Thursday to continue expressing the military's position 'without fear,' ahead of an expected security cabinet meeting where war plans for Gaza are likely to be discussed. 'We will continue to express our position without fear, in a pragmatic, independent, and professional manner,' Zamir said, according to a military statement, as rumors swirled about alleged disagreements between him and the cabinet over Gaza.

Al Arabiya
2 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
Man executed by Iran for nuclear espionage was nuclear scientist: State media
Rouzbeh Vadi, who state media said was executed on Wednesday for giving information on Iran's nuclear program to Israel's Mossad spy agency, was himself a nuclear scientist, state broadcaster IRIB said on Thursday. The judiciary's news outlet Mizan had said on Wednesday that Vadi was convicted of spying for Israel and passing on information about a nuclear scientist killed in Israel's June air strikes on the Islamic Republic. 'Key facilities were Fordow and Natanz (uranium enrichment plants), for which I sent information. I told them I knew this and that about Fordow, they (Mossad agent) told me to send everything,' Vadi said in what IRIB described as a confession video it ran on the air. 'The entry and exit of nuclear material into the Uranium Conversion Facility (UCF) and Fuel Manufacturing Plant (FMP) were very important to them,' Vadi, who held a PhD in nuclear engineering from Amir Kabir University of Technology, added. A voiceover in the video said that Vadi met five times with Mossad agents while in Vienna and was asked to open a cryptocurrency account to receive payment for his services. The defendant said in the video that Mossad had promised him a foreign passport should he complete a long-term collaboration. IRIB on Thursday shared a screenshot of an academic paper presented at an Iranian nuclear conference in 2012 that was written by Vadi as well as Ahmad Zolfaqar and Abdolhamid Minouchehr - two nuclear scientists killed in June by Israel. In the document, Vadi is introduced as a nuclear researcher at the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, the country's top nuclear body. Executions of Iranians convicted of spying for Israel have significantly increased this year, with at least eight death sentences carried out in recent months. Israel carried out 12 days of air strikes in June, targeting Iran's top generals, nuclear scientists and sensitive nuclear installations. Iran retaliated with barrages of missiles and drones at Israel.


Arab News
2 hours ago
- Arab News
Grok, is that Gaza? AI image checks mislocate news photographs
PARIS: This image by AFP photojournalist Omar Al-Qattaa shows a skeletal, underfed girl in Gaza, where Israel's blockade has fueled fears of mass famine in the Palestinian when social media users asked Grok where it came from, X boss Elon Musk's artificial intelligence chatbot was certain that the photograph was taken in Yemen nearly seven years AI bot's untrue response was widely shared online and a left-wing pro-Palestinian French lawmaker, Aymeric Caron, was accused of peddling disinformation on the Israel-Hamas war for posting the a time when Internet users are turning to AI to verify images more and more, the furor shows the risks of trusting tools like Grok, when the technology is far from said the photo showed Amal Hussain, a seven-year-old Yemeni child, in October fact the photo shows nine-year-old Mariam Dawwas in the arms of her mother Modallala in Gaza City on August 2, the war, sparked by Hamas's October 7, 2023 attack on Israel, Mariam weighed 25 kilograms, her mother told she weighs only nine. The only nutrition she gets to help her condition is milk, Modallala told AFP — and even that's 'not always available.'Challenged on its incorrect response, Grok said: 'I do not spread fake news; I base my answers on verified sources.'The chatbot eventually issued a response that recognized the error — but in reply to further queries the next day, Grok repeated its claim that the photo was from chatbot has previously issued content that praised Nazi leader Adolf Hitler and that suggested people with Jewish surnames were more likely to spread online mistakes illustrate the limits of AI tools, whose functions are as impenetrable as 'black boxes,' said Louis de Diesbach, a researcher in technological ethics.'We don't know exactly why they give this or that reply, nor how they prioritize their sources,' said Diesbach, author of a book on AI tools, 'Hello ChatGPT.'Each AI has biases linked to the information it was trained on and the instructions of its creators, he the researcher's view Grok, made by Musk's xAI start-up, shows 'highly pronounced biases which are highly aligned with the ideology' of the South African billionaire, a former confidante of US President Donald Trump and a standard-bearer for the radical a chatbot to pinpoint a photo's origin takes it out of its proper role, said Diesbach.'Typically, when you look for the origin of an image, it might say: 'This photo could have been taken in Yemen, could have been taken in Gaza, could have been taken in pretty much any country where there is famine'.'AI does not necessarily seek accuracy — 'that's not the goal,' the expert AFP photograph of a starving Gazan child by Al-Qattaa, taken in July 2025, had already been wrongly located and dated by Grok to Yemen, error led to Internet users accusing the French newspaper Liberation, which had published the photo, of AI's bias is linked to the data it is fed and what happens during fine-tuning — the so-called alignment phase — which then determines what the model would rate as a good or bad answer.'Just because you explain to it that the answer's wrong doesn't mean it will then give a different one,' Diesbach said.'Its training data has not changed and neither has its alignment.'Grok is not alone in wrongly identifying AFP asked Mistral AI's Le Chat — which is in part trained on AFP's articles under an agreement between the French start-up and the news agency — the bot also misidentified the photo of Mariam Dawwas as being from Diesbach, chatbots must never be used as tools to verify facts.'They are not made to tell the truth,' but to 'generate content, whether true or false,' he said.'You have to look at it like a friendly pathological liar — it may not always lie, but it always could.'