Floriculturists urge revival of long-pending scent factory project in Kanniyakumari
While the farmers from the region have consistently urged for the implementation of the project, officials have pointed to the Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board's (TNPCB) nonchalant attitude to issue No Objection Certificate for the implementation of the project, citing various environmental and safety concerns.
Established in 2008, the FRS in Thovalai is the first research station dedicated to flowers in a plain region. The station has been actively engaged in experimenting various projects for the benefit of the floriculturist and individuals involved in utilising the byproduct of the flowers.
Accordingly, the station had undertaken a project under the National Agriculture Development Programme about seven years ago to set up a scent factory on the station premises.
This initiative received robust backing from the farmers, floriculturists from Kanniyakumari and nearby districts, as it promised a regularised income through their floral yields. A steam distillation unit including boiler and other essential equipment was installed at a cost of around ₹25 lakh. However, the project came to halt due to the TNPCB's non-clearance of NOC.
Despite this setback, farmers have continued to urge the government to shift the project to other suitable locations within the district.
Chenbagasekara Pillai, a farmer from Thuvarangadu, highlighted that the implementation of the project would benefit the floriculturist in the region, where they will be having a stable income.
'The project would also encourage many others to turn to floriculture, which has been declining in the region due to climatic challenges, financial difficulties, and other issues,' he added.
Noting that flowers are being actively cultivated in Rajavoor and nearby areas, beyond Thovalai region, he emphasised that setting up even a small unit elsewhere in the district would be beneficial. 'This issue has been raised multiple times at the farmers' grievance redressal meeting, but no effective measures have been taken so far,' he stated.
Vasanth, a florist from Thovalai echoed these concerns, stating that the establishment of the scent factory would create employment opportunities in the region. He added, 'Many times our flowers are destroyed by rain and are thrown away as garbage due to lack of alternative use. If a scent factory is established in our district, floriculturists from Kanniyakumari and neighbouring districts could benefit from our hard earned yield.'
A source from the research team explained that the primary reason for the TNPCB's refusal is the safety requirements that there should be no residential units within 2 km radius from the plant, due to the use of inflammable substances like hexane and others scent making.
The source noted that the project could still be shifted to other remote places in the district, the central government has stopped funding under the scheme, and it remains at the audit update phase. 'If the State government or any other private entity is willing to take up the project, it would be a significant boon for the farmers,' the source noted.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
17 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Lack of OC at Willingdon View: 27 residents of Tardeo highrise get 3 weeks to vacate illegally occupied flats: HC
MUMBAI: The Bombay High Court on Wednesday granted three weeks' time to 27 families residing on the upper 18 floors of a highrise in Tardeo to vacate their flats, which lack an Occupancy Certificate (OC). The court said that if they fail to comply, the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) must evict the residents and seal the premises. Mumbai, India. July 02, 2025: View of Willingdon Heights at Tardeo area in south Mumbai. Mumbai, India. July 02, 2025. (Photo by Raju Shinde/ HT Photo) (Raju Shinde) The direction comes five days after the Supreme Court refused to stay the High Court's earlier eviction order, calling it 'very well considered, bold and lucid'. The apex court also allowed the Willingdon View Co-operative Housing Society, which owns the building, to approach the High Court for more time to vacate. The High Court bench of justice GS Kulkarni and justice Arif Doctor made it clear on Wednesday that the extension was being granted purely on humanitarian grounds and warned that no further leniency would be shown. The petition was originally filed by a resident, Sunil Jhaveri, who flagged illegal construction and structural changes in the 34-storey building. While the lower 16 floors have a partial OC, the top 18 floors were built without one and the entire structure lacks a fire department No Objection Certificate (NOC), making occupation of the upper floors illegal. The building has been partially occupied since 2008. On July 15, the High Court ordered eviction of the upper-floor occupants, prompting the society to approach the Supreme Court. On August 1, the top court upheld the High Court's order, with justices JB Pardiwala and R Mahadevan remarking, 'At the end of the day, the rule of law must prevail.' They also praised the High Court's 'courage and conviction' in dealing with unauthorised constructions. Following this, the housing society returned to the High Court seeking four weeks' time to vacate. Its counsel argued that the families needed time to find alternative accommodation nearby, especially as some children were enrolled in schools in the area. The High Court agreed to extend the deadline by three weeks, but stressed that this was a 'mercy plea' and warned that no further extensions would be granted. 'We permit the residents to occupy the respective flats for a period of three more weeks at their own risk and consequence in the event of any untoward incident,' the court stated. It also directed the society to file an undertaking within two days, and ordered the BMC to take immediate action — including eviction and sealing of the flats — if the occupants failed to vacate within the given timeframe.


Time of India
4 days ago
- Time of India
1,855 trees cut without permission in Mohali: DFO to NGT
Mohali: The district forest officer (DFO) has informed the National Green Tribunal (NGT) that 1,855 trees were cut in Mohali area without mandatory permission. He informed that this happened outside the jurisdiction of the forest department and the land in question was not classified as forest land. In a written reply submitted to the NGT, DFO Kanwar Deep Singh clarified that the land where the felling occurred falls under a non-forest category, and thus, the forest department had no authority to regulate or prevent cutting of trees on it. "The forest department does not have jurisdiction over the said land since it is not a forest area," stated the DFO. The issue came to light in the wake of a petition filed by the Environment Protection Society, through its president, Harbhajan Singh Minhas and Save My Trees Foundation coordinator, Daljit Singh. The complaint raised serious environmental concerns over large-scale felling of trees in the district. According to the DFO's report, although the department was asked to assess the trees on non-forest land, permission for felling of trees was not granted. "It was clearly mentioned in our correspondence that the assessment does not constitute special permission or a No Objection Certificate (NoC). As per procedure, permission must be obtained from the competent authority of the respective department," the reply stated. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like This Could Be the Best Time to Trade Gold in 5 Years IC Markets Learn More Undo The forest officer assessed the reserve value of the felled trees and 21 poles at around Rs 69 lakh. He proposed that this amount may be imposed as environmental compensation under the Environmental Protection Act, 1986. However, he noted that enforcement of environmental compensation lies within the purview of the Punjab State Pollution Control Board or the department of environment, not the forest department. "As provisions related to environmental compensation fall under the Environment Protection Act, the agency concerned may be directed to take necessary steps," the DFO stated. In a strong recommendation for environmental restoration, the forest department has suggested planting 10 times the number of saplings in place of the cut trees. "To ensure environmental protection and prevent pollution, we advise that 18,550 tree saplings be planted. These can be procured from forest department nurseries," said the DFO. The matter now rests with the NGT and environmental authorities, with further directions awaited on compensatory measures and accountability of agencies involved in the unauthorised tree felling. MSID:: 123077325 413 | Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Friendship Day wishes , messages and quotes !


Time of India
26-07-2025
- Time of India
No hydrants in Thiruvananthapuram city: Fire dept's alarming RTI reply
Thiruvananthapuram: A Right to Information (RTI) query filed by a city resident has revealed alarming lapses in Thiruvananthapuram city's fire safety infrastructure. In a written reply dated July 19, the fire and rescue services said that no fire hydrants have been installed anywhere in the city, and therefore, none are operational. More surprisingly, when asked who is responsible for maintaining fire hydrants, the department passed the buck to the Kerala Water Authority (KWA), stating that installation and upkeep do not fall under its purview. However, it turns out that many residential apartments in the city do have fire hydrants installed, as the city corporation mandates their presence before issuing a No Objection Certificate. In fact, fire officials themselves are often involved in inspecting these installations as part of the NOC process. The fact that the department's RTI response claimed there were no hydrants at all points to either a complete lack of internal coordination or a disturbingly casual approach to critical public safety infrastructure. However, there are no fire hydrants in public places, with the single exception of the one near the Secretariat. "Their reply shows a complete disconnect and apathy from those responsible for our safety," said KS Hemaraj, a resident of Kaimanam, who filed the RTI query. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Free P2,000 GCash eGift UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo He had asked nine questions about hydrants in the city—including their number, locations, functionality, maintenance and any future plans—but received vague or inadequate responses. A senior Fire and Rescue Services officer, speaking anonymously, admitted the issue was serious. "Technically, hydrants are part of civic water infrastructure under the KWA. But during emergencies, we rely on them for immediate water access. The fact that there is only one operational public hydrant is a real concern. I will also verify why the fire and rescue officers gave such an irresponsible answer," he said. When contacted for clarification, a KWA official said: "We install fire hydrants only when requested by the fire and rescue services or the local body. In most cases, there is no formal communication or demand. Also, hydrants must be connected to adequate pipeline pressure, which needs planning and budget allocation," the official said.