
Brown pelicans are starving across California. Wildlife experts think they know why
JD Bergeron felt the dread return this spring when worried volunteers kept showing up at International Bird Rescue's wildlife facilities with starving brown pelicans.
It's happening again, Bergeron thought.
For the third time in four years, brown pelicans around California appear to be ailing. Over the past month, more than 100 malnourished and struggling birds have been brought to the nonprofit's Bay Area and Southern California wildlife centers, said Bergeron, International Bird Rescue's CEO.
The birds are arriving listless and starving, and are being found in places out of their habitat: parking lots, backyards and even a tattoo shop. Many sport additional injuries, probably caused by fishing hooks or lines.
'There's been semi-regular problems with brown pelicans,' he said. 'These large population crashes result in lots of birds coming in for care. Fortunately, many can be saved.'
Bergeron and others believe climate change is warming water close to the ocean surface — sending the fish that pelicans eat deeper and out of their reach, leading to skinny, malnourished and disoriented birds.
The phenomenon marks a potentially worrying setback for a species that has struggled over the years and spent decades on the endangered species list due to exposure to DDT, a synthetic pesticide that weakened eggshells, causing their breeding numbers to plummet. It wasn't until 2009 that brown pelicans were removed from the list.
Last year, the Bay Area rescue center and its Southern California counterpart treated hundreds of malnourished pelicans, which wildlife officials attributed to a late spring storm that made fishing extremely difficult for the birds.
A similar starvation happened in spring 2022, when almost 800 pelicans were admitted into wildlife facilities and close to 400 were returned to the wild, according to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife.
This year's wave of malnourished pelicans came as the bird sanctuary was already dealing with an onslaught of birds suffering from poisoning from domoic acid, caused by algal blooms.
Then, dozens of young pelicans started arriving at International Bird Rescue's wildlife centers. By the end of March, the center was treating 41 birds, including many that hatched this year, Bergeron said. Large numbers of fledgling pelicans can point to a strong breeding year, but he and others worry that the domoic acid bloom may have poisoned parent pelicans, causing fledglings to leave their nests in search of food.
More pelicans kept arriving in April, but many of those did not seem to be suffering from domoic acid, he said.
'It took us a minute to realize, 'Uh-oh, it's transitioning,'' he said. 'We were nervous, having had challenges in 2022 and 2024, we thought, 'Maybe this is something cyclical,' but … this happening the very next year wasn't on any of our radars.'
Bergeron and others are concerned that fish are swimming deeper to escape warming ocean waters, out of pelicans' reach. Other animals that eat the same fish don't seem to be suffering.
'There are changes in the ocean resulting in pelicans not being able to feed the way they historically have,' he said.
Now, the birds are gorging — they can eat their body weight in fish every day — and the influx of birds has Bergeron's staff working long hours, scrambling to make sure it has enough food, medicine and other supplies to care for its patients.
'We're clearly not out of the woods,' Bergeron said. 'We need to dig deeper and figure out what are the root causes of this problem and how do we fix that.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


USA Today
3 days ago
- USA Today
Once frail, hairless black bear cub runs around happily before moving to new home: Watch
Once frail, hairless black bear cub runs around happily before moving to new home: Watch The black bear cub will join Sequoia Park Zoo's two resident black bears, Tule and Ishŭng, who are both three years old. Show Caption Hide Caption Before and after: Once malnourished, hairless bear is now fully furred The orphaned and once hairless bear cub now weighs nearly 80 pounds, fully furred and has all the energy in the world. An orphaned black bear cub, whose future was at one point uncertain, has found a new, permanent home at Sequoia Park Zoo in California. The hairless bear cub was rescued in El Dorado County, California after several residents reported him slinking through the neighborhood in December 2024. After six months of intensive treatment, the cub has made an incredible recovery, gaining 60 pounds and growing back all of his hair. Residence and treatment has been provided by Gold Country Wildlife Rescue in Auburn, California. Despite the cub's comeback, the California Department of Fish and Wildlife determined he is not fit for a return to the wild. Specifically, the agency has concerns about the cub's fur coat and whether it would be able to sustain winter conditions. As a result, the cub will be placed permanently at the Sequoia Park Zoo in Eureka, California, about 270 miles north of San Francisco. At the zoo, the cub will receive ongoing treatment and daily enrichment. More bear news: 'Mom, run!' Black bear caught swimming at Naples beach. What type of treatment did the bear receive? In Gold Country Wildlife Rescue's care, the bear cub received topical and environmental antifungal protocols; treatments for his ear infections, nutritional support; and supplements to support immune function, reduce inflammation, and restore skin and coat health, according to a news release. When the cub was brought in to the rescue, he weighed only about 22 pounds. As of June 8, the cub weighed nearly 80, a news release states. According to the Bear With Us Centre for Bears, 1-year-old black bears should weigh between 15 pounds to more than 100 pounds, depending on their food supply. More animal news: Zebra in Tennessee captured after more than a week on the run: Watch video Preparing for a new home Sequoia Park Zoo's bear habitat features a stream bed, including a waterfall that flows into a pond for swimming and foraging; log structures for resting and playing; and redwood trees for climbing, according to a news release. The cub will join the zoo's two resident black bears, Tule and Ishŭng, who are both three years old. For his six months in human care, the bear cub has been referred to as solely Cub 24-3926. However, once the cub is transferred to the zoo, he will receive a real name. The name will be selected by the Bear River Band of the Rohnerville Rancheria, who funded the zoo's bear habitat, according to a news release. A date for the cub's transfer had not been finalized, as of June 8. What was wrong with the bear cub? When the bear cub arrived to Gold Country Wildlife Rescue in December 2024, he was dehydrated, anemic, severely underweight, suffering from ear infections in both ears and a skin infection, as previously reported by USA TODAY. The cub was also about 90% hairless. Greta Cross is a national trending reporter at USA TODAY. Story idea? Email her at gcross@
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
US regulators move forward on controversial policy change that could pose risks to human health: 'By then it'll be too late'
The United States Environmental Protection Agency is considering the approval of a new pesticide ingredient that contains per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, or PFAS, a class of harmful chemicals. The potential approval has sparked concerns among health and environmental advocates. As The New Lede reported in early May, the EPA announced the proposed registration of cyclobutrifluram, a chemical designed to control pests and diseases in crops such as soybeans, lettuce, cotton, and ornamental plants, per an April EPA news release. Developed by Syngenta, the chemical is being marketed as the active ingredient in the agritech company's new product Tymirium, which is intended to protect plants from parasitic nematodes and fungal diseases. "It will give farmers the freedom to maximize their yields without having to compromise on sustainability," Jon Parr, then-president of global crop protection at Syngenta, said in a 2020 statement. However, environmental groups have urged the EPA to reject the registration of cyclobutrifluram, citing concerns about potential long-term health and ecological impacts since the chemical falls into the PFAS category. This group of chemicals is known to accumulate in human bodies and the environment for decades, possibly centuries. While the EPA says it didn't find any risks to human health or threats to animals when the chemical was used in line with directions, the agency opened a portal for public comments and will consult with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service before making a final decision. The New Lede reported that opponents of the chemical are concerned its registration will be approved anyway. "We're quickly returning to the age of the 1960s and 1970s, when really persistent pesticides, like DDT, were in wide use," Nathan Donley, the Center for Biological Diversity's environmental health science director, told the outlet. "The legacy of impacts of what the EPA's currently approving won't be known for decades. By then it'll be too late." PFAS have been called "forever chemicals" because natural processes do not easily break them down. They can persist in the environment long after contamination and in human bodies long after exposure. The chemicals have been linked to a slew of health problems, including increased cholesterol, reproductive issues, an increased risk of cancers, and developmental delays. In ecosystems, they can pose similar risks to wildlife and can harm habitats by contaminating air, water, soil, and food sources. Do you worry about having toxic forever chemicals in your home? Majorly Sometimes Not really I don't know enough about them Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. While the EPA designated two widely used PFAS — PFOA and PFOS — as hazardous substances in 2024 and banned 12 PFAS chemicals from nonfood pesticide products in 2022, the agency appears to support approval of this new PFAS-containing pesticide ingredient, according to an April memorandum. Given that PFAS compounds have been detected on around 4,000 farms across the U.S., and many fertilizers used to grow our food contain these chemicals, approving a pesticide that includes them could further contaminate food supplies. Environmental groups such as Toxic Free North Carolina and the Environmental Protection Network submitted petitions to the EPA expressing opposition to the registration of cyclobutrifluram. In its public comment, science, regulatory, and advocacy manager Sara Grantham wrote on behalf of the organization Beyond Pesticides, "PFAS should be banned from all products, and no new chemicals should be approved for use that fall into this class." While the period for public comment appears to have closed, residents may still consider sharing their opinions on the matter with elected officials and voicing support for pro-environment policies that protect human health and fragile habitats. In the meantime, lawmakers in Maryland are considering a sweeping ban on over 1,000 pesticides that contain forever chemicals, and environmental groups in the United Kingdom are urging the government to ban PFAS-containing pesticides after a study found the substances on numerous fruits and vegetables. Those who wish to mitigate their exposure to PFAS and pesticides now might consider buying organic produce or even growing their own fruits and vegetables, which may come with the added benefits of higher nutrient levels and lower grocery costs. Avoiding certain consumer goods, such as nonstick cookware, can also help reduce household PFAS exposures. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
Bed Bugs May Have Been The First Urban Pest to Ever Plague Humans
Humans were letting the bed bugs bite long before beds existed, and while they do live on other species, we're the main reason this notorious parasite is still going strong. In fact, bed bugs might have been the first pest to plague our cities – earlier than the black rat, for instance, which joined us in urban life about 15,000 years ago, and even the German cockroach, which only got the memo about 2,100 years ago. Researchers think the blood-sucking pests – Cimex lectularius – first jumped from their bat hosts onto a passing human some 50,000 years ago, a move which would change the course of the insect species forever. Human bed bugs, it turns out, have boomed since the Last Glacial Maximum about 20,000 years ago. But it's a different story for those populations that continued living on bats. "Initially with both populations, we saw a general decline that is consistent with the Last Glacial Maximum; the bat-associated lineage never bounced back, and it is still decreasing in size," says entomologist Lindsay Miles, from Virginia Tech. "The really exciting part is that the human-associated lineage did recover and their effective population increased." The researchers were able to track this evolution because the human bed bugs have a much narrower genetic diversity, since only a few 'founders' probably came with us when we abandoned life in caves. But our move into cities around 12,000 years ago is what really kicked off the human bed bug boom. This was only briefly interrupted when DDT was invented in the 1940s. Populations crashed, humans slept sweetly, and then five years later, the bed bugs were back. Since then, bed bugs have travelled around the world with us, and even become resistant to our pesticides. For now, it seems, bed bugs are here to stay. It's been a long-term relationship, after all. The research is published in Biology Letters. Your Brain Wrinkles Are Way More Important Than We Ever Realized Something Strange Happens to Your Eyes When You're Sexually Aroused 2-Year-Old Prodigy Joins 'High IQ' Club Mensa as Youngest Member Ever