logo
Trump Travel Ban Rattles Immigrant Communities across U.S.

Trump Travel Ban Rattles Immigrant Communities across U.S.

Yomiuri Shimbun20 hours ago

Valerie Plesch/For The Washington Post
A woman carries a platter and groceries for Eid al-Adha as she leaves the Afghan Market in Alexandria, Virginia, on Thursday.
Immigrants from the dozen countries targeted by President Donald Trump's travel ban have put down roots in all 50 states, many escaping violence or political instability in their homelands. They left spouses, children and friends behind, hoping one day to be reunited.
Overnight, those hopes have been shattered. Even plans for visits to or from relatives – for graduations, weddings or funerals – are now very uncertain.
'There's already this heightened awareness and heightened atmosphere of fear,' said Amaha Kassa, executive director of the nonprofit African Communities Together.
In his executive order, Trump said the ban was based on 'foreign policy, national security, and counterterrorism goals.' Yet immigrants like Roozbeh Farahanipour, who left Iran in 2000 and now owns three restaurants in Los Angeles, said Trump's action will punish individuals and families who pose no threat to the United States.
Farahanipour was fielding calls Thursday from fellow Iranians in his community and back home, who are terrified about what the ban means for their future. His own story, he said, reflects a quintessential American success story.
'I want other people to follow me,' he added. 'I don't want to be the last American Dream.'
Haitians in Ohio
Gangs have taken over much of Haiti since the 2021 assassination of its president, pushing families to seek safety anywhere they can. Yet those who fled the violence now face a different danger in the United States: The temporary protected status (TPS) that has allowed hundreds of thousands of Haitians to work in the U.S. is set to expire in August.
Yvena Jean François is among those whose future is at risk. She hadn't heard about the president's travel ban until she clocked into work Thursday at an Amazon warehouse in Springfield, Ohio, where many of those laboring around her were also Haitian.
Everyone has been scared since Trump's election, she said, with the travel ban only the latest blow. Innocent civilians are the ones trying to escape Haiti, she noted, and her friends back home say the situation has only deteriorated since she left. François, a journalist, saw the carnage firsthand as she documented events.
'Following all the news,' she said, 'is nothing but stress.'
As many as 15,000 Haitians have settled in her county, according to local estimates, with most of the newcomers arriving legally in the past five years. As Springfield pushed to revive its once-prosperous manufacturing sector, business leaders aimed recruitment efforts at Haitians to alleviate labor shortages. Some plants in town now employ Creole-speaking interpreters.
Haitian restaurants, convenience stores and hair salons have opened their doors. At the same time, the burst of arrivals crowded medical clinics and classrooms, sparking some complaints in the city of roughly 60,000 and attention from far-right pundits.
Trump blasted the immigrants last year during the campaign, saying they had 'destroyed' Springfield. The city's Republican mayor pushed back against the 'mischaracterization of our city.'
Under the still-glaring political spotlight, community leaders say many Haitians in town are scared to venture out beyond school, work and church. The new ban may only intensify their fears.
François, 39, prays that a judge will rule to preserve her protected status, as was the case in 2018. The Trump administration, she said, 'keeps making life harder for us.'
Afghans and Somalis in Texas
Valerie Plesch/For The Washington Post
An employee at the Afghan Market in Alexandria carries a platter of homemade pastries on the day before Eid al-Adha.
Thousands of Afghans raced to escape their country in 2021 when U.S. troops withdrew and the Taliban assumed power. In Somalia, another country on the travel ban list, humanitarian groups say the government suppresses citizens' basic rights.
Immigrants from both of these places settled in Houston's Gulfton neighborhood, filling apartments and working to rebuild their lives. In one small strip mall here that caters to Afghans – with a clothing store, barbershop, restaurant and bakery offering familiarity – workers set trays of cookies outside as a steady stream of families flowed through Thursday, shopping for the Eid al-Adha holiday.
Hasebullah Akhundzada, 20, migrated from Kabul four years ago, first to Boston, then to Houston. He left most relatives behind, in a country still controlled by the extremist Taliban regime.
'The whole family is over there,' he said as he helped customers at the Afghan Bazaar peruse glittering bangles, leather sandals, and racks of colorful embroidered shalwar kameez, traditional Afghan dress.
In the barbershop at the back of the store, Said Jallal, 27, a security guard from outside Kabul, said that when he heard about the travel ban, he immediately thought of his wife, brother and father. All remain in Afghanistan.
A few doors down in the same strip mall, Ali Ahmed nursed tea at Chai n Paan, a cafe broadcasting Al Jazeera and Arabic language news on several big screens.
Ahmed, 41, came from Somalia 25 years ago after spending a decade in a Kenyan refugee camp. His wife and six children, ages 2 through 11, have been visiting Somalia for a family wedding and are due to return by summer's end – which makes the travel ban 'scary.'
All have U.S. passports, he said, but 'you never know what's going to happen.'
He has his own travel horror stories, though. He says immigration officials always pull him aside at airports for added screening in windowless rooms – traumatizing encounters that in recent years have taken seven to 10 hours, forcing him to miss flights and causing 'humiliation' and 'stigma.'
He now shows up at airports five hours in advance. 'It makes you think you're doing something wrong, even though you're not.' And with the travel ban, he predicted, 'this is going to get worse, much worse.'
Iranians in California
On the west side of Los Angeles, in a neighborhood known as Tehrangeles, Iranian Americans received news of the president's ban with a mixture of resignation and dread. Iran was targeted in Trump's 2017 ban, and the country is in the middle of tumultuous negotiations with the United States over its nuclear program. Many figured it was only a matter of time until the travel prohibition was revived.
Farahanipour recounted how he was imprisoned and tortured for his role helping to lead the Iranian student uprisings of 1999. He sought exile in the U.S. after his country's government issued a death sentence against him.
From a table inside his Mary and Robb's Westwood Cafe, he said Trump's order is overly broad and will punish average Iranians who are just looking to visit relatives, receive medical care or study in the U.S.
'I don't think they're going to make the country safer,' he said. 'It's a blanket ban for normal, random people.'
Alex Helmi, another Iranian business owner, said the policy will be especially harmful for Iranian students – who for years have studied in the United States as part of a cultural and academic exchange that Helmi still believes will ultimately lead to a more open Iran.
'Students come and see the democracy here and they go back,' he said. 'It's good for our country.'
Down the street at Shahrzad Travel, a travel agency that primarily serves the city's Iranian community – the world's largest outside Iran – phones were ringing nonstop Thursday morning.
Sherry Tahouri, the company's owner, said she is telling her clients that they must wait and see whether the president's order changes or is challenged. 'I think it's wrong,' she said. 'But I cannot say what he should do or not because I don't have control.'
Stuck in limbo
Krish O'Mara Vignarajah, who leads Global Refuge, a resettlement agency that handles refugee placements across the U.S., said Thursday that the organization was fielding calls from terrified clients who don't know whether their cases will proceed or family members will ever make it to the U.S.
The emotional toll is enormous, she said, adding anxiety to families who 'are putting down roots and so eager to become contributing Americans.'
'People who have spent years doing everything we asked of them, navigating an already complex system, now face indefinite limbo,' she said. 'For many immigrants from these countries, this order is equally personal. It effectively says, because of where you're from, your family doesn't deserve the same chance to be together. You don't deserve the chance to make your case.'
Late Thursday afternoon outside an Afghan supermarket in Alexandria, Virginia, Parwin Azizi Omari, 38, waited with her four children to be picked up from her grocery shopping for Eid al-Adha. It had taken her family a couple of years to get from Afghanistan to the U.S. They fled after the Taliban took over their country, first to Canada, then to New York and finally to the D.C. area, where she found a job as a cook at a local snack company.
She has been grateful for the opportunity to rebuild her life. 'In our country, it's not safe,' she said. And since Trump suspended refugee admissions earlier this year and froze aid to resettle refugees, friends and former colleagues back home have become only more desperate. One woman she knew killed herself, Azizi Omari said.
'It's very difficult, because they are waiting for a long, long term,' she said. Now, they probably will have to wait even longer.
Kassa, the executive director of African Communities Together, is focusing on supporting the large pockets of Sudanese and Eritreans in the U.S. He fears the ban will prompt some to withdraw from civic life and be less willing to engage with government services.
'What this does, he said, 'is make a region that feels like home to many African immigrants feel less like home.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Israeli airstrikes kill 55; body of Thai hostage retrieved from Gaza
Israeli airstrikes kill 55; body of Thai hostage retrieved from Gaza

Japan Today

time3 hours ago

  • Japan Today

Israeli airstrikes kill 55; body of Thai hostage retrieved from Gaza

Women react at the site of an Israeli strike on a house, in Gaza City, June 7, 2025. REUTERS/Ebrahim Hajjaj By Maayan Lubell and Jaidaa Taha The Israeli military has retrieved the body of a Thai hostage who had been held in Gaza since Hamas' October 7, 2023 attack, Defence Minister Israel Katz said on Saturday, as Israeli airstrikes killed 55 people, according to local medics. Nattapong Pinta's body was held by a Palestinian militant group called the Mujahedeen Brigades, and was recovered from the area of Rafah in southern Gaza, Katz said. His family in Thailand has been notified. Pinta, an agricultural worker, was abducted from Kibbutz Nir Oz, a small Israeli community near the Gaza border where a quarter of the population was killed or taken hostage during the Hamas attack that triggered the devastating war in Gaza. The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), the U.S.- and Israeli-backed aid group, said on Saturday it was unable to distribute assistance to Palestinian civilians, blaming threats by Hamas, which Gaza's dominant militant group denied. Israel's military said Pinta had been abducted alive and killed by his captors, who had also killed and taken to Gaza the bodies of two more Israeli-American hostages that were retrieved earlier this week. There was no immediate comment from the Mujahedeen Brigades, who have previously denied killing their captives, or from Hamas. The Israeli military said the Brigades were still holding the body of another foreign national. Only 20 of the 55 remaining hostages are believed to still be alive. The Mujahedeen Brigades also held and killed Israeli hostage Shiri Bibas and her two young sons, according to Israeli authorities. Their bodies were returned during a two-month ceasefire, which collapsed in March after the two sides could not agree on terms for extending it to a second phase. The military said on Saturday it had killed As'ad Abu Sharaiya, who served as the head of the Mujahideen, but there was no confirmation from the group. Israel has in recent weeks expanded its offensive across the Gaza Strip as U.S., Qatari and Egyptian-led efforts to secure another ceasefire have faltered. Medics in Gaza said 55 people in total were killed in Israeli airstrikes across the enclave on Saturday. At least 15 Palestinians were killed and 50 wounded by airstrikes in the Gaza City district of Sabra in the northern Gaza Strip on Saturday, local health authorities said. More than one missile landed in the area. The target seemed to have been a multi-floor residential building, but the explosion damaged several other houses nearby, according to witnesses and media. The Israeli military did not immediately comment. It later warned people to evacuate the nearby district of Jabalia, saying it was going to strike there after rockets were launched by militants in the vicinity. The Palestinian Health Ministry said on Saturday that Gaza's hospitals only had fuel for three more days and that Israel was denying access for international relief agencies to areas where fuel storages designated for hospitals are located. There was no immediate response from the Israeli military or COGAT, the Israeli defence agency that coordinates humanitarian matters with the Palestinians. Meanwhile, the Israeli military said it had uncovered "an underground tunnel route, including a command and control center from which senior Hamas commanders" operated beneath the European Hospital compound in southern Gaza. It added that it had located several bodies of militants whose identities were "under examination". The Israeli government and military said last month it had killed Mohammad Sinwar, Hamas' Gaza chief, but Hamas did not confirm his death. The United Nations has warned that most of Gaza's 2.3 million people are at risk of famine after an 11-week Israeli blockade, with the rate of young children suffering from acute malnutrition nearly tripling. Aid distribution was halted on Friday after the GHF said overcrowding had made it unsafe to continue operations. The GHF, which has been fiercely criticised by humanitarian organisations for alleged lack of neutrality, said it was unable to distribute any humanitarian aid on Saturday because Hamas had issued "direct threats" against its operations. "These threats made it impossible to proceed today without putting innocent lives at risk," the GHF said in a statement in which it also said it intended to resume aid distribution "without delay". A Hamas official told Reuters he had no knowledge of such 'alleged threats'. On Wednesday, the GHF suspended operations and asked the Israeli military to review security protocols after Palestinian hospital officials said more than 80 people had been shot dead and hundreds wounded near distribution points between June 1-3. Eyewitnesses blamed Israeli soldiers for the killings. The Israeli military said it fired warning shots on two days, while on Tuesday it said soldiers had fired at Palestinian "suspects" who were advancing towards their positions. The Israeli military said on Saturday that 350 trucks of humanitarian aid belonging to the U.N. and other international relief groups were transferred this week via the Kerem Shalom crossing into Gaza. The war erupted after Hamas-led militants took 251 hostages and killed 1,200 people, most of them civilians, in the October 7, 2023 attack, Israel's single deadliest day. Israel's military campaign has since killed more than 54,000 Palestinians, most of them civilians, according to health authorities in Gaza, and flattened much of the coastal enclave. © Thomson Reuters 2025.

Trump threatens Musk with 'serious consequences' in spending bill row
Trump threatens Musk with 'serious consequences' in spending bill row

Japan Today

time3 hours ago

  • Japan Today

Trump threatens Musk with 'serious consequences' in spending bill row

US President Donald Trump and former top advisor Elon Musk hurled insults at each other in a spectacularly public fallout on social media this week By Sarah TITTERTON US President Donald Trump threatened his former advisor Elon Musk with "serious consequences" Saturday if the tech billionaire seeks to punish Republicans who vote for a controversial spending bill. The comments by Trump to NBC News come after the relationship between the world's most powerful person and the world's richest imploded in bitter and spectacular fashion this week. The blistering break-up -- largely carried out on social media before a riveted public on Thursday -- was ignited by Musk's harsh criticism of Trump's so-called "big, beautiful" spending bill, which is currently before Congress. Some lawmakers who were against the bill had called on Musk -- one of the Republican Party's biggest financial backers in last year's presidential election -- to fund primary challenges against Republicans who voted for the legislation. "He'll have to pay very serious consequences if he does that," Trump, who also branded Musk "disrespectful," told NBC News on Saturday, without specifying what those consequences would be. He also said he had "no" desire to repair his relationship with the South African-born Tesla and SpaceX chief, and that he has "no intention of speaking to him." Just last week, Trump gave Musk a glowing send-off as he left his cost-cutting role at the so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). But their relationship cracked within days as Musk described as an "abomination" the spending bill that, if passed by Congress, could define Trump's second term in office. Trump hit back in an Oval Office diatribe and from, there the row detonated, leaving Washington stunned. With real political and economic risks to their falling out, both had appeared to inch back from the brink on Friday, with Trump telling reporters "I just wish him well," and Musk responding on X: "Likewise." Trump spoke to NBC Saturday after Musk deleted one of the explosive allegations he had made during their fallout, linking the president with disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein. Musk had alleged that the Republican leader is featured in unreleased government files on former associates of Epstein, who died by suicide in 2019 while he faced sex trafficking charges. The Trump administration has acknowledged it is reviewing tens of thousands of documents, videos and investigative material that his MAGA movement says will unmask public figures complicit in Epstein's crimes. Trump was named in a trove of deposition and statements linked to Epstein that were unsealed by a New York judge in early 2024. The president has not been accused of any wrongdoing in the case. "Time to drop the really big bomb: (Trump) is in the Epstein files," Musk posted on his social media platform, X. "That is the real reason they have not been made public." Musk did not reveal which files he was talking about and offered no evidence for his claim. He initially doubled down on the claim, writing in a follow-up message: "Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out." However, he appeared to have deleted both tweets by Saturday morning. Trump dismissed the claim as "old news" in his comments to NBC on Saturday, adding: "Even Epstein's lawyer said I had nothing to do with it." Supporters on the conspiratorial end of Trump's "Make America Great Again" base allege that Epstein's associates had their roles in his crimes covered up by government officials and others. They point the finger at Democrats and Hollywood celebrities, although not at Trump himself. No official source has ever confirmed that the president appears in any of the as yet unreleased material. Trump knew and socialized with Epstein but has denied spending time on Little Saint James, the private redoubt in the U.S. Virgin Islands where prosecutors alleged Epstein trafficked underage girls for sex. "Terrific guy," Trump, who was Epstein's neighbor in both Florida and New York, said in an early 2000s profile of the financier. "He's a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side." © 2025 AFP

Bill Emmott: China shifting from 'wolf warrior' diplomacy in style swap with US
Bill Emmott: China shifting from 'wolf warrior' diplomacy in style swap with US

The Mainichi

time7 hours ago

  • The Mainichi

Bill Emmott: China shifting from 'wolf warrior' diplomacy in style swap with US

By Bill Emmott, independent writer, lecturer and international affairs consultant A few years ago, the talk was about China's "wolf warrior" diplomacy, a term used to describe the aggressive, often coercive style being used by Chinese ambassadors all over the world but especially in the Indo-Pacific. It felt as if the Chinese government simply didn't care about whether other governments liked China or not. This year, however, the Chinese style seems to have changed. To some extent, in fact, that wolf-warrior style has been taken over by the United States. This swapping of styles was displayed clearly at the annual Shangri-La Dialogue of Indo-Pacific defence and security ministers that was hosted by the International Institute for Strategic Studies, a London-based think tank of which I have the honour of being chairman, in Singapore from May 30 to June 1. Pete Hegseth, the U.S. Secretary of Defense, did not use the term "wolf" but in his powerful speech to the Shangri-La Dialogue he talked frequently about reintroducing "the warrior ethos" into the American military and to America's deterrence posture in the region. Unusually for a U.S. Secretary of Defense, he referred specifically to the threats being posed by China in the region and named that country not just as China but as "Communist China," an ideological style rarely heard since the end of the Cold War 35 years ago. This message was perfectly welcome from the point of view of the Indo-Pacific countries, especially traditional security allies such as Japan, South Korea and the Philippines, and other partners in South-East Asia. For decades, the region has been happy to have American warriors helping to keep the peace. But now that American peacekeeping has "wolf" elements attached, albeit chiefly in an area of policy that is outside Secretary Hegseth's remit, trade and other things are feeling less comfortable. Under President Joe Biden's administration, countries often complained that America was not paying sufficient attention to trade and foreign investment, even while it was strengthening its security commitments. Since January, under Donald Trump's administration the complaints have reversed: The huge import tariffs he imposed on countries in the region on his so-called "Liberation Day" of April 2 represent far more attention than the region wanted. In fact, they represent a severe economic blow. Questioned about this at the Shangri-La Dialogue, Secretary Hegseth simply avoided answering by saying that trade was his boss's responsibility, not that of the Department of Defense. He also, however, stated that Trump's foreign policy approach was that America should not be telling other countries what they should be doing -- yet his trade policy appears to many in the region to be doing exactly that. The interesting thing is that instead of attending the Singapore event and exposing that contradiction, China chose to stay away and keep its head down. Unlike in recent years, China chose not to send its minister of national defense, nor even any senior military officers from the People's Liberation Army, and gave no explanation for its seemingly last-minute decision. Each time a Chinese official asked a question, however, it was one about tariffs or about America's treatment of the 10 (soon to be 11 with Timor-Leste joining) members of the Association of South-East Asian Nations (ASEAN). The intention seemed to be to exploit the contradiction in America's approach, but to do so quietly and gently rather than in the wolf-warrior style. This lower-key, more genuinely diplomatic policy was also shown by the fact that one day before the Shangri-La Dialogue China unveiled a new multilateral institution of its own, to be based in Hong Kong: the International Organization for Mediation. A convention to establish the new organization was signed by 30 countries, notably including Indonesia. The likely work of the new organization remains unclear, except that the convention says that it will aim to help resolve international disputes through mediation rather than through existing legal bodies such as the International Court of Justice. It is also not yet clear what sort of disputes might benefit from this mediation, but it is reasonable to suppose that one potential candidate might be the frontier dispute between two ASEAN members, Cambodia and Thailand, a recurrent dispute which led to an exchange of gunfire on May 28 and the death of a Cambodian soldier. Policy contradictions are not unique to the United States. China says that this new organization will aim to reinforce the principles of the United Nations Charter of 1945. Yet the most flagrant breach of those principles in recent years has been the invasion and seizure of Ukraine's sovereign territory by Russia, which is China's strategic partner "without limits," according to the Joint Statement issued by China and Russia three weeks before the attempted military takeover of Ukraine in February 2022. Furthermore, there are no signs of a condemnation by China of Russia's breach of the U.N. Charter nor of China proposing the use of its new mediation organization to try to bring an end to that deadly war. According to Kaja Kallas, the European Union's chief representative for foreign and security policy, China is the source of 80% of Russia's imports of dual-use goods that it needs for its war. Nor has China commented publicly on Russia's use of North Korean troops to fight alongside its own army in this war on the European continent. The other contradiction in China's position is that in the South China Sea, its own navy and coastguards are the most frequent cause of disputes over territorial waters and the reefs beneath them. China is confronting military and civilian ships from the Philippines on a daily basis, and it has ignored a 2016 ruling by the International Court of Arbitration in the Hague over those waters and the U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea. If China chooses during the coming months or years to try to test the "warrior ethos" Secretary Hegseth talked about at the Shangri-La Dialogue, it is likely to do so over its dispute with the Philippines in the South China Sea, to see what Trump's America is willing to do under the terms of its Mutual Defense Treaty of 1951 with the Philippines. Such a test would risk raising the U.S.-China confrontation to a new and dangerous level. Until and unless such a test happens, what we are seeing looks like a new stage in Chinese diplomacy in the Indo-Pacific: to be quiet, to sound cooperative and to provide a market for regional exports that is easier to access than the United States. The "wolf warrior" has, for the time being, been superseded by the friendly, quite reasonable-sounding neighbourhood mediator. Let's see how long this phase lasts.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store