Cheers To China: Three Sisters Brewing Significant Export Growth
What began as a 10,000-can 'sample' order in mid-2024 from a Chinese distributor has grown rapidly, with recent shipments increasing to 20,000 cans.
Award-winning local brewery Three Sisters has been toasting to international success recently, with booming demand from China a resounding endorsement to the quality of their beer.
What began as a 10,000-can 'sample' order in mid-2024 from a Chinese distributor has grown rapidly, with recent shipments increasing to 20,000 cans.
'The initial email came out of the blue,' says founder Joe Emans. 'To be honest, when I initially saw the email, I thought it was spam. That's a really big sample order. It's nearly equivalent to what we'd normally produce every other month.'
The order wasn't just by chance however, as Three Sisters had captured the attention of the distributor thanks to their reputation for top-quality hazies and strong user ratings on the global beer app Untappd, where users can discover new brews and track trending favourites. This visibility helped them stand out in a crowded market.
Fortunately, Emans followed up on that initial email – and the relationship has since flourished.
'China has its own version of Untappd, so they're really in tune with their customers over there,' says Emans. 'Sours in particular have really taken off, making up around 60% of their orders, up from 30% a year ago.'
Emans is no stranger to adapting. Since brewing in his garage with his wife Sarah in 2017, the brewery has expanded three times thanks to some hugely successful crowdfunding campaigns, and they recently launched a popular taproom. Three Sisters has also won numerous national and international awards, including back-to-back Champion International Small Brewery trophies in 2023 and 2024 at the Australian International Beer Awards.
Now, with demand approaching capacity in recent months, another expansion is already in sight.
'We're a small brewery even by national standards, but we're flexible and curious,' says Emans. 'If we're asked for a beer that's a particular colour, with specific flavour notes – we'll make it. We're happy to tailor beers to suit the market, while keeping our creativity and quality at the heart of everything we do.'
Recent global market shifts, including US tariff increases, have made New Zealand beer even more attractive to Chinese distributors, alongside the country's growing reputation in the industry.
The journey from garage to exporter hasn't happened over night though.
'We've had some great help from the community along the way, including from Venture Taranaki who has provided some fantastic support – from providing co-funding for courses on crowdfunding campaigns which have been crucial to expanding our production capacity, to helping us tell our story as a guest on their Podcast series ', says Emans.
Venture Taranaki, the regional development agency, has also supported and explored the potential of a local hops industry through the Branching Out project.
If you're a local business looking for advice or support, check out the range of services offered by Venture Taranaki here: https://www.venture.org.nz/enterprise-and-entrepreneurship/
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
4 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Is it time to curb our fast-fashion addiction?
April saw the 12th anniversary of the Rana Plaza garment factory collapse in Bangladesh, a tragedy that took the lives of more than 1100 workers and left thousands more injured. Structural failures and poor building safety rules were blamed for the disaster. A report highlighted atrocious working conditions and a lack of safety regulations. Ultimately, the collapse became a symbol for the dangers in the production of what has come to be known as 'fast fashion' and sparked a global call for reforms. Workplace safety, supply chain transparency and brand accountability were all in the spotlight, but tangible outcomes have been slow and mixed. The term fast fashion refers to hastily produced and marketed clothing trends that are, for the most part, manufactured in high volume and sold cheaply. It is widely agreed that fast fashion exploits people and the environment. But what does this have to do with Kiwi consumers? A 2023 report prepared for Auckland Council found Aucklanders consume more than 24,000 tonnes of fashion clothing a year, while retaining just 7800 tonnes for continued use and wear. That excess clothing is, in some cases, recycled, but with fewer clothing bins around and second-hand shops not always accepting used clothing, it can be difficult to pass on the unwanted apparel. Estimates suggest Kiwis send about 180,000 tonnes of clothing and textile waste to landfills every year. Last week, US President Donald Trump signed an executive order ending the de minimis trade loophole that allows for low-value goods to be shipped to the US duty-free. This will likely impact fast-fashion online shopping platforms such as Chinese retail giants Temu and Shein, for which the US is a huge market. If, when that US$25 dress becomes US$35, US consumers could well look elsewhere for their cheap clothing fix. If those giant global retailers decide to seek out new markets, Kiwis' desire for the latest fashion trends at a cheap price could make us a sound target. While not all cheaper fashion is unethical, it is perhaps time all of us took a moment to question the provenance of that top, or those shorts, before hitting the pay now button. Sign up to the Daily H, a free newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Scoop
21 hours ago
- Scoop
On New Zealand's Role In The New ANZUS Remake
Want Donald Trump to lower the tariffs on your exports to US markets? Easy. Offer him money. Lots of it. As the New York Times explained yesterday (in a story headlined 'Trump's Demand to Trading Partners: Pledge Money or Get Higher Tariffs) South Korea bought its way to a 10% reduction in its tariff rate by offering to spend $350 billion on US investments, and to purchase $100 billion of liquified natural gas. South Korea is not the only country to make such pledges. Japan said it would establish a $550 billion fund for investments in the United States. The European Union indicated that its companies were poised to invest at least $600 billion. To trade experts, the commitments raise the question of whether Mr. Trump is negotiating with trading partners or trade hostages. One can only hope that the New Zealand diplomats and corporate leaders heading to Washington to beg for leniency on our 15% tariff rate do realise that paying Trump off with large amounts of protection money is the only way to grease the tariff wheel. Think of those billions we recently set aside for new defence spending. Perhaps a few billions committed to Lockheed Martin or Raytheon or General Dynamics might knock a few points off the tariff rate? Keep this scam in mind if, by some miracle, our tariff rate does get reduced. It won't be because of Winston Peters' diplomatic wizardry, or Christopher Luxon's innate will be because we succumbed to a shakedown by the Mafioso-in-Chief, and paid him off. Makes one high would be we willing to bid for a tariff cut? New Movie, Same Actors Previously on AUKUS, Death From Below... back in 2021, Joe Biden, Boris Johnson and Scott Morrison hatched a secret defence pact. The core narrative involved the deployment of a fleet of nuclear submarines to negate the threat he inscrutable Chinese allegedly pose to everything that Australia holds dear: everything from shrimps on the barbie to the rightful dominance of Euro-American civilisation over the heathen hordes of Asia, a threat that's as old as Fu Manchu himself. In this week's episode... in a surprising story twist, it looks as if the fabled Second Pillar of AUKUS (consisting of quantum technology, hypersonics, underwater drones and other James Bond stuff) might have more chance of becoming a reality than the Pillar One that begat it. Basically, AUKUS is/was a reward to the nation of little Aussie battlers for faithful services rendered to Washington. In return, the US agreed to equip Australia with a fleet of super silent Virginia-class nuclear subs to update Canberra's ageing submarine fleet. Keen as mustard, Scott Morrison cancelled an existing submarine contract with France, at great expense. Alas, the story hasn't worked out the way the US had promised in the trailer. Due to the low annual rates of productivity in American shipyards, the US Navy and Australia can't both get these new submarines in a timely fashion. The key risk to AUKUS is that the Americans fail to manufacture enough new Virginia-class boats to enable them to transfer up to five vessels to Australia. The required production rate for that to happen is 2.3 Virginia-class subs per year. Last year, the production rate was below 1.2, and it has never exceeded 2 at any stage in the life of the programme. How come? There are many things to blame: Admiral Jonathan Rucker, the programme executive for the Virginia-class boats, [has] told Congress that workforce was the main issue. 'Our 2024 annual production rate of Virginia-class submarines per year was 1.13 compared to our need of 2.0. The main causes for this are workforce challenges, material and supplier delays, and shipbuilder facilities and infrastructure issues, all of which are driving cost increases and schedule delays.' Under Donald Trump, America's needs always come first. Therefore, it will now be many years (at best) beyond the initial 2034 delivery dates before Australia finally gets its hot new mega-expensive submarine deterrent, long after any Chinese threat to Taiwan has been done and dusted. Oh, and Taiwan is a key reason why Elbridge Colby, Trump's defence policy mastermind has been stalling on AUKUS: After taking the post [at the Pentagon] Colby told his British counterparts that the Royal Navy should focus on threats from Russia and leave the U.S. Navy to lead in the western also helped trigger a review of former President Joe Biden's multibillion-dollar U.S.-U.K.-Australia submarine pact, out of concern that the Australians might not deploy U.S.-provided submarines during a U.S.-led campaign on Chinese forces in the event of an assault on Taiwan. In effect, Colby was saying that Australia (with New Zealand tagging along behind) can't be relied on to go to war with China over Taiwan when expected to do so by Washington. Plainly, if New Zealand is to be allowed into AUKUS, we will similarly need to demonstrate our willingness to take orders from further up the operational chain of command.. and ultimately, that means from Generalissimo Donald Trump, the AUKUS commander in chief. Are we really going to spend billions of taxpayer dollars on defence, in order to be marched into WW3 by Donald Trump? Looks that way. Footnote: Reportedly, we are still very, very annoyed at the Cook Islands for not telling us about the deals with China they announced in February. So much so that we skipped attending their 60th birthday celebrations this week. Talk about a double standard. AUKUS is/was a secret deal struck with the US ,whereby nuclear submarines would pass through Pacific waters en route to intimidating China – but we never told Pacific leaders beforehand, let alone sought their feedback. They only found out about AUKUS on the news. You get the picture. The Cook Islands and Vanuatu are supposed to notify us ahead of time and get our stamp of approval before signing up to any deals with China. Yet at the same time, the neo-colonial powers can do whatever secret military deals they like with the US that affect the region, and tell Pacific nations about it only after the fact. Footnote Two: There is a further story twist in the AUKUS saga. The original band of brothers (Biden, Johnson, Morrison) have all left the political scene. Vladimir Putin though, has changed things for Britain. In the UK's Integrated Defence Review back in 2021, Boris Johnson had happily embraced Biden's 'Indo-Pacific tilt' as being the UK's strategic priority as well. Not any more. As Keir Starmer recently stressed, the UK's defence spending priority is now a 'NATO first' strategy aimed at countering the threat posed by Russia to Ukraine, and to the rest of Europe. Meaning: the 'UK' part of AUKUS has virtually left the building. What is left behind? An old story line is being revived. The former team of the US, Australia and New Zealand are back in combat fatigues, and preparing to kick China's ass. To all intents, AUKUS is an ANZUS reboot, but one that's been shorn of New Zealand's old anti-nuclear misgivings. Luxon, Peters, and Defence Minister Judith Collins now seem more than happy for New Zealand to be actively engaged with a nuclear deterrent that projects its force far beyond our shores. Oh, we'll say we're in it only for the high-tech spin-offs. But you can bet that our access to those good things will be conditional on us agreeing to the rest of it. No doubt, some woke generals will want Japan on board for diversity reasons, to give the pact more credibility in the capitals of Asia. But to repeat: there should be no doubt about would be the boss. In the new JANZUS War Room, there will be no room for 'independent' foreign policy. All of the key operational decisions will be made in Washington. USA, USA! We've all seen that movie. Luther Reborn ( again and again) Talking of the early to mid 1970s, the sweet and soulful lover man Luther Vandross (1951-2005) was an inescapable presence. The recent mega-hit 'Luther' tribute track by Kendrick Lamar and SZA drew creatively on the classic 1973'If This World Were Mine' duet by Vandross and Cheryl Lynn, a song that Marvin Gaye had originally written for the doomed love of his life, Tammi Terrell. OK. So we have the Gaye/Terrell duet as radically re-interpreted by Lynn and Vandross, a version that in turn was sampled and lovingly re-imagined by Kendrick Lamar and SZA. Here's the Vandross/Lynn version : And here's the long version of the Kendrick Lamar/SZA revamp, which ends with a lengthy Vandross/Lynn sample : It doesn't end there. Last week, the alt-folk musicians Sam Beam (aka Iron & Wine) and Ben Bidwell of Band of Horses released an Americana version of 'Luther.' At the very least, they deserve some points for trying:
Scoop
a day ago
- Scoop
Public Service Association Endorses Government's War Agenda
New Zealand's largest trade union, the Public Service Association (PSA), is fervently supporting moves to roughly double the military budget in preparation for war. Under the guise of seeking to protect jobs in the NZ Defence Force (NZDF), the union has denounced the National Party-led government, from the right, for not maintaining a strong enough military to join the coming US-led war against China. The NZDF confirmed on July 21 that it intends to cut 255 civilian jobs. They include roles in the army, air force, strategy, financial, health and safety, defence college, joint defence services, joint support group, chief of staff office and veterans affairs. It brings a total of one in ten positions axed in the last year, including 'voluntary' redundancies. A further 45 may also be cut. At the same time, a major escalation of military front-line capability, equipment and weaponry is under way. With the support of the opposition Labour Party, the government plans to nearly double defence spending from just over 1 percent to 2 percent of gross domestic product (GDP), a $NZ9 billion increase, in line with demands of the US Trump administration and NATO powers. Defence Minister Judith Collins last week told graduating army recruits to prepare for the real possibility of combat 'as the world faces its most complex and volatile global environment in decades.' Nearly 700 NZDF troops this month joined the massive Talisman Sabre exercise in Australia, a multi-national dress rehearsal for war against China. A NZDF spokesperson told Stuff they were 'reprioritising' the workforce to focus on 'maintaining combat readiness' and 'delivering core military activities.' It is establishing 276 new civilian roles while disestablishing 281 currently filled with a further 250 vacant positions not replaced. The PSA criticised the cuts from the standpoint of promoting the government's vast military buildup. The union's national secretary Fleur Fitzsimons condemned the cuts as 'incredibly shortsighted' and 'not how you build a modern, combat-ready defence force at a time of rising security risks.' Fitzsimmons added that civilian defence workers were needed to support new investment in military equipment and technology and warned the cuts would force 'those in uniform to pick up the work of the civilian workers. That is not what they signed up to do and won't help NZDF improve retention.' Fitzsimons commented: 'This is all about saving money, not strengthening security. It doesn't make any sense when tensions are rising across the Asia Pacific area and in Europe… It was only a few months ago that a warship from China was in the Tasman Sea.' In February a 'live fire' exercise by three Chinese warships in nearby international waters was seized upon by the New Zealand and Australian governments, along with the corporate media, to stoke hysteria about an escalating 'threat' posed by Beijing and to justify the military spend-up. The US and its allies routinely carry out naval drills in waters close to the Chinese mainland. The pro-war position advanced by Fitzsimons is thoroughly anti-working class. It expresses the reactionary nationalist outlook of the labour and trade union bureaucracies at home and abroad that are closely integrated with the capitalist state. In May, Spain's General Union of Workers (UGT) and Workers' Commissions (CCOO), the two largest trade union federations, threw their full support behind the European Union's plans for mass rearmament, aligning themselves with the European establishment's preparations for war against Russia. In the US, the leader of the United Auto Workers Union, Shawn Fain, a rabid Trump supporter, has cited the collaborationist labour mobilisation of the American economy during World War II as the model for today's trade unions. There is mass opposition to war, witnessed in the ongoing protests against the genocide in Gaza. In every country, however, including in New Zealand, the union bureaucracy has refused to take any action to stop the supply of weapons and other materials for Israel's war machine. All the imperialist powers are involved the rapidly escalating wars that are engulfing the globe. New Zealand is no exception. A minor imperialist power in the Pacific and a US ally, it is part of the US-led Five Eyes spying network; NZ troops are in Britain training Ukrainian conscripts to fight Russia; and NZ forces are involved in repeated provocative military exercises aimed against China. The trade union apparatus supports the war drive of its 'own' national bourgeoisie because it represents the interests of a privileged layer of the upper middle class, whose wealth is bound up with enhancing the position of NZ imperialism. Unmentioned by Fitzsimons and other union leaders is the fact that the massive armaments upgrades can only be carried out at the expense of the social conditions and basic rights of the entire working class. The PSA is an accomplice in the deepening attacks on jobs and conditions among public sector workers. Prior to the 2023 election the union openly supported Labour's own plan to slash public service budgets by up to 4 percent as 'a prudent move to tighten the belt'—as PSA leader Duane Leo put it in a Radio NZ interview. Fitzsimons was a Labour candidate in that election. In the past 18 months, NZ's far-right government has launched a scorched earth policy against all the social services on which the working class depends. Over 10,000 public sector jobs have been eliminated with no serious resistance from the PSA, which has over 95,000 members, or any of the unions. With unemployment increasing from 3.6 percent in 2023 to 5.1 percent this month and forecast to continue rising, the government is increasingly despised. The right-wing nationalist NZ First and libertarian ACT Parties—which are part of the National-led coalition government—are leading the assault on the working class, despite gaining only 6.08 percent and 8.6 percent respectively of the popular vote in 2023. A broad-based mobilisation against job losses in the public and private sectors would win widespread support in the working class. The government's 2024 budget was handed down amid nationwide protests. In the capital, Wellington, a crowd of 7,000 descended onto parliament grounds while protests coincided with a two-day strike over pay by 2,500 junior doctors. Since then, the unions have dissipated the opposition, with the Council of Trade Unions boasting a purported new 'policy vision' that will be unveiled for the 2026 elections. The corporatist unions have enforced the thousands of job cuts. The PSA's strategy has been to take a handful of legal cases in the Employment Relations Authority, including against the Ministry of Education (MoE) and Health NZ, over the way in which the cuts have been managed. Instead of challenging mass layoffs, the union insists that they are carried out according to provisions in employment agreements which require 'consultation' with the unions. PSA spokesman Leo declared the MoE had rushed through its restructure without complying with the collective agreement, which requires the MoE and PSA to first 'try to agree to the outcomes of cost-cutting exercises and present that view to the management of the MoE.' The fight against austerity cannot be separated from the struggle against war. The demand must be raised for the vast resources being wasted on the military to be redirected to solve the crisis in public education and healthcare, and to put an end to poverty and homelessness. But to carry forward a real fight against war and austerity, workers and young people must recognise who their enemies are. They face a political struggle against not only the National Party-led government, but also the opposition Labour Party and its allies—the Greens, Te Pāti Māori, the various pseudo-left organisations—and the union bureaucracy. The PSA's open support for escalating war preparations against China underscores the urgent need for workers to build new organisations that they themselves control. Rank-and-file committees should be established in every workplace, independent of the union apparatus, to mobilise the working class against militarism and war, and to defend jobs, working conditions and vital public services. This fight must be informed by a socialist political perspective, aimed at putting an end to the capitalist system, which is plunging the world into war.
