Temples of social justice
Religious endowments law
Through the Religious Endowment and Escheats Regulation 1817, the East India Company set up the earliest legislative architecture around regulation of religious endowments. When the British Crown assumed direct control over Indian territories in 1858, Queen Victoria issued a proclamation stating that the sovereign would restrict interference in religious affairs. This was necessary as there was concern about losing face from the 1857 Sepoy Mutiny, which was triggered by religious issues.
However, the withdrawal of the British government from religious affairs was not complete. In fact, in the Madras Presidency, various British officials argued for continued oversight of religious endowments. Finally, the British government settled for a balanced approach: the sovereign would not interfere with practices that were essentially religious, such as rituals, but would exercise control over the lands and secular aspects of the religious endowments.
The idea of the government supervising religious institutions came to be crystallised when the Justice Party was elected in 1920. One of the earliest legislative interventions by the Justicites was Bill No. 12 of 1922: Hindu Religious Endowments Act. When it was introduced in the Madras Legislative Council, it faced opposition, mainly due to the provision in the law that allowed surplus temple funds to be diverted for other purposes.
The nub of the issue was whether funds provided to a temple could be used for secular purposes. The matter was debated and settled in 1925, when the law was enacted. Since then, every revised version of the plenary law, including the current law — The Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959 — has retained the provision of surplus funds.
Also read | Activist alleges 'criminal misappropriation' of temple funds by T.N. HR&CE Dept, Madras High Court calls for response
Section 36 of the 1959 Act permits the trustees of religious institutions to appropriate any surplus funds for any purposes listed under the law, with the prior sanction of the Commissioner. 'Surplus' means any amount remaining after adequate provisions have been made for the maintenance of the temple and training of its officials. The Act also empowers the Joint Commissioner or the Deputy Commissioner to appropriate funds in cases where the original purpose has become impossible to fulfil.
Endowments to temples have a long and rich history. Temples received lavish donations from the sovereign rulers from as far back as in 970 AD, when the Chola empire was at its peak. Historian Anirudh Kanisetti writes that Sembiyan Mahadevi, a Chola queen, made strategic donations of land and kind to temples. The practice continued during the Vijayanagara kingdom. Temples were not just places of worship; they were socio-cultural hubs and were also used for educational purposes. This is confirmed by the inscriptions on temple walls and the spacious mandapams (pillared halls) which were used to hold educational or cultural events. So the original intent argument would also support the theory of utilising temple resources for educational purposes.
The 1959 Act has been tested and upheld by constitutional courts. Among the permissible uses of surplus funds under the 1959 Act is the establishment and maintenance of universities or colleges (Section 66). These educational institutions are also required to make available the study of the Hindu religion or Hindu temple architecture. Seen within this framework, building colleges from temple funds is not only legal, but a logical extension of these provisions.
Social justice legacy
The controversy around the use of temple funds cannot be restricted to discussing legal propositions, however; it also carries ideological and sociopolitical significance. In the pre-colonial era, the motivation for the rulers to support large-scale endowments was that the temples acted as channels through which State resources could be allotted for important welfare projects. Through colonial rule, the British East India Company and the Crown viewed sovereign involvement in the management of temple affairs as necessary for reasons of revenue and maintenance of local control.
Over the last century, the Self-Respect Movement, which emerged from the Madras Presidency, viewed the regulation of temples and oversight of their resources as a critical feature of anti-caste reforms. Without this, there would have been no temple entry legislation in 1936 and 1947. Today, Tamil Nadu and Kerala are among the few States where governments have appointed priests from backward classes after a prolonged legal struggle.
Ultimately, any argument against government control of temple affairs would be striking at the root of social justice. The role of the government in ensuring that surplus funds are appropriated in a lawful manner is settled. Any reversal of this would only result in a set back of the long legacy of social justice and religious reforms that south India has pioneered.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The Hindu
20 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Congress leader Lakshmana blames Centre for GST notice on petty traders in Karnataka
Karnataka Pradesh Congress Committee (KPCC) spokesperson M. Lakshmana on Tuesday sought to lay the blame for small traders receiving notices from the Commercial Taxes Department at the Centre's doorstep by claiming that the Goods and Services Tax (GST) came under the purview of Union government. Even though Commercial Tax Department functioned under the State government, the notices had been issued in accordance with the guidelines issued by the Centre under the GST Act, which was brought into force in 2017, said Mr. Lakshmana while speaking to the presspersons outside the GST office in Mysuru on Tuesday. Extending the Congress party's support to the agitating small traders, Mr. Lakshmana accused the BJP of spreading misinformation on the notices issued by the Commercial Tax Department and blaming the Congress government. 'If you have any respect, you should clarify', he told BJP leaders. Citing Section 22 of the GST Act, Mr. Lakshmana said suppliers of goods are liable to be registered under the Act if their aggregate turnover crosses ₹40 lakh in a financial year. Recalling that the Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha and Congress MP Rahul Gandhi had criticised GST in the Parliament and described it as 'Gabbar Singh Tax' as it provides for 'removing money from the pockets of the poor', Mr. Lakshmana regretted that people did not bother to listen to him when he pointed out that one item was being taxed multiple times under GST regime. He demanded a clarification with regard to the notices issued to small traders from Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman and Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Mr. Lakshmana also took exception to the statement issued by Joint Commissioner of Commercial Taxes Meera Pandit that the traders can be given a reprieve only if the Centre and the State government come to a solution. Describing Ms. Pandit as an 'IRS officer, who is an employee of the Union government,' Mr. Lakshmana said the statement issued by her was 'misleading'. 'It is not our tax. It is Centre's tax', the KPCC spokesperson sought to clarify. Campaign against ED The Congress leaders gathered outside the office of Lokayukta Superintendent of Police in Mysuru on Tuesday and displayed 'Satyameva Jayate' placards claiming victory against the BJP's sustained campaign to foist a false case against Chief Minister Siddaramaiah and his wife in the MUDA case. With regard to the critical remarks by the Supreme Court against 'misuse' of the Directorate of Enforcement (ED) by the BJP in the alleged Mysuru Urban Development Authority (MUDA) case against Mr. Siddaramaiah's wife, Mr. Lakshmana said the Congress party is planning a campaign against ED. Claiming that the apex court's observations should bring 'shame' to an autonomous institution like ED, 'which had been misused by the BJP for its political purposes', Mr. Lakshmana said the Congress party will be devising a plan of action to create awareness among the general public about the misuse of ED by the BJP.


Indian Express
20 minutes ago
- Indian Express
After plans to ban Rottweilers and pitbulls, Goa govt introduces Bill to prohibit breeding of ‘ferocious' animals
The Goa government has introduced a Bill in the Legislative Assembly aimed at prohibiting domestication, breeding and regulation of 'ferocious' animals. The Bill, titled 'The Goa Animal Breeding and Domestication (Regulation and Compensation) Act, 2025', proposes that the government may declare any breed or class of animals to be a 'ferocious animal' through a notification published in the Official Gazette. Earlier this month, Goa Chief Minister Pramod Sawant had announced that the Cabinet gave the nod to a Bill that proposes to ban the import, sale and breeding of certain 'ferocious' dog breeds in the state. In February, the Cabinet approved a ban on the Rottweiler and pitbull breeds following a spate of incidents of dog bites. The Statement of Objects and Reasons of the new Bill states, 'The Bill seeks to provide for regulation of breeding and domestication of animals…The Bill seeks to prohibit domestication and breeding of ferocious animals.' The proposed Bill defines a 'ferocious animal' as meaning 'dangerous and violent animal which may pose a danger to humans and other animals'. It says the government, before issuing a notification to declare any breed or class of animals as 'ferocious', shall issue a public notice inviting objections from the public. 'No person after issuance of notification…shall domesticate, breed or cause to breed any animal of the breed or class specified in the said notification. No person after issuance of notification…shall bring or cause to bring in the state of Goa, an animal of the breed or class as specified in such notification,' the proposed Bill says. It also mandates owners of notified 'ferocious' animals to inform in writing to the Director of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Services department about the ferocious animal in their possession within a month from the publication of the notification. 'The owner of the animal which is declared to be a ferocious animal…shall be solely responsible for the actions of such a ferocious animal and he shall also be liable if such ferocious animal injures any other human or animal,' the proposed Bill says. It adds that owners must sterilise such animals within 60 days from the issuance of notification and that the Director (of Animal Husbandry) will then issue a certificate confirming that the animal has been duly sterilised. In case a person suffers an injury or is killed by a 'ferocious' animal, the Bill states that the legal representative of the deceased person can file a claim for compensation against the owner of the animal. The Bill proposes a punishment of simple imprisonment, which may extend to three months, but shall not be less than 15 days, Rs 50,000 fine, and community service for those who domesticate or breed animals in contravention of the provisions of the proposed Act. It states that the court may, in its discretion, order an accused to render community service in lieu of imprisonment. The issue of dog bites came to prominence in Goa after a number of incidents in recent months. In January, a 40-year-old man suffered injuries after he was bitten by a pet Rottweiler at Assagao in North Goa. After the incident, the Assagao village panchayat issued a notice requesting owners of certain breeds (pitbulls and Rottweilers) 'not to leave and roam with their pets in open public places'. In August last year, a seven-year-old boy died after he was fatally attacked by a pitbull in North Goa's Anjuna. The boy had accompanied his mother, who worked as a domestic help, to her employer's house where he was bit by the dog on the neck and body. The incident had sparked outrage and a clamour for stricter regulations, including a ban on certain dog breeds.


Indian Express
20 minutes ago
- Indian Express
World Bank Report: By 2030, Indian cities to create 70% of jobs but may lose $5 bn to floods; need greater autonomy to counter climate risks
Indian cities will need some autonomy to invest effectively in climate change adaptation and mitigation, according to Auguste Tano Kouame, the World Bank's Country Director for India. Cities with more decision-making power have performed better than average, he said on Tuesday at the launch of a report on building urban climate resilience. The report, prepared by the World Bank in collaboration with the Union Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs, estimates Indian cities will require $2.4 trillion by 2050 to build climate-resilient infrastructure and services. 'In order for cities to invest in resilience, adaptation, and mitigation, they need to have some kind of autonomy to make decisions and implement them. Some people think this can be achieved only by fully implementing the 74th Amendment, others disagree,' Kouame said at a media briefing. The 74th Constitutional Amendment Act of 1992 gave constitutional status to Urban Local Bodies (ULBs) to strengthen local self-governance. However, official audits as recently as 2022 have found that several states have yet to fully implement its provisions. While the World Bank does not have an official view on this, Kouame said 'some version' of the 74th Amendment could be considered. 'It doesn't have to be implemented in the same fashion across all states. It depends on local conditions and several other factors,' he added. 'The truth is that when you look across India, cities that have been given autonomy by the states to make decisions and manage themselves have done well. They've done better than average. They've been able to mobilise resources, monetise assets, and increase sources of revenue,' Kouame said, adding that devolution of power also improves accountability. The report titled Towards Resilient and Prosperous Cities in India projects that the country's urban population will nearly double to 951 million by 2050, and that by 2030, cities will account for 70 per cent of all new employment generated. In addition to the rapid pace of urbanisation, Indian cities will face two major shocks in a business-as-usual scenario — flooding and extreme heat — according to Asmita Tiwari, who co-authored the report with Natsuko Kikutake. 'We found that the flood risk is growing rapidly. Not only are cities growing into areas that are exposed to flooding, they are also building more concrete structures and pavings that restrict the amount of rainwater the ground can absorb,' Tiwari said, referring to pluvial flooding. According to the report, annual pluvial flood-related losses can amount to $5 billion by 2030 and $30 billion by 2070 if cities don't invest in adaptation. A conservative estimate for supporting 60 per cent of high-risk cities with flood resilience measures over the next 15 years is $150 billion, it added. 'We also looked into 10 large cities in India, from the period 1983-1990 to 2010-2016, and found that exposure to dangerous extreme heat stress has increased by 71 per cent. Along with that, there is the urban heat island impact — which makes cities warmer at night because they have concrete structures and roads that absorb heat and release it at night,' Tiwari said. Heat-related deaths can double to over 3 lakh each year by 2050 due to global warming and the urban heat island phenomenon, the report said. Measures like shifting working hours to early morning and late afternoon, urban greening, early warning systems, and cool roofs can save over 1.3 lakh lives, it added. The report makes several recommendations for national- and state-level interventions, including boosting private sector engagement, creating a financing roadmap, and setting standards to build municipal capacities. For cities, it calls for risk evaluation and the mobilisation of capital — including private investment — to support mitigation and adaptation efforts. Aggam Walia is a Correspondent at The Indian Express, reporting on power, renewables, and mining. His work unpacks intricate ties between corporations, government, and policy, often relying on documents sourced via the RTI Act. Off the beat, he enjoys running through Delhi's parks and forests, walking to places, and cooking pasta. ... Read More