Crongton creator Alex Wheatle dies aged 62 after prostate cancer
Alex Wheatle, who wrote a string of books about life on London's streets for young black men including the Crongton series, has died at the age of 62 after having prostate cancer.
The author, who was known as the 'Brixton Bard', was diagnosed with the condition in 2023, and campaigned for awareness of the cancer.
Born on January 3 1963, Wheatle grew up in children's homes and began by writing lyrics then progressed to poetry, short stories and novels.
He was also known for being part of the 1981 Brixton riot – which saw him being sent to prison, and inspired Sir Steve McQueen to direct the film Alex Wheatle about the writer's life for the anthology series Small Axe.
View this post on Instagram
A post shared by Alex Wheatle (@alexwheatle)
Wheatle would later contribute to the BBC programme Battle For Brixton, and put out the fiction book East Of Acre Lane about the events.
His first novel, Brixton Rock, about a troubled London teenager getting to grips with finding his family, was published in 1999.
Wheatle's A Crongton Story series, about children growing up on a council estate and facing gang wars and other struggles, has been made into the upcoming BBC show Crongton – set to begin airing on Monday.
His family posted on his Instagram, saying: 'It is with great sadness to inform you that Alex Wheatle our 'Brixton Bard' sadly passed away on Sunday March 16 2025 after his fight with Prostate Cancer.
'Alex has 26 years of legacy for you all to continue and enjoy by reading his novels, watch again the self-titled episode Alex Wheatle from the Small Axe TV series and also watch the new upcoming Crongton TV series as he looks over us in spirit.
'Alex's family would like to thank you all for your support over the years in his work and we ask that you respect our privacy during this difficult time.'
Fellow Prostate Cancer UK supporter and actor Colin McFarlane said he was 'shocked and saddened'.
He added: 'Sadly, tragic deaths like these are all too common. We're losing far too many beloved Dads, brothers, sons, and friends to the most common cancer in men, simply because too many are diagnosed too late – and the situation is at its worst when it comes to black men.
'On several occasions when I met Alex, we talked about the desperate need for a national screening programme, and for GPs to be empowered to reach out and speak to black men about their higher risk and their right to a PSA blood test.
View this post on Instagram
A post shared by Prostate Cancer UK (@prostatecanceruk)
'Prostate cancer is curable if it is diagnosed earlier, and one day I hope we can stop losing brilliant men like Alex to this disease.'
Wheatle joined Prostate Cancer UK in calling for the Government to overhaul NHS guidelines to allow GPs to proactively start conversations with black men about their increased risk of prostate cancer and their options for a quick and simple PSA blood test from the age of 45.
Keith Morgan, associate director of Black Health Equity at Prostate Cancer UK, said: 'We're deeply saddened to hear of the loss of Alex Wheatle MBE.
'Our hearts go out to his family, friends, and the thousands he inspired through his work and activism.
'His book East Of Acre Lane had a big impact on me growing up as a young man in London, and his powerful words will live on to inspire the next generation.
'I'm proud to have worked with him later in life as he used his platform, and his own shocking late-stage diagnosis, to raise vital awareness of prostate cancer and campaign for change.'
He added that one in four 'black men will get prostate cancer, double the risk of other men', and said that men like Wheatle 'are dying twice as much from a cancer that is treatable if caught early'.
When he received his honour in 2008 for services to literature, Wheatle said: 'I know some people might say the MBE's got 'empire' on it, but there is no British empire any more.
'But more importantly, it shows young kids coming up that they can achieve and you can be successful.'
View this post on Instagram
A post shared by Hachette Children's Group (@hachettechildrens)
On Instagram, publisher Hachette Children's Group said they were 'incredibly saddened', and added that he 'leaves behind a legacy of rich and powerful' stories.
'We are extremely proud at Hachette Children's Group to publish Alex's acclaimed and award-winning Crongton series,' the statement also said.
'He will be remembered for his astonishing creative talent, enormous generosity to other writers and his ability to bring joy to any room.
'We will miss him very much and our thoughts are with his family and friends at this difficult time.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gizmodo
an hour ago
- Gizmodo
‘Doctor Who' Utterly Wasted Belinda Chandra
Varada Sethu's addition to the TARDIS was a jolt of energy 'Doctor Who' needed—but it bafflingly transformed her into the modern era's most squandered companion. When the latest season of Doctor Who kicked off, the most exciting thing about it wasn't even its premiere story, or what was being set up to lead towards the season's grand finale: it was the arrival of Varada Sethu as Belinda Chandra, promising to shake up the Doctor/companion dynamic in a way it hadn't been in years. But now that the season is over, and Doctor Who lies amid a litany of narrative and production messes lurching towards an uncertain future, one of its biggest of all is just how it completely and utterly wasted Belinda's character. A young nurse balancing the rigorous demands of her career with the sudden tumult of being thrust into a suitably ludicrous Doctor Who narrative—abducted by giant robots and whisked off into space to become a planetary ruler and forcibly thrust into a horrific arranged marriage—Belinda's arrival in 'The Robot Revolution' immediately bucked the trends of most Doctor Who companion debuts, especially in the modern era. After initial moments of fear and hesitation, life in the Doctor's orbit is, more often than not, too mesmerizing to resist: 45 minutes to an hour later everyone from Rose Tyler to Ruby Sunday is ready to step inside the TARDIS, remark on its interior's size, and run straight forward into adventures in time and space. And yet, while Belinda ends up in the blue box just like the rest of them, she challenges the Doctor, both from his own perspective and that of the audience, every step of the way. The Belinda of 'The Robot Revolution' isn't obstinate for the sake of it or anything, but she rightfully pushes the Doctor's assumption that his way, his default of being the person that everyone in the room should listen to unquestionably, isn't the only way. It made for a remarkable chemistry between the Doctor and Belinda, and not just for Ncuti Gatwa and Varada Sethu's own sparkling charisma (the latter certainly cannot be blamed for the narrative choices the show makes with her character), but because you really see them feel out each other over the course of the episode, figuring out where lines are drawn between them—and it's Belinda drawing the lines. The Doctor's charm offensive, which has by and large driven so many of those initial sparks in the companion/Doctor relationship, simply does not work on Belinda. It all culminates in a brilliant final moment in that debut episode to set the tone going forward: calling him out for invading her privacy, for not thinking to ask people consent, for brazenly trying to dazzle her in the same way he'd clearly dazzled many people before her. There is clearly some part of Belinda that likes the Doctor; she's not actively horrified or disdainful of him, but she makes it clear he crosses lines, and the world he operates in (or rather worlds) are dangerous. She wants home, and the only thing that stops that is the fact that they can't get there—the adventures along the way aren't her signing up for this dazzling new life, but a necessity to get what she wants. It's a shame then, that this version of Belinda by and large stops existing halfway through her season of Doctor Who. Of course, she was always going to soften in her appraisal of the Doctor the longer she spent with him, but the show plays an awkward balancing act where both Belinda moves on from this challenging almost inorganically—arguably she is totally fine with traveling with the Doctor by the end of the second episode, 'Lux,' but even after the darkness of 'The Well' an episode later she is truly into the default companion mode—and because the season then also starts suddenly having to balance in dedicating its limited runtime to episodes about Ruby like 'Lucky Day,' or 'The Story and the Engine,' where Belinda is barely part of the narrative. For many of the other thorny narrative issues it has, by the time the season is heading into its endgame in 'The Interstellar Song Contest,' the version of Belinda we get there, where her reaction to the Doctor crossing a distinct moral line in aggressively torturing his 'foe' in Kid, is far from the woman who called him out for scanning her without asking her in 'The Robot Revolution,' willing to effectively rubber-stamp the Doctor's actions as a moment of duress. Which would be disappointing, but fine if Doctor Who replaced that initial skeptical archetype with anything, but instead Belinda is pushed into a void, a generic 'companion.' We don't learn anything about her, really, other than the fact that she wants to get home. But all that is before the real injustice comes in the two-part season finale. In its first part, 'Wish World', Belinda is transformed by the reality imposed by Conrad—the asshole villain weirdo who stalked Ruby in 'Lucky Day'—onto the earth into the Doctor's matronly wife. The reality is presented by the text as aberrant and dystopian, a world where every woman exists to be a good daughter, a good wife to her husband, and then a willing mother dutifully raising the next generation of daughters to follow in that exact same mold. In 'Wish World,' Belinda's one-note definition as mother to her and the Doctor's child, Poppy, is reflective of Conrad's retrograde views about women, filing them down into a single trait that is subservient to a traditionalist, conservative patriarchal power balance. The fact that Belinda, Poppy's mom, is not Belinda, the Doctor's companion that we've followed over the course of this season, is meant to be disturbing, to be something we want her to break free of and recognise the trap she, the Doctor, and the rest of the world in. 'The Reality War' instead decides that reducing Belinda to this singular trait—altered reality or otherwise—is Good, Actually. The second Belinda is freed from Conrad's world, her sole dramatic trait is reminding us that she is Poppy's mother and that that is all that she cares about, regardless of the chaos beginning to unfold around her on the Doctor, to the point that she literally tells him that she can't help him in his fight against the Rani. The episode metaphorically and literally shoves her in a box so Ruby can take on the primary companion role, safeguarding her and Poppy from any reversions to the original reality that might render the latter erased as quickly as she was wished into being. She's only allowed out the box when the day is saved, and again, she reverts to this matriarchal character, both when it initially seems like she, the Doctor, and Poppy might travel together, and then when Poppy vanishes from reality and the Doctor choses to sacrifice his life to bring her back. There is a lot of 'Reality War' that is an absolute mess, but little of it feels quite as insulting as what it does to Belinda's character. Having a character for whom motherhood is important is not the issue here; there is plenty that could've been done with a companion that's a mother (we certainly got a particularly involved version of that with Amy's arc in the Steven Moffat era!). It's that Doctor Who essentially took the Belinda it had—who, by episode count and other narrative decisions, had already been losing her sense of an arc—wiped her clean, and then metaphorically stamped 'mom' on her forehead, and left her like that for the episode's final act. An act that is now our farewell to the character, one that even attempts to retroactively 'reveal' that Belinda's arc was always about returning home to Poppy via a series of flashbacks to prior scenes from the season altered to now have Belinda add 'for Poppy' to the end of every mention of her desire to get back to Earth. That's not an actual character arc, or even an interesting recontextualization that reframes what the audience had already seen in new light. It's a literal re-write of what the audience already saw! After telling us the week prior that it was wrong for Conrad to impose, without consent, a patriarchal gender role on Belinda, Doctor Who itself has the Doctor do exactly that to Belinda, re-write all of reality to make her into a single mom. The Belinda Chandra we met in 'The Robot Revolution' doesn't exist any more, not just because the show whittled down her character into nothingness, but because the show concludes her arc by rewriting her existence so that that Belinda never existed in the first place. There's even a dark mirror in the final moments of that arc, when the Doctor does exactly to Poppy what he did to Belinda in the climax of 'The Robot Revolution': medically scan her with his alien technology without a single thought to ask if he was allowed to first. It's just that this time not only does Belinda not challenge him, she doesn't react at all. She is 'just' Poppy's mother now, with no thought or feeling given to her beyond that description. Again, a having a female character to whom being a parent is important is not the issue with what Doctor Who did with Belinda. There were so many ways the series could've given this ending to her storyline and actually organically laid out a path to it across the season. Perhaps have her slowly realize over time that something, someone is missing from her memories of her life on Earth, to struggle with the feeling that she has to get back to Earth as soon as possible while not fully grasping why, to eventually play with the reality manipulation that the finale hangs its dramatic stakes on. Instead, the show started with a completely different idea and dynamic for her—one brimming with potential it almost immediately decided not to capitalize on—before slowly but surely pushing her further and further to the fringes of its priorities over the course of the season. Belinda was never given the chance to grow and change over her time in the TARDIS, to challenge, and to be challenged by, life at the Doctor's side. Her final ending was just the last nail in a coffin Doctor Who had been building for Belinda's character as we'd known her in that first episode for a while, whether that was its narrative intent or otherwise—and ultimately just one extra failure to add to the season's list of many.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
ITV The Chase's Bradley Walsh says 'wow' after hearing contestant's impressive job
Bradley Walsh said "wow" when one player revealed what he does for a day job. Jack, Dorrett, Kim and Simon made up the team of four contestants who were keen to test their general knowledge skills on the hit ITV quiz show. Simon from Oxfordshire was first up to take on The Chaser, who in this case was Anne Hegarty aka The Governess. But first, Bradley Walsh was lost for words when he heard what the contestant does as his day job. Simon explained he had worked for 30 years in the Royal Air Force. The ITV presenter asked what rank he was, suggesting roles such as "Commander." But Simon replied: "I'm an air vice marshal." READ MORE: No fire extinguishers in block of flats where blaze broke out READ MORE: BBC series dubbed 'show of the summer' starring Scouser will be your next binge-watch Bradley Walsh was taken aback as he said: "You're an air vice marshal! No you're not." Simon joked: "I'm surprised too." Brad turned to the team and said: "Wow." He added: "An air vice marshal that's big news guys." The impressive position is a senior officer rank, above air commodore and below air marshal. It is equivalent to the rank of rear admiral in the Royal Navy or major general in the army. When the host came to terms with Simon's impressive role, he continued the regular game-play as Simon tackled the Cash Builder round. He accumulated an impressive £6,000 and bagged himself a spot in the final. Simon returned to his teammates and kickstarted the shared cash prize pot ahead of Kim's turn to take on The Governess. She gave a great performance and earned £5,000 for the team. However, her time on the ITV show came to an unfortunate end when she was caught by The Chaser. She soon heard Bradley's dreaded words: "For you, The Chase is over" and she left the show empty-handed. Dorrett was next up who hoped to make a better impression against The Governess. She proved her general knowledge skills as she joined Simon in the final and increased the prize pot to £11,000. Jack was eager to join the quizzers after he accumulated an impressive £8,000 in the Cash Builder. He gave a great performance against The Chaser and secured his spot alongside Simon and Dorrett. With the cash pot now standing at £19,000, the three quizzers tested their luck in the final chase. But their score of 17 was not strong enough to triumph against The Governess, and they were caught with just one second remaining. The Chase airs weekdays at 5pm ITV1 and ITVX
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Queen Camilla Reportedly 'Stays Out' Of Prince Harry And King Charles' Rift After Duke Labeled Her A 'Villain'
Queen Camilla is reportedly distancing herself amid escalating tensions between King Charles and Prince Harry, intensified by the duke's bombshell BBC interview and memoir "Spare." Sources also recently shared that Charles lacks trusted advisers who can encourage reconciliation, while Prince William reportedly opposes mending ties. Prince Harry has since been urged by royal commentators to keep a "dignified silence," warning his public comments damage trust. Queen Camilla is avoiding the growing tensions between King Charles and his estranged son, Prince Harry. According to palace insiders who spoke to People Magazine, the 77-year-old queen "stays out of" the ongoing family feud, especially after coming under heavy criticism in Harry's explosive memoir "Spare." In the book, the Duke of Sussex described his stepmother as "dangerous" and "the villain," accusing her of leaking stories to the media to protect her public image. Additionally, sources suggest the rift between Harry and his family recently intensified following a BBC interview in which Harry's remarks were seen as damaging to any remaining trust between him and his ailing father. Although the interview may not have been intended as a direct attack, royal commentator Valentine Low noted, "it would be seen as one." She added that "It makes Charles reaching out even harder." Royal expert Sally Bedell Smith also noted that both Charles and Prince William "don't trust Harry and Meghan with any kind of confidential conversation." Catherine Mayer, author of "Charles: The Heart of a King," echoed this sentiment, warning that "If you have that level of breach in a family, and you are estranged, you run that risk every day of having something unfathomable to deal with." According to People, Charles isn't expected to make the first move to reconcile with Harry largely because he's not surrounded by advisers pushing for reconciliation. Royal commentator Valentine Low shared that the monarch lacks a "good angel in his ear to say, 'Be a good dad and make the first move.'" Further complicating the situation is William, who, after being heavily criticized in Harry's memoir "Spare," reportedly has no interest in repairing their relationship. Sources suggest that the Prince of Wales is firmly against any efforts to reconnect. Meanwhile, royal commentator Joe Little believes Harry's chances of mending his fractured relationship with the royal family may be slipping away, and suggests the Duke of Sussex would be better served by keeping a "dignified silence." Speaking to the PA news agency via the Mirror, Little, managing editor of Majesty magazine, described Harry's remarks about Charles' health in the BBC interview as "quite alarming," especially given Harry's admission that he hasn't spoken to his father in some time. "From what Harry is saying, despite admitting that he has not spoken to his father for some time, I thought it sent out a bit of a mixed message, really," Little said. "Is Harry suggesting that the King isn't as well as we are led to believe?" Joe Little further criticized Harry's continued tendency to air grievances publicly rather than resolve them privately. "I think for somebody who is seeking reconciliation with his father, his brother, and his family, his royal family as a whole, I think the very last thing that he should have been doing was talking publicly," Little argued. He added that Harry's repeated public disclosures have made it difficult for the royal family to place their trust in him again. "There is a great deal to be gained by maintaining a dignified silence — sadly, as we know from past events, this isn't Harry's way of doing things," he noted. Little concluded by suggesting that "Maybe lessons just haven't been learned from previous occasions where also silence would have been the very best thing to maintain." Meanwhile, Harry is reportedly exploring the possibility of legally changing his surname to "Spencer," his late mother Princess Diana's family name, in a dramatic symbolic gesture to further distance himself from the royal family. According to the Daily Mail, the Duke of Sussex is believed to have consulted his maternal uncle, Earl Spencer, about the idea during a recent visit to the UK. While the conversation was said to be amicable, sources claim the Earl ultimately advised Harry against "such a step." The change would have meant abandoning the royal surname Mountbatten-Windsor, the name currently used by both of Harry's children, Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet. Though Buckingham Palace has remained publicly silent on the matter, royal expert Richard Fitzwilliams told Express that the idea "deeply hurt" Charles. Quoting Shakespeare's "Romeo and Juliet," Fitzwilliams emphasized that "someone's family name is a pivotal and public link to the other family members." "This news will be deeply hurtful to King Charles, especially as it would have been a very public renunciation of the Royal Family only a relatively short time after he (Charles) had become king," Fitzwilliams explained.
